I generally agree with the discussion of Trump and Hillary as controlled opposition mirrors of each other. Many, such as me, figured that Trump was a stalking horse for Hillary, but maybe it was always intended that the golden boy wins.
If we can use the globalism / nationalist dialectic as a lens, then as an analogical comparison it might be useful to compare Steve Bannon, Trump's new chief advisor (and co-equal to Reince Preibus, the new Chief of Staff) as a modern day Apostle Paul, an "all things to all people"
agent provocateur.
Bannon came to advise Trump in the last few months after running Breitbart News, founded as an uber-Zionist right wing media aggregator. But by the time of the presidential campaign, Breitbart News had become a prime site for white Race Nationalists, among other fringe right groups. Breitbart was getting more hits than many MSM outets by far.
Bannon came to this Zionist enterprise as a member of the neo-Roman imperium. He mixed it up with the admirals at the Pentagon, Virginia Tech, Harvard (MBA), Master's Degree in National Security from Georgetown, Priebus say Bannon also attended the London School of Economics, then was a big wig at Goldman Sachs M&A, started his own boutique bank in Hollywood, and was director of science experiment
Biosphere II, and produced the movie
Titus (Andronicus).
In this Hollywood sphere, he likely earned his 'Jewish friend' Entryism bona fides by taking a major position in the hit TV series
Seinfeld. It was during this time that he met Matt Drudge and Breitbart. When Breitbart's heart was mysteriously 'taken out', Bannon took over the reins of Breitbart's media empire.
Then:
... By March 14 several top executives and journalists at Breitbart had resigned complaining that "... Breitbart's unabashed embrace of Mr. Trump, particularly at the seeming expense of its own reporter, struck them as a betrayal of its mission."[42] Former employers accused Breitbart executive chairman Stephen Bannon of having "turned a website founded on anti-authoritarian grounds into a de facto propaganda outlet for Mr. Trump."[13]
On August 17, Stephen Bannon stepped down from his role as executive chairman at Breitbart to join the Trump campaign as its new CEO.[43][44] On August 25, Trump's opponent Hillary Clinton criticized him for hiring Bannon as his CEO in her rally in Reno, Nevada. She stated that the site "embraces ideas on the extremist fringe of the conservative right" by reading out the site's headlines and that Trump's decision to hire Bannon "represents a landmark achievement for the alt-right".[45][46]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breitbart_News
Here is the beginning of
Breitbart News:
During a stay in Israel, Breitbart conceived of the idea of founding Breitbart News Network, with "the aim of starting a site that would be unapologetically pro-freedom and pro-Israel. We were sick of the anti-Israel bias of the mainstream media and J-Street."[9]
Co-founder and owner of Breitbart, Larry Solov writes:
“ One night in Jerusalem, when we were getting ready for dinner, Andrew turned to me and asked if I would de-partner from the 800-person law firm where I was practicing and become business partners with him. He said he needed my help to create a media company. He needed my help to “change the world"... We were blown away by the spirit, tenacity, and resourcefulness of the Israeli people on that trip. Andrew could be quite convincing, not to mention inspiring, and I decided right there and then to “throw away” (my Mom’s phrase) a perfectly good, successful and safe career in order to start a “new media” company with Andrew Breitbart. ”[9]
The Wikipedia page details a number of big story propaganda scams that Breitbart ran, and in this light it appears to me that the Weiner Affair(s) are part of the same milieu, in addition to Weiner likely being involved with such compromising sexual actions discussed about Podesta
et al. (And yes, Republicans are caught up in that all the same. For one, remember Jeff Gannon from Boys Town and Dubya.)
Bannon also started a completely separate and expensive data mining operation to dig dirt on Lefties, and feed the analysis packages to mainstream media reporters. Bannon produced
Clinton Cash. So in addition to agitating the redneck goyim with half truths or worse, he can produce slick and sophisticated materials, all things to all people.
It would be interesting if Joe / Collectivist would agree that today's Jews are ironically today's globalists and today's White Nationalists are today's Zealots when compared to Flavian times?
Would Joe / Collectivist agree that today's Christians are truly the good fruit of Imperial Rome's efforts?
How does Joe reconcile these two propositions, if he accepts them, that is?