Postlavians Beating a Dead Fuhrerprinzep

Erc

Member
So if you were being consistent here, you would want to protect the rights of Israel (as a racialist ethno-nation)?

Erc: yup totally agree

Again I ask, what about the right to live in a cosmopolitan, diverse society?

Erc: the natrual right of free association works both ways, the right of a people to not want cosmopolitanism in the nation: https://www.timesofisrael.com/knesset-votes-contentious-jewish-nation-state-bill-into-law/

On the one hand I don't support the promotion of transsexualism and homosexuality by billionaire or government mass media or institutions. On the other hand, it's important to respect and protect the rights of transsexual or homosexual individuals. Do you agree?

Erc: thumbs up
 

Erc

Member
Sorry, but I've already explained the issue I have with this. I have concerns about the author's religious bias, I'm willing to give it a "pass" on my earlier charge of anti-Semitism, but mainly I'm concerned that the author makes one assertion after another, with never any sources or justification.
Sorry, I won't prostrate myself as a slave to a jewish effeminate son, who claims to be global messianic monarch, of a mythical he-she "god" (1) (!!) whether dead or alive (aka judaeo-masonic-christian worship) nor honor it or it's mythical son on his so called "second coming" as they are not of my ancestor's ...

... like I said, it is anti-Supernal Spirit, anti-Brahma (ie. A-braham), anti-Amen, anti-Christ and gay nihilistic misogynist anti-Isis/Sophia, ... I don't bow nor "worship" (ie. in the judaeo-masonic-chr-islam, ie. A-brahmic sense of prostration as a slave/borg/serf), nor honor a he-she "god" nor it's fictitious mythical effeminate son (http://www.nazarethmyth.info/).

also we all know what the transmogrifying "god" is really all about... oligarchic usury communist monarchy (2) (ie transfer of all wealth and property into oligarchical hands (3) ) : https://psalmistice.com/2017/03/13/the-lawd-of-doubles/ https://psalmistice.com/2018/07/04/italian-professors-confirm-outright-false-accounting-and-double-nature-of-bank-money/

(1) (https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/13/opinion/is-god-transgender.html?_r=0 https://sacred-texts.com/mas/sof/sof26.htm)
(2) communist oligarchical usury political-economy/monarchy: https://www.abbevilleinstitute.org/blog/poison-under-the-wings/)
(3) "Canadian politicians in the loop of “COVID planning” have been told to their horror of a plan for a totalitarian response to an international economic collapse, involving a federal government offer to eliminate all personal debts (mortgages, loans, credit cards, etc) funded by the IMF (an extranational usury oligarchy) under “the World Debt Reset program”. In exchange the individual would forfeit ownership of any and all property and assets forever,"
https://cairnsnews.org/2020/10/16/canadian-politician-leaks-new-covid-lockdown-plan-and-great-reset-dictatorship-australia-is-part-of-it/

PS: per the not so holy book, usury is considered total warfare by other means!! Whether all property is held by a global "Messianic/Mahdi" monarch whom the A-Brahmic judeao-masonic-chr-islam's call "Lord" (2962 kýrios – properly, a person exercising absolute ownership rights; lord (Lord) [In the papyri, 2962 (kýrios) likewise denotes an owner (master) exercising full rights.] https://biblehub.com/greek/2962.htm) ; or whether all property is held in common by all as in the former USSR, it's still oligarchy (aka "the inner party", see Orwell) communism either way, ... as the individual nor his nation will have right to any property and the individual and his nation would be slaves/borgs/serfs as humaton's for the usury oligarchy rendering life of any meaning.

"The insidious programming of the A-brahmic usury matrix of the transmogrifying he-she "god"suppresses racial identity and seeks to pasteurize all peoples into a raceless, rootless mass of homogenous humatons. The reality of divine oneness is falsely invoked to legitimize this dehumanization, with the cant that if All are One we should live together in peace and brotherhood forever. The truth is that there is no contradiction between the oneness of Supernal Spirit, which underlies all creation, and the infinite variety of separate forms and beings which it spawns. In fact if all went back to unity, it would be the end of the cosmos.

Spiritual enlightenment awakens an individual to the love of God for all beings, called Caritas. We have also awakened to the reality of racial identity; from this arises another kind of love, the deep primordial philos that binds together a family, clan, or tribe. Again there is no contradiction: enlightened white individuals have philial feelings exclusively for their racial kindred, and this does not diminish their Caritas for all humanity. Awareness of the overarching unity gives us the wisdom to draw the line of separation exactly where it’s needed. Dharma requires strong boundaries on every front..." J. Rex K.

this jive don’t fly buddy :: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/23629443-when-a-jew-rules-the-world
 
Last edited:

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
Sorry, I won't prostrate myself as a slave to a jewish effeminate son....
Me neither :)

... like I said, it is anti-Supernal Spirit, anti-Brahma (ie. A-braham), anti-Amen, anti-Christ and gay nihilistic misogynist anti-Isis/Sophia, I don't bow nor "worship"...
I am curious if you bow or worship Brahma, Isis, and/or Sophia?

Whether all property is held by a global "Messianic/Mahdi" monarch ... or whether all property is held in common by all as in the former USSR, it's still oligarchy (aka "the inner party", see Orwell) communism either way,
Agreed! Communism wraps around in its extreme form to become identical to monarchy.

J. Rex K.
Found it! J. Rex K = Joseph Rex Kerrick; the quote is from:

https://arieskindred.wordpress.com/2015/03/27/dharma-5-white-spirit/

Dharma requires strong boundaries on every front...
... and legitimate conflicts of interest between peoples must sometimes be dealt with by means of war.

Here's where I disagree most strongly with J. Rex K. Of course he's correct that if you organize human society into race nations bound together only by "Caritas" which is weaker than "philos", and each race nation seeks to grow its population and economy, eventually the nations must compete for land and resources. With no basis to resolve these "legitimate" conflicts, the result is the debacle of war.
 

Erc

Member
Me neither :)



(A) I am curious if you bow or worship Brahma, Isis, and/or Sophia?



(B) Agreed! Communism wraps around in its extreme form to become identical to monarchy.



Found it! J. Rex K = Joseph Rex Kerrick; the quote is from:

https://arieskindred.wordpress.com/2015/03/27/dharma-5-white-spirit/

Did you report him to Mossad? o_O

(C) ... and legitimate conflicts of interest between peoples must sometimes be dealt with by means of war.

Here's where I disagree most strongly with J. Rex K. Of course he's correct that if you organize human society into race nations bound together only by "Caritas" which is weaker than "philos", and each race nation seeks to grow its population and economy, eventually the nations must compete for land and resources. With no basis to resolve these "legitimate" conflicts, the result is the debacle of war.
Funny, no comment on this from your kin Joel: this jive don’t fly buddy :: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/23629443-when-a-jew-rules-the-world ? ... is this global messianic jew ruler gonna be a transsexual transgender monarch after the "god" they worship? (5)... as you say you think the "conspiracy" originated in Egypt, probably did as two factions, the Shasu of Yhw/ Hyksos (ps: the Trojan's were also at Kadesh, ... Make note: "By the 14th century BC, before the cult of Yahweh had reached Israel, groups of Edomites and Midianites worshipped Yhw(h) (aka Yahweh) as their god."[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shasu and clearly "YHWH the transgender he-she god of the Midianites WAS NOT the national deity of "historic" "Israel" contra the modern state of same name!) with no legitimate Egyptian Blood Queen to rule Egypt, and Egyptian Blood King's (ie. the "firstborn" of the nation) were only granted sovereignty of rule by an Egyptian Blood Queen, no Egyptian Blood Queen, no right to rule, therefore no foreigner blood King (messianic or otherwise!). See also the metaphorical European Arthurian Vulgate Cycle on kin(g)ship and nation ...

(A) are metaphorical descriptions concepts about reality : Supernal Spirit-Brahma-Krist is Quantum Epiontic Consciousness (3) , Sophia-Isis-Mater is the "potential of potentials" of the Void-Plenum of Cosmos (ie. the Schwarze Sonne) (see mother and child, somehow Isis and Horus (4) got transmogrified by someone's into a transgender he-she coming out of Egypt?): "It is time to take the scare quotes away from “worship” and to understand what this means. The word comes from Old English weorþscipe, where weorþ is “worthy” in the sense of “honored” and “esteemed,” and –scipe means basically “state” or “condition of” (corresponding roughly to -ness, or -dom; “-ship” is cognate with German –schaft in words like Gesellschaft, “society,” or Wissenschaft, “knowledge”). Essentially, to worship means to honor. Due to the influence of Judaism and Christianity, however, the word now conjures images of prostrating oneself before the divine, as a slave does before a master. Needless to say, the relationship of the Northmen to the Aesir was fundamentally different. It was, again, the relationship of men to their ancestors, the forebears of their family and tribe." ~ Cleary

(B) So are you a nationalist classical defined? (not as Ben Shapiro's and others Hazony etc define it (who also wants classical nation for the modern state if "Israel" but "propositional" and race and ethno’s destroying mixed "cosmopolitanism" for thee goy https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/11553263-hold-back-this- day ) who redefinition of what a nation is to a "propositional" unnatural Corporatism.
Or are you a trotskyite communist (ie. a global usury corporatist communist monarchist (see Jefferson (2))
which includes the promotion of mass migration into kin-nations (as classical defined) to destroy said kin-nation people's for a communistic "cosmopolitism", ie. to bolster the base of slaves/serfs/borg's for the oligarchical usury ponzi scheme for global wealth and property theft into their hands by fraudulent contract upon bankruptcy by unplayable exponential interest (1)

(C) those that promote oligarchical global usury ponzi communism (not legitimate at all (1)), in all it's facets including the attempted destruction of natural kin-ethno-nations will lead to global total warfare as the kin-ethno-nations will not tolerate subjugation ...

(1) https://psalmistice.com/2018/07/04/italian-professors-confirm-outright-false-accounting-and-double-nature-of-bank-money/
https://ia801202.us.archive.org/31/items/empire_of_the_city/empire_of_the_city.pdf https://www.unz.com/mhudson/debt-deflation-and-the-neofeudal-empire/ https://cairnsnews.org/2020/10/16/canadian-politician-leaks-new-covid-lockdown-plan-and-great-reset-dictatorship-australia-is-part-of-it/ and due note the seal of "Solomon" on the so called modern state of "Israel" flag (the Hasmonean's were Levites who conquered the Edomites in Judea, they, the Levites are not Israel by there own law (see Genesis 48, Gen. 48:19, 20, Jer. 31:9) nor even Judah who had right of the sceptre not the Levites by their own law (Genesis 49:10) (ps: who really are the Levites?): https://psalmistice.com/2017/03/13/the-lawd-of-doubles/ ? Contra the usurer's beholding to no kin, clan, tribe, nation, not even their own: If the world is going to use political economy, It might as well be MORAL benefitting the kin-nation's with barter between the nation's instead of the immoral oligarchical usurer's extranational thieving scheme:
https://archive.org/details/GottfriedFederTheGermanStateOnANationalAndSocialistFoundation/page/n7/mode/2up http://prosperityuk.com/2000/09/thomas-edison-on-government-created-debt-free-money/ What is "political economy" (ie. socialism and extranational usury communism): https://www.cobdencentre.org/2011/10/the-second-crisis-of-socialism/comment-page-1/

(2) https://www.abbevilleinstitute.org/blog/poison-under-the-wings/

(3) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277749264 better: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/28120484-cosmic-dna-at-the-origin https://web.archive.org/web/20100214114623/http://www.quodlibet.net/articles/moore-origen.shtml https://www.academia.edu/3637888/_Origens_Doctrine_of_Pre_Existence_and_the_Opening_Chapters_of_Genesis_Zeitschrift_für_Antikes_Christentum_16_2013_516_549

(4) http://www.simchajtv.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/IsisHorusMaryJesus.jpg

(5) https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/13/opinion/is-god-transgender.html?_r=0 https://psalmistice.com/2017/07/17/cheating-females-milk-and-honey-were-their-lies/ https://psalmistice.com/2019/01/07/banks-usury-and-doublethink-in-the-roman-empire-part-1/

826
 
Last edited:

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
this jive don’t fly buddy :
This comment is an example of what I mean by "the chip on your shoulder". Who are you calling "buddy" and where did anyone say anything about whether the "jive" would fly or not?

Funny, no comment on this from your kin Joel:
Why would you call Joel "my kin"? He seems to be a fundamentalist Christian.

It's hard to keep up with the large number of links you post. If I followed every link and studied it, I wouldn't have time to do anything else during my day.

So are you a nationalist classical defined? ...
Or are you a trotskyite communist
Why does it have to be one or the other?
 

Erc

Member
Erc: “So are you a nationalist classical defined? ...
Or are you a trotskyite communist” (ie global totalitarian corporatism communism run by Joel’s hero’s)

Jerry: Why does it have to be one or the other?
I’m sure you are most likely both ... the dichotomy is only for those being “crooked” (the global totalitarian messiah/mahdi monarch is good) and “flailed” (“Islam is evil terror for Christians and visa versa”, another of Joel’s well paid propaganda works, despite the fact that Islam is anti-Usury as was historic Christianity prior to Calvin!!) into “Tikkun Olum” ...
 

Erc

Member
Hi Erc,

Erc said:
I’m sure you are most likely both ...

What did I say to make you think that? I would say I'm neither one...
Well you support a modern ethno-nation (classically defined mind you!) state, so called "Israel" for your ethno's, and you want "cosmopolitanism" for all others! (aka communism, ie. no right to property, not even the property of your own ancestral being "for thee" (ie. want us to be raceless, rootless mass of homogenous humaton borg's, serfs, ie. cattle, ... "but not for me and mine") ... Indeed, what is that symbol on the flag of the ethno-nation state, to quote you: "Zionist Jewish nationalism, ... so it is perhaps understandable why they want to build a power base" (1) https://psalmistice.com/2017/03/13/the-lawd-of-doubles/ ? also see: https://psalmistice.com/2018/07/04/italian-professors-confirm-outright-false-accounting-and-double-nature-of-bank-money/ https://psalmistice.com/2017/07/07/cheating-females-the-production-of-inequality-by-illusions-of-equality/ ... wow that "trans"-mogrifying "god" is quite profitable for those globalist thieves: http://prosperityuk.com/2000/09/thomas-edison-on-government-created-debt-free-money/ ...

.... contra the wishes of, and the ancestral natural right of association or not to associate (forced assocation or by coercive assimilation by other mean's is warfare and ethnocide genocide (ie, genetic destruction and or replacement!!) of any other ethno's to refuse said "cosmopolitanism" (aka ethno-nation destroying communism, see above!) for the rest of the world!!

You never denied this postion for you and your ethno's nation and state in the middle east: https://www.timesofisrael.com/final-text-of-jewish-nation-state-bill-set-to-become-law/

go figure where the conspiracy lies ...

(1) https://postflaviana.org/community/index.php?threads/postlavians-beating-a-dead-fuhrerprinzep.2508/post-17259
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
to quote you:
The way you've done this is a dishonest misquote. What I said inside the ellipses is important. My complete statement was:

I agree it is problematic to support Zionist Jewish nationalism while opposing white nationalism. I don't see it as completely hypocritical, because the Jews are a small minority that have suffered greatly from persecution in the past, so it is perhaps understandable why they want to build a power base. But I would prefer to see them honor their own principles, and stop the cruel, horrific apartheid regime they have established over the Palestinians.
In other words, expressing humanitarian compassion for the Jewish plight, while at the same time maintaining a critical stance towards the implementation of the Zionist state.

Well you support a modern ethno-nation (classically defined mind you!) state, so called "Israel" for your ethno's,
Why do you call them "my ethno's"? Are you assuming that I'm Jewish?

I prefer civic nationalism as opposed to classically defined ethnic or racist nationalism. In the USA, opinion polls show overwhelming support for cosmopolitan integration, and the broadest possible interpretation of the words "all men are created equal". Those words have been very powerful and persuasive over the centuries.

(aka communism, ie. no right to property, not even the property of your own ancestral being "for thee" (ie. want us to be raceless, rootless mass of homogenous humaton borg's, serfs, ie. cattle, ...
Why do you equate communism with civic nationalism? Many individuals don't fall into neat racial categories, do you consider them "humaton borgs"? Is Barack Obama (half black, half white) a serf, borg or cattle?

Why should right to property be determined on the basis of "ancestral being"? By that criteria, my farm in Eugene, Oregon would belong to the Kalapuya.

But as to this:

... contra the wishes of, and the ancestral natural right of association or not to associate (forced assocation or by coercive assimilation by other mean's is warfare and ethnocide genocide (ie, genetic destruction and or replacement!!) of any other ethno's to refuse said "cosmopolitanism" (aka ethno-nation destroying communism, see above!) for the rest of the world!!
Some nations in this world are, as a matter of fact, ethnic nations. Overwhelming majorities of their citizens reject cosmopolitan assimilation. What to do in that case? I do not support war or any other form of coercive assimilation or genocide, to destroy existing ethnic nations.

The USA is not an ethnic nation. White nationalists want to pretend that America belongs to whites only, but in fact it belongs to all its citizens of many races.
 

Erc

Member
The way you've done this is a dishonest misquote. What I said inside the ellipses is important. My complete statement was:

I agree it is problematic to support Zionist Jewish nationalism while opposing white nationalism. I don't see it as completely hypocritical, because the Jews are a small minority that have suffered greatly from persecution in the past, so it is perhaps understandable why they want to build a power base. But I would prefer to see them honor their own principles, and stop the cruel, horrific apartheid regime they have established over the Palestinians.
In other words, expressing humanitarian compassion for the Jewish plight, while at the same time maintaining a critical stance towards the implementation of the Zionist state.



Why do you call them "my ethno's"? Are you assuming that I'm Jewish?

I prefer civic nationalism as opposed to classically defined ethnic or racist nationalism. In the USA, opinion polls show overwhelming support for cosmopolitan integration, and the broadest possible interpretation of the words "all men are created equal". Those words have been very powerful and persuasive over the centuries.



Why do you equate communism with civic nationalism? Many individuals don't fall into neat racial categories, do you consider them "humaton borgs"? Is Barack Obama (half black, half white) a serf, borg or cattle?

Why should right to property be determined on the basis of "ancestral being"? By that criteria, my farm in Eugene, Oregon would belong to the Kalapuya.

But as to this:



Some nations in this world are, as a matter of fact, ethnic nations. Overwhelming majorities of their citizens reject cosmopolitan assimilation. What to do in that case? I do not support war or any other form of coercive assimilation or genocide, to destroy existing ethnic nations.

The USA is not an ethnic nation. White nationalists want to pretend that America belongs to whites only, but in fact it belongs to all its citizens of many races.
“civic nationalism“ is not nationalism! as is not “cosmopolitanism” either, “civic nationalism” is more of the same commie redefining of the term “nationalism‘ and nation to unnatural “corporatism” to meaninglessness and weaponized to destroy natural ethno-nations (which by the Geneva convention’s is promoting genocide)...

...
for example such as the Irish who are a far far smaller minority within their tiny island state, historically persecuted and also enslaved(!!), the Jews were never enslaved by their own admission, John 8:33, but because there “white” European’s, a so called “social construct” (even if that lie (skin color has nothing to do with race/ethnicity!) were true, it would still make them a natural coherent folk for thousands of years who do not want to be destroyed as a racial-ethnic kin-folk family nation!), but they must be destroyed by massive induced migration, ... absolute hypocrisy. Indeed, we could say that Jewishness is a social construct as well and the so called modern state of Israel should also take in massive amounts of migration immigration from the middle east as well, so called “refugee’s”, correct?

Why does the modern jewish ethno-nation state get a pass on “civic nationalism” with their ethno-national (classically defined nationalism state law as linked above, whereby you must pass a genetic test for entry on making Aliyah https://academic.oup.com/jlb/article/2/2/469/826237 )
while they apartheid Palestinians (who are Semites also, I might add), hmm? Plessy v. Ferguson!? Why cannot the several European nations do genetic texting for right of return likewise? Why should the several small ethno-nations of Europe take any migration! They should all go to the absolutely huge continent of Africa!

Why do you assume I’m an USA American? But I will say that the USA was founded as a pan-European confederation, see Naturalization Act of 1790 and Law that was subverted by non-European’s Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 fatally destroying the European American Confederation of several sovereign Republics in N. America into a communistic “democracy” mobocracy for the fraudulent communist usury political economy oligarchy and their daughter extranational corporations needing more cheap labor serf’s!

... are you Anglo-Saxon?
 
Last edited:

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
Hi Erc,

they must be destroyed by massive induced migration,
I have also heard that there are big problems in many parts of Europe because of mass immigration. I'm not sure I fully understand what's inducing all this migration. I know that a major factor is war, colonialist exploitation and climate change making many parts of the world a living hell, creating strong motivation for people to escape from those conditions. I'm not sure what specific factors are making Ireland a destination. More data is welcome!

Why do you assume I’m an USA American?
I didn't mean to make that presumption. I've been writing about the USA because this is where I live.

I will say that the USA was founded as a pan-European confederation, see Naturalization Act of 1790
But by then, the Europeans had already brought in vast numbers of black African slaves. Hispanic Europeans had interbred for many generations with native Americans in greater Mexico, which later became Texas and California. Thus, the reality was that in 1790 this was already not an ethnically pure nation.

... are you Anglo-Saxon?
I'm not sure how I could be. The Anglo-Saxons were vanquished in the Norman conquest. But I have mostly English ancestry.
 

Seeker

Active Member
I'm not sure how I could be. The Anglo-Saxons were vanquished in the Norman conquest. But I have mostly English ancestry.
Speaking as an amateur genealogist, and with no other implications intended, I think that there is a very good chance that you have at least some unrecorded Anglo-Saxon ancestry. Yes, the Anglo-Saxons were defeated in the Norman conquest, but they were not decimated by a long shot (although most certainly some were killed resisting the invasion and defending their lands). Normans and the surviving Anglo-Saxons did assimilate in the following years, decades, and centuries, and so I do not honestly think that I am speculating when I say that you have some distant Anglo-Saxon forebears, that you are completely unaware of now. Although this was an aristocratic marriage, made long before he ever set foot in England, even Norman leader William the Conqueror married a lady descended from the famous Anglo-Saxon King Alfred the Great.
 

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
I think that there is a very good chance that you have at least some unrecorded Anglo-Saxon ancestry.
Yes, this is highly likely. And probably some Norman and Viking, like most all English. As a wee lad I was told I had some Irish ancestry, but I haven't seen any evidence.

Here's a study of genetics in the British Isles. They worked with subjects who had four grandparents born within 80km of each other. (That sure wasn't the case for my grandparents.) They found that Anglo-Saxon genetics are especially predominant in the southeastern part of England.

https://archive.is/pSNUD
Britons still live in Anglo-Saxon tribal kingdoms, Oxford University finds
Britons are still living in the same 'tribes' that they did in the 7th Century, Oxford University has found after an astonishing study into our genetic make-up.
Archaeologists and geneticists were amazed to find that genetically similar individuals inhabit the same areas they did following the Anglo-Saxon invasion, following the fall of the Roman Empire.
In fact, a map showing tribes of Britain in 600AD is almost identical to a new chart showing genetic variability throughout the UK, suggesting that local communities have stayed put for the past 1415 years.
(Follow the link for the map. For some reason I couldn't paste it here.)
 

Seeker

Active Member
As a wee lad I was told I had some Irish ancestry, but I haven't seen any evidence.
(Follow the link for the map. For some reason I couldn't paste it here.)
I know what you mean, my late Father told everybody that he was Irish when I was young, and my Sister and his friends believed him. However, he later admitted to me privately that he didn't know what he was (lol)!
I think I got the map-
831
 
Last edited:

Claude Badley

Registered Guest
Fascist
[Digression to Fascist advocacy moved from coronavirus thread...]

I am curious if you see this as a far-left site? I think of myself as an advocate for a well-regulated capitalist system, with serious antitrust enforcement and a Henry George-style tax on land and raw materials.
You seem far-left compared to Joe. But the USA government and other Western governments cannot and will not well-regulate a "capitalist system". This is because liberalism, liberal democracy, is anti-state and so encourages the elites to rule over government, over state institutions (why do you think Joe has gone on and on about Freemasonry and secret societies?).

Therefore Georgist style taxes on land are essentially impossible under Western regimes, and the philosophical reason for that is Einstein's relativity, peddled and upheld by the liberal elites and which claims that matter, space (meaning 2-D space too!) and time reduce to one thing: stuff - this following the agenda of Bento Spinoza originally. You are advocating for what is impossible in the West - only the Fuehrerprinzip, accepting significant character and thus caste differences between people - this to replace class differences - can solve this aporia. This is why Georgism flounders helplessly without garnering public support.

But your worst imposture is below.
Agreed that they are "pretend Left" and that their caricature of the Frankfurt School "agenda" causes distraction, debasement and destruction. But while pretending to be "Left" they are actually captives of the billionaires.
The pretend Left can believe what they like about the Frankfurt School, but any caricature of the Frankfurt School agenda on their part merely causes distraction! By singling out the pretend Left you are singling out halfwits to blame without understanding or admitting the elite agenda in force in the West!

Your words instead exculpate the Frankfurt School, and its anti-family agenda causing Sex'n'Drugs'n'R&R to debase the young in preparation to destroying them utterly. The pretend Left's caricature of it is incidental, revealing instead the pretend Left's subordinate status, their manipulation and their lack of awareness thereof.

Marcuse said:
(Eros & Civilization p. 90) Historically, the reduction of Eros to procreative-monogamic sexuality (which completes the subjection of the pleasure principle to the reality principle) is consummated only when the individual has become a subject-object of labor in the apparatus of his society; whereas, ontogenetically, the primary suppression of infantile sexuality remains the precondition for this accomplishment. The development of a hierarchical system of social labor not only rationalizes domination but also "contains" the rebellion against domination. At the individual level, the primal revolt is contained within the framework of the normal Oedipus conflict. At the societal level, recurrent rebellions and revolutions have been followed by counterrevolutions and restorations. From the slave revolts in the ancient world to the socialist revolution, the struggle of the oppressed has ended in establishing a new, "better" system of domination; progress has taken place through an improving chain of control.
You completely fail to grasp the implications of Marcuse's hypocrisy. He wants to liberate infantile sexuality to free us from "domination" i.e. from an "authoritarian personality", whether our own or someone else's (the Fuehrer's e.g.).

Liberating infant sexuality in adults old enough to read the book means paedophilia in practice and utter confusion among the 'liberated' masses of people e.g. transgenders, people thinking that they should be the sex opposed to what nature gave them in organs, leading to utter confusion and emphatic government support for such surgical procedures. Worse still it serves to distract, debase and destroy the population, ensuring that the mass of the underclass remain divided and confused until they day they die on the street.

Now you can argue that the particulars of domination are wrong - e.g. Catholic emphasis on sinful masturbation etc. - but the solution to this problem is not, repeat, not the liberation of infantile sexuality, since the issue of wealthy - largely Jewish - financiers (the Frankfurt School being primarily of Jewish origin) is sidelined and forgotten by the idiot liberal middle class, a.k.a. the "Evangelical Christians", the mass of Judaeo-Christians who add their names to this crooked Frankfurt agenda, thinking they are somehow helping the poor to overcome their prejudices.

That you have put your name to denouncing only a caricature of the Frankfurt School agenda, one peddled by the "pretend Left" (?Democrats?), can only suggest to me that you are comfortable with if not supportive of the real Frankfurt School agenda, that of "critical theory", the Cultural Marxist Clown College, whose Marxist core, I might add, derives from Marx & Engels research into human origins, later published by Engels as The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. The teaching there derives from a fatal flaw dealing with humanity's original tribal societies: they presumed that there was an original situation in which there was group marriage, promiscuous &/or indiscriminate sexual liaisons between males & females.

No such tribe of people has ever been found* - the story of group marriage merely arises from Marx & Engels - and many others' - adolescent fantasies.

Yours faithfully
Claude very Badley

*This is also the underlying reason why there was so much conflict over Margaret Mead's Coming of Age in Samoa.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
But the USA government and other Western governments cannot and will not well-regulate a "capitalist system"....
You need only be patient, Claude. The triumph of Postflavian political philosophy is inevitable!! Or if not, I shall go down in flames, but with honor.

Is there some sort of contradiction about being a land tax advocate and a small time landlord? I can't quite put my finger on it...

That you have put your name to denouncing only a caricature of the Frankfurt School agenda, one peddled by the "pretend Left" (?Democrats?), can only suggest to me that you are comfortable with if not supportive of the real Frankfurt School agenda
Thanks for at least acknowledging that the caricature is not identical to the actual teachings of the Frankfurt School. Before replying further, I will call your attention to earlier discussions about Frankfurt School here at the site:

This thread, posts #32 thru about #95.

https://postflaviana.org/community/index.php?threads/drugs-sex-rocknroll-as-weapons-against-us.2545/

https://postflaviana.org/community/index.php?threads/sitting-on-a-cornflake-decoding-typology.5/post-63 (and following)

https://postflaviana.org/community/index.php?threads/postmodern-anthropology.1256/
 
Top