Thanks 1698code. I do generally support freedom of speech, and I don't see anything hateful or inciting violence in these posts. So I'm glad to provide you with hosting for the material, and whatever little traffic we get here.[Jerry, delete these posts if you don't want them on your site]
Even if we presume that this is deliberately designed to yield a significant number (or even if it's been supernaturally guided as such): how does this tell us whether to believe it or not? Given that presumption, it could mean that some force for good is telling us that it's true, or that it's false... or it could be some evil being or entity trying to deceive us?[underlined]:
The only reason why I nevertheless continue to express my concerns is that I cannot refrain from urging national and international public health agencies to immediately engage their populations in large scale antiviral chemoprophylactic campaigns, especially in highly vaccinated countries.
= 17076 s
What if you were to also 'count' some random, unconnected text as well? An article about a local high school basketball team, or some ads from Craigslist? Would you find 'significant' numbers at a similar rate?I will try to 'count' a bit of this man's text in the next week or so.
I agree it would be more helpful if Vanden Bossche would specify more clearly what he has in mind. Most of the "health freedom" folks are promoting such as HCQ, ivermectin, zinc, quercetin, povidone iodine, vitamin D as antivirals. But if that's what he wants, why doesn't he say so?Sounds like the Ghent graduate wants to pass out a chemical of some kind on a mass scale (maybe I am wrong).
Robert Eisenman's work is very important, but I find it hard to read. Andrew Gould wrote a very accessible summary which was posted to Eisenman's website. Gould's website is down today, but I found the article at the Wayback Machine:I will read some of The New Testament Code
I'm curious about that book, too. From what I can tell of the preview at Amazon, it's based on Abelard Reuchlin and Roman Piso's view.and look again at the Henry Davis book, Creating Christianity
... and the hyped-up COVID scam.Thanks 1698code. I do generally support freedom of speech, and I don't see anything hateful or inciting violence in these posts. So I'm glad to provide you with hosting for the material, and whatever little traffic we get here.
I do wish you could write a bit more about why you think this is interesting. What do all these numbers mean, if indeed there's more going on here than just simple coincidences uncovered by powerful computer search methods?
Thank you for the reminder.... I did promise you that I would try to read and understand, and offer some sort of commentary.Einstein makes predictions that lead to logical paradoxes - as you have no doubt found when you read my five articles on the General Science Journal
Can't we blame the problems with Bidenpox etc. on Big Pharma? That is, a consortium of giant corporations whose monopoly power is clearly illegal under antitrust laws; except that they've become so powerful that they can bribe every government official, and control the media through advertising and influence, and keep the people so stupid that they remain clueless, thus rendering "democracy" a cruel joke?This is then trumpeted as a great success for Big Pharma
I'm pretty sure they could too, as you don't have to compensate for non-existent effects!Welcome back, Mr. Baddie! I must admit that so-called "Liberal Democracy" is looking worse every day. *
I am pretty sure that some sort of mathematical modeling or calculations went into the design of the elaborate fuel injection system and engine control unit of this tractor. But on the other hand, I presume the engineers were able to make it work without any compensation for length contraction or time dilation.
Back in Australia I call it 'Albo-pox' after our new PM Anthony Albanese (Anthony Albert Sneezy) but while he is probably in the know to a low degree, he does not realize that it is NOT merely Big Pharma...Can't we blame the problems with Bidenpox etc. on Big Pharma? That is, a consortium of giant corporations whose monopoly power is clearly illegal under antitrust laws; except that they've become so powerful that they can bribe every government official, and control the media through advertising and influence, and keep the people so stupid that they remain clueless, thus rendering "democracy" a cruel joke?
...because Big Pharma have to be underpinned by the leading financiers e.g. the Rothschild-Rockefeller-Morgan consortium or whatever you want to call them. What was traditional Fascism - Mussolini to some degree, but especially Hitler and Franco - were totally against the Rothschild-Morgan moneylenders based in the UK (and by default in the USA too). Latter day Fascism-so-called e.g. General Pinochet in Chile, was completely arm in arm with Western finance capitalism e.g. in the form of the Chicago Boys in Chile. In contrast Hitler excoriated the wealthy Jewish financiers, something Lenin & Stalin did not do lest they lose their funding and support from William Thomson (head of Newmont Mining) and Armand Hammer respectively. In contrast, Hitler's fatal weakness was his indulgent attitude towards Britain (as seen in his Second Book).The union of corporate and state power to dominate the people is called "fascism", which is my label for the Big Pharma / government complex. Or would you prefer some other label?
No disagreement about this!...because Big Pharma have to be underpinned by the leading financiers e.g. the Rothschild-Rockefeller-Morgan consortium or whatever you want to call them.
Here we're back to the same conversational conundrum as we've been in before. I think you're trying to say that there's a bad fascism and a good fascism? I don't understand what you mean by the good form of fascism, except for your occasional attempts to re-habilitate Franco, Mussolini and Hitler.Hence to use the term 'fascism' to describe the merger of corporate and state power Western countries is highly misleading since two entirely different issues about the future nature of political power are being confused under the term 'fascism'.