March 28: 'Jews' as a Scapegoat Class

[Claude Badley]

Dear Miss Kitty, I was absolutely amazed, flabbergasted even, at the video you posted about Yuri Bezmenov, which you prefaced with the following phrase.

I come to suspect that you guys are the sort of Americans described by Yuri Bezmenov.

As an Australian I suspect this comment - and thus your later post quoted below - does not necessarily include me, though I suppose I suffer from the same 'wordiness' that you condemn in some others. (And though you haven't expressed any criticism of me, I feel I should apologize for comments about your 'feline' nature on another thread.)

Well, you shouldn't have any trouble finding some Jewish publishers, especially since Jews control most of the publishing houses.

I'd say what we are living through is simple communist subversion. It's not hard to spot. It's not subtle or esoteric. Things that are not subtle or esoteric are not appealing to you guys, I know.

This subversion is combined with replacement level immigration. Jews changed our immigration laws back in 1965. At the time, America was about 90% white, but we'll soon be outnumbered. Communists have been secretly warring on us for decades. Psychological warfare. The worst of them don't believe any of this utopian multi culti stuff. They want us gone.

You've bought into the most basic clown world nonsense contained in communist subversion - radical egalitarianism, social justice, diversity, globalism, contempt for Christianity and traditional American values....

You guys are commies, doncha know it? Ha, ha! ***

Before I clicked on the video I had just been reading about British agents buying off Russian workers at the Putilov works to come out and demonstrate against the Tsar in 1917, in the book by G. Edward Griffin "The Creature from Jekyll Island". Hence I was staggered to find that it was none other than this very writer who was interviewing Bezmenov!

The real gem in Bezmenov's understanding is that while one can "pull the [ideological] bananas" out of one's ears, it requires much effort to hear and understand the various agendas underlying our situation, these agendas even built into our language structures. While the Soviets, just like the US Government, had an ideological agenda to peddle, the primary question resulting from his discussion is the question of backward inference - to ask what is the ULTIMATE basis of our reasoning, since it does not and cannot lie in mere language alone but has to comprise dogmatic fundamentals about the working of the universe itself. The genuine task is to ascertain these dogmatic fundamentals and to prove why these, as opposed to present day ruling notions, are the correct fundamentals.

This is not the outlook of modernity however, which teaches paradoxically that reason and rationality, or alternatively acausal chance (pure randomness e.g. Complementarity), govern our universe entirely, this spoiled only by a few bad-egg leaders and ideologies. Judaeo-Christian and other financial elites subscribe to this modernist notion - and so, essentially, did Soviet communism (though not the greater understanding of Gramsci who has been falsely tainted e.g. ignorantly by Joe, with the Frankfurter brush). So too I quote the words of Nietzsche concerning backward inference:

Aphorism #344 … Consequently "will to truth" does not mean "I will not allow myself to be deceived " but - there is no alternative - "I will not deceive, not even myself." And with that we stand on moral ground.

Hence, since we are deceived by language etc. all the time, forever exposed as stooges of the era in which we live, the need to ascertain the dogmatic fundamentals on which genuine criticism (rather than e.g. the Culture of Critique) is a task that has to be resolved as against the claims of modernity given in the paragraph above.

And I think you would agree Miss Kitty, that wordy wordy [re post #96] is better than shooty, shooty - and that contacting wordy wordily with others would be very good as you would bring in more discussion.

Yours faithfully
Claude

 

[Richard Stanley]

What?

 

[Miss Kitty]

Maybe you guys are such massive egg heads that I'm simply unable to comprehend your meaning. Please help me to help myself by going to 1:00 on the following youtube video and answer the questions posed to college students:

Here's a hint - is it:

A. You are you, and I am I, and if by chance we find each other, it's beautiful.
B. I thought you were Jewish.
C. We're all equal in the eyes of God, so what does it matter?
D. Where can I get me some of that weed you're smokin'?

 

[Claude Badley]

Please help me to help myself by going to 1:00 on the following youtube video and answer the questions posed to college students:

Here's a hint - is it:

A. You are you, and I am I, and if by chance we find each other, it's beautiful.
B. I thought you were Jewish.
C. We're all equal in the eyes of God, so what does it matter?
D. Where can I get me some of that weed you're smokin'?

It can't be D since the interviewer is clearly not stoned. C is a mere evasion but would calm the monotheist beast. B is the answer one might expect if one felt threatened and manipulated without knowing why . A however is the unchallenging answer for people to get along in our complex world.

Bezmenov however is referring to the stubborn miseducation of Western students from the early 1960s leading to the mindset of today, a 'postmodern' mindset resistant to factual evidence - because what, actually, are "the facts"? Are facts reducible to language alone as pop pomo asserts? We can only ever introspect our own thinking in a limited way - and in difficult situations each of us can come up with our own words even - in order to describe new situations and combinations of difficult ideas and procedures.

Richard answered 'What?' to my above post, so here is a neologism (new word) that he used - chimpig.

Now by chimpig I think Richard means the formation of a new species from genetic combinations of two organisms which cannot and do not interbreed normally i.e. in his example, chimpanzees and pigs. Normally geneticists say such combinations are impossible - other than in single-celled organisms. However it has been demonstrated at least once in plants, an accidental result from a graft between Laburnum and Cystis (broom), two related but mutually nonviable species if cross-pollinated. In this case the resulting organism, evidently due to a fusion between cells of the different species, led to a viable combination, called Laburnocystis which apparently survives today.

The underlying issue here, Miss Kitty, is that the universe is in a continuous process of change, but the words we give to relatively stable features of this perpetual change e.g. human, Laburnocystis, ex-KGB officer, banana, are but labels which do not always capture the inner dynamics of these entities since the history of these entities is always largely unknown. Take bananas for example; in their original form they were full of seeds, seedless bananas being discovered in prehistoric times as a mutant somewhere in New Guinea, and cultivated and developed from there.

I hope that replies will concentrate on the words I have highlighted in the previous paragraph, correctly emphasizing the very opposite to what I have written there!

Yours faithfully
Claude

 

[Richard Stanley]

Maybe you guys are such massive egg heads that I'm simply unable to comprehend your meaning. Please help me to help myself by going to 1:00 on the following youtube video and answer the questions posed to college students:

The irony of this makes my head want to explode. Besides which, I don't really give a damn about these neurotic, navel gazing questions and why you're so concerned about them, when we have important things to worry about -- that you merrily have no concern about. You claim to care about my country, but you could give a damn if my country becomes a dictatorship, because your now self-admittedly Russian president has been stating that he will not recognize the results of the next fake election, unless he wins by a big margin, that is. This is the most degenerate human, with his illegal immigrant wife and chain migration in-laws, to have walked the planet, and he's your savior.

Your ONLY interest in learning is to confirm your prejudicial biases. You are "simply unable to comprehend" because you have no interest in challenging your beliefs with actual facts, rather than the Dookey half-truths that make you feel justified and righteous in playing a victim.

It surely demoralized the hillbilly Nationalist Jews, like you, of 2,000 years ago when they learned that your god didn't give a shit about them, or you. But I've wasted much more time indulging your BS than your genocidal god ever has.

But I'm only really mad about your president, because of the Big Lie. Otherwise, I'm not so mad, because I now understand that this is just part of the cyclical, globalizing Process of Western Civilization. But you and your hillbillies, Hollywood and otherwise, think that you are entitled by your precious exceptional culture to withstand the gears of Time and real white power (not what you think it is, even though you've been schooled).

I used to be business partners with a former Soviet Jew, and he will tell you all the evils of Communism till Jerry's cows come home, and then typically conflate them with Socialism, as do you. All the while I'll tell you the virtues of owning a business, but never mind, in your binary world there is no compromise. Fuck that Jesus was a socialist, what do you care about your own precious religion. You only care about Santa Claus and your Chinese manufactured Nativity and Christmas lights on your pagan Christmas tree. It's all about YOU, and maintaining your vain delusions of permanence.

That's it, Jerry needs to ban your ass.

That said, I'm quite certain that horny chimpanzee juveniles that couldn't get any satisfaction at home, and weren't happy banging their fellow losers any more, decided to party with an available comely sow. There is no other way to explain the numerous porcine features of the human ape. And besides, there are porno tapes which prove this.

And BTW, here's what I said only a few days ago regarding Yuri Bezemov's Demoralization and Destabilization ... and the likes of you.

 

[Jerry Russell]

Please help me to help myself by going to 1:00 on the following youtube video and answer the questions posed to college students:

Q: I'm a woman.
A: Can I take you to lunch?

Q: I'm Chinese.
A: I know a nice Chinese restaurant.

Or, if I don't have time for lunch:

Q: I'm a woman.
A: No, you're an entitled white male without the slightest understanding of gender issues, making a click-baity youtube video.

Q: I'm Chinese.
A: Racist bigot too, eh?

 

[Jerry Russell]

Say what? Who said that? Not me.

Perhaps you meant that Trump intensely exploited that the prohibition had been undone? The Silk article explains that preachers have been proudly flaunting their defiance of the 1954 rule since at least 2008.

Also, perhaps our discussion of this topic should be cleaned up & moved to its own thread.