The truth about cancer. They don't want to Cure you.

lorenhough

Well-Known Member

Gov report; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed

1996 Apr-Jun;21(2):133-60.



Significant mercury deposits in internal organs following the removal of dental amalgam, & development of pre-cancer on the gingiva and the sides of the tongue and their represented organs as a result of inadvertent exposure to strong curing light (used to solidify synthetic dental filling material) & effective treatment: a clinical case report, along with organ representation areas for each tooth.

Omura Y1, Shimotsuura Y, Fukuoka A, Fukuoka H, Nomoto T.
Author information

Abstract
Because of the reduced effectiveness of antibiotics against bacteria (e.g. Chlamydia trachomatis, alpha-Streptococcus, Borrelia burgdorferi, etc.) and viruses (e.g. Herpes Family Viruses) in the presence of mercury, as well as the fact that the 1st author has found that mercury exists in cancer and pre-cancer cell nuclei, the presence of dental amalgam (which contains about 50% mercury) in the human mouth is considered to be a potential hazard for the individual's health. In order to solve this problem, 3 amalgam fillings were removed from the teeth of the subject of this case study. In order to fill the newly created empty spaces in the teeth where the amalgams had formerly existed, a synthetic dental-filling substance was introduced and to solidify the synthetic substance, curing light (wavelength range reportedly between 400-520 nm) was radiated onto the substance in order to accelerate the solidifying process by photo-polymerization. In spite of considerable care not to inhale mercury vapor or swallow minute particles of dental amalgam during the process of removing it by drilling, mercury entered the body of the subject. Precautions such as the use of a rubber dam and strong air suction, as well as frequent water suctioning and washing of the mouth were insufficient. Significant deposits of mercury, previously non-existent, were found in the lungs, kidneys, endocrine organs, liver, and heart with abnormal low-voltage ECGs (similar to those recorded 1-3 weeks after i.v. injection of radioisotope Thallium-201 for Cardiac SPECT) in all the limb leads and V1 (but almost normal ECGs in the precordial leads V2-V6) the day after the procedures were performed. Enhanced mercury evaporation by increased temperature and microscopic amalgam particles created by drilling may have contributed to mercury entering the lungs and G.I. system and then the blood circulation, creating abnormal deposits of mercury in the organs named above. Such mercury contamination may then contribute to intractable infections or pre-cancer. However, these mercury deposits, which commonly occur in such cases, were successfully eliminated by the oral intake of 100 mg tablet of Chinese parsley (Cilantro) 4 times a day (for average weight adults) with a number of drug-uptake enhancement methods developed by the 1st author, including different stimulation methods on the accurate organ representation areas of the hands (which have been mapped using the Bi-Digital O-Ring Test), without injections of chelating agents. Ingestion of Chinese parsley, accompanied by drug-uptake enhancement methods, was initiated before the amalgam removal procedure and continued for about 2 to 3 weeks afterwards, and ECGs became almost normal. During the use of strong bluish curing light to create a photo-polymerization reaction to solidify the synthetic filling material, the adjacent gingiva and the side of the tongue were inadvertently exposed. This exposure to the strong bluish light was found to produce pre-cancerous conditions in the gingiva, the exposed areas of the tongue, as well as in the corresponding organs represented on those areas of the tongue, and abnormally increased enzyme levels in the liver. These abnormalities were also successfully reversed by the oral intake of a mixture of EPA with DHA and Chinese parsley, augmented by one of the non-invasive drug-uptake enhancement methods previously described by the 1st author, repeated 4 times each day for 2 weeks.
 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
Search Results

  1. Cancer Still a Mystery to Medical Science - Dr. Sircus
    drsircus.com/medicine/cancer/cancer-mystery-medical-science
    Aug 17, 2011 - Medical scientists continue to explore the far reaches of cell physiology in their .... Dr. Yoshiaki Omura, all cancer cells have mercury in them.
    Mercury and Cancer - Research and Dental Amalgams - Dr. Sircus
    drsircus.com/.../cancer/mercury-and-cancer-research-dental-amalgams
    Mar 23, 2010 - According to the observations made by the internationally recognized medical researcher, Yoshiaki Omura, MD, all cancer cells have mercury ...
    Significant mercury deposits in internal organs following the removal ...
    www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8914687
    by Y Omura - ‎1996 - ‎Cited by 24 - ‎Related articles
    Significant mercury deposits in internal organs following the removal of dental ... the 1st author has found that mercury exists in cancer and pre-cancer cell nuclei, ... of radioisotope Thallium-201 for Cardiac SPECT) in all the limb leads and V1 ...
    Dr. Greg Emerson Health & Wellness :: Mercury
    www.drgregemerson.com/fact-file/mercury
    Aug 25, 2009 - Mercury containing thimerasol has been removed from all vaccines except the influenza vaccine. .... medical researcher, Dr Yoshiaki Omura (Journal of Natural Medicine June 1988), all cancer cells have mercury in them.
    Mercury – The Cancer Connection - Our Toxic Planet
    ourtoxicplanet.com › Heavy Metals
    Nov 21, 2011 - When Mercury gets inside a human cell, it has potential to damage DNA. ... “All cancer cells have mercury in them,” says Dr. Yoshiaki Omura.
    (Part I) Protect yourself from cancer-causing heavy metals ...
    www.naturalnews.com/030211_heavy_metals_cancer.html
    Oct 29, 2010 - Mercury, the heavy metal most dangerous for human health, has been "officially" recognized as ... Internationally known medical researcher, Yoshiaki Omura, MD,has observed that all cancer cells have mercury in them. ... Italian oncologist Dr. Tulio Simoncini`s high cancer cure rate is achieved by injecting ...
    The Causes of Cancer 2 | Mouth Body Doctor
    www.mouthbodydoctor.com/the-causes-of-cancer-2/
    May 11, 2013 - The search for the association between mercury and cancer produces 643 ... researcher, Dr. Yoshiaki Omura, all cancer cells contain mercury.
    Cancer Still a Mystery to Establishment Medical Science - Activist Post
    www.activistpost.com › Health
    Aug 17, 2011 - is not a homogeneous mass of cancer cells. .... recognized medical researcher, Dr. Yoshiaki Omura, all cancer cells have mercury in them.
    Positive Health Online | Article - New Cancer / Fungus Theory
    www.positivehealth.com/article/oxygen/new-cancer-fungus-theory
    “I believe that, conservatively, 15 to 20% of all cancer is caused by infections; .... medical researcher, Dr Yoshiaki Omura, all cancer cells have mercury in them.
    Cancer, Dental Connection - ICNR
    www.icnr.com/cs/cs_21.html
    by Dr. Gerald H. Smith ... All of these metals have various degrees of toxicity. .... medical researcher, Yoshiaki Omura, MD, all cancer cells have mercury in them.
 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member

Environment effects your genes and can give you cancer.
Those people that would dare say it's ok to eat the sea food and weed from the North Pacific are duped fools or paid to be dumb. When one dr say it's ok and says it says it is not the best logic is to error on the safe side. And not eat the fish yes? Sorry it's not a crime to be stupid! When it comes to hurting others with your mistakes. LH
 
Last edited:

lorenhough

Well-Known Member

Environment effects your genes and can give you cancer.
Those people that would dare say it's ok to eat the sea food and weed from the North Pacific are duped fools or paid to be dumb. When one dr say it's ok and says it says it is not the best logic is to error on the safe side. And not eat the fish yes? Sorry it's not a crime to be stupid! When it comes to hurting others with your mistakes. LH

 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
Victory Over Cancer! (Part 1: Making The Unthinkable ... - Amazon.com
www.amazon.com/Victory-Over-Cancer-Part-Unthinkable/.../061553371X
This book does not claim that we have already reached the goal of victory over cancer, but paves the way to turn cancer into a manageable disease. Read more ...

Victory Over Cancer! (Part 2: Understanding History ... - Amazon.com
www.amazon.com/Victory-Over-Cancer-Part-Understanding/.../061553372...
*FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Part 2 of the Groundbreaking book Victory Over Cancer! This book answers the question of why this scientific breakthrough ...

Survivor: One Man's Victory Over Cancer: Greg Carter - Amazon.com
www.amazon.com › ... › Leaders & Notable People › Religious
Survivor: One Man's Victory Over Cancer [Greg Carter] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on ... Sold by Silver Arch Books. Condition: Used: Very Good.

Since the dawn of history, mankind has been haunted by a disease that has remained largely incurable - cancer. For almost a century, this disease has been the target of an investment business - the pharmaceutical industry - that has turned this epidemic into a multi-billion dollar business. Today, at the beginning of the 21st Century, cancer is spreading globally; for most types of cancer the annual death rate still increases, and the skyrocketing costs are financially ruining millions of cancer patients and strangulating the economies of entire nations. This book marks the end of this tragedy. The natural health approaches presented in this book have been shown to block all key mechanisms that make cancer a deadly disease. With the publication of this book the 'Age of intoxication' by chemotherapy and radiation is being replaced by the 'Age of cellular regulation'. This book does not claim that we have already reached the goal of victory over cancer, but paves the way to turn cancer into a manageable disease.
 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
Victory Over Cancer! (Part 1: Making The Unthinkable ... - Amazon.com
www.amazon.com/Victory-Over-Cancer-Part-Unthinkable/.../061553371X
This book does not claim that we have already reached the goal of victory over cancer, but paves the way to turn cancer into a manageable disease. Read more ...

Victory Over Cancer! (Part 2: Understanding History ... - Amazon.com
www.amazon.com/Victory-Over-Cancer-Part-Understanding/.../061553372...
*FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Part 2 of the Groundbreaking book Victory Over Cancer! This book answers the question of why this scientific breakthrough ...

Survivor: One Man's Victory Over Cancer: Greg Carter - Amazon.com
www.amazon.com › ... › Leaders & Notable People › Religious
Survivor: One Man's Victory Over Cancer [Greg Carter] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on ... Sold by Silver Arch Books. Condition: Used: Very Good.

Since the dawn of history, mankind has been haunted by a disease that has remained largely incurable - cancer. For almost a century, this disease has been the target of an investment business - the pharmaceutical industry - that has turned this epidemic into a multi-billion dollar business. Today, at the beginning of the 21st Century, cancer is spreading globally; for most types of cancer the annual death rate still increases, and the skyrocketing costs are financially ruining millions of cancer patients and strangulating the economies of entire nations. This book marks the end of this tragedy. The natural health approaches presented in this book have been shown to block all key mechanisms that make cancer a deadly disease. With the publication of this book the 'Age of intoxication' by chemotherapy and radiation is being replaced by the 'Age of cellular regulation'. This book does not claim that we have already reached the goal of victory over cancer, but paves the way to turn cancer into a manageable disease.
Beating Cancer with Nutrition, book with CD: Patrick Quillin ...
www.amazon.com › ... › Diseases & Physical Ailments › Cancer
There is good news in the "war on cancer". Optimal nutrition coupled with appropriate medical treatment can dramatically improve the quality and quantity of life ...

[PDF] Download Beating Cancer with Nutrition, book with CD PDF ...
ebook.stepor.com/.../beating-cancer-with-nutrition-book-with-cd-67659-pd...
Book Info: Beating Cancer with Nutrition. Sugar feeds Cancer: diet and supplements can starve tumors· Nutrition makes chemo and radiation more toxic to the ...
 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
Beating Cancer with Nutrition, book with CD: Patrick Quillin ...
www.amazon.com › ... › Diseases & Physical Ailments › Cancer
There is good news in the "war on cancer". Optimal nutrition coupled with appropriate medical treatment can dramatically improve the quality and quantity of life ...

[PDF] Download Beating Cancer with Nutrition, book with CD PDF ...
ebook.stepor.com/.../beating-cancer-with-nutrition-book-with-cd-67659-pd...
Book Info: Beating Cancer with Nutrition. Sugar feeds Cancer: diet and supplements can starve tumors· Nutrition makes chemo and radiation more toxic to the ...
The water cure!

"You're not sick; you're thirsty. Don't treat thirst with medication." Dr. F. Batmanghelidj
Our life, our planet. Over 70% of the earth's surface is water. However, most of it—98%--is salt water. Only 2% of the earth's H20 is fresh water that we can drink, and of this, almost all is trapped in frozen glaciers.

You are not just what you eat; you are what you drink.

This is why water is so important to your health.

The Water Cure (TWC) does not sell water or purification systems or any related products. We offer insights and information; both free and in books that give you easy-to-understand scientific explanations on why water is vital to your well-being.

TWC believes promoting "water for health, for healing, for life" is an invaluable public health message. We can all change the way we drink – by drinking pure, natural water that is good for our health, our pocket book, and our environment.

No miracles. Just common sense backed by Dr. F. Batmaghelidj’s years of research and investigation into why water works so well in keeping us healthy and pain free. It can even cure illness in some people who get sick.

Water is the basis of all life and that includes your body. Your muscles that move your body are 75% water; your blood that transport nutrients is 82% water; your lungs that provide your oxygen are 90% water; your brain that is the control center of your body is 76% water; even your bones are 25% water.

Our health is truly dependent on the quality and quantity of the water we drink. Read more here;

http://www.watercure.com
 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
What Angelina Jolie’s Doctors Didn’t Tell Her about the BRCA Gene Before Her Double Mastectomy
Posted by: Dr. Veronique Desaulniers in Breast Cancer, Cancer 101, The Basics

In 2013, actress, filmmaker, and human rights activist Angelina Jolie made headlines by announcing that she had undergone a preventative double mastectomy. The reason: A family history of breast cancer (her mother had died of it) and what she called a “faulty gene,” referring to the BRCA gene (BRCA 1).

Jolie is a talented and extremely intelligent woman. I cannot judge her personal decision to take the course of action she did when it came to her own health. A woman’s decision when it comes to breast cancer is a personal one and must be respected. When that woman is a celebrity and decides to discuss the matter in a public forum using medical generalities that are debatable at best, this becomes cause for concern, however.

To me, her decision begs the question ─ were Ms. Jolie’s doctors telling her the whole story about BRCA1? I suspect that they did not.

If they had told her the whole truth, would she have still made the decision that she did?

The Truth: BRCA1 and BRCA1 Gene Mutations DO NOT Inevitably Lead to Breast Cancer

Angelina Jolie’s decision to remove both of her breasts was based on the advice of medical professionals — doctors, surgeons, oncologists (no doubt she had access to the best of them). In an Op-Ed piece for the New York Times, Jolie stated:

My doctors estimated that I had an 87 percent risk of breast cancer and a 50 percent risk of ovarian cancer, although the risk is different in the case of each woman…Only a fraction of breast cancers result from an inherited gene mutation. Those with a defect in BRCA1 have a 65 percent risk of getting it, on average.”

The above comment leads one to believe that BRCA1 represents a single defect, and a possibly deadly one at that. This is only a half truth. First of all, BRCA1 and BRCA2 (which stand for Breast Cancer 1 and 2) are tumor suppressor genes. They produce a protein which assists in DNA damage repair caused by, according to the U.S. National Institute of Health, “natural and medical radiation or other environmental exposures.” If there is a mutation in this gene, then what is actually happening is that the gene is not doing its job. I.e. the DNA damage is not being repaired, thus leading to a higher risk of cancer.

The second clarification that needs to be made is the statistical determination that Ms. Jolie mentioned in her Op-Ed: “Those with a defect in BRCA1 have a 65 percent risk of getting [breast cancer], on average.”

Two factors cloud this oversimplified message that conventional medicine is promoting en masse to the general public. Firstly, according to the National Cancer Institute, to date there has been no long-term general population studies regarding BRCA1 or BRCA2. Secondly, there are literally thousands of possibly BRCA 1 and 2 gene mutations, many of which actually reduce the risk of breast cancer. According to a 2011 study conducted by the University of California, San Francisco, “It seems that some polymorphisms may actually have a protective effect.”

Gene Expression is NOT the Largest Determining Factor for Breast Cancer

The days when a person’s DNA was their destiny is over. Increasing study into the area of epigenetics is revealing the overwhelming influence of environmental factors in the proliferation of disease. Toxic exposure and toxic lifestyle choices, including stress, may account for as much as 95 percent of the factors associated with disease of all kinds.

In fact, a study published in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine found that the trauma associated with a cancer diagnosis can cause a 26-fold increase in “adrenaline-mediated multi-drug resistance” and, subsequently, heart-related deaths. More relevant to this discussion is the fact that only 2 percent of women in the US who have a family history of breast cancer may test positive for gene mutation. According to the Centers for Disease prevention, “In some families breast cancer or ovarian cancer will occur due to inherited mutations in genes other than BRCA1/2. However, this is uncommon.”

When it comes to statistical causes for cancer ─ including breast cancer ─ environmental toxins beat genetics, hands down. Yet, when was the last time a major news source promoted this fact?

The Medical Industry’s Real Agenda

This fact is probably the hardest one to swallow, but it is also the most important to understand and never forget. First and foremost, conventional medicine is a business! As such, profit, not people, often reigns supreme. Shortly after Ms. Jolie made her announcement, stock in the medical technology company Myriad Genetics climbed significantly. This company owns patents on BRCA 1 and 2 genes for both men and woman, and has repeatedly blocked necessary and unbiased testing to determine the validity of BRCA-breast cancer connection claims.

It is estimated that there have been approximately 1.3 million women in the US who have been over-diagnosed and over-treated for apparent “breast cancer” over the last three decades. How many millions of dollars have pharmaceutical companies and the medical industry in general made during that time? Firstly on “preventative” therapies and treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. And secondly on breast reconstruction materials and procedures after the fact, some of which has been proven to cause cancer themselves! How many breasts, and how many lives, could have been saved over the last 30 years?

Epigenetic studies have proven time and time again that gene expression can be turned off and on by proper nutrition and the lessening of the toxic load. The hard science is in and the evidence is overwhelming. Ms. Jolie, I respect your personal decision to do what you felt was right for your own body. I only wished that you would have gotten all of the facts about BRCA 1 and 2, and about breast cancer in general, before you promoted this course of action to the hundreds of thousands of women worldwide who look up to you as a role model and may follow your lead.
 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
Video – Two Very Different Natural Cancer Treatment Approaches
Posted by: Ty Bollinger in Experts, Treatments/Healing, Videos


  • Spread the Word to
    Friends And Family
    By Sharing this Article.
See video here; http://thetruthaboutcancer.com/2-weird-natural-cancer-treatments/




Video Transcript: Video – Two Very Different Natural Cancer Treatment Approaches Every Oncologist Needs to Discuss with Their Patients


Ty Bollinger: Can you talk about a few natural cancer treatments other than what you already listed? Any other natural cancer treatments that you are aware of that areeffective?

Dr. Bradford Weeks: Well, the first is really to ask the patient why he or she wants to live. And it’s shocking, Ty. I think probably at least over 50 percent of my male clients, let me say my former patients. Sixty percent of the males, once the wife is out of the room, they say to me something like “Look doc, with all due respect I really don’t want to live anymore. I certainly don’t want to bankrupt my family. I’ve had a great life. Everything is good. I don’t want to be a burden. I’m done. I’m only here because my wife wants me to be here.”

I respect that because these are guys who know from friends and so forth that the next five years of conventional cancer treatment is going to be a debacle. They don’t want to go through that. My first job is to try to get them inspired. If they could see a way through, where we could focus on helping their body be healthy, would they buy-in?

What I have to tell you is most patients have given up by the time they see an oncologist. They don’t believe they’re going to do well. They don’t think it’s possible and they know they can’t afford it and they’re dreading it. So, if the oncologist doesn’t put on a psychiatrist’s hat and say “How are you feeling about this Mr. Jones? Or “What would you like to do Mrs. Jones?” and not get those thoughts and ideas out on the table, then you’re just wasting time.

So the first [cancer] “treatment” really is to have a relationship with a patient where they can really share their concerns. And then you can say, “I’m not God. I can do my best. What are the criteria? You don’t want pain or this or that.” And you can formulate something. I have to tell you, it is shocking what oncologists get away with when they simply lay out a plan, they don’t really listen to NOs and they say the patient has no choice. You know it’s even worse with parents with their kids with cancer. So, the first treatment is really to have a relationship and try to learn what the patient wants. Now in the current way that medicine is practiced in America nobody has time for that kind of a discussion, but it’s critically important.

The second thing is I will ask my clients why do they think they have cancer. A lot of them will say “I don’t know.” So I say, “Well, why do you think you have cancer?” They will say “Well, I don’t know.” So I’ll say, “Well, why do you think you have cancer?” And they know I’m not going to stop until they tell me. And it could be that they feel like they’ve sinned. Or they could feel they could have some guilt or something. So then if one doesn’t exorcise, so to speak, that and help them understand that whatever they’ve screwed up in the past, their main commitment is what they can do today and going forward. Again, the best chemo drugs in the world aren’t going to be helpful.

You have to have people understand that it’s their life and help them feel empowered. You and I can appreciate the word enthusiasm means “God within” – En theos. If the patient can’t be enthusiastic about each day then that’s a big immune drain as well. It’s not about prolonging life and suffering. It’s about quality of life. You want to prolong quality and quantity. But I would like to encourage my medical colleagues, my oncologists to have those types of discussions with the patients. I just think it’s critically important. And then we deliver smart therapies.
 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
How I Used Ketone Bodies to Help Reverse My Brain Cancer1
Posted by: Dr. Charles Majors in Cancer 101, The Basics, Ways to Prevent Cancer


  • Spread
I had stage-4 bone marrow cancer that metastasized to the brain. My brain cancer was secondary, but it what was shutting my body down quickly. I had lost over 50 pounds and was so weak I was in a wheelchair. I not only had to reverse the bone marrow cancer that was primary, I also had to quickly bring down the cancer in my brain and reverse that as well.

Ketone Bodies Feed Your Brain, Not Cancer
The brain needs glucose 24 hours a day to function. Since sugar feeds cancer, the brain is taking in sugar 24 hours a day and the cancer is been fed 24 hours per day. But, if you understand the brain, you will also know there is another FUEL the brain will use and prefers over sugar – it’s ketone bodies or keto acids. Ketones are what your body produces when it converts fat (as opposed to glucose) into energy.

I made the switch immediately to get my body in ketosis, so the only fuel my brain was getting were ketone bodies. Normal healthy brain cells use ketones for fuel but cancer cells (because their mitochondria is damaged) cannot use ketone bodies and the cancer begins to die. I still monitor my body to make sure my sugars are low and I’m in ketosis.

Toxins Destroy the Brain
There are many toxins that can pass the blood brain barrier and affect the brain. You have to minimize your exposure to toxins immediately.

Example: Environmental toxins, heavy metals, household products and cleaners, perfumes, colognes, lotions, etc. One of the hardest toxicities that damages your brain are artificial sweeteners, sucralose, Splenda®, Sweet N Low®, etc. Say NO to sugar-free processed foods that contain these artificial sweeteners, along with diet sodas, diet drinks or pretty much “diet” anything. You must read your labels. But then again, whole foods such as fruits, vegetables, salad greens, etc. don’t need labels. They are real foods. Eat more of those and minimize the processed foods!

Test, Don’t Guess
Cancer is always secondary. You need to run tests to find the cause(s) of your cancer and monitor those as well.

Here is a brief list of some of the more important tests to do:

  1. Toxicity tests
  2. Vitamin D
  3. Hormone panel
  4. Thyroid panel
  5. Fatty acid ratio
  6. Leaky gut
  7. Leaky brain
  8. Food sensitivities (IgG, IgA)
Fat Doesn’t Make You Fat – It Makes You Healthy
My favorite healthy fat I eat all day long is coconut oil. Coconut oil contains medium-chain triglycerides (MCT) and they are a great source of ketone bodies, since coconut oil is about 66 percent MCTs. Every meal and snack has to include lots of healthy fats as well as drinking a ketogenic shake 3-4 times per day. This is the easiest way to stay in ketosis and produce ketone bodies.

Stop Inflammation!
Whatever affects the colon, affects the brain immediately! I ask my patients this, “if you were to drink 3 shots of whiskey, how fast would your brain feel it?” They say, “immediately.” That’s because the colon affects the brain immediately. You have to stop inflammation and stop damaging your colon immediately and repair it.

What will damage and create inflammation in your gut and then in your brain?

  • Gluten
  • Dairy
  • GMOs
  • Food sensitivities
  • Medications (NSAIDs, birth control, pain medications, etc.)
  • Bad fats, caffeine, processed soy, and alcohol
  • High and low cortisol (excess stress)
This is just the beginning steps to reversing brain cancer. All cancers are a multi-factorial and multi-system failure. You didn’t get cancer and then get sick, you have been sick and toxic for years and THEN you got cancer. The cancer is secondary, not primary. The only cure for cancer is to get to the cause(s).

It is now five years I am cancer-free and I’m the healthiest and strongest I have ever been. Again, the only cure for cancer is getting to the cause(s)!
 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
Nancy Appleton Books Health Blog
Sugar Kills!
Feeds cancer cells!

141 Reasons Sugar Ruins Your Health


By Nancy Appleton PhD & G.N. Jacobs



  1. Sugar can suppress your immune system.
  2. Sugar upsets the mineral relationships in the body.
  3. Sugar can cause juvenile delinquency in children.
  4. Sugar eaten during pregnancy and lactation can influence muscle force production in offspring, which can affect an individual’s ability to exercise.
  5. Sugar in soda, when consumed by children, results in the children drinking less milk.
  6. Sugar can elevate glucose and insulin responses and return them to fasting levels slower in oral contraceptive users.
  7. Sugar can increase reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can damage cells and tissues.
  8. Sugar can cause hyperactivity, anxiety, inability to concentrate and crankiness in children.
  9. Sugar can produce a significant rise in triglycerides.
10. Sugar reduces the body’s ability to defend against bacterial infection.

11. Sugar causes a decline in tissue elasticity and function – the more sugar you eat, the more elasticity and function you lose.

12. Sugar reduces high-density lipoproteins (HDL).

13. Sugar can lead to chromium deficiency.

14. Sugar can lead to ovarian cancer.

15. Sugar can increase fasting levels of glucose.

16. Sugar causes copper deficiency.

17. Sugar interferes with the body’s absorption of calcium and magnesium.

18. Sugar may make eyes more vulnerable to age-related macular degeneration.

19. Sugar raises the level of neurotransmitters: dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine.

20. Sugar can cause hypoglycemia.

21. Sugar can lead to an acidic digestive tract.

22. Sugar can cause a rapid rise of adrenaline levels in children.

23. Sugar is frequently malabsorbed in patients with functional bowel disease.

24. Sugar can cause premature aging.

25. Sugar can lead to alcoholism.

26. Sugar can cause tooth decay.

27. Sugar can lead to obesity.

28. Sugar increases the risk of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis.

29. Sugar can cause gastric or duodenal ulcers.

See all here;
http://nancyappleton.com/141-reasons-sugar-ruins-your-health/
 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
The Suppression of a Natural Cancer Cure
Posted by: Ty Bollinger in Alternative Cancer Cures, Treatments/Healing


  • Spread the Word to
    Friends And Family
    By Sharing this Article.

36
13 – 21 2015.





The BioMedical Center may be the oldest alternative cancer clinic in North America. It started in Dallas, Texas, circa 1936 as the Harry Hoxsey Cancer Clinic, and soon became the largest independent cancer clinic in the world, having expanded to 16 other American states.

Hoxsey’s flamboyant, aggressive persona persisted through many decades of the American Medical Association (AMA) attempts to stop him from curing cancer patients. He even won a libel lawsuit in 1950 against AMA head Morris Fishbein and the powerful Hearst Publications group.

It wasn’t until the FDA became more empowered to intervene with interstate sales of unapproved remedies that the Hoxsey Clinic was forced to shut down all its branches in 1960 and move to Tijuana, Mexico.

Hoxsey Wanted to Prove His Natural Cancer Cures Worked

Harry Hoxsey, born in 1901, assisted his father’s veterinary practice as a child. Word of mouth led Hoxsey’s cancer practice to overlap with human patients, using what some claim to be an old Native American herbal formula for cancers. Hoxsey’s account differs…

He explains in his book You Don’t Need to Die that his great grandfather observed his favorite horse recover from cancer by eating certain flowers and weeds. His great grandfather then formulated these botanicals into liquid concoctions. Each subsequent Hoxsey generation also worked as veterinarians and continuously improved the formulas.

Soon people with cancer began asking for the Hoxsey formulas. When his father was dying, he had Harry promise to use the topical salves, powders, and internal liquid herbal formulas to help as many people as possible and not exploit the remedies for personal wealth.

After being arrested for practicing medicine without a license in Taylorville, Illinois, Hoxsey went to Chicago around 1924. His goal was to prove his remedies’ efficacy to Morris Fishbein, head of the American Medical Association (AMA) and editor of the newly started JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association). Hoxsey’s formula was tested with a terminal cancer patient (Chicago policeman, Sgt. Thomas Manix), who was cured by Hoxsey’s herbal treatments and wound up living another 10 years.

Fishbein was impressed and offered to buy Hoxsey’s formulas to gain exclusive AMA control over their applications. Remembering the commitment to his father and wary of Fishbein’s motives, Hoxsey refused the offer. Thus Fishbein’s AMA war on Hoxsey began.

Even though Fishbein admitted the sanguinarine in Hoxsey’s bloodroot-based red paste worked for skin cancer, the AMA vilified Hoxsey’s brown liquid herbal tonics as worthless. Hoxsey kept his internal herbal formulas secret after winning his libel lawsuit against Fishbein and the AMA in 1950. However, he was forced to reveal the constituent ingredients to the FDA once they gained the power to enforce ingredient listing.

Esquire Magazine Suppresses Article; Hoxsey Found Legit

In 1936, Hoxsey established the nation’s largest independent cancer clinic in Dallas, Texas. There he was confronted by a new nemesis, Dallas District Attorney Al Templeton. Al Templeton continued harassing Hoxsey until his brother, Mike Templeton, secretly attended Hoxsey’s clinic and was cured of what was declared an incurable cancer.

Subsequently, Al Templeton became Hoxsey’s lawyer. Soon after, Templeton was elected as a district judge in Dallas, and Hoxsey finally had friends in high places, albeit only locally. As Hoxsey’s clinics expanded from Dallas to 16 clinics in different states, his notoriety became too obvious for the AMA to ignore.

Hoxsey’s assistant, Nurse Mildred Nelson, who later established the Mexico clinic, originally came to Dallas to take her mother away from “that quack.” After her mother was cured, Mildred ended up staying to help Hoxsey.

In 1939, Esquire magazine journalist James Burke was sent to Hoxsey’s Dallas cancer clinic to do an article exposing Hoxsey as a quack. After Burke investigated, he was convinced that Hoxsey’s clinic was actually curing cancer and Hoxsey wasn’t a charlatan. Burke then wrote an article entitled “The Quack Who Cured Cancer” and sent it to Esquire. It was never published. Burke returned from active duty during WWII and went to work for Hoxsey as his press agent.

San Diego journalist Peter Chowka had a similar mission after the BioMedical Center had been taking in patients for a couple of decades. He went to Tijuana and discovered the Center was a great place for cancer patients, and its treatments were safe and effective. Since then Chowka has been a natural cancer treatment advocate.

What’s in the Hoxey Formulas?

A solution of cascara (Rhamnus purshiana) and potassium iodide served as a base for the following herbs, added according to individual cancer cases:

  • Burdock root (Arctium lappa)
  • Barberry or berberis root (Berberis vulgaris)
  • Buckthorn bark (Rhamnus frangula)
  • Stillingia root (Stillingia sylvatica)
  • Prickly ash bark (Zanthoxylum americanum)
  • Poke root (Phytolacca americana)
Hoxsey’s understanding of cancer was that it is a systemic disease created from metabolic imbalances that needed to be restored. His tonics were meant to help create homeostasis (internal stability), kill cancer cells, and remove the toxins created from killing cancer cells. This perspective is in line with almost all natural cancer treatments and practitioners.

Hoxsey’s treatments were considered effective by a panel of independent physicians who had reviewed the case histories of his patients. Their written testimonies were used in Hoxsey’s 1950 lawsuit against the AMA, along with testimonials from some of his cured patients.

Today, the BioMedical Center (just across the Mexican border from San Diego) has doctors that diagnose and prescribe only natural remedies in addition to Hoxsey’s tonics and salves. These natural cancer remedies include homeopathy, laetrile, Montana Yew extract, and dietary recommendations.

Cancer patients too sick to travel can send a relative to the Tijuana Center with medical records, which the staff reviews to decide how to formulate Hoxsey tonics specifically for that patient. Relatives then return to that patient with enough tonic for six months. Usually that’s enough to render the patient well enough to travel to the clinic and continue their treatment.

No doubt, Harry Hoxey’s promise to his father lives on in Tijuana’s BioMedical Center, providing an intelligent alternative to conventional cancer treatments.

What's Your Cancer Risk?

You may or may not know this, but your everyday habits (nutrition, environment and activities) play a significant role in your risk for getting cancer or avoiding it.1 To find out, take this short 13 question quiz.

Discover the many hidden causes of cancer and what you can do TODAY so you don't become a cancer statistic. Here's the cancer-risk quiz.

  • Spread the Word to
    Friends And Family
    By Sharing this Article.

[+] Sources and References
 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
"Come Alive" Hardcover – February, 1997, Amazon
by Bernard Jensen (Author)


This informative book will teach you everything there is to know about the trace elements, electrolytes and minerals you must have to protect your health and light up your life. This book, like the human body, is about energy. Learn that you are an electric, chemical being. Know how you are all put together. When your "going power" is gone, how do you regain it? Let nature assist you back to health. This is a book to help you restore lost energy. Start the energy working in your body and the minerals will do their job. Change your mind! Become wiser! Step into the energies of nature and become one with action, exuberance, and healing! Come Alive! is meant to teach you to harmonize your body with the minerals that feed, trace elements that rejuvenate, and electrolytes that energize! Total Health Through an Understanding of Minerals, Trace Elements, & Electrolytes. Chapter 13 how he cured his cancer.

See

http://www.thetruthaboutcancer.com/wade/

Also

https://www.masszymes.com/prevention/?a_aid=research&a_bid=9ad33685
 
Last edited:

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
The 4 Fascinating Theories Of
Enzymes Treatments And Cancer.



There are a few theoretical explanations for how enzymes help in the treatment of cancer.

Some of these include:

1) Enzymes may promote cytokine production, including interferon and tumor necrosis factor.
Cytokines are chemical messengers that help cells in the immune system communicate with each other.

They’re essential for immune function, and play a role when it comes to fighting cancer cells.

Interferon is a type of cytokine released when there’s pathogens around — whether it’s viruses, bacteria, or tumor cells.

It activates immune cells known as “macrophages” that are able to clear away stuff the body doesn’t want — like cancer cells.

Tumor necrosis factor is also a cytokine that helps with killing off tumor cells.

It causes them to break down, through a process called cytolysis, which is where a cell bursts after being filled with too much water.

So, if enzymes boosts levels of these cytokines, tumor and cancer cells should have a tougher time surviving.

2) Enzymes may reduce inflammation.
There are theories that inflammation may have a role in causing or worsening cancer.

One proposed theory is that cancer cells are able to “lure” immune system cells to them, and then leverage these cells for their own benefit.

This is what may happen: when the immune cells invade the cancer cell to kill it off, they start growing blood vessels inside. But by doing this, these cancer cells end up having a source of oxygen and nutrients because of these new blood vessels.

So instead of killing them off, these immune cells may mistakenly be helping the cancer cells survive.

Why this might happen is not completely understood — but the theory is out there.

Inflammation may also encourage the spread of cancer cells.

This may happen as a result of chemicals being released during inflammation. These chemicals may slice away the connection between tumor cells and their surroundings, which allows them to roam free to other parts of the body.

3) Enzymes may improve the potency of white blood cells (macrophages and Natural Killer cells)
White blood cells are often what people refer to when they’re talking about cells of the immune system.

They’re responsible for keeping us healthy by fighting off foreign invaders.

Macrophages are a type of white blood cell that are responsible for devouring unwanted cells and substances like cancer cells.

Natural Killer cells are also a type of white blood cell, and are known as the most aggressive in the immune system.

They target infected cells and tumor cells, and work by causing a process calledapoptosis. Apoptosis is also known as “programmed cell death”.

Enzymes may boost the strength of these powerful white blood cells.

Perhaps the most interesting one is this:

4) Enzymes may break down fibrin, a protein that may mask cancer cells from being attacked by the immune system.
There’s a theory by some scientists proposing that cancer cells are able to “hide” themselves from our immune system.

The theory is that cancer cells might do this by covering themselves in a coat of a protein called “fibrin”.

The theory is that enzymes may be able to break down the fibrin coat and remove the disguise.

The theory proposes that once the disguise is removed, the cells of the immune system should be able to identify the cancer cells and clear them from the system.

Again, there are no major studies to prove any of these theories yet. But there are researchers out there seeking funding to support these concepts.

WE ARE NOT STATING IN ANY SHAPE, WAY, OR FORM THAT ENZYMES CAN CURE CANCER.

Modern Research On Enzymes And Cancer

Science has found that an enzyme extracted from pineapple may have anti-tumoral effects similar to chemotherapy medication.
DISCLAIMER: We are not saying that bromelain can cure cancer

Bromelain is a proteolytic enzyme extracted from pineapple stems, and in recent research, it has been seen to have better anti-tumoral effects compared to chemotherapy -- when studied in animals.

In one 2007 study published in the journalPlanta Medica, animals treated with bromelain had a survival index of 318%, compared to the chemotherapy drug 5-fluorouracil, which had a survival index of 263% -- indicating that the bromelain enzyme had a more effective anti-tumoral activity than the drugs. In this study, “survival index” was used as a measure of anti-tumoral activity.

Though the findings haven’t been replicated in human studies yet, these results are quite remarkable, because bromelain has very limited side effects -- compared to the debilitating effects of chemotherapy medication.

CLICK HERE TO DISCOVER THEMOST POTENT PROTEOLYTIC COMBINATION
Research sources:
 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
113 Years Of Enzyme And Cancer Research
In the last 113 years, there have been some very interesting theories, books and research done on enzymes and cancer.

This article will summarize various theories as well as highlight the more popular doctors and researchers who published their findings in the last century.

It all started with Dr. Beard.

Dr. John Beard was an Embryologist and Professor at the University of Edinburgh. In 1902, he wrote an article for the the British Medical Journal, Lancet, proposing that trypsin (an enzyme from the pancreas) could be a defense against cancer, and used as cancer treatment.

How did he come to this conclusion?

He had speculated that there were similarities between cells known as trophoblasts, and cells that cause cancer.

Trophoblasts are cells that have a very invasive nature in pregnant mammals (including humans), very similar to the activity of cancer cells. They multiply, just like how cancer cells do.

What he noticed is that the trophoblasts shifted from a “malignant” nature to a benign nature as pregnancy moved on, and noted that it happened in the presence of enzymes.


By Wade Lightheart

  • Director Of Education For BiOptimizers


  • 3-Time All Natural National Bodybuilding Champion


  • Advisor For The American Anti-Cancer Institute

Dr. John Beard
As a result, he thought that since enzymes are able to turn trophoblasts benign, they could maybe do the same with cancer cells.

With his support, other physicians in the early 20th century began using injectable enzymes to treat their patients with cancer.

However, after his passing in 1924, the practice of using enzymes in the treatment of cancer faded away.

Then A Doctor From Texas DiscoveredDr. Beard's Work... And Used It For
Himself And Many Others

His own take on Dr. Beard’s protocol became adapted and known as the “Kelley Enzyme Protocol” -- which he used to treat many patients with.

Years later, in the 1980s, Dr. Kelley began working with Dr. Nick Gonzalez, who studied Dr. Kelley’s cancer patients.

Eventually, he published a book about Dr. Kelley’s treatment of cancer with enzymes, “One Man Alone: An investigation into cancer and William Donald Kelley.”

In this book, he reviewed approximately 10,000 of Dr. Kelley’s records, and interviewed and evaluated over 500 patients diagnosed with cancer. He discussed in detail the patients who experienced long-term survival and apparent regression of disease after using Dr. Kelley’s regimen.
 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
Bicarbonate and CO2
November 12, 2015 under Medicine



Bicarbonate and CO2 are profoundly important for human health. Both are necessary for the successful practice of medicine and the treatment of cancer yet few understand the importance of both. Even a so-called health expert like Sang Whang, who is supposed to be an expert at pH regulation, seems not to understand.

Whang says, in a long promotional essay pushing a product, “Consuming sodium bicarbonate (baking powder) does not add bicarbonates to the blood because hydrochloric acid breaks up sodium bicarbonates into water, carbon dioxide and sodium salt in the stomach. It is exactly like ingesting carbonic acid and sodium salt.” The truth though is bicarbonates enter the bloodstream "only" when the stomach produces hydrochloric acid. What Whang failed to see is that the CO2 is going into the blood in the form of bicarbonate.

Baking soda (sodium bicarbonate) immediately reacts when it mixes with stomach acid. NaHCO(3) + HCl ---> NaCl + H(2)0 + CO(2). That is sodium bicarbonate + stomach acid yields salt + water + carbon dioxide.

Carbon dioxide is present in the blood in a number of forms such as bicarbonate, dissolved carbon dioxide and carbonic acid, of which 90% is bicarbonate or HCO3. Sodium bicarbonate turns to CO2 when it reaches the stomach causing an increase in stomach acid production as well as an increase in bicarbonates in the blood. Bicarbonate can act as acid or base.

The basic reason that sodium bicarbonate is such a wonderful cancer treatment is that it directly increases CO2 levels in the body and this has the direct result of allowing more oxygen to reach the cancer sites, which hate O2. A $2.61 pound of sodium bicarbonate will outperform a $100,000 dollar chemo treatment because it targets the most fundamental aspects of cancer physiology, which are acidity and low oxygen conditions, but Sang Whang would rather you buy his product because he does not think sodium bicarbonate works. Over a hundred years of clinical evidence would say otherwise. (This essay is in response to a reader questioning Whang’s statement)

Some people feel that sodium bicarbonate is not recommended for long-term preventive use because the body will become resistant to its action. This is not true since bicarbonate and CO2 are absolute constants in human physiology and though pH levels should be maintained by other means, by alkaline diets and drinks, there is no resisting the power of sodium bicarbonate to radically shift upwards the pH of tissues whether healthy or cancerous. There is no resistance though one can overdue a good thing and drive alkaline rates too high causing other problems.

The body struggles to produce enough bicarbonate and it is a losing battle as we age. Carbon dioxide, as well as bicarbonate, is a nutrient as well as a product of respiration and energy production in the cells and its lack or deficiency is of itself a starting point for different disturbances in the body. If a carbon dioxide deficiency becomes chronic, it can be responsible for serious diseases, ageing and cancer.

One of the reasons exercise is so important for our health is that it is the most wonderful way for us to generate large amounts of CO2 and thus much more oxygen passes into the lungs, blood and cells. If the level of carbon dioxide in the blood is lower than normal, which it is in all people who do not exercise or breathe too fast, then this leads to difficulties in releasing oxygen from hemoglobin and that is why it is antihumanitarian to suggest people away from using bicarbonate.

Bicarbonate deficiency is the most unrecognized medical condition on earth.

Once carbonic acid forms, it very quickly equilibrates with the other acids and bases in solution. It can, for example, lose one or two protons (H+). The extent to which this happens depends upon the pH and a variety of other factors. In seawater at pH 8.1, most of it (87 percent) will lose one proton to form bicarbonate, a small amount will lose two protons to form carbonate (13 percent), and a very small amount will remain as H2CO3 (<>1 percent). All of these forms, however, interconvert faster than the blink of an eye, so one cannot identify one as carbonate and one as bicarbonate for more than a tiny fraction of a second. All one can really say is that on average X percent is in the form of bicarbonate, and Y percent in the form of carbonate.[1]

CO2 Chemistry
 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
Bicarbonate and is an important read for all doctors and people interested in maintaining their health and youth. The book is also available in EBook form.

Total CO2 is defined as the sum
of carbonic acid and bicarbonate.


Carbonic acid plays a very important role as a buffer in our blood. The equilibrium between carbon dioxide and carbonic acid is very important for controlling the acidity of body fluids, and the carbonic anhydrase increases the reaction rate by a factor of nearly a billion to keep the fluids at a stable pH. Carbon dioxide does change the pH of water. This is how it works:

Carbon dioxide dissolves slightly in water to form a weak acid called carbonic acid, H2CO3, according to the following reaction:

CO2 + H2O --> H2CO3

After that, carbonic acid reacts slightly and reversibly in water to form a hydronium cation, H3O+, and the bicarbonate ion, HCO3-, according to the following reaction:

H2CO3 + H2O --> HCO3- + H3O+

In the basement of human physiology are these lightning fast translations so for all intent and purpose drinking sparkling water is very similar to drinking bicarbonate water. Scientists have found in animal studies that sparkling water stimulates HCO3- secretion in both the stomach and the duodenum[2]. CO2 and HCO3- (bicarbonate ions) are interchangeable in the presence of water.

The normal ratio of bicarbonate to carbonic acid at normal pH is around 20:1; total CO2 will therefore be about 5% higher than serum bicarbonate. When you observe a difference between total CO2 and bicarbonate that is larger than 5%, the patient will be acidic. In aqueous solution, carbonic acid dissociates into a bicarbonate ion and a proton or into carbon dioxide and water depending on the conditions such as pH and the relative concentrations of each of the products, i.e., carbon dioxide and bicarbonate.

The carbonic acid, carbon dioxide bicarbonate axis represents the main buffers against dangerous pH changes; a buffer is a substance that resists changes in pH (acid concentration) by undergoing a reversible reaction. When weak acids are added to a buffer solution, the resulting change in pH is less than it would have been if the buffer were not present. When hydrogen ion (H+) is added, much of the hydrogen is taken up by the salt of the buffering acid. With bicarbonate, H+ bonds to HCO3- to form H2CO3, which is a weak acid. The main characteristic of a buffer is that the reaction is reversible — the hydrogen ion can be given back.

[1] http://www.fishchannel.com/saltwater-aquariums/aquarium-frontiers/co2-friend-or-foe.aspx?cm_sp=InternalClicks-_-RelatedArticles-_-saltwater-aquariums/aquarium-frontiers/co2-friend-or-foe

[2] Stimulation by sparkling water of gastroduodenal HCO3- secretion in rats. Med Sci Monit. 2009 Dec;15(12):BR349-56. Division of Pathological Sciences, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Misasagi, Yamashina, Kyoto, Japan.

Learn more about my recommended treatments »
 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
Bicarbonate and is an important read for all doctors and people interested in maintaining their health and youth. The book is also available in EBook form.

Total CO2 is defined as the sum
of carbonic acid and bicarbonate.


Carbonic acid plays a very important role as a buffer in our blood. The equilibrium between carbon dioxide and carbonic acid is very important for controlling the acidity of body fluids, and the carbonic anhydrase increases the reaction rate by a factor of nearly a billion to keep the fluids at a stable pH. Carbon dioxide does change the pH of water. This is how it works:

Carbon dioxide dissolves slightly in water to form a weak acid called carbonic acid, H2CO3, according to the following reaction:

CO2 + H2O --> H2CO3

After that, carbonic acid reacts slightly and reversibly in water to form a hydronium cation, H3O+, and the bicarbonate ion, HCO3-, according to the following reaction:

H2CO3 + H2O --> HCO3- + H3O+

In the basement of human physiology are these lightning fast translations so for all intent and purpose drinking sparkling water is very similar to drinking bicarbonate water. Scientists have found in animal studies that sparkling water stimulates HCO3- secretion in both the stomach and the duodenum[2]. CO2 and HCO3- (bicarbonate ions) are interchangeable in the presence of water.

The normal ratio of bicarbonate to carbonic acid at normal pH is around 20:1; total CO2 will therefore be about 5% higher than serum bicarbonate. When you observe a difference between total CO2 and bicarbonate that is larger than 5%, the patient will be acidic. In aqueous solution, carbonic acid dissociates into a bicarbonate ion and a proton or into carbon dioxide and water depending on the conditions such as pH and the relative concentrations of each of the products, i.e., carbon dioxide and bicarbonate.

The carbonic acid, carbon dioxide bicarbonate axis represents the main buffers against dangerous pH changes; a buffer is a substance that resists changes in pH (acid concentration) by undergoing a reversible reaction. When weak acids are added to a buffer solution, the resulting change in pH is less than it would have been if the buffer were not present. When hydrogen ion (H+) is added, much of the hydrogen is taken up by the salt of the buffering acid. With bicarbonate, H+ bonds to HCO3- to form H2CO3, which is a weak acid. The main characteristic of a buffer is that the reaction is reversible — the hydrogen ion can be given back.

[1] http://www.fishchannel.com/saltwater-aquariums/aquarium-frontiers/co2-friend-or-foe.aspx?cm_sp=InternalClicks-_-RelatedArticles-_-saltwater-aquariums/aquarium-frontiers/co2-friend-or-foe

[2] Stimulation by sparkling water of gastroduodenal HCO3- secretion in rats. Med Sci Monit. 2009 Dec;15(12):BR349-56. Division of Pathological Sciences, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, Misasagi, Yamashina, Kyoto, Japan.

Learn more about my recommended treatments »
8-Year-Old Girl Diagnosed With Breast Cancer
Story by KTVX/CNN Newsource

CENTERVILLE, Ut. (KTVX) - It's a diagnosis rarely seen in someone so young.

A Salt Lake City 8-year-old girl is battling breast cancer, CNN affiliate KTVX reports.

Troy and Annette Turner recently found out that their daughter Chrissy has cancer.

"It was about the middle of October she came to us with a lump on her chest and was scared," Troy Turner said.

"It is a very rare form of breast cancer. It's called secretory carcinoma. Only 1 in one million are diagnosed and she is the youngest that they've run across having this particular type of breast cancer," Annette Turner told KTVX.

The Turner family has faced a similar situation before.

The girl's mother Annette is a cervical cancer survivor. Her father Troy is a Desert Storm veteran who was diagnosed with non-Hodkin's Lymphoma.

Chrissy and her parents know that she has a difficult battle ahead of her. It will start here at the Huntsman Cancer Institute where she will undergo a mastectomy.

"I was scared the first time that I knew about it but I knew, I knew that I could fight it off and I hope that I can fight it off," Chrissy told KTVX.

Friends have created a GoFundMe campaign to help raise money for the family's medical bills.

"We're just going to keep fighting and doing everything we can to smile every day and laugh every day and carry our head high and do our best to overcome this."

For more information on Chrissy's fight against cancer, go to https://www.facebook.com/ChrissysAlliance

To donate to the Turners, go to https://www.gofundme.com/chrissysalliance
 

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
I think this is a real service that Loren is performing for us, to gather up all this information about alternative cancer treatments.

As time goes on, I'm intending to be looking into more of this information. The limitations of standard medical treatment (surgery, chemotherapy and radiation) are all too well known, and many voices are suggesting that alternative treatments could be more humane & effective.

On the other hand, it's important to investigate these alternatives as conscientiously as possible. Certainly before betting your life. (For me, fortunately, this is an academic curiosity at the moment.)

There are two sides to the story when it comes to some of these alternative health practitioners. For example, see:

https://theotherburzynskipatientgroup.wordpress.com/about/

Quote:

Of the thousands of patients who have gone to him and emptied their bank accounts at his feet, a very, very few have survived. This does not mean that he has cured them; in fact, when you look at the cases closely, you find reasons to doubt that he has cured anyone at all. Of course, the few patients who have survived this shonky treatment have become full-time advocates of Burzynski, and he has acquired something of a cult-leader status.​
 
Last edited:
Top