I have quickly skimmed that article and, yes, Hexane527 has some interesting arguments and overlap with our positions. It appears that we generally agree with the role of the 'Jews', which we label as Sheepdogs (aka Suffering Servants), as opposed to the elite Shepherds. And, I generally agree over the role of the entire Reformation project, with the Tudor creation of the Anglican Church intended to control and mitigate the other sectarians. And, I agree with the colonization parallel to the USA with especially the OT narrative for the semi-historical Conquest of Canaan and the current Israeli project.
Where I depart is the ultimate aim of that project. While there is absolutely racism involved, this is one means of motivation, not the end or goal. As I have discussed, both the OT and the NT (and the Quran) are explicitly Globalist in nature, barely subtext.
As such, Hexane mentioned the possibility of a diminution of white peoples at some recent point as a driver for making a racist push to gain lebensraum. Ironically, I see this as needing different framing .. to better fit with the widest facts. In this regard, I am now seeing most all religious 'apocalyptic' is speaking to semi-periodic catastrophes that happen over long scales of time. See the works of Randall Carlson posted on YouTube for more.
Such wiped out the dinosaurs (except the birds) and it is now know in only the last few decades that the Earth gets hit by fairly large objects on average about every 50 years. So, in this context one might better see the 'project' as yes, racist, yet this as subsidiary to garnering the best seats for surviving the next round of the cosmic shooting gallery.
Hexane should also avail himself of Israeli Shlomo Sand's great book, The Invention of the Jewish People, to bolster his case in that regard.
I think this is generally correct. I think I have stated this before: that shortly after being taught about Uniformitarianism in high school we took a field trip in a bus past a dramatic cut in an escarpment ridge running along the San Andreas Fault. I thought to myself, "no freaking way". The thick layers of sedimentary rocks are all folded back and forth with no cracks anywhere.I tend to think that our rulers understand the ripple-effects of such a catastrophe as Phaeton are far too variable to accurately predict, so they feed us the results of their investigations in limited-hangout form like ice-age hypotheses and climate-change models, not to mention endless spectacle. They keep everyone busy and entertained while they hunker down with plans to keep some technological system intact after whatever happens next. Could those be among the reasons that Allan and Delair themselves are so obscure? One would think the truth is right out there for anyone to see.
If the mother was "clothed with the sun", could this be interpreted as a corona(virus) emanating from her?With the global dawn of the Coronavirus, I have been wondering about how it might fit into the sequence of Revelation. We are about 2 years and 5 months after the cosmic birth of baby Space Jesus on 9/23/2017, so he and mommy are still hiding in the wilderness, so to speak, for almost another year. This from Revelation 12.
I just had another strange thought emanating from that previous one, could what the coronavirus is doing to the population on earth now be the Elite version of the Rapture (culling of humans), sugarcoated with the idea of a heavenly "reward" for those who perish, after hearing the "trumpet of God" (is that a timing indicator)?If the mother was "clothed with the sun", could this be interpreted as a corona(virus) emanating from her?
Ah Yes, 2020 is getting more and more interesting, for those with "eyes to see" (perfect "20/20" vision), as we now have, as I mentioned elsewhere, the "Beast" and the "False Prophet" (Immanuel), and fifty years from now (fifty would make a "Jubilee" Year), would tie in right to your 2070 "prophecy" about the arrival of "Space Jesus", to save or end us all for the Third Millennium/Apocalypse. Meanwhile, continue to "Watch" this year (perhaps tell the mountains and hills to fall and cover you?), so as not to get "Raptured" prematurely by the Woman Clothed With the Sun (Corona), when the "Trump(et)" sounds for you, that would be "Vial"! After all, from "The Fall of the Roman Empire" (released 1964, when the British "invaded" the "Roman" USA)-Now that we've opened the metaphoric chronological pasture gate your going to let all the horses out?
This volume adds new sources and insights to the work of Ernest L. Martin and contains over 375 descriptions of Jerusalem’s southeastern hill (Mount Zion), the temple mount in the City of David, and the tower of Antonia (today called the "temple mount").
Melchizedek built his temple in Salem, Jacob erected his pillar at the same location, and the borders of Benjamin and Judah, home to the temple, divided the southeastern hill.
Solomon erected the temple in the City of David before breaking down its northern wall to install Pharoah’s daughter in her palace (3 Kings 2: 35, Septuagint version).
Josephus described the hill of the temple as descending by degrees toward the east parts of the city, but there has never been a city on the east side of the alleged temple mount. A host of other descriptions (with references) place the temple’s east wall in the Kidron valley, in the middle of the city, and over the Gihon Spring, whereas the alleged temple mount is north of the city, its east wall is at the top of the hill, and there is no accessible spring within its precincts.
It does not match Josephus’s descriptions of the temple’s dimensions, walls, gates, height, position, or finished state. Its remarkable square rock (under the Dome), is never mentioned with reference to the temple, but is for the Roman Camp, which the Byzantine Christians identified as the "Praetorium" and the site of the Church of St. Sophia (which Caliph al-Malik destroyed to build the Dome of the Rock). Indeed, Eutychius stated the Christians had never built on the temple ruins site and Rabbi David Kimchi said the same for the "nations."
At Masada, eye-witness Eleazar described the Roman camp as the only monument remaining after the 70 A.D. destruction. Today, the alleged temple mount is the only surviving monument from the destruction and is the Roman camp. Archaeological findings relating to the issues are dispersed throughout, but two specific chapters on the alleged temple mount’s archaeology and the archaeology of the City of David are included. A list of the most relevant descriptions is given at the end.
A review of the book by Margaret Barker, UK scholar and author of 29 books states: "Marilyn Sams brings together a vast array of ancient evidence to argue that the Jerusalem Temple was not on the Temple Mount."