You don't grasp the dead end of the Left, Jerry. Physical reality is built upon hierarchy.
Capitalism itself is based upon hierarchy - with the financiers at the top!
Another ten paragraphs of filibustering obfuscation in answer to a simple question, is exactly what I mean.
BS! All you want to do is equate 'fascism' in the generic sense with philosophical Fascism as the only system that understands that nature is fundamentally disordered such that mankind need fuerhrer-type leadership for the future, leadership that recognizes that hierarchy is fundamental. Your silence on Ezra Pound (and Georges Sorel) is revealing too - because Pound saw what the British elite were really like, greedy, grasping and hypocritical, the perfect soil for Karl Popper and his 'leftist-but-capitalist' Open Society BS. Poor Mussolini was but a flawed human - but in his last incarnation as leader of the Salo Republic, he governed justly, regaining much mass respect by blunting German rule - which is why the Communists strung him up, because he was winning the masses over again (See e.g. Richard Griffiths, Fascism pp. 141-143)!
Liberalism (capitalist philosophy) and the left deny the need for hierarchy and fantasize about democratic rule instead - because they fantasize about an essential human equality that does not exist. Human equality is but a crude approximation, and when applied exclusively destroys all hierarchy and fatally weakens all effective opposition to the financiers.
This is why the Left has proven worse than useless, while capitalist-funded opposition movements (Antifa, BLM etc.) merely bleat 'democracy' to the idiots. What is funded in the West is what does NOT work. This is why E. Michael Jones is such a breath of fresh air. He tackles the Jewish Question openly whereas you wish to deny it by playing sotto voce with Judaeo-Christianity - and Protestant-grounded Zionism* - blaming Roman Catholics instead.
Antifa is propped up by the financial elites because it DENIES the need for hierarchy, fantasizing about communistic local systems of government - just like Noam Chomsky with his village-level rule (his note on the 'most just' village of Membrilla in "The Responsibility of Intellectuals"). Hence the masses are rendered helpless while their Zio leaders have them knock over statues and historical figures, just to annoy the Far Right so that the Far Right focuses on POOR minorities rather than the wealthy minorities. I.e. the 'opposition' is part of the financier-controlled regime hence it cannot ever get to grips with the fundamental economic structure of financial capitalism, because it misunderstands everything (no surprise when the Frankfurt School and Einstein rule).
While you pine away for some imaginary Georgist "far right" savior, the real Fascist in the American White House is cementing his power. A Bible-flaunting Presbyterian Evangelical with a Catholic wife and Jewish son-in-law, surprise surprise.
But this what your Western democracy has led to. Calling it 'flawed democracy' or 'not true democracy' is mere superficiality, as it implies that "genuine true democracy" is what should be aimed for. The deeper issues of natural fundamental disorder and the need for the Fuehrerprinzip to establish effective law court systems are simply denied in favor of a hankering for some sort of "communistic egalitarianism" instead of looking at the land question. George wrote too far back in history for his ideas to have direct influence - and Georgists were deliberately suppressed by capitalism, even more than Communism was, being even more optimistically inclined than Communism, though not as optimistic as Antifa and democrats!
Why is your Fascist savior going to implement the Henry George system? And for that matter, what does Henry George have to do with the "Far Right"?
Because the new ruling regime(s) will understand that the disaffected masses have to be encouraged to work and be assured that there will no longer be a privileged landowning financial elite to cream off the wealth - as there is today (and inflated house prices in rich suburbs are only a minor manifestation of this, since it is ownership-&-control of farmland that will really matter as Henry George also saw). This is why an elective caste system will arise - since wages will be set out explicitly, and everyone (notably the unskilled) find an individual balance between unpleasant work and higher wages versus pleasant work with lower wages (after all, even the Georgists have not explained to themselves why they were sidelined by the powerful and influential once their ideas started to spread).
Clearly, as you would agree, the Far Right has not yet considered the land question -
and that is why we have Antifa, to distract the Far Right from thinking properly, to focus their rage upon poor minorities instead of rich ones.
Answer the questions or I will block you.
Your 'questions' amount to mere demands that I accept democracy as fundamental for mankind and deny hierarchy and fuehrers anchoring a post-capitalist legal system as the correct way to govern large-scale post-tribal human society (the weaker version of this being the 'Mandate of Heaven' Chinese dynastic philosophy). I.e. that I am merely to accept the central but trivial discussion that pines away uselessly about "getting democracy to work". (As for the violence of traditional Fascism, such violence is an essential part of transitions between regimes before the new one is set up. The American Revolution had similar violence, and those countries beset by Western influence, the West trying to overthrow their sovereignty,** have suffered similar crises (e.g. Vietnam); after all, the Left had proved even more lethal than the Right to the masses e.g. Stalin's Holodomor of Ukrainian peasants, something Hitler or Mussolini never did to their own people - which is why the modern Left so idolize scum like Antifa)
After all, post-nuclear war with say 10,000,000 USA survivors, isolated tiny Chomskyesque communities, organized in various democratic and feudal forms, will be all that's left after the US government crumbles - most other countries not much better in this regard, though Southern Hemisphere countries will be less damaged due to the atmospheric circulation of nuclear fallout.
I'd much rather be blocked than have to conform to a
disempowering ideological fantasy world of localism/communism run by "Open Society" Antifa-types who deny the need for hierarchical rule for extended societies - since only the latter is practical, so long as it admits the disorder of nature and the need for the Fuehrerprinzip, people of integrity and self-discipline recognized by others and selected and elected as the type of people most capable to rule and govern a fair legal system NOT based upon financier rule. In contrast this selection and election is by party members, members of the new ruling regime -
it is NOT based on the masses as a whole, (
which I think is the question you wanted me to address and answer!***) as they are too incompetent and too manipulated by Western ideals and by Antifa to make any useful contribution or judgment whatsoever on what humanity or the planet requires,
let alone their own future, which, under capitalism, is to be to die off as part of a perishing childless (thanks to the Frankfurt School) unemployed underclass!
Yours faithfully
Claude
*
Were it not for Protestant prejudices Zionism would not exist. (And to think I even had to explain to you the distinction between Christianity and Judaeo-Christianity using the examples of Outremer and modern Israel) Nowadays the RCs only play along with Zios because the RCs are hoping that with Islam crushed in a big war, its masses will return to Catholic Christianity - as many now-Islamic countries once were (Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Syria etc.)
**Sovereignty of nations has been violated by Jewish influence as W. D. Rubinstein reveals (in
The Left, the Right and the Jews p. 43ff. though he does not use the word 'sovereignty'), replaced with pluralist interests i.e. rich financiers controlling government from behind. That is what constitutional monarchy means - the king is but a figurehead. The Fuehrerprinzip, by re-establishing sovereignty, first in one nation then gradually worldwide, is the key to wresting control from financier rule -
denying this means rendering oneself permanently impotent, and not just politically!
***i.e.
Jerry said:
Please explain why a Fascist strongman at the head of a rentier capitalist elite, would institute Georgist land rent? Wouldn't this be undermining his support base?
He would not, because a "fascist strongman" in our era is one ruled by Western capitalism, ultimately by the USA, so he has no real independence, being but a figurehead, a small-f 'fascist.'
Hence for a fascist actually running a capitalist country e.g. Pinochet in Chile, this 'fascism' is merely the popular description of the present-day situation
under the rule of international financier elites. Chile is in debt to the Western Judaeo-Christian finance system. Hitler and Franco were trying to break from it - Mussolini being inconsistent here, his popularity lost due to the inroads of the Great Depression. So don't confuse Western-backed dictators with authentic Fascistic philosophical thought as found in Ezra Pound! (Yet even Pinochet realized he could not hand over Chile's copper mines to Western control, though a Western democrat-capitalist might readily label Pinochet a fascist-nationalist for having done just that
- but who knows what the Leftist Freemasonic Allende might have done?
) But then you must block me because I will not bow down whatsoever to the Zionist Judaeo-Christian agenda which rules the West - well knowing that the "worthier egalitarian-democrat-type people" you are hoping for on this website will
never arrive because such people, though they once existed (30+ years ago), have by now already been thoroughly polluted by Western ideology or have gone elsewhere, i.e. to political oblivion, or to the Far Right as the letter is the
only option left that is not COMPLETELY subverted by the Zios.
