People are so gullible, they will believe almost anything. Will it be sufficient for propaganda effect, to post some pictures of fake bombs, or maybe even carpet bomb a real city? That's the claim for Hiroshima, but I don't think the Japanese were so gullible back then.
Actually it's not only
Anders Björkman, who claims that atomic bombs are fake, but also this Japanese author:

Here is its review on Amazon:
https://www.amazon.com/Death-Object-Exploding-Nuclear-Weapons/dp/1545516839/ref=cm_cr_arp_d_product_top?ie=UTF8
Akio Nakatani is a Professor of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. His research interests include Stochastic Systems, Parameter Estimation, Stochastic Optimization, Monte Carlo Methods and Simulation, Neural Networks, Statistical Pattern Recognition, Statistical Image Analysis, Time Series, Graphical Models, Nonparametric Bayes and Bayesian Hierarchical Models.
PRODUCT INFO – Death Object
Trickery is the way of war - thus has it always been. But the nuclear trick is the biggest, boldest and baddest-ass scam in all of mankind’s ancient and eternal quest for power and profit through mass slaughter.
DEATH OBJECT takes you behind the curtain and reveals the empty sound stage. The science, the history, the misery, the mystery – the full hoax is covered.
The DOD and the security agencies all have amply-paid COINTELPRO media staff devoted to jackbooting publications that get the masses a little too ‘interested” for their own good. They’ll be on here trashing and thrashing this book within an inch of its life. Don’t fall for that. You may have to duck, but you don’t have to let them cover you with manure.
DEATH OBJECT packs more evidential meat into a couple hundred tightly reasoned pages than any existing nuclear hoax website, conspiracy forum, blog series or YouTube video. Every element of the atomic bomb scam, the founding myth of the technological age, is tied to every other, coalescing into an unanswerable exposé.
Here are some readers' reviews:
I was merely expecting a book with eye-witness testimony from Japanese that contradicted the official story that nukes are real. The book includes that, but so much more. The book did numerous scientific analysis of the various first nuke tests and actual alleged nuke explosions in Japan. Any engineer who is familiar with the engineering design to test to deployment cycle from experience will at the very least, suspect something is very fishy with the reality of nukes ever existing.
I have no doubt that attempts to create nukes occurred. But at some point late in WWII, it was determined that a chain reaction fast enough to make an actual nuke explosion was not possible. But to end the war, the psy op of nukes was still used. The book's scope was mainly limited to the first nukes and first hydrogen bombs, so it does not speculate beyond why Japan would go also with the nuke charade. Japan found the charade to be an adequate excuse to surrender to the USA (to save face among their own proud people), even though apparently the real reason they surrendered was due to the Soviet Union declaration of war against Japan after the alleged nuking. The implications of this book are far beyond what I can imagine, and thus make this a must read for anyone willing to go beyond standard storytelling on the matter.
This is the first book about the Nuclear Hoax that I know of. So the five stars are first of all for the author, who dares to write such a book in these times, where political correctness is key to success. For someone who never informed himself about the topic I still recommend to watch the coresponding videos on youtube, just to make clear that we are talking about official footage. I also recommend the analysis of Miles Mathis concerning Trinity and the Bikini Atoll tests. The official site has already reacted by a new campaign called "Denying history" , but as always they can't defend the illogicality and the contradiction against simple physics, but emphasize on the problem to keep such a conspiracy a secret.
This is a good book. Prof. Akio Nakatani has carefully checked the 1942/5 American war time scientific research and industrial developments to produce three nuclear terror bombs and concludes that (1) military explosive fission producing in nano-seconds a FLASH and radiation vaporizing any observer in the vicinity and making the ground inhabitable for 500 years doesn't work and is propaganda any time, (2) that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were destroyed spring 1945 by standard napalm carpet bombings, and (3) that the the whole show of American a-bombs destroying Hiroshima and Nagasaki late summer August 1945 was pure propaganda to scare the shit out of normal people. The towns were already destroyed, which was kept secret by Japanese and American censorship.
It is very common for people to think that just because there was radiation, therefore a nuclear explosion occurred, either by fission or fusion.
If they wanted to fake the whole thing they could very well have used dirty bombs with radioactive material that just gets spread throughout the area to generate the false evidence of a nuclear blast. Just playing the devil's advocate here.
Nuclear weapons hoax argument was very hard for me to get my head around. I finally decided that there wasn't one piece of legitimate evidence that "I" could verify that proved that nuclear weapons exist.
Literally everything that has been put forward as evidence for nukes being real is producible through conventional explosives/ incendiaries, trick photography, or just good old fashioned State sponsored lies.
Craters can be caused by conventional explosives as well. On the other hand, every piece of relevant evidence that i could verify is completely consistent with nukes being a hoax.
Why on Earth would the US drop poisonous nuclear bombs on tens of thousands of defenceless women and children when conventional weapons would've done the job just as well?
How could the Japanese immediately repopulate an irradiated city?
Why do the pictures of destroyed Nagasaki and Hiroshima look just like the pictures of destroyed Tokyo?
Why is there no crater, or even a bald spot directly under what we are told was a fifteen kiloton explosion?
Why was there never any outcry about the violation of 1925 Geneva Convention laws against the use of poisonous weapons?
Why were nukes never used in the Korean or Vietnam wars?
Why didn't the Russians use them during their war in Afghanistan?
Isn't it convenient that the bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki only after the Germans, Italians, and Japanese were soundly defeated, and in no position to dispute the story?
What better deception could you imagine to fleece and terrorize the masses into submission to the godlike power of the State?
Robert Oppenheimer, Niels Bohr & Co no doubt assisted developing the a-bomb 1942/5 at Los Alamos in the USA but they failed completely. Explosive fission didn’t work and exist. So somebody decided to fake it. It was easy. Everything was secret and censorship ensured that the public didn’t know anything. The Japanese were very happy to play along just to stop WW2 by unconditional surrender 9/45.
But the unfortunate result was that particular interests maintained that a-bombs were real. Luckily there was Manne Siegbahn, Swedish Nobel prize winner physics who was asked by the Swedish government to build a Swedish a-bomb 1945.
Manne agreed subject to all being peer reviewed and official. No chance. Rockefeller gave Manne $1M to shut up.
But a fake a-bomb would be useless unless the enemy also could use it. So Stalin suddenly built his fake a-bomb that exploded 1949. But how? Aha – Stalin used uranium provided by Wismut AG, Germany, a company created and owned 100% by Stalin 1945. A friend of mine worked for Wismut AG and found that the whole company was a hoax. Wismut AG never produced any Uranium at all. My German friend had later been arrested by KGB and tortured by Stasi and with luck excaped to the West.
I purchased the book fearing that it would be the typical conspiracy theory nutcase job, but I was so wrong.
This book is well written and although short (about 210 pages) is full of insightful points that makes you question the unquestionable.
The only shortcoming from the book is that the author sometimes tries to make use of humour and/or clever remarks that makes hard to understand his train of thought. Nevertheless a very welcomed work to my library. I also wished the author (a professor of applied mathematician and statistics) had published his numerical / statistical model(s) of fission which he says is proof that nukes (both gun-type uranium little-boy as well as plutonium implosion fat-man) are a hoax, but he couldnt out of fear of being prosecuted or worse.