"their ever-burdened benefactors"

[mika]

"Yet the Jews are portrayed by Kipling as focusing their laser-like hate on the Gentiles, their ever-burdened benefactors."
==

They've been constantly set up for destruction and genocide by their so-called "benefactors", really the creators and sponsors of their contrived enemies and destroyers, be it Nazies, Stalinists, Salafis, Khomeinis, recently imported Paliwood "natives", etc. All these contrived conflicts are spawned and sponsored, and are actively agitated, by their so-called "benefactors" and their propaganda machinery.

It's not a recent pattern, this has a long history in practice. And it is a pattern still very much in practice.

Kipling correctly surmised that sooner or later this pattern will be widely learned and understood.

 

[Jerry Russell]

Hi Mika,

I agree completely, and intended the remark to be taken ironically. "Benefactors" of the white man's burden have not fared well anywhere in the colonialist empire.

 

[mika]

Greetings, Jerry. Very perceptive perspectives.. but "colonialism" just another false and contrived dialectic. We are all "colonialists". To assert otherwise is to be willfully ignorant and a dupe to an agenda. Same for the matter of eugenics and "race".

 

[mika]

.."colonialism" ^is just another false and contrived dialectic..

Listening to the podcasts with Joe now. Fascinating stuff!

 

[Jerry Russell]

Hi Mika,

I want to explain how I use the term "false dialectic" here. I mean an intellectual construct that has little or no inherent worth, rooted in some mythological view of history, or incorrect application of theological or philosophical reasoning. No one would be fighting over false dialectics, except that the elite use false flag attacks and black propaganda to stoke up the conflict. Once a false dialectic is under way, however, it can become very real and deadly serious to the antagonists.

'Colonialism' has aspect of false dialectic to be sure, being based in racism. But it also represents a conflict in which the elite and their allies are fighting to gain control of land and natural resources in genocidal opposition to indigenous peoples -- and as such it represents what we consider the "true" dialectic; that is, the conflict between the oligarchs vs. "the people". Although in this case, the oligarchs have their allies at the national level.

 

[mika]

A false dialectic is false because it is a lie. It is a contrived falsehood and a propaganda construct that has no basis in reality or truth. A false dialectic is of extreme value or else it would not have been created or used extensively. So again, there's no such thing as "native"or "colonialist" and there's no such thing as "race". Population characteristics change with geography and populations changed and shifted several times as climates changed due to catastrophic inter-planetary events that several times changed the Earth and its orbit. (See: Worlds in Collision by Immanuel Velikovsky). The real dialectic is not "us vs them", the real dialectic is that of being a participant in the system or not. So the question now becomes what is "the system" and why am I part of it. That's the real essence. The rest is nonsense.