The Hidden History of Jesuits

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
Hi Gilius,

As the video notes early on, much of this type of material does seem to be being systematically eradicated. To what purpose and why in such a place as England?

As of this moment I am at 35 minutes in, and this appears to me to be yet another example of when everything presented that is (likely) true doesn't always reveal the whole truth and nothing but the truth. This is similar to what I was complaining about Loren's barrage of anti-Jewish content (which is typical of one motivated or inspired from a Catholic's or Neo-Catholic's perspective).

This all gets to Jerry's and my take on what we are terming the False Dialectic of Western Civilization, namely that of the Jews versus Gentiles. Thus reading more closely at what the foundational OT patriarch narratives are actually saying, and what the likes of Nicholas De Vere was saying begin to reveal that something very different is going on, and as I said to Joe at one point, there seems to be no good guys, at least at the very top on both sides.

Joe has previously raised to Jerry's and now to my attention the book, When Scotland was Jewish, and I have just briefly looked through it and discovered that it gets right to an issue I have wondered about for some time. Namely, just who the Normans really were. Of course, they are connected intimately with the Templars and the Crusades, and thus onto Freemasonry. But if they are 'Jews', then why the focus on building Romanesque architecture that so closely mimics Roman architecture, and other problems?

So all these Scottish lords came over along with William the Conqueror, from Normandy ... France? And this Frenchy pope launches the Crusades while the Templars are rutting around the Temple Mount? So far the book says that all the portrait depictions of the early 'lairds' show a typical Mediterranean appearance, olive skin, brown eyes, and such. So where all the red heads and such? Say like with Elizabeth I and 'Norman' friends to the south?

So far, with every new revelation, the only construct that seems to allow the data to fit coherently is the continuance of the False Dialectic. This allows, most everybody, divided into two main camps, to (somewhat correctly) point fingers at the opposite and equally deluded camp, while ignoring the people at the very top. Such researchers as Joseph Ferrell have identified a phenomenon that has been termed the Breakaway Civilization, but I am now going to assert that this phenomenon is really just evidence of the Hidden Hands of the human shepherds.

Pope Innocent III from 35:30 in the video (Note the hair color and pale skin, can't tell if he has De Vere's green eyes)
 

Attachments

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
Hi Gilius,

As the video notes early on, much of this type of material does seem to be being systematically eradicated. To what purpose and why in such a place as England?

As of this moment I am at 35 minutes in, and this appears to me to be yet another example of when everything presented that is (likely) true doesn't always reveal the whole truth and nothing but the truth. This is similar to what I was complaining about Loren's barrage of anti-Jewish content (which is typical of one motivated or inspired from a Catholic's or Neo-Catholic's perspective).

This all gets to Jerry's and my take on what we are terming the False Dialectic of Western Civilization, namely that of the Jews versus Gentiles. Thus reading more closely at what the foundational OT patriarch narratives are actually saying, and what the likes of Nicholas De Vere was saying begin to reveal that something very different is going on, and as I said to Joe at one point, there seems to be no good guys, at least at the very top on both sides.

Joe has previously raised to Jerry's and now to my attention the book, When Scotland was Jewish, and I have just briefly looked through it and discovered that it gets right to an issue I have wondered about for some time. Namely, just who the Normans really were. Of course, they are connected intimately with the Templars and the Crusades, and thus onto Freemasonry. But if they are 'Jews', then why the focus on building Romanesque architecture that so closely mimics Roman architecture, and other problems?

So all these Scottish lords came over along with William the Conqueror, from Normandy ... France? And this Frenchy pope launches the Crusades while the Templars are rutting around the Temple Mount? So far the book says that all the portrait depictions of the early 'lairds' show a typical Mediterranean appearance, olive skin, brown eyes, and such. So where all the red heads and such? Say like with Elizabeth I and 'Norman' friends to the south?

So far, with every new revelation, the only construct that seems to allow the data to fit coherently is the continuance of the False Dialectic. This allows, most everybody, divided into two main camps, to (somewhat correctly) point fingers at the opposite and equally deluded camp, while ignoring the people at the very top. Such researchers as Joseph Ferrell have identified a phenomenon that has been termed the Breakaway Civilization, but I am now going to assert that this phenomenon is really just evidence of the Hidden Hands of the human shepherds.

Pope Innocent III from 35:30 in the video (Note the hair color and pale skin, can't tell if he has De Vere's green eyes)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Scotland

cut from the above;
By 1878, Jews became attached to the Scottish aristocracy when Hannah de Rothschild, born in England, married Archibald Primrose, 5th Earl of Rosebery. She died at Dalmeny. Her son, Harry, would become Secretary of State for Scotland in 1945 during Winston Churchill's postwar Caretaker Government.

thanks Richard didn't know about this LH

next from amazon books;

https://www.amazon.com/When-Scotland-Was-Jewish-Archeology/dp/0786477091

The popular image of Scotland is dominated by widely recognized elements of Celtic culture. But a significant non-Celtic influence on Scotland's history has been largely ignored for centuries? This book argues that much of Scotland's history and culture from 1100 forward is Jewish. The authors provide evidence that many of the national heroes, villains, rulers, nobles, traders, merchants, bishops, guild members, burgesses, and ministers of Scotland were of Jewish descent, their ancestors originating in France and Spain. Much of the traditional historical account of Scotland, it is proposed, rests on fundamental interpretive errors, perpetuated in order to affirm Scotland's identity as a Celtic, Christian society. A more accurate and profound understanding of Scottish history has thus been buried. The authors' wide-ranging research includes examination of census records, archaeological artifacts, castle carvings, cemetery inscriptions, religious seals, coinage, burgess and guild member rolls, noble genealogies, family crests, portraiture, and geographic place names

also; Meet Lord Anthony Ashley-Cooper, the English crypto-Jew whose secretary was the philosopher John Locke...the Scottish princess Maud de Lens who combined several lines of Davidic ancestry and was one of the richest women in Europe...and the Clan Douglas warrior who removed the heart of Robert the Bruce to have it buried in Jerusalem.--Teaser

also google this
The Opium Wars: how Scottish traders fed the habit - The Scotsman
www.scotsman.com/.../the-opium-wars-how-scottish-trader...
Sep 6, 2005 - Opium was banned in China by an Imperial Court worried by its pernicious influence. For British traders, opium was the only commodity that ...

were these guys Jewish? they come from Scotland and work with the Russell family in usa, who start skull and bones; LH

History of Jardine, Matheson & Co. - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/.../History_of_Jardine,_Matheson_%2...
Jardine Matheson & Co., later Jardine Matheson & Co. Ltd., forerunner of today's Jardine .... James Matheson was born in 1796 in the Scottish highlands and also .... Nevertheless, William Jardine wanted to expand the opium trade in China and ...

also on amazon; https://www.amazon.com/Jews-Muslims-British-Colonial-America/dp/0786464623
 
Last edited:

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
Hi Gilius,

As the video notes early on, much of this type of material does seem to be being systematically eradicated. To what purpose and why in such a place as England?

As of this moment I am at 35 minutes in, and this appears to me to be yet another example of when everything presented that is (likely) true doesn't always reveal the whole truth and nothing but the truth. This is similar to what I was complaining about Loren's barrage of anti-Jewish content (which is typical of one motivated or inspired from a Catholic's or Neo-Catholic's perspective).

This all gets to Jerry's and my take on what we are terming the False Dialectic of Western Civilization, namely that of the Jews versus Gentiles. Thus reading more closely at what the foundational OT patriarch narratives are actually saying, and what the likes of Nicholas De Vere was saying begin to reveal that something very different is going on, and as I said to Joe at one point, there seems to be no good guys, at least at the very top on both sides.

Joe has previously raised to Jerry's and now to my attention the book, When Scotland was Jewish, and I have just briefly looked through it and discovered that it gets right to an issue I have wondered about for some time. Namely, just who the Normans really were. Of course, they are connected intimately with the Templars and the Crusades, and thus onto Freemasonry. But if they are 'Jews', then why the focus on building Romanesque architecture that so closely mimics Roman architecture, and other problems?

So all these Scottish lords came over along with William the Conqueror, from Normandy ... France? And this Frenchy pope launches the Crusades while the Templars are rutting around the Temple Mount? So far the book says that all the portrait depictions of the early 'lairds' show a typical Mediterranean appearance, olive skin, brown eyes, and such. So where all the red heads and such? Say like with Elizabeth I and 'Norman' friends to the south?

So far, with every new revelation, the only construct that seems to allow the data to fit coherently is the continuance of the False Dialectic. This allows, most everybody, divided into two main camps, to (somewhat correctly) point fingers at the opposite and equally deluded camp, while ignoring the people at the very top. Such researchers as Joseph Ferrell have identified a phenomenon that has been termed the Breakaway Civilization, but I am now going to assert that this phenomenon is really just evidence of the Hidden Hands of the human shepherds.

Pope Innocent III from 35:30 in the video (Note the hair color and pale skin, can't tell if he has De Vere's green eyes)
thanks for the video here is a moive it talks about LH
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amen.
 

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
https://www.amazon.com/When-Scotland-Was-Jewish-Archeology/dp/0786477091

The popular image of Scotland is dominated by widely recognized elements of Celtic culture. But a significant non-Celtic influence on Scotland's history has been largely ignored for centuries? This book argues that much of Scotland's history and culture from 1100 forward is Jewish. The authors provide evidence that many of the national heroes, villains, rulers, nobles, traders, merchants, bishops, guild members, burgesses, and ministers of Scotland were of Jewish descent, their ancestors originating in France and Spain. Much of the traditional historical account of Scotland, it is proposed, rests on fundamental interpretive errors, perpetuated in order to affirm Scotland's identity as a Celtic, Christian society. A more accurate and profound understanding of Scottish history has thus been buried. The authors' wide-ranging research includes examination of census records, archaeological artifacts, castle carvings, cemetery inscriptions, religious seals, coinage, burgess and guild member rolls, noble genealogies, family crests, portraiture, and geographic place names
The book also goes on to show that the Jews who came along to England and Scotland with William the Conqueror were more likely to be mostly of the descent of goy converts to Judaism starting with the time of Charlemagne, the founder of the Holy Roman Empire. The authors claims this from the predominance of the R1b genome. This would include families like the St. Clairs (Sinclairs) central to the Templar and Freemasonic narratives -- according to the book.

"Importantly, Jews were settled where they would have had contact with the Normans, who arrived in Gaul from Scandinavia around 900 C.E. Jews functioned in Gaul and elsewhere as full-fledged Roman citizens, without religious or ethnic hindrance, and were active traders and merchants. Further, they would not necessarily have had Semitic DNA. As we shall argue shortly, many, perhaps most, were converts to Judaism from the French or German regions, so they would have carried primarily R1b DNA. As Benbassa (p. 4) notes, the Jews ... dressed like the rest of the population, bore arms, and spoke the local language; even in the synagogue. Hebrew was not the only language used for rituals. Their ancestral names—biblical, Roman, and Gallo-Roman—did not differentiate them from other inhabitants."

"During the fifth century, just as Columba was converting the Irish and Scottish Celts to a Christianity that closely followed Jewish practice, Benbassa writes that Jews in France “lacking the Talmud, adhered closely to the text of the Bible and to certain oral traditions. There existed a religious confusion between Judaism and Christianity, both with regard to prescriptions and to worship” (p. 5). Thus we have a loose compatibility between two monotheistic faiths—Christianity and Judaism—and persons moving back and forth between them up until the early 600s (Benbassa, p. 6). With the establishment of the Carolingian Empire under Charlemagne in 800 C.E., the Jews of France were well treated and socially mobile. Especially in their community in Narbonne, they enjoyed self-governance and moved into the highest political and economic advisory positions."

"Isaac the Jew, who was sent by Charlemagne in 797 with two ambassadors to Harun al-Rashid [in Baghdad], was probably one of these merchants.... It was said that the Jews, far from being objects of hatred to the emperor, were better loved and considered than the Christians."

The point of all this, on Gilius's Jesuit thread, is that the underlying dynamics between these factions like Jesuits and Freemason/Protestants is very complex and further trying to boil them down to simple ethnic associations is very problematic. Instead, to me, looking for the common denominators in terms of elite people, actions, and results that align with the stated aims of their holy texts pays better dividends. When people see a fight, they tend to align themselves with one side or the other, based upon their natural and/or learned predispositions. Once sucked into one camp one feels compelled to view all evidence in their favor, ignoring matters to the contrary. This psychology seems perfect to exploit by the elite shepherds of humans, and should seem incredible that they would not do so from a pure logical analysis. Yet, one can talk yourself blue in the face trying to convince people that this is so. Accepting such a concept means that they must reject much of what they had been taught by such as their parents and other sources that they were raised with, i.e. Culture.
 
Last edited:

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
thanks for the video here is a moive it talks about LH
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amen.
Loren, there is a funny problem with the links, and as well the title on the YouTube trailer lends to the confusion.

The actual name of the movie is AMEN. - with the period in the name. It appears that perhaps you copied the wikilink correctly but edited out the period in the URL because it didn't appear correct. The result it that one is taken to the page discussing the holy word "Amen' - without the period. And the movie trailer compounds the problem by omitting the period.

I have pleaded with Jerry to fix this problem on Wikipedia by providing a disambiguation page for this, and maybe to spell the movie page URL with all caps like the actual movie title. But so far, no luck. :(
 

Tyrone McCloskey

Active Member
At 5:30 this image appears- This may be a nit but I've been looking at Hitler imagery lately and it looks for all the world like the Fuhrer's right arm would stretch all the way past his knee if he let it hang straight down- Some of the light patterns are also wrong, some arms in shadow that should be in light, etc.- The question isn't that they use false imagery, but is this character at all real? And I don't mean are they using real actors? Obviously they are- My question is: Who concocted this character and what cultural foundations help contextualize this character to make him seem real? What was in the stock pot of character traits from which this character was assembled? Someone somewhere suggested once Scaramouche as a partial template- (A Venetian concoction) If, as I assert, that Hitler was largely a British intelligence project, that would leave Shakespearean tradition within arm's reach- (A dab of Henry V at the podium in Triumph of the Will) And, as is asserted at this forum, Shakes the Clown's work was a Jewish project, so if there is a connection to the assemblage of Hitler, that's rather awkward, to say the least- (And of course, a dollop of Charlie Chaplin added for laffs)hitll2.jpg
 

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
If you measure the length of Hitler's sleeve to the cleric's left sleeve, you'll see they are the same, leaving issues of perspective and lens distortion aside. I'm guess that the appearance is mostly an illusion from the framing.

As to H being a double agent, are you aware of H's association with Houston Chamberlain and their close ties and affinity to Wagner and his widow? Also, that there is a claim that H spent two years in England along with Alois, his brother, shortly after WWI. During this time H gained a British nephew, Patrick(?), who finished his life in New York.

If Lothar Machtan is correct in his The Hidden Hitler, then H was subject to being coerced due to his homosexual nature, in the highly conservative Bavaria. Machtan provides, among other evidence, rather interesting intimate letters between H and his inner circle of Nazis, of which I would be hard pressed to characterize them as typical heterosexual male content. In this regard, H went for years using his niece Geli(?) as his female social escort, before she ... died.

It is alleged that Mein Kampf was ghost written by a Jesuit, but in any case, Otto Strasser, in Hitler and I claimed that H became quite wealthy from the book and other means of extortion and scams once he rose to power in the NSDAP. And, of course, Strasser claims that H changed the course of the NSDAP overnight from a pure socialist workers party to one that did the bidding of the industrialists, hence fascism. Strasser and his brother knew H firsthand, from their leadership in the NSDAP before and during H's time.

Also interesting to note is that the extreme antipathy between German socialists and communist parties prevented them from unifying behind a candidate against Hitler. That if they had been able to they would have prevented H's election, who was backed by such as the Catholic Zentrum Party which Fritz von Papen was part of.

In addition to the British Crown having been German supporters, and thus having to change their name to the Windsors, because they are ... Germans (or a sort), the book discussed prior, When Scotland was Jewish mentions that the Kennedy family are Melungeons (like Elvis Presley), and thus one branch of Crypto-Jews. It is well know that father Joseph Kennedy was a Nazi supporter, but Jack also got in trouble for refusing to dump his Nazi girlfriend. Supposedly this is what got Jack transfered to the Pacific theater and thus being able to be a hero on PT109. I'm not sure I believe that story any more than I believe the crash stories about Poppy Bush and John McCain.
 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
At 5:30 this image appears- This may be a nit but I've been looking at Hitler imagery lately and it looks for all the world like the Fuhrer's right arm would stretch all the way past his knee if he let it hang straight down- Some of the light patterns are also wrong, some arms in shadow that should be in light, etc.- The question isn't that they use false imagery, but is this character at all real? And I don't mean are they using real actors? Obviously they are- My question is: Who concocted this character and what cultural foundations help contextualize this character to make him seem real? What was in the stock pot of character traits from which this character was assembled? Someone somewhere suggested once Scaramouche as a partial template- (A Venetian concoction) If, as I assert, that Hitler was largely a British intelligence project, that would leave Shakespearean tradition within arm's reach- (A dab of Henry V at the podium in Triumph of the Will) And, as is asserted at this forum, Shakes the Clown's work was a Jewish project, so if there is a connection to the assemblage of Hitler, that's rather awkward, to say the least- (And of course, a dollop of Charlie Chaplin added for laffs)View attachment 149
always happy to here what you have to say;
the sleeve look to me the same as the Priest also;
but I believe you are right on the rest.
don't forget this; goddess transplant
you give Powerful men a good looking women and they my take the bait old as Plato; she could have feed info keep a eye on him etc. LH
  • HITLER'S BRITISH GIRL (2/5) - YouTube
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvUeVhu6ANo
    • BY AUFSEHERLNNEN
    • 10 MIN
    • 65K VIEWS
    12/5/2009 · Video embedded · Hitler's British Girl is a Channel ... Unity and Hitler said to have had a ... suggesting the possibility that she may have given birth to Hitlers baby.
 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
The book also goes on to show that the Jews who came along to England and Scotland with William the Conquer were more likely to be mostly of the descent of goy converts to Judaism starting with the time of Charlemagne, the founder of the Holy Roman Empire. The authors claims this from the predominance of the R1b genome. This would include families like the St. Clairs (Sinclairs) central to the Templar and Freemasonic narratives -- according to the book.

"Importantly, Jews were settled where they would have had contact with the Normans, who arrived in Gaul from Scandinavia around 900 C.E. Jews functioned in Gaul and elsewhere as full-fledged Roman citizens, without religious or ethnic hindrance, and were active traders and merchants. Further, they would not necessarily have had Semitic DNA. As we shall argue shortly, many, perhaps most, were converts to Judaism from the French or German regions, so they would have carried primarily R1b DNA. As Benbassa (p. 4) notes, the Jews ... dressed like the rest of the population, bore arms, and spoke the local language; even in the synagogue. Hebrew was not the only language used for rituals. Their ancestral names—biblical, Roman, and Gallo-Roman—did not differentiate them from other inhabitants."

"During the fifth century, just as Columba was converting the Irish and Scottish Celts to a Christianity that closely followed Jewish practice, Benbassa writes that Jews in France “lacking the Talmud, adhered closely to the text of the Bible and to certain oral traditions. There existed a religious confusion between Judaism and Christianity, both with regard to prescriptions and to worship” (p. 5). Thus we have a loose compatibility between two monotheistic faiths—Christianity and Judaism—and persons moving back and forth between them up until the early 600s (Benbassa, p. 6). With the establishment of the Carolingian Empire under Charlemagne in 800 C.E., the Jews of France were well treated and socially mobile. Especially in their community in Narbonne, they enjoyed self-governance and moved into the highest political and economic advisory positions."

"Isaac the Jew, who was sent by Charlemagne in 797 with two ambassadors to Harun al-Rashid [in Baghdad], was probably one of these merchants.... It was said that the Jews, far from being objects of hatred to the emperor, were better loved and considered than the Christians."

The point of all this, on Gilius's Jesuit thread, is that the underlying dynamics between these factions like Jesuits and Freemason/Protestants is very complex and further trying to boil them down to simple ethnic associations is very problematic. Instead, to me, looking for the common denominators in terms of elite people, actions, and results that align with the stated aims of their holy texts pays better dividends. When people see a fight, they tend to align themselves with one side or the other, based upon their natural and/or learned predispositions. Once sucked into one camp one feels compelled to view all evidence in their favor, ignoring matters to the contrary. This psychology seems perfect to exploit by the elite shepherds of humans, and should seem incredible that they would not do so from a pure logical analysis. Yet, one can talk yourself blue in the face trying to convince people that this is so. Accepting such a concept means that they must reject much of what they had been taught by such as their parents and other sources that they were raised with, i.e. Culture.
William the Conquer from Holland had a lot of rich Jews and rich People from Venice there all wanting a new base to rule the new world from a island etc. safer from the Problems in Europe ..LH
 
Last edited:

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
This needs to be promoted to the top!

the fact they still Pay this tells us something yes?

 

Tyrone McCloskey

Active Member
Richard-
I'll concede the irregularities of the picture for now and ask why "Hitler", surrounded by saluting arms as stiff as pikes, is in a subservient position relative to whoever that is he's shaking hands with- The dignitary has held his hand just out far enough for Hitler to have to reach- Can't tell if that is a Masonic grip- I doubt it if AH is, say, Gustav Weler or Pistol Schreck in the role; just an actor reciting lines-

As for Mein Kampf, as of now I see it as a collaboration between Halford Mackinder acolyte and all around spook/scholar Karl Haushofer, and his star pupil, Rudolph Hess, with an overlay of anti-Semitism provided by the editor, father Bernhard Stampfle- As for royalties, it did not play well initially with the critics, Il Duce being especially dismissive of its "basket of clichés", but it may have sold as was reported, or was bought up by the Abwehr or some such outfit to give the appearance of popularity- It was later given away by the party as a standard wedding gift to all members of the armed forces when their marriages were approved- What I've read of it in English translation sounds like it was written for the hordes of over educated, underemployed men who had an axe to grind but didn't have a champion who could articulate their simplistic rage- As such, it was designed like any other propaganda, to incite and inflame against a common enemy in a middle brow vernacular- Its always the same: Jews then, communists in the Cold War era, terrorists today- Mein Kampf is in main parts Mackinder's empire of the seas repurposed by Haushofer for an empire of the land, what with Germany somewhat landlocked-

The trope of blackmail and manipulation via homosexuality is just another layer of the onion within which there is no center- The Kaiser's entourage was suspected of being gay central, but that may have been a smoke screen for why that inner circle was so tight, likely congregating to run deep background intrigues like the project that came to center on the Hitler figure- The vacation to Liverpool of all places may hide a kernel of truth as the Beatles home port was for a very long time the key office of American intelligence in Royal England- To concoct a legend like Hitler (or The Beatles) there in that milieu is somewhat plausible-

My version has a "Hitler"* working for Ludendorff and Myer in Intel right after WWI, gathering names on the left through infiltration and then ratting them out, firing squads to follow- Also, he was working as a bag man for the project, receiving funds from then Papal nuncio Archbishop Eugenio Pacelli, the future Hitler Pope, Pius XII, who was at that time bagman for the Vatican-

Meanwhile, the aforementioned Weler was being coached by Eckart, a playwright and likely stable boy of the Prussian Royal theater director, Von Hülsen-Haeseler, to be the Podium-Speak Hitler- Therein might be the homosexual component rewritten post-mortem to further cloud the truth of who/what AH really was-

Julius “Pistol” Schreck, founder of the SA and SS, was the administrative Hitler- He later became "Hitler's" bodyguard and chauffeur, which is an odd use of such talent, but he may have been the on-site director of the project, the line producer and show runner as they call it in Hollywood today, and took over the part as needed to have a competent Hitler to liaise with the generals who were really running the war, such as it was described to the press and public-

There is a swarm of spooks involved in the founding of the NSDAP and I will elaborate on that another time, but the PR men that put together the Hitler that was rolled out initially for the beer halls, all had some connection to media, Putzi Hanfstaengl perhaps the most important of the bunch, Eckart included-

The use of things like the Thule Society is also camouflage, employing a basic British strategy of hiding behind the occult, and in the case of Thule, it derived from a British novel of the 19th century penned by spook, Bulwer-Lytton, lover of another spook propagandist, Disraeli-

I’m trying to corral this mess into book form but it is a huge project with many moving parts that have to be included, so don’t pre-order anytime soon (EL Oh EL)

*The name Schicklegruber may be an alias or may be a sick joke that was inserted in Hitler bios as a “tell”, letting on oh so subtly that the tall tale of AH is dookie- According to one Austrian native I came across on a forum, the name is Austrian slang for “shit digger”, an apparent job description of the 19th century, assigned to the low man on a cattle farm totem pole- His task was to dig a ditch and set up a sluice for the run off of liquefied cow shit- This may also be an allusion to the coprophilia Eva and “Dolphie engaged in, according to propagandists tasked with demonizing the figure once the popular Hitler was no longer required-
 

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
William the Conquer from Holland had a lot of rich Jews and rich People from Venice there all wanting a new base to rule the new world from a island etc. safer from the Problems in Europe ..LH
I think you might be conflating William the Conqueror with William of Orange, the latter who was from Holland, and according to the When Scotland Was Jewish book might have been a Crypto-Jew himself. The authors of the book are Jewish BTW.

William the Conqueror was a Norman, from Normandy, but according to the book there may have been some intermarriage surrounding him.

One thing I have just realized recently is regarding the year 1066 CE. Subtract 1000 years and you get to the year 66 CE. As Joe discussed in CM, the Jewish War lasted 7 years (the Tribulation) of which the middle was the capture of Jerusalem and the Temple in 70CE. Technically, one might then think that 1067 might be the right number, but maybe its all how you need to do the math (rounding up and such) combined with circumstances.

Everyone had been concerned with millennial End Times at the year 1000, but if these people understood that the Jewish War was starting in 66/67 CE then perhaps this is why the Normans called their book The Doomsday Book (or rather the Domesday Book).

Shortly after this is when the Crusades start, and the Templars traipse off to dig around the Temple Mount. And then the Normans also conquer Sicily and southern Italy.
 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
Have you looked into the claims of many offspring of top Nazis living in Israel?
total state mind control schools comic books to die for hitler. the school fish lead to there death, Planed by the big boys..

think of boy Scotts but with war games no more mother no more father the state is the new family
and hitler was god
I didn't know women worked in war factories or became g i joes. see with your own eyes.

now thanks to the eu the People of Germany have a million extra men from Africa in there country it will be the finish of Germany to dissolve in to the eu.

this is a rare and very well done look at just how far People can go into mind control, must be seen when today there much better at it..LH

there are 5 Parts
 
Last edited:

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
total state mind control schools comic books to die for hitler. the school fish lead to there death, Planed by the big boys..

think of boy Scotts but with war games no more mother no more father the state is the new family
and hitler was god
I didn't know women worked in war factories or became g i joes. see with your own eyes.

now thanks to the eu the People of Germany have a million extra men from Africa in there country it will be the finish of Germany to dissolve in to the eu.

this is a rare and very well done look at just how far People can go into mind control, must be seen when today there much better at it..LH

there are 5 Parts
I lived on a beach in Fiji next to a school and found out the children were drilled as if they were in the army everyday, its here even in Paradise ..the radio tv food school slowly changing them to sick fat fools who had it all. fooled by the big boys at the un eu London Washington jaPan china Russia Pope banking old rich families combination. 1984 brave new world. new age religion
why did Russia have the best tank in ww2 and so many ? usa gave it to them. who had the best Planes and bombers?? usa .. the big boys set the game and know how to win.. to get there new world order ..
 

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
Info on "Hitler's Children":

http://docuwiki.net/index.php?title=Hitler's_Children

Quote:

English version of the Guido Knopp series Hitlers Kinder, which was broadcast by ZDF in 2000. Never has a generation been so completely taken over by a totalitarian state as was the case in Hitler's Third Reich: at the age of 10 children joined the "Jungvolk" movement, at 14 they joined the Hitler Youth, and at 18 they joined the party, the "Wehrmacht", the SA, or the SS. This 5-part documentary is the first comprehensive film portrayal of young people in the Third Reich. With in-depth witness statements and some previously unpublished archive material, the documentary demonstrates how Hitler succeeded in gaining power over "his children" through years of manipulation.
Not to be confused with the 1943 film, the 2011 film or the 1977 book, all by the same name.
 
The use of things like the Thule Society is also camouflage, employing a basic British strategy of hiding behind the occult, and in the case of Thule, it derived from a British novel of the 19th century penned by spook, Bulwer-Lytton, lover of another spook propagandist, Disraeli-
There is an interesting article with many references:
" Edward Bulwer-Lytton: Agharta, Shambhala, Vril and the Occult Roots of Nazi Power"
that discusses the blatant plagiarism of Bulwer-Lytton's book, "The Coming Race".
Here is a link to that article by Joseph Caldwell:
http://www.foundationwebsite.org/OnBulwerLytton.htm
Caldwell refers to several books, including "The Occult Roots of Nazism: Secret Aryan Cults and Their Influence on Nazi Ideology" by Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke.

Here is a link to a review of "The Coming Race" that gives some background on the influence of the novel:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/R3KLYPMOWRS9BT/ref=cm_cr_getr_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B0082UPBF4
https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/R3KLYPMOWRS9BT/ref=cm_cr_getr_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B0082UPBF4
Tyrone, I quoted you above. Would you please provide the documentation that shows that Bulwer-Lytton was a "spook", and the gay lover of Disraeli?
 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
Richard-
I'll concede the irregularities of the picture for now and ask why "Hitler", surrounded by saluting arms as stiff as pikes, is in a subservient position relative to whoever that is he's shaking hands with- The dignitary has held his hand just out far enough for Hitler to have to reach- Can't tell if that is a Masonic grip- I doubt it if AH is, say, Gustav Weler or Pistol Schreck in the role; just an actor reciting lines-

As for Mein Kampf, as of now I see it as a collaboration between Halford Mackinder acolyte and all around spook/scholar Karl Haushofer, and his star pupil, Rudolph Hess, with an overlay of anti-Semitism provided by the editor, father Bernhard Stampfle- As for royalties, it did not play well initially with the critics, Il Duce being especially dismissive of its "basket of clichés", but it may have sold as was reported, or was bought up by the Abwehr or some such outfit to give the appearance of popularity- It was later given away by the party as a standard wedding gift to all members of the armed forces when their marriages were approved- What I've read of it in English translation sounds like it was written for the hordes of over educated, underemployed men who had an axe to grind but didn't have a champion who could articulate their simplistic rage- As such, it was designed like any other propaganda, to incite and inflame against a common enemy in a middle brow vernacular- Its always the same: Jews then, communists in the Cold War era, terrorists today- Mein Kampf is in main parts Mackinder's empire of the seas repurposed by Haushofer for an empire of the land, what with Germany somewhat landlocked-

The trope of blackmail and manipulation via homosexuality is just another layer of the onion within which there is no center- The Kaiser's entourage was suspected of being gay central, but that may have been a smoke screen for why that inner circle was so tight, likely congregating to run deep background intrigues like the project that came to center on the Hitler figure- The vacation to Liverpool of all places may hide a kernel of truth as the Beatles home port was for a very long time the key office of American intelligence in Royal England- To concoct a legend like Hitler (or The Beatles) there in that milieu is somewhat plausible-

My version has a "Hitler"* working for Ludendorff and Myer in Intel right after WWI, gathering names on the left through infiltration and then ratting them out, firing squads to follow- Also, he was working as a bag man for the project, receiving funds from then Papal nuncio Archbishop Eugenio Pacelli, the future Hitler Pope, Pius XII, who was at that time bagman for the Vatican-

Meanwhile, the aforementioned Weler was being coached by Eckart, a playwright and likely stable boy of the Prussian Royal theater director, Von Hülsen-Haeseler, to be the Podium-Speak Hitler- Therein might be the homosexual component rewritten post-mortem to further cloud the truth of who/what AH really was-

Julius “Pistol” Schreck, founder of the SA and SS, was the administrative Hitler- He later became "Hitler's" bodyguard and chauffeur, which is an odd use of such talent, but he may have been the on-site director of the project, the line producer and show runner as they call it in Hollywood today, and took over the part as needed to have a competent Hitler to liaise with the generals who were really running the war, such as it was described to the press and public-

There is a swarm of spooks involved in the founding of the NSDAP and I will elaborate on that another time, but the PR men that put together the Hitler that was rolled out initially for the beer halls, all had some connection to media, Putzi Hanfstaengl perhaps the most important of the bunch, Eckart included-

The use of things like the Thule Society is also camouflage, employing a basic British strategy of hiding behind the occult, and in the case of Thule, it derived from a British novel of the 19th century penned by spook, Bulwer-Lytton, lover of another spook propagandist, Disraeli-

I’m trying to corral this mess into book form but it is a huge project with many moving parts that have to be included, so don’t pre-order anytime soon (EL Oh EL)

*The name Schicklegruber may be an alias or may be a sick joke that was inserted in Hitler bios as a “tell”, letting on oh so subtly that the tall tale of AH is dookie- According to one Austrian native I came across on a forum, the name is Austrian slang for “shit digger”, an apparent job description of the 19th century, assigned to the low man on a cattle farm totem pole- His task was to dig a ditch and set up a sluice for the run off of liquefied cow shit- This may also be an allusion to the coprophilia Eva and “Dolphie engaged in, according to propagandists tasked with demonizing the figure once the popular Hitler was no longer required-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suppression_of_the_Society_of_Jesus
cut from the above
Suppression of the Society of Jesus


Part of a series on
Society of Jesus


The suppression of the Jesuits in the Portuguese Empire (1759), France (1764), the Two Sicilies, Malta, Parma and the Spanish Empire (1767) is a highly controversial subject. It has been argued that it was a result of a series of political moves in each polity rather than a theological controversy.[1] Monarchies attempting to centralize and secularize political power viewed the Jesuits as being too international, too strongly allied to the papacy, and too autonomous from the monarchs in whose territory they operated.[2] By the brief Dominus ac Redemptor (21 July 1773) Pope Clement XIV suppressed the Society of Jesus. The Jesuits took refuge in non-Catholic nations, particularly in Prussia and Russia, where the order was either ignored or formally rejected. The Jesuits were allowed to return to many places starting in the late nineteenth century.
Background to Suppression
Prior to the eighteenth-century suppression of the Jesuits in many countries, there was an early ban in territories of the Venetian Republic between 1606 and 1656/7, began and ended as part of disputes between the Republic and the Papacy, beginning with the Venetian Interdict.[3]

so now there in Prussia and what to go after Rome and the church, over the years Power fights each other then take each other over as it look the Rome and Jesuits London and washition un world bank are all on the same Page now, for one world order religion..LH
 

lorenhough

Well-Known Member
I see the dots connect here 1 May 1776.& By the brief Dominus ac Redemptor (21 July 1773) Pope Clement XIV suppressed the Society of Jesus. The Jesuits took refuge in non-Catholic nations, particularly in Prussia and Russia, where the order was either ignored or formally rejected. The Jesuits were allowed to return to many places starting in the late nineteenth century.

cut from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illuminati
so the Jesuits team up with others very rich people like in London who want to take over the world; and ROMe LH
Illuminati
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the secret society. For the film, see Illuminata (film). For the Muslim esoteric school, see Illuminationism. For other uses, see Illuminati (disambiguation).

Adam Weishaupt (1748–1830), founder of the Bavarian Illuminati
The Illuminati (plural of Latin illuminatus, "enlightened") is a name given to several groups, both real and fictitious. Historically, the name usually refers to the Bavarian Illuminati, an Enlightenment-era secret society founded on 1 May 1776. The society's goals were to oppose superstition, obscurantism, religious influence over public life and abuses of state power. "The order of the day," they wrote in their general statutes, "is to put an end to the machinations of the purveyors of injustice, to control them without dominating them."[1] The Illuminati—along with Freemasonry and other secret societies—were outlawed through edict, by the Bavarian ruler, Charles Theodore, with the encouragement of the Roman Catholic Church, in 1784, 1785, 1787 and 1790.[2] In the several years following, the group was vilified by conservative and religious critics who claimed that they continued underground and were responsible for the French Revolution.

Origins

The Owl of Minerva perched on a book was an emblem used by the Bavarian Illuminati in their "Minerval" degree.
Adam Weishaupt (1748–1830) was a professor of Canon Law and practical philosophy at the University of Ingolstadt. He was the only non-clerical professor at an institution run by Jesuits, whose order had been dissolved in 1773. The Jesuits of Ingolstadt, however, still retained the purse strings and some power at the University, which they continued to regard as their own. Constant attempts were made to frustrate and discredit non-clerical staff, especially when course material contained anything they regarded as liberal or Protestant. Weishaupt became deeply anti-clerical, resolving to spread the ideals of the Enlightenment (Aufklärung) through some sort of secret society of like-minded individuals.[5]

Finding Freemasonry to be expensive, and not open to his ideas, he founded his own society which was to have a gradal system based on Freemasonry, but his own agenda.[5] His original name for the new order was Bund der Perfektibilisten, or Covenant of Perfectibility (Perfectibilists), later changing it because it sounded too strange.[6] On 1 May 1776 Weishaupt and four students formed the Perfectibilists, taking the Owl of Minerva as their symbol.[7][8] The members were to use aliases within the society. Weishaupt became Spartacus. Law students Massenhausen, Bauhof, Merz and Sutor became respectively Ajax, Agathon, Tiberius and Erasmus Roterodamus. Weishaupt later expelled Sutor for indolence.[9][10] It was not until April 1778 that the order became the Illuminatenorden, or Order of Illuminati, after Weishaupt had seriously contemplated the Bee order.

Many other masons found Knigge's description of the new masonic order attractive, and were enrolled in the Minerval grade of the Illuminati.

Knigge appeared at this time to believe in the "Most Serene Superiors" ***which Weishaupt claimed to serve.****

Most Serene Superiors? who are they these Jesuits? ?LH
 
Last edited:
Top