Richard Stanley
Well-Known Member
Randy as in 'randy' -- Mmm ... Holy sexual intercourse? Randy as in Ayn 'Rand'y?
I never said anything about central banking (which indeed is privately owned by the private member banks - under the deceptive aegis of government fiat). I stated the 6 largest American banks, for which all I know are majority foreign owned, except for ousia's shares. Which, BTW, Jerry do you know how much of the American economy is controlled by those banks?
But yes, all of that is fascist - by definition given such as the bailout loans.
I wonder what ousia's position is on the Supreme Court ruling that corporations are essentially 'super' humans? Maybe this is what what Mitt Romney was really referring to when he said that "corporations were really human beings, after all." Mitt Romney, the "vulture capitalist", according to Newt Gingrich, who likes to buy otherwise profitable companies, break them up into their constituent assets and then sell them off, with the poor socialist thieves (the displaced workers) having to steal even more from ousia. Where did the Robber Barons fit into this picture?
With ousia's 'no rules of the road' (except his gun I guess) COMPLETE SEPERATION [sic] schema the whole arguments about so-called freetrade agreements are moot. Or maybe with us all not paying any taxes anymore, there will be no more international trade, because of PIRATES (thanks Flying Spaghetti Monster), no FAA, and such? Then the factories must back?
Better off that we return to our old familial professions, no not engineers, but warlords. If we don't do it someone else will. As such ousia is clearly squatting on my lands and not paying his rent tithes.
Because ousia, like us before, has been laser focused on that he is being constantly scalped by his fellow envious victims, he has latched on to a dystopian scheme where there is a society of nothingness, but his Rational Shellfish Interest. Like with the saying about LA, "there is no there there." It's not that I don't agree that rational shellfish are certainly better than irrational shellfish, but he wants to throw the shellfish hammer (the one used to break the claws open) out, just because he has been sold that such tools (government and any of their programs) must necessarily be run by the glutenous crooks. But why is that so?
I really think what is happening here is that the real goal with all the economic disruptions, and cultural degradation, is a planned desire and program to pit people against each other, while the next phase of globalization is established. 50,000 + American factories are relocated offshore and ousia is convinced that the now unemployed workers (and us) are the cause of the problem, because the Koch brothers have convinced him this must be the case. Their radical Catholic fealty more to Rome's (Ok, Venice, London et al.) global victory than Libertarianism.
Funny, I was just reading in The Evolution of God again where Wright discusses all the kvetching about moral degradations of the pure Judaic society by the Hellenizing (globalist) camp. Then the New Age arrived. Point being, if no one is programmatically poking sticks in your society, economically, culturally, or whatever, then its much harder to roll out and ultimately gain acceptance the new paradigm. America was built upon OT justification of genocidal land Conquest and now the author of a book that explains how the Romans neutered the original Zealots is apparently in the same camp as this New Age Zealot. And so now the Zealot, in his obvious rage against the mis-perceived enemies of his warped cosmoview he must attack the wolfish messengers, all because they think there are better alternatives that deviate from the unassailable Logos revealed to him by some other shellfish.
There's a distinction I'd make, that "Wildly Out of Control, Neo Fascist Capitalism" (which is, IMO, what we are facing today) is different from "unrestrained capitalism." A big part of the success of Central Banking is the artificial constraints placed on their natural competitor, commodity based money and banking. And giant corporations in general couldn't be what they are today, without suppression of small business.
I never said anything about central banking (which indeed is privately owned by the private member banks - under the deceptive aegis of government fiat). I stated the 6 largest American banks, for which all I know are majority foreign owned, except for ousia's shares. Which, BTW, Jerry do you know how much of the American economy is controlled by those banks?
But yes, all of that is fascist - by definition given such as the bailout loans.
I wonder what ousia's position is on the Supreme Court ruling that corporations are essentially 'super' humans? Maybe this is what what Mitt Romney was really referring to when he said that "corporations were really human beings, after all." Mitt Romney, the "vulture capitalist", according to Newt Gingrich, who likes to buy otherwise profitable companies, break them up into their constituent assets and then sell them off, with the poor socialist thieves (the displaced workers) having to steal even more from ousia. Where did the Robber Barons fit into this picture?
With ousia's 'no rules of the road' (except his gun I guess) COMPLETE SEPERATION [sic] schema the whole arguments about so-called freetrade agreements are moot. Or maybe with us all not paying any taxes anymore, there will be no more international trade, because of PIRATES (thanks Flying Spaghetti Monster), no FAA, and such? Then the factories must back?
Better off that we return to our old familial professions, no not engineers, but warlords. If we don't do it someone else will. As such ousia is clearly squatting on my lands and not paying his rent tithes.
Because ousia, like us before, has been laser focused on that he is being constantly scalped by his fellow envious victims, he has latched on to a dystopian scheme where there is a society of nothingness, but his Rational Shellfish Interest. Like with the saying about LA, "there is no there there." It's not that I don't agree that rational shellfish are certainly better than irrational shellfish, but he wants to throw the shellfish hammer (the one used to break the claws open) out, just because he has been sold that such tools (government and any of their programs) must necessarily be run by the glutenous crooks. But why is that so?
I really think what is happening here is that the real goal with all the economic disruptions, and cultural degradation, is a planned desire and program to pit people against each other, while the next phase of globalization is established. 50,000 + American factories are relocated offshore and ousia is convinced that the now unemployed workers (and us) are the cause of the problem, because the Koch brothers have convinced him this must be the case. Their radical Catholic fealty more to Rome's (Ok, Venice, London et al.) global victory than Libertarianism.
Funny, I was just reading in The Evolution of God again where Wright discusses all the kvetching about moral degradations of the pure Judaic society by the Hellenizing (globalist) camp. Then the New Age arrived. Point being, if no one is programmatically poking sticks in your society, economically, culturally, or whatever, then its much harder to roll out and ultimately gain acceptance the new paradigm. America was built upon OT justification of genocidal land Conquest and now the author of a book that explains how the Romans neutered the original Zealots is apparently in the same camp as this New Age Zealot. And so now the Zealot, in his obvious rage against the mis-perceived enemies of his warped cosmoview he must attack the wolfish messengers, all because they think there are better alternatives that deviate from the unassailable Logos revealed to him by some other shellfish.