March 28: 'Jews' as a Scapegoat Class

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
Or did you mean that you'll erase your usage but not mine?
The applicable site rule states:

https://postflaviana.org/community/index.php?threads/forum-rules-site-policies-and-disclaimer.1224/


2 - No personal attacks or abusive behavior
Each and every member on this forum has a right to be treated with dignity and respect. The following behavior is not acceptable:
- Personal attacks: Any insulting or abusive behavior that is directed at a specific person.
- Bullying (flaming): Repeated abuse towards another member, this could be undertaken by one member or a number of members.
- Instigating (trolling): Repeatedly provoking a member with the goal of getting an irrational response from them. Or, content consisting of unsupported assertions, speculations, or opinions, which are deemed to be gratuitously inciting acrimony, rather than promoting sincere dialogue and mutual understanding.
- Comment bombardment: replying by posting an excessive volume of marginally relevant content.
However, any member who is attacked in such a fashion, shall have the right to reply with an analysis of the personal shortcomings of the attacker.

So -- I suppose that since Miss Kitty has been calling for absquatulation of Jews and Mexicans, then according to the site rules it's only fair for you to point out that it's actually Miss Kitty whose ethnic group is historically obligated to absquatulate.

And if she gets to complain about trannies, then she is granting you the privilege under the site rules, to go on the attack against White Trash. So again I would not have any basis for administrative action.

It still isn't very nice of you.
 

Richard Stanley

Administrator
So -- I suppose that since Miss Kitty has been calling for absquatulation of Jews and Mexicans, then according to the site rules it's only fair for you to point out that it's actually Miss Kitty whose ethnic group is historically obligated to absquatulate.
Just to be purrfectly clear here, Miss Kitty berated your interpretation of the Constitution, as it only applying to White people as the new or neoJew Chosen People. This is only partially correct, because the Constitution was written to ensure the power of rich White men (rWm), not of the White absquatulative subclass. (I sincerely hope this last term is not taken offensively by any human whatsoever.)

As such, I suspect that the rWm felt certain that the various absquatulators (including the White subclass) would never amount to, because of their various wastrel, wanton, banal, and crass pursuits of happiness, raise a challenge to the rWm hegemony. But someone left the figurative barn door open, via those damnable amendments, and hopefully the Great Orange Pumpkin (GOP) will declare them all to be Fake. GOP is working hard on the first one. Only news and religion which praises GOP can and should be tolerated.

Now let's put this into practice:

For example, any 'news' which discusses GOP riding around in the sex taxi jet airplane of a Jew (like Mr. Epstein) is acceptable, only because the young White women being ferried about were of the absquatulative subclass, and any possible blame can be attached to all Jews because of the presence of one of them.

Otherwise, such scurrilous discussion is verboten, besides being Fake. All facts are Fake unless they konform to the benefit of the rWm. Kapeesh?
 

Richard Stanley

Administrator
It seems to me that the questioner is not "justifying" the described actions & motivations of the Jews. He is explaining Solzhenitsyn's view of the sequence of events, and criticizing both sides in the strongest possible terms.

The questioner (a Jew) then asks whether Jews could kill again. It seems to me that an appropriate answer, coming from a (neo) Roman would be "Yes, and we Romans could also kill again."

But rather than trying to predict future atrocities, perhaps it would be more useful to ask how to reduce tensions, find increased compassion for the 'other', and thus try to prevent those atrocities?
From Miss Kitty's perspective, the problem is that this Jew should not mention the "supposed" Christian atrocities against Jews in Russia, or anywhere else for that matter, because everyone knows, that White Christians, via their acceptance of their Jewish mangod, cannot possibly commit crimes. Unless a Jewish man or woman leads them astray, of course.

Combined with any implied or express mention of the anti-Jewish pograms, is this Jew's dry discussion of Solzhenitsyn's mention of the Holomodor sans this Jew's proper admission of collective guilt combined with a request to convert. A request which must be denied because we all know such conversions are genetically impossible even though there is no genetic basis for Judaism, it only being a cultural construct.
 

Richard Stanley

Administrator
At least we can agree that the driving issue of the day is that of Globalization versus Nationalization. Unfortunately, there are problems in either camp, and as such, Jerry and I have not curried favor with many on either side. We're just trying to report on the problem. And that there is an approximately 3,000 year old historical and religious continuum central to the Western problem doesn't make changing minds any easier. Especially when most people only view matters from how their personal lives are affected in the relative short term, constantly sweeping inconvenient truths under the carpet.

They are chauvinistically convinced that their particular cultural POV and mindset must either be definitively true or just that their wish for it to be so is all that matters. Their Designer Truth is Relative and Trumps Facts. The irony is that their respective Designer Truths were synthetically crafted by other humans, who had a purpose in mind when crafting such. "Do Not Question my Truth, as then I would have to question where Mommy and Daddy (or whomever) got all that from, and I don't want to go there. After all, from there where will it stop?"

Such as this kind of thinking is what makes certain people fearful and thus "stiff-necked" as God complained to Moses (Exodus 32: 9, 10) about the Hebrews (not just the Jews). These 'Hebrews' were stiff-necked because they had gotten the heebeejeebeez when they had been told to massively alter their traditional Canaanite culture to the one Moses (aka the 'pharaoh') was now imposing on them.

7And the LORD said unto Moses, Go, get thee down; for thy people, which thou broughtest out of the land of Egypt, have corrupted themselves: 8They have turned aside quickly out of the way which I commanded them: they have made them a molten calf, and have worshipped it, and have sacrificed thereunto, and said, These be thy gods, O Israel, which have brought thee up out of the land of Egypt. 9And the LORD said unto Moses, I have seen this people, and, behold, it is a stiffnecked people: 10Now therefore let me alone, that my wrath may wax hot against them, and that I may consume them: and I will make of thee a great nation.

In Acts 51 Stephen calls the Jews "stiff-necked" because these nationalistic Jews, at least, would not abide with the New World Order, that the Roman's Christianity was crafted to support. It was crafted with the strong and indispensable theological and literary support of the most elite of the 'Jews', Josephus Flavius Maccabee (and his time-shifted Jewish alter-ego, Paul of Tarsus). These Jews said never matter the wider context and massive globalist implications of our canon, we're going to take a narrow 'real-estate' view, because "we're Chosen, like our exceptional conquered Promised Land is, so screw everyone else".

Josephus recorded that these particular taliban Jews were exterminated (and this went on for some time longer) while those that agreed to their new (Useful Demons) role within the new system got to live on to become today's Rabbinic Jews. In their new synthetic role, however, these particular White people were not to convert completely to the new Christian system, but rather to fulfill a most useful and cynical role (the controlled opposition, a foil) for their New Boss (Same as the Old Boss).

Their stiff-necks, once a problem for their designer God, magically became a virtue:

R. Isaac ben Redifa said in the name of R. Ammi: You might think that this is a negative attribute, but in fact it is praiseworthy, for it means: "Either be a Jew or prepare to be hanged." Jews were stiff-necked, says R. Ammi, in the sense that they were ready to die for their faith.

We can also view all this in the context of the prophecies in the Book of Daniel, which explicitly identify the symbols employed as being the literal rise and fall of empires and later nations. This is describing a dynamic (and in reality - human) process, not a static notion. It is widely considered that this text was written in the period of Greek control over 'Israel', but this can just as well be seen in the lens of Alexander's Globalism du jour versus the respective nationalist impulse. The two impulses are somewhat natural, even if human, dialectics - just as with light and dark, heat and cold. The Bible, OT and NT, is replete with such dialectic tension, yet the most ignorant (regarding their own religion and culture) are the most sure of their self-ordained, entitled, static place in the dynamic world.

Their respective dogmas will invent logical laps of fancy to co-opt whatever is necessary to assuage their neurotic personal and group vanities. But, Karma, at some point, will indeed run over their Dogma(s).

Hitler, that apocalyptic uber-hero and literal messiah to many White and other Nationalists, was defining an Imperial Reich, modeled upon the prior imperial Reichs, but his minions were so hysterically focused on their nationalistic vanities that they could not realize this, or else made a rationalization that their particular 'nation' was the Chosen one worthy of being a global construct.

The revolving symbol of Yin and Yang implies one state continually transitioning into the other. Day becomes night, night becomes day. Such is life.
 
I know you like to question the Holodomor, but surely you cannot deny that questioning the Holocaust can get you thrown into prison in many countries. If you were to accept that Jews killed tens of millions of people in the Soviet Union, you'd have to come up with another thesis, I suppose. And if everybody accepted this, Jews would have to stop guilt tripping the stupid goyim for more shekels. Every ethnic group, as far as I know, has been guilty of atrocities. So what are we talking about, really?

The richest neighborhoods in LA are practically all Jewish. Maybe these people aren't just half of America's billionaires, maybe they are a huge percentage of the ten or fifteen percent below the billionaires. There are vast areas of multi million dollar houses in LA that are mostly owned by Jews. New York is the same. And yet they want to tell you about how they suffered in Egypt and Germany. They want reparations from Poland - a relatively poor country whose people suffered greatly in WWII. They are using victimhood as a way to amass more wealth. They simply can't get enough.

And now I know for a fact that Jews are selling Lebanese cuisine in America and calling it Israeli. They are going to make billions off of this lie. Actually, they have already made billions off of hummus alone.

Lately, E. Michael Jones has been saying that three very rich Jews are running our foreign policy and angling for war with Iran.


I am not able to see Jews as particular victims or scapegoats. It's difficult to know for sure if they are driving the current nightmare we find ourselves in, or if they are just collaborators. I personally think they are drivers. I think they're at the center of the madness. If they are drivers, and they suffer consequences because of this, they are not scapegoats. I'd say Jewish behavior is the root cause of anti-semitism.

But I question the value of endless debate, as you know. Debate is fine, but I also value gut level impressions, common sense, and what I can see.


I come to suspect that you guys are the sort of Americans described by Yuri Bezmenov. Here he is, in case you haven't seen him:


Current world view:

 
Last edited:
Miss Kitty, I'm sorry to have to do this, but I've warned you before. "Tranny" is a hateful slur, and a violation of the site rules. Such persons are referred to as transsexuals, or TS. If you want to post hate speech, find another website, or send me email.
Trannies often refer to themselves as trannies. They don't generally find it insulting, in my experience.
I agree that subjecting children to sex change surgery amounts to child abuse. Little boys wearing dresses, is not child abuse.
I think little boys wearing skirts (tulle skirts) in America is child abuse because it might cause confusion in formative years. Can we agree that there is no reason to encourage transgenderism or homosexuality? I think these things are fundamentally against the natural order of things, and should not be encouraged.

According to actual research, 46% of gay men reported that they'd experienced homosexual molestation. That's terribly high, but your claim "every gay guy I've ever known" seems odd. Confirmation bias on your part? Something special about the men you meet? I don't have any real world experience to report about this.
I lived in San Francisco for about fifteen years. I know what I'm talking about. Wow, I thought the studies would uphold that homosexuality is inborn. Frankly, all the gays I have known well were basically mentally ill, just pretty disturbed. Good people, though. I have nothing against people who are mentally ill, btw. And we all know there's too much bias in studies these days, right? Why don't you know more gay guys? I like nothing better than an evening out at Trunks in West Hollywood.


Among everything that's been said on the entire planet, they managed to come up with two statements that were less than respectful towards the cathedral. Including one tweet in French that's been badly mistranslated. The other, a brief quote in a Rolling Stone interview that left me suspecting that the reporter probably got it wrong.
Badly mistranslated? That guy went to college in France. There was worse, but I was too lazy to track it down.


Which is it, Miss Kitty? Strict behavioral controls, or outright ethnic cleansing?? Again, in all honesty: if you want to post hate speech, please go somewhere else. You are bringing shame and dishonor to this website.
Are you kidding me? Hate speech? Since when are you so pearl clutching and hand wringing?
Absquatulate??
What?

I know you're being tongue in cheek, but that only makes it worse. I used this phrase "White Trash" in another post, and found myself feeling ashamed. I'll probably erase it tomorrow. It's not only a racist slur, but class-based as well. Just because the esteemed Dr. Isenberg used it in the title of her book, and just because that book became a best-seller, doesn't make it OK.
Isenberg is a typical Jewish hater of white people, I imagine. Don't you understand there is a double standard here - which you are supporting? You didn't notice the so called racial slur you were using? Why am I not surprised? Why do you suppose she didn't write a book called, "Greedy Jews"? Do you think it would take you more than a moment to notice that slur?

White trash refers to very poor white people in places like the rural south, people like your grandparents. Great people, but lacking in education and other refinements. I have no problem with it, and our grandmother used it. She laughed when using it. Doesn't anyone have a sense of humor any more? I have wonderful memories of her. She'd say, "Suga, we're jus po white trash. Doncha know it? Ha ha. "

White trash does not imply to me that such people are racists or criminals, although Jews like Isenberg would probably want to claim that it does. I didn't watch that video. It started with a creepy anti-white Hollywood movie, and I didn't want to see it. I had to read "To Kill a Mockingbird" in high school. Did you? It was not believable, but I believed it at the time. The po white trash girl was pining after a black guy rather than trying to catch the white lawyer. Give me a break. Probably written by Truman Capote, who should have known better. But he was gay and into running down poor southerners. A great writer, but why he wanted to do that, I don't know.

Frankly, I suspect the word "racist' is a Jewish construct invented by Jews to abuse people like us. To my knowledge, Jews are more racist than any other group. If people like us were as racist as Jews, they would not be here in America, and neither would about 200,000,000 other people. It makes no sense at all to accuse white Americans of racism. I can't believe you buy into it.


THAT BOOK WAS A BESTSELLER? WELL, SHUT MY MOUTH!


[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OMG. I just looked at the full title of that Isenberg book. White Trash: The 400-Year Untold History of Class in America. It implies to me that she sees all white people as trash. Maybe she's a Communist or a Cultural Marxist! When will we see a book called Greedy Jews: The 100-Year Untold History of Financial Crime in America? How about never! Here's something to listen to while reading Isenberg's racist hate filled book:

 
Last edited:

Richard Stanley

Administrator
I know you like to question the Holodomor, but surely you cannot deny that questioning the Holocaust can get you thrown into prison in many countries. If you were to accept that Jews killed tens of millions of people in the Soviet Union, you'd have to come up with another thesis, I suppose. And if everybody accepted this, Jews would have to stop guilt tripping the stupid goyim for more shekels. Every ethnic group, as far as I know, has been guilty of atrocities. So what are we talking about, really?
So it seems that now, perhaps out of frustration, is that you are taking a more honest, ecumenical, and inclusively disgusting approach to defending your JudaeoChristian position, with more emphasis on the 'Judaeo' with specific regards to yourself. But this admission of guilt is, at least, consistent with the real Christian confession that all are sinners, and not just from stealing a slice of Sabra pizza here and there.

Please stop lying that I question the Holodomor. What does people in Europe or elsewhere questioning the Holocaust have to with our thesis?

What you are really pissed about is that we are criticizing the nature of your Scapegoat (as a cynical, artificial social construct), from which you have derived so much gain from and perverse pleasure in invoking. And, that we are criticizing the Old Testament Conquest modus operandi that allowed you to exist in your admittedly cushy neighborhood. You are pissed off because we don't think that your neighbors, for the vast most part, are real Jews, if there ever were any real Jews. And if there we're any real Jews, it was more likely to be your ancestors .... that created the social construct by cuckolding authentic Semitic peoples of Canaan long ago.

Now, you are exposed to some of discomforts from the larger Biblical global expansionist social process and you squeal like one of Christ's Greek pigs? That pig was squealing because she had no eyes to see or ears to hear like you.

You should be teaching your neighbors that they are just a bunch of Turko-Slav poseurs. But they will be just as stiff-necked as you, because they have profited from this arrangement (similar but different to you), just as described by Israel Shahak in Chapter 4 of his Jewish History, Jewish Religion. This work is ironically a favorite of White Supremacists like yourself, but like most people you selectively see only what you want (as you prove every time you post here).

As I have just discussed on another thread (and hopefully Jerry will move soon) one of your neighbors revealed the system in the one season of the 2015 series Agent X. It overtly displays the inherent nationalist / globalist tensions that must exist inside of any expansionist construction like Western Civilization. It is only the myopic vision of the serfers, regardless of their ethnicity, that think that their temporary hold on the ground that the globalists won for them will last. You argue that your pioneer ancestors won this land, but it was the globalist PTB that invoked the OT script of Conquest that made this so.

OMG, fake Jews are selling fake Lebanese food. Thank Dogod I don't eat at Taco Bell. Your fakir President was selling fake real estate lessons at a fake university, making fake American flags and presidential campaign materials in Communist China. But you bought the rhetoric that because he knows where all the global(ist) skeletons are (foreign and domestic) that he will be your savior.

As with Vice President Natalie Maccabee, in Agent X, and the real life Maccabees (aka Hasmoneans), President Donald Maccabee Trump is selling you a serfer's bill of goods, and at the right moment the globalist fangs are revealed in the inherent duality of your system, which you seem not to understand. Usually there are people who don't understand, because they are too emotionally invested in the patriotic illusion, who think they are Free, but they are really mind slaves, willing sacrificing their sons and daughters to Moloch in foreign lands to a globalist cause. Then they get pissed at the likes of Jerry and me for bursting their bubble of happy delusion, where they have certainty in blaming the institutional scapegoat.

The name Sabra (tzabra) etymologically traces back to the tzabeans, the armed retinue of Abraham. His Biblical career starts in the land of the Sabeans (odd pagans who are strangely accorded as Peoples of the Book in Islam - as all other pagans are to be put to the sword). As you hopefully know, Abraham's people (including the OG Jews), per the propagandic text of Genesis, end up taking over Canaan, the land of the Phoenicians and the later Lebanese. Abraham's people, per the narrative, have pale and ruddy skin, and red hair. If one reads carefully then, one can see that Abraham's people, tzabians, have cuckolded their way into Canaan. Later, they would cuckold their way into Etruscan / Tarquin era Rome. Later they would cuckold their way into Normandy. Later they would cuckold their way into Britain. Later they would cuckold their way into the New World.

Now the United States of America, as was intended, is an empire in its own right, albeit steered from the Old Countries, for deniability sake. The Deep State versus Trump drama is generally just as depicted with Agent X, where all the Maccabees are pulling the wool over your eyes. Thus, in your myopic eyes, the Constitution and this Promised Land was meant for (White) "me and yous", but you hero, as with the nationalist Jews of the Maccabean days, refuse to comprehend the deception. The script gets repeated, because sheep cannot figure out the shepherd's ploys. The sheepdogs act according to their perceived interests as well, because their master feeds them well.

Go to the mall and get some pizza and hummus. They have the same at Costco as well, only the founders went to my high school if that makes you feel any better.
 

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
I come to suspect that you guys are the sort of Americans described by Yuri Bezmenov.
You mean like this:

"A person who is demoralised is unable to assess true information. The facts tell him nothing, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it..."
Ironic that you would say this, when we are showering you with information, and you refuse to believe it.

E. Michael Jones has been saying that three very rich Jews are running our foreign policy and angling for war with Iran.
Right: Donald Trump (Presbyterian), John Bolton (Lutheran) and Mike Pompeo (Evangelical Presbyterian) have absolutely nothing to do with determining US foreign policy. The 88% of Congress who are various denominations of Christian, have absolutely nothing to do with it. They are all helpless, pathetic victims and/or tools of those three rich Jews.

Did you mention something about information, or common sense?

Trannies often refer to themselves as trannies.
This is part of a two-pronged strategy to combat hate speech.

On the one hand, when a person outside the oppressed group uses the word as part of an attack, and in a demeaning fashion, it's appropriate to call them out on it.

But if a person is a member of the oppressed group, it's OK to use the same slur, but in an endearing and humorous fashion, to reclaim it and create confusion about whether it's pejorative or not.

You were using it in the first way, as an outsider, and as part of a vicious attack: saying that TS are "sick as hell" and that school children need to be protected from knowing that such people even exist.

Whereas I was using "white trash" in somewhat endearing or at least ironic fashion, describing folks of my own culture and social class who would like to go on a ride to space on their honeymoon. And I wish I hadn't. Because I might see myself as "white trash" but I'm not sure everyone who knows me would agree.

Why do you suppose she didn't write a book called, "Greedy Jews"? Do you think it would take you more than a moment to notice that slur?
Isenberg probably wouldn't write that book, but you just did:

The richest neighborhoods in LA are practically all Jewish. Maybe these people aren't just half of America's billionaires, maybe they are a huge percentage of the ten or fifteen percent below the billionaires. There are vast areas of multi million dollar houses in LA that are mostly owned by Jews. New York is the same. And yet they want to tell you about how they suffered in Egypt and Germany. They want reparations from Poland - a relatively poor country whose people suffered greatly in WWII. They are using victimhood as a way to amass more wealth. They simply can't get enough.
As if there aren't any "white" or even "black" people remaining, who own nice houses in Los Angeles? As if there are not now, and never have been, any "white" people who amass wealth?

As if you yourself haven't complained bitterly, at this very website, about having failed to amass great wealth by trading Bitcoin?

I just looked at the full title of that Isenberg book. White Trash: The 400-Year Untold History of Class in America. It implies to me that she sees all white people as trash.
A bizarre conclusion. Isenberg is very clear on the fact that wealthy blue-blood Americans do not see themselves as "white trash" and are not, objectively, members of that oppressed class. I'm not sure whether Isenberg identifies as white (some Jewish people do) or whether Isenberg would consider herself "white trash". At any rate, if you had watched the video, you would know that Isenberg's treatment of "white trash" is compassionate, insightful, and not hateful in any way I could discern. Although her use of the term is inappropriate, especially if she doesn't see herself as one of us.
 
Last edited:

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
Please stop lying that I question the Holodomor.
I'm the one who questions the Holodomor. And I'm pretty sure that something very bad happened, and that a lot of people died. I'm not sure to what extent it was an intentional genocide, vs. the outcome of bad weather, and the aftermath of WWI. And I'm not sure to what extent it was ethnically motivated as Jewish revenge against Christians.

If indeed 10 million Christians were killed in cold blood by Jews for purposes of revenge, I don't think such an event would challenge our thesis. I'm just not convinced it happened exactly that way.
 

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
Frankly, I suspect the word "racist' is a Jewish construct invented by Jews to abuse people like us.
Nope. As it turns out, the history of the word is well known. It was invented in 1902 by Richard Henry Pratt, a Western Cultural Missionary who was complaining about segregation of American Indians in reservations. See:

https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2014/01/05/260006815/the-ugly-fascinating-history-of-the-word-racism

The Oxford English Dictionary's first recorded utterance of the word racism was by a man named Richard Henry Pratt in 1902. Pratt was railing against the evils of racial segregation.
"Segregating any class or race of people apart from the rest of the people kills the progress of the segregated people or makes their growth very slow. Association of races and classes is necessary to destroy racism and classism."
[....]
Beginning in the 1880s, a group of well-heeled white men would travel to upstate New York each year to attend the Lake Mohonk Conference Of The Friend Of the Indian. Their primary focus was a solution to "the Indian problem," the need for the government to deal with the Native American groups living in lands that had been forcibly seized from them. The Plains Wars had decimated the Native American population, but they were coming to an end. There was a general feeling among these men and other U.S. leaders that the remaining Native Americans would be wiped out within a generation or two, destroyed by disease and starvation.
The Lake Mohonk attendees wanted to stop that from happening, and they pressed lawmakers to change the government's policies toward Indians. Pratt, in particular, was a staunch advocate of folding Native Americans into white life — assimilation through education.
http://chronicles.dickinson.edu/studentwork/indian/2_pratt.htm

...religion played an important role in shaping Pratt’s attitude toward Indians. His beliefs fell into the camp of the so-called “Indian reformers” of the time, many of whom were Quakers and Christian missionaries. Christian values were heavily espoused at the school. Bible stories were routinely read to teach moral lessons to the students. For Pratt, religion was a motivating force in his approach to educating the Native Americans: “In Indian civilization I am a Baptist, because I believe in immersing the Indians in our civilization and when we get them under holding them there until they are thoroughly soaked.” Pratt saw his work with Native Americans in part as a religious calling. He regarded the transformation of Indians into civilized Americans as a form of conversion. His rhetoric of salvation was rooted in notions of Christian sacrifice and rebirth. Pratt’s motto, “Kill the Indian, but save the man,” bluntly stated that to save the Indians, their culture had to be sacrificed. To these ends, Pratt required each student to attend mass regularly. Fittingly, he came to be known as the “Red Man’s Moses.”
I had to read "To Kill a Mockingbird" in high school. Did you? It was not believable, but I believed it at the time. The po white trash girl was pining after a black guy rather than trying to catch the white lawyer. Give me a break. Probably written by Truman Capote, who should have known better. But he was gay and into running down poor southerners. A great writer, but why he wanted to do that, I don't know.
I thought that part of the "white genocide" syndrome that you're so fearful of, is the phenomenon of cross cultural mixing, i.e. "white" women hooking up with "black" men? What's so unbelievable about that? Trying to catch the lawyer would be crossing a class barrier, which would perhaps have been more challenging & less likely to succeed.

About Truman Capote, it seems that he was a huge fan of the book, and he probably wished he wrote it, but he didn't. See:

https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5244492
 
Last edited:

Richard Stanley

Administrator
Regarding: "absquatulate".

If you had watched the White Trash video you'd now know what the word means, and that Isenberg was pointing out that non po racist White People think that you are White Trash in a quite pejorative sense. Those White people most certainly did not think that they themselves were White Trash. You'd also have learned a number of other slurs that proper White people thought about White Trash.
Isenberg is a typical Jewish hater of white people, I imagine. Don't you understand there is a double standard here - which you are supporting? You didn't notice the so called racial slur you were using? Why am I not surprised? Why do you suppose she didn't write a book called, "Greedy Jews"? Do you think it would take you more than a moment to notice that slur?

White trash refers to very poor white people in places like the rural south, people like your grandparents. Great people, but lacking in education and other refinements. I have no problem with it, and our grandmother used it. She laughed when using it. Doesn't anyone have a sense of humor any more? I have wonderful memories of her. She'd say, "Suga, we're jus po white trash. Doncha know it? Ha ha. "
Funny, you are actually practicing what Jerry discussed about an in-group using a self-directed slur. Ironically its a problem for you if a black refers to another black as a nigger, and you feel slighted because you're not allowed to do the same.

Your grandmother was using ironic humor, knowing full well that other Whites were using this term and worse as a slur against her. But you have lost the irony, becoming certain that such as you are the (next) intended Chosen People of your Jewish god.

But if a black person, or a Jew like Isenberg, (accurately) discusses the term 'White Trash', you feel 100% justified in basely asserting that this must be a slur against you, even though its a reasonable and educational discussion.
White trash does not imply to me that such people are racists or criminals, although Jews like Isenberg would probably want to claim that it does. I didn't watch that video. It started with a creepy anti-white Hollywood movie, and I didn't want to see it.
OMG. I just looked at the full title of that Isenberg book. White Trash: The 400-Year Untold History of Class in America. It implies to me that she sees all white people as trash. Maybe she's a Communist or a Cultural Marxist!
Other than being criminal squatters (on land that was stolen from the natives), which gave rise to the term 'absquatulate', you White Trash descendants are no more racist or criminal than anybody else, except for those of you who are more racists and criminal. You feel more comfortable projecting your paranoid delusions onto others rather than face the painful Truth, the cognitive dissonance of your profit from historical Globalism. That other fake Jew, Jesus of Nazareth, told you that The Truth could set you Free, but you're convinced that your ignorant and neurotic cherry picking is superior to the painful Truth. Jesus, an avatar for the imperial Roman Caesars and their Maccabee friends, knew that you'd respond this way. And now you want to play "kill the messenger".

Isenberg, and us, are not saying that all such White Trash are racists. But that said, there are two general types of Racism, overt and latent. The latter types will tell us that they are not 'racist' at all (in their minds), but might go so far as to proclaim that the freed slaves and the Jews, and similar, are now a big problem. Back in the day these White Protestants would start taking in the words of the Grand Wizard and join the KKK, and become overt racists. Today, you listen to a former Grand Wizard and wish you could just have your Race Nation. Your Race Nation on land that taken by Conquest thanks to the Globalist Racists that were reading the Old Testament script from your Bible.

Globalist Racists??

Now the schizo Miss Kitty is going to tell us that White Globalists cannot be Racists ... because they are White and can do no wrong - unless the White Jews trick them into doing so that is. These heroic White Globalists will garner her some lebsenraum, and once it is comfortably settled by more White Trash Volk the Volk will deny the bloody kind deeds of Miss Kitty's White Globalists. https://postflaviana.org/community/index.php?threads/agent-x-dialectic.2511/post-11948

"Pearl clutching"? How ironic!!!
 
Last edited:

Richard Stanley

Administrator
What we have been witnessing consistently with Miss Kitty is a frantic need to misdirect attention from the otherwise dissonant reality of her particularist Globalism. Therefore, she perversely twists our criticism of the Abrahamic construct at the core of her culture as somekind of support for the Jewish scapegoat. While we feel some sympathy for those Jews that are not in on the secret, like most other White People, Miss Kitty kultishly konforms to the mass psychology, despite now being clearly informed of the Reality of the dark situation. In her mass Stockholm Syndrome delusion she mis-identifies with the 'noble' White ringleaders while happily admitting to being White Trash. She cannot admit that the White joke is on her, foisted by .... White People, especially her heroes.

This is why fake Jesus (aka Titus Flavius, the Son of the god Vespasian) had to sarcastically say, "Forgive them Father, they know not what they do".

She will defiantly not read the Bible (for what it is or otherwise) nor will she watch or read White Trash, because to do so will force her to acknowledge all the dirt swept under her rug. That is, other than to say it was obviously the Jews that put all the dirt there.
 

Richard Stanley

Administrator
Can we agree that there is no reason to encourage transgenderism or homosexuality? I think these things are fundamentally against the natural order of things, and should not be encouraged.
I think maybe we should fork this off onto a new thread titled: Miss Kitty and Her Black and White Scape-Zygote.

In any case, Miss Kitty is still operating in the superstitious world of total binary existence, where there are no shades of grey.

In the biologic process of sexual differentiation from an undifferentiated zygote, the differentiation process is directly steered by the levels and ratio of testosterone and estrogen that are being produced inside the zygote by its internal X/Y genes. And those hormones and hormone mimickers which comes from outside, mostly from a mother and her immediate environment. I'm going to guess that there may be some epigenes that are involved as well, further muddying the once binary genetic picture.

It is known that the more boys that a mother has, her ratio level of testosterone to estrogen successively drop, thus increasing the odds that successively younger sons might display increasingly effeminate traits, one of which is passing the threshold of being more attracted to the same sex than the opposite one. This effect is likely one reason that Catholics place a younger son into the priesthood. In fact, one can find Catholics state that this indeed is, or was, their traditional practice for effeminate and homosexual sons.

It is also well known in nature that there are other species where homosexual behavior exists, such as chimpanzees. Many young male dogs and even human 'dogs' will hump just about anything that moves. Maybe this came from watching Jewish porn? Are Jews also responsible for hermaphrodites Miss Kitty?

If homosexuals and Jews have neurotic issues, like yourself now, perhaps it comes from their sense of being outside the approval of mainstream society. Their sense is long historical and now you're complaining because you feel the odd-goyl out?
 
Last edited:
Well, you shouldn't have any trouble finding some Jewish publishers, especially since Jews control most of the publishing houses.

I'd say what we are living through is simple communist subversion. It's not hard to spot. It's not subtle or esoteric. Things that are not subtle or esoteric are not appealing to you guys, I know.

This subversion is combined with replacement level immigration. Jews changed our immigration laws back in 1965. At the time, America was about 90% white, but we'll soon be outnumbered. Communists have been secretly warring on us for decades. Psychological warfare. The worst of them don't believe any of this utopian multi culti stuff. They want us gone.

You've bought into the most basic clown world nonsense contained in communist subversion - radical egalitarianism, social justice, diversity, globalism, contempt for Christianity and traditional American values....

You guys are commies, doncha know it? Ha, ha!

https://archive.org/stream/BezmenovLoveLetterToAmerica/YuriBezmenov-LoveLetterToAmerica_divu.txt

I'm especially annoyed with you, Jerry. You have the blood of revolutionaries in your veins - people that risked their lives so that you could have a little freedom. That's not subtle or esoteric, either.


I had to know whether or not you guys were right about Jews being scapegoats. Sorry, but I can't see it.
 
Last edited:

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
Well, you shouldn't have any trouble finding some Jewish publishers, especially since Jews control most of the publishing houses.
I doubt it. I wouldn't even try. We are staunchly anti-Zionist, and opposed to Jewish racism in Israel and elsewhere, and supporters of Palestinian rights. In case you haven't noticed, there's currently a campaign to conflate anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism, and make both of them equally subversive. Anti-Zionism is certainly marginalized outside of Islamic countries.

Also, our portrayal of Moses and the other Old Testament heroes, is not exactly flattering.

I'd say what we are living through is simple communist subversion.
Which communists? Where?

Communism was a system envisioned by Karl Marx, and manifested in 20th century Soviet and Chinese society. The system was characterized by state ownership of all means of production, managed through a central bureaucracy.

But, Communism in Russia, China and everywhere else on the planet, has been "consigned to the dustbin of history". What's left in Russia and China, are "revisionist" systems in which extractive industries like petroleum are nationalized, and everything else is owned by private individuals. In Europe, most of the rest of the world, and even the USA, we have hybrid economies which are socialized at least to some minor extent, with the state providing a basic level of social services.

Are there any true Communists left? A very few, and extremely marginalized, if any. None here.

I say what we are living through, is Zionist Neocon subversion.

You've bought into the most basic clown world nonsense contained in communist subversion - radical egalitarianism, social justice, diversity, globalism, contempt for Christianity and traditional American values - and all the rest.
I don't know what you mean by "radical" egalitarianism, but yes, we are proudly egalitarian here. We support social justice, and diversity.

We believe there is a globe, so I guess that makes us globalists? As opposed to Christians, who turn into Flat Earthers if they actually read their Bible.

Contempt for traditional American values? You mean, like racism and genocide against indigenous peoples? Check.

You guys are commies, doncha know it? Ha, ha!
You mean, like FDR was a commie? Or, like Einstein was a commie? Yeah, I bet even Richard is a commie!

Bezmenov's Love Letter to America
Aww schucks, 'Murrica, I luv you too :)

I love all of you -- liberals and conservatives, "decadent capitalists" and "oppressed masses", blacks and whites and browns and yellows, rednecks and intellectuals."
Ha! Just what you'd expect a commie subversive writing under the pen name of "Tomas David Shuman" to say. He comes right out and admits it, on the very first page, that he's a defector from the USSR and that he admires American diversity.

I had to know whether or not you guys were right about Jews being scapegoats. Sorry, but I can't see it.
Well, I suppose the goat did eat the blackberries.
 
Last edited:

Richard Stanley

Administrator
You mean, like FDR was a commie? Or, like Einstein was a commie? Yeah, I bet even Richard is a commie!
Yeah. And Karl Marx was not a 'sincere' commie, since he was working as a (double) agent for Miss Kitty's noble, shining white, aristocratic heroes, (those people that called her grandmother White Trash) that her patriotic revolution was supposed to free us from. Miss Kitty doesn't like the po white trash workers, former serfs, getting uppity with the Capitalist Boss Man. So Miss Kitty's elite globalist white heroes got a Sheepdog to subvert democratic organizing workers, aka socialism, with what became totalitarian Communism.

Now just who's a commie?

How ironic that I feel such great compassion and pity for the noble white MAGA savages. I know a lot of them, and underneath it all they are truly one of the many salts of the spherical Earth. Simply misguided by a lifetime of being propagandicly converted into the next Chosen People. Miss Kitty feels that she and her fellow savages are becoming contextualized into the next scapegoats, and in this regard she is quite correct, with great help from Donald Maccabee Trump. We have repeatedly attempted to show her the mechanics of how this is really happening, but her ingrained methodology of selective and preferential interpretation only reinforces her paranoia, as is typical of these savages, and thus she doubles and triples down on her defective logic.

Noble Savages are NOT the same as Savage Nobles.
 
Last edited:

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
Now just who's a commie?
FWIW, Miles Mathis reached similar conclusions about Marx: that he not only married into the Prussian nobility, but he was also related to the industrialist Philips family of Belgium through his mother. Mathis says that Marx was bankrolled by his (great) uncle Benjamin Philips.

Who knew? The von Westphalens of Prussia, and the Philips of Belgium, were a bunch of commies! And not only that, but Communists too!

http://mileswmathis.com/marx.pdf

Obviously, Miss Kitty must be a commie just like us, otherwise why would she be posting at this commie infested website?
 
Last edited:
Top