On Chomsky and human personality differences.
But now you're getting to the whole point at issue.
E.g. the Laws of Hammurabi, Egyptian rituals and constructions to guide the people's "collective mind" and solidarity.
When Columbus sailed from Spain he was hoping to reach China, so when he discovered America he tried to pretend that it was part of China and Cuba was part of the mainland. He was thinking on the run, eventually realizing that he could make a fortune from slavery in these newly discovered lands - except that the natives were dying of European diseases.
We like to think of Cuba as this egalitarian socialist land under Castro - peasant-poor but free of internet pornography.
Columbus however said that Cuba was inhabited, in part, by a mysterious people called either Caribs or Canibs - from the former we get Caribbean, from the latter, Cannibal! His early journals describe the people of the Bahamas as having human-inflicted wounds but lacking weapons for fighting! He also describes one West Indian island, Montserrat as being inhabited only by women and children, while Hispaniola, where he made his base, was apparently infiltrated by Carib spies. While people have tried to say that he made up these stories to justify slavery, the evidence yet points to the Carib tribe in Cuba being the most male chauvinist in history - the men learning to coordinate their activities to wipe out the men of neighboring tribes and turning their women into sex-slaves, castrating any doubtful male children early in life and turning them ultimately into food!
This activity clearly relied on substantial canoes that could travel from island to island - though with Columbus' arrival and the spread of disease the Carib system quickly broke up, so we have little evidence on the nature of these craft and the original Carib tribal structure.
My point is: human differences are extreme because the human potential is extreme, for Good and for Evil (if I may be permitted that religious imagery) cultural differences being maintained, habituated and utilized not only for justifying slavery but cannibalism and imprisoned prostitutes too. Geoffrey Epstein's sex-island is merely a later timid imitation of the Carib system, showing that Human Nature is not some fixed but some all-too-differentiable entity that needs to be trained and to learn to train itself. I.e. not be like Marcuse, Wilhelm Reich and the cultural Marxists to be encouraged to wallow in sexual debauchery like the flower-children at Woodstock!
Hitler trained Germans to be warriors - and got 'em all slaughtered. Chomsky and the cultural Marxists train Westerners to be, respectively, learned academic babblers and sex-obsessed halfwits ("porno-male and single-Mom" as Joe says) forever seeking relief in Jesus, sex, drugs and gambling since they are incapable of grasping the bigger picture; in this way they are now wasting two generations in a debauchery-mediated genocide!
Westerners believe that Human Nature is fixed (Conservatives like Richard Dawkins with his Selfish Genes) or absolutely malleable (Marxism) so they cling to democracy among large masses of people as the political solution to our difficulties, without appreciating that personality (character) difference between people is an emergent property of life itself and is essentially neither genetically based nor fully attributable to one's life experiences.
Democracy at large can only provide simple answers: complexity requires specialization. The control of complexity requires hierarchy - thus the search for people of proper character to run the hierarchy, a situation rendered impossible by the Cultural Marxist Clown College - along with Chomsky's failure to indict it or even recognize it - that rules Western social discourse today!
Yours faithfully
Claude
Hopefully we won't have to because his supporters will wake up feeling utterly embarrassed - and abandon him.Having scanned through this very quickly, I'm not seeing any basis for bringing the jackbooted thugs out for a raid on Chomsky's office.
Indeed they are - so why confuse them here as if we were just "common vernaculars"?No, by anti-Semitism here I mean precisely anti-Judaism. We have commented elsewhere on this site, about the lack of precision of the terminology. But in common vernacular, anti-Judaism and anti-Semitism are the same thing.
Can you not draw the analogy though? Do I really have to spell it out? EMJ is a devout Catholic, I am not, you are not, Joe is not! The answer is on post #74 of Fixing Democracy!But Hitler didn't say "Zionist Anglo American". He said "Jew" and that's what he meant. EMJ didn't say "Z-A-A", he said "Jew" in the passage you quoted. And in that same passage, he exonerated Christianity. But in fact, Christianity and Judaism were designed together, as part of the same mind control system.
But now you're getting to the whole point at issue.
Yes, it sounds a strange idea - but the human diversity of character (= personality) is extreme, not something that can be contained by superficial dialogue - as at an ordinary political democratic meeting - or a "feeling of human brotherhood". It can be managed in small groups - as you see from sortition above - but it cannot work without face-to-face interaction since human extremes, what is commonly limited by the term "Human Nature" is extreme in its variation, hence the creation of laws when tribal societies break down into something more complex.What a strange idea, to believe that democracy denies the diversity of human character and personality. That because there is diversity, therefore we must resort to a fascist dictatorship, and place all power in one allegedly supreme human being.
E.g. the Laws of Hammurabi, Egyptian rituals and constructions to guide the people's "collective mind" and solidarity.
Really? I admire the insight in the quotation, not so the otherwise rabid racist who wrote it. What Hitler has done is drawn the ultimate implication of human difference - but let me give you another example, from Cuba.You aren't helping your cause here, by admiringly quoting Adolf Hitler.
When Columbus sailed from Spain he was hoping to reach China, so when he discovered America he tried to pretend that it was part of China and Cuba was part of the mainland. He was thinking on the run, eventually realizing that he could make a fortune from slavery in these newly discovered lands - except that the natives were dying of European diseases.
We like to think of Cuba as this egalitarian socialist land under Castro - peasant-poor but free of internet pornography.
Columbus however said that Cuba was inhabited, in part, by a mysterious people called either Caribs or Canibs - from the former we get Caribbean, from the latter, Cannibal! His early journals describe the people of the Bahamas as having human-inflicted wounds but lacking weapons for fighting! He also describes one West Indian island, Montserrat as being inhabited only by women and children, while Hispaniola, where he made his base, was apparently infiltrated by Carib spies. While people have tried to say that he made up these stories to justify slavery, the evidence yet points to the Carib tribe in Cuba being the most male chauvinist in history - the men learning to coordinate their activities to wipe out the men of neighboring tribes and turning their women into sex-slaves, castrating any doubtful male children early in life and turning them ultimately into food!
This activity clearly relied on substantial canoes that could travel from island to island - though with Columbus' arrival and the spread of disease the Carib system quickly broke up, so we have little evidence on the nature of these craft and the original Carib tribal structure.
My point is: human differences are extreme because the human potential is extreme, for Good and for Evil (if I may be permitted that religious imagery) cultural differences being maintained, habituated and utilized not only for justifying slavery but cannibalism and imprisoned prostitutes too. Geoffrey Epstein's sex-island is merely a later timid imitation of the Carib system, showing that Human Nature is not some fixed but some all-too-differentiable entity that needs to be trained and to learn to train itself. I.e. not be like Marcuse, Wilhelm Reich and the cultural Marxists to be encouraged to wallow in sexual debauchery like the flower-children at Woodstock!
Hitler trained Germans to be warriors - and got 'em all slaughtered. Chomsky and the cultural Marxists train Westerners to be, respectively, learned academic babblers and sex-obsessed halfwits ("porno-male and single-Mom" as Joe says) forever seeking relief in Jesus, sex, drugs and gambling since they are incapable of grasping the bigger picture; in this way they are now wasting two generations in a debauchery-mediated genocide!
Westerners believe that Human Nature is fixed (Conservatives like Richard Dawkins with his Selfish Genes) or absolutely malleable (Marxism) so they cling to democracy among large masses of people as the political solution to our difficulties, without appreciating that personality (character) difference between people is an emergent property of life itself and is essentially neither genetically based nor fully attributable to one's life experiences.
Democracy at large can only provide simple answers: complexity requires specialization. The control of complexity requires hierarchy - thus the search for people of proper character to run the hierarchy, a situation rendered impossible by the Cultural Marxist Clown College - along with Chomsky's failure to indict it or even recognize it - that rules Western social discourse today!
Yours faithfully
Claude
Last edited: