March 28: 'Jews' as a Scapegoat Class

Richard Stanley

Administrator
La Raza will soon take California, and it will be a barrio. Maybe the Jews will go to China. What do they care? They were never Americans. They're international. A separate nation in diaspora. Have you been to Detroit lately? Oregon may be safe, but not for long. People will chase down every livable area until there is nothing left. Is this what you want?
And so the correct Christian White solution is to vote for a hypocritical chain migrationist who adulterously sleeps with porn stars, walks unannounced into the dressing rooms of teenage beauty queens, grabs them by their kitties, acts and talks like a mafia don, dyes his hair orange, and will save the republic by talking up and acting like fascist dictators and strong men (except for Claude's virtuous fascists, of course), decrying the republic's Rule of Law?

And you say that he isn't doing enough to make you happy? And you complain about Jerry and me? If this is your culture who needs it?
 

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
The preamble of the constitution says that the United States was founded for the benefit of the founders themselves and their posterity.
I will not stand for this re-writing of history. The US Constitution was a great aspirational document of the Enlightenment era. An era which rose out of times of feudalism, slavery, and tribal racism, but looked forward to an end of those institutions.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
"We the People". It doesn't say "We the White People". It doesn't say "We the Protestants". It doesn't say "We the Oligarchs".

At the time that the Constitution was written, "We the People" included Jews, Catholics and Freethinkers from many European countries, as well as about 20% African-Americans, mostly slaves, but some free.

The authors of the Constitution may have been hypocrites, but they didn't enshrine their hypocrisy in the Preamble to the Constitution. They wrote it to appeal to the highest ideals of the time.

Did you notice the glee over the burning of Notre Dame - a lot of it Jewish?
No, I didn't notice a single word of glee anywhere about the burning of Notre Dame. What are you reading?

People will chase down every livable area until there is nothing left. Is this what you want?
We've never written up a Postflavian political platform -- that is, a program to achieve what we want.

But I'm sure if we did, it would include a goal to improve living conditions everywhere, and especially in Central and South America. Those places have been turned into "shit-holes" by European and North American colonialism and imperialist economic policies. If those policies were reversed and conditions south of the US border started to improve, there would be far less economically driven immigration.
 
Vladimir Putin in his grey suits reminds me of that Warner Brothers' grey-suited character: Bugs Bunny...
And so the correct Christian White solution is to vote for a hypocritical chain migrationist who adulterously sleeps with porn stars, walks unannounced into the dressing rooms of teenage beauty queens, grabs them by their kitties, acts and talks like a mafia don, dyes his hair orange, and will save the republic by talking up and acting like fascist dictators and strong men (except for Claude's virtuous fascists, of course), decrying the republic's Rule of Law?

And you say that he isn't doing enough to make you happy? And you complain about Jerry and me? If this is your culture who needs it?
...who is about to face both Elmer 'Pompeo' Fudd and John 'Yosemite Sam' Bolton.

I.e. it's NOT his hair that's dyed orange - it's his bill!

Yours faithfully
Claude-the-not-so-virtuous
 
When you have a nickname based on incompatible cartoon characters, hiding behind the faux innocence of Tweety Pie...
Without mentioning John Earnest, PewdiePie very clearly repudiated white nationalist violence today. It seems very sincere. I don't believe we can blame this on him.
... then you have to find an outlet for your skunklike racist inclinations. Perhaps he should revert to his Pepe prototype and devote himself once more to chasing cats!

Yours peg-on-nosefully
Claude
 

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
Frankly, ridiculous academic theories, as well as those who buy into them, will be irrelevant when America breaks up into territories.
Just to be clear, we aren't predicting here that America would ever break into territories. If there's ever a civil war (which Richard considers plausible, while I think it's unlikely) it would break more or less along red-blue lines, or nationalists vs. globalists. The globalists will win easily in that case, and the nationalists will be slaughtered.

My sister-in-law just took her nine year old out of public school for this reason, along with wildly distorted anti-white American history, pushing gender as a social construct, a couple of little boys wearing tutu skirts at dance class, and too many Mexican kids with lice who can't speak English.
If you're going to disagree with academic concepts, you could at least try to understand them first. Sociologists make a distinction between 'sex' and 'gender'. The human race is divided into two sexes, male and female, with a small percentage that don't fit readily into one of the two categories. 'Gender' is a social construct built on a sexual basis, and includes concepts such as that little boys shouldn't wear tutu skirts. In Scottish culture, kilts are considered very manly.

You think that Mexican kids prefer to have lice, or that white kids don't get lice?

If you don't want to be murdered, probably best to move to an area where people can easily accept you as one of their own.
Nobody here is denying that socially constructed racial prejudices exist. Yes, sometimes people murder each other based on socially constructed racial prejudices.

The relevant question is - what group is going to accept me and defend me if the SHTF?
Perhaps you could pass for Jewish if you wanted to, and safely ride things out right where you are? Or find yourself a WASP enclave if you prefer, there are many of them still existing.

It seems to me you are wasting a whole lot of time worried about a hypothetical problem, while World War III is coming rapidly upon us. Look at what's happening in Iran, Venezuela, Korea, Syria, Gaza... in a context of trade war with China, and rampant Russophobia... a powder keg waiting for a match, just like 1914.
 

Richard Stanley

Administrator
It's nice that we finally agree that today's non-Semitic Jews (Ashkenazi) are a Scapegoat Class, probably after we explained that they are also in the dual role of a Sheepdog Class, just like their predecessor OG synthetic Jews. That said wwwe've [sic] gone horribly off-topic again.

Semites look like Arabs and such, hence Jews are White people, because they are ... White. John Fitzgerald Kennedy and his brothers are Melungeons, which means they are Jews. OK, Jews by conversion, but aren't they all. The Fitzgerald, as we have learned from a Fitzgerald, portion of the blood is from good Norman stock, meaning that they are .... White people, (pretending to be Irish. And according to the self-proclaimed late leader of the Norman tribe, the shep-eeps who created this whole social construct in the first place. Which, in some conflated eyes makes them Jews as well.

Guess what I discovered in my backyard the night before last fellow chimpigs? Racoons. Yes, I know they have them in Los Angeles, but I live in the freaking middle of the desert, in the middle of a medium sized city. The only way for racoons to get their is via hillbillies. Bible thumping, White hillbillies from the South. They came here to make a living building airplanes to fight the Cold War, and now we can't get them to return. Why would they, they can't get their slaves back. They'd have to keep them hidden in their basement like David Duke does, and that's agin the Good Book that mandates that slaves be treated kindly.
 

Richard Stanley

Administrator
This is, once again, sadly hilarious.

Who was it that decided to assign the humans of the world different languages (and thus cultures) and so disperse them across the world? God created one Man and one Woman, and all races descended from these two individuals. Of course, Eve's sons necessarily had to sleep with mommy. Oh ... that's how it got all fucked up. Never mind.

Of course, this isn't really how it happened is it?

How did your ancestors get to America? They followed the globalist plans and playbook of your precious 'Jew' Books. Now you complain about the process that got you ensconced among your neighbors?

https://postflaviana.org/community/index.php?threads/is-the-bible-nationalist-or-globalist.2142/

The problem is you want a nice comfy and serene life like your parents made you accustomed to. This accustomization occurred at the end of the last outward push of the globalist wave and, for your oyster culturizing, that sloshing wave was moving less in between the to and fro phases. Now you are afraid and want to surf the wave back out to sea, but this usually ends badly, one getting overtaken by the next inevitable wave.
 
Last edited:

Richard Stanley

Administrator
We must also eliminate the scourge of White Trash in this great nation, before it is too late. They must be made to Absqualulate ... or else.

The following is Nancy Isenberg's lecture on such:

 

John

New Member
I believe I was remiss in addressing an important issue raised by Joe as to why the Jews would portray themselves so. This is actually very easy to see, that is, if one accepts our underlying premise. Namely that such a group has been made to become a 'fronting' veil for the true and powerful players going forward, aka a 'front'. This issue is somewhat funny, in that it seems like asking why the Christians would portray themselves as they did (not).

To activate such requires that the people in this group come to believe the Jonestown Kool-Aide being forced down their throats, via various carrot and stick means. It was a process likely involving generations to effectively take hold, and thus we see the reflection of such transitional efforts being cast as numerous 'backsliding' events moving back towards the old religion.

And thus we can see here, that it was not the 'Jews' per se portraying themselves as such in the Torah, but rather the men behind the veil who established this synthetic front for them. Thus a special identity is established for them that appeals variously to their vanity, i.e. the Chosen of God. And they are given a divine task, to do their 'biblically' ordained globalizing work for the ultimate betterment of mankind, everyone suffering most all the way - in one way or another. This special identity and task, combined with their version of Victimology, is what motivates and crystallizes the apparent unifying principle that has maintained them together for so long.

The Torah is considered, by many, to be the first 'respectable' history in addition to having later become a holy screed. Here, I am referring specifically to the relatively detailed annals of the kings. Ordinarily, one of the features of pre-modern historical narratives is that they are almost always written to flatter the royal sponsor of such. This ability to be so critical of Israel's and Judea's failures is then taken as a huge helping of credibility. Here it seems rather odd that a people whose kings and such were so flawed for numerous offenses could then be so enlightened as to record everything negative as they did. This in view of actions against God's laws and who literally comes to Earth in a human appearance and kills Chosen evildoers - on a rather arbitrary basis BTW.

So here, I suggest an alternative explanation for such recording of negative aspects was rather to uniquely cast the die of their self image and for that of the goyim towards them. The psychological effect might thus be that of: "Gee, we really must be special in God's eye because after all we've done wrong, he still wants us as the Chosen. He loves us, he really, really loves us." As for the goyim, this construct must have been frightening for many so inclined as: "Gee, these people must be crazy, because they constantly make their vindictively jealous God uniquely angry enough to kill people (including Jews) himself, if not by employing other means." Other gods of the day did not involve themselves so in the affairs of mankind.

There is a pretty well understood concept that one way for a scared person to improve the odds of protecting themselves from potential attackers is to take on a crazy behavioral affect, whose unpredictability is more likely to dissuade a less than determined attacker. In the animal world, such as lions and tigers are known to shy away from unexpected and unusual behavior, that might prove harmful to them. Similarly there are similar psychological principles invoked with giving a task to a work animal, say like a sheepdog. When a man tells a woman that she is 'special' (Chosen) this improves his odds of being rewarded as well.

But, as has been revealed above and with more to continue, there was different levels of Chosen, which reveals that the historical society was not monolithic, as today it is not either. But it is rather irritating to see most that want to constantly frame Jews as monolithic in interests, when the phantom White Nation is not monolithic in interests either. I see this as the same unifying principle powerfully operating as a vanity mirror (pun intended).
Hello Richard - I spent a few hours with this document the other day. The author says he spent 30 years doing the research. It's quite long and most of it is comparative philology that I couldn't hope to understand. The textual conclusions are what I found interesting. His basic premise is that the Hebrews were Asiatic Greeks. I thought you might find it of interest. https://ia802702.us.archive.org/19/items/Hebrew.is.Greek/Hebrew_is_Greek_lite_text.pdf
 

Richard Stanley

Administrator
Hello Richard - I spent a few hours with this document the other day. The author says he spent 30 years doing the research. It's quite long and most of it is comparative philology that I couldn't hope to understand. The textual conclusions are what I found interesting. His basic premise is that the Hebrews were Asiatic Greeks. I thought you might find it of interest. https://ia802702.us.archive.org/19/items/Hebrew.is.Greek/Hebrew_is_Greek_lite_text.pdf
Thx John, and welcome to the forum.

Yes, one does need to be a specialist to get a full understanding of this. The thesis is pretty amazing and may fit in well with our research.

I was just pondering last week what the relationship between the name for God, El, and the romantic article of 'el', and on page xvii of the preface has a discussion of such, that also invokes the Latinized name magnus ille Alexander, that gives us a clue as to the linkage to the English title of 'lord'.
 
Well, Richard, you are obviously a self hating white person. I don't know what has brought this about, but it's pretty sick. Maybe if Jerry stops taking care of the cows long enough to get out to my house in Hollywood, you can come by and we can all observe some fun Jewish behavior together. Maybe you can at least come to hate them equally as much as you hate Christians. Maybe Claude can come by also. Christmas is always a good time because they love to unplug my Christmas lights, and say things like, "You should have to get a permit for those." I plan on torturing them this year with a blow up nativity. It's so cutting edge anti-semitic, you know.

Here's a swell video featuring Jordan Peterson, just in case you missed it. The questioner is a Jew, and he admits that his people probably killed four million Ukranian Christians in the Holodomor (the lowest estimate I've ever seen), but then justifies it as a reaction to pogroms in Russia. Even certain Russian acquaintances of mine translate Solzhenitzyn's estimate much higher. The questioner then goes on to say that maybe Jews will kill again in Europe because they hate Europeans for supposed mistreatment of Jews. Personally, I think Jews are soft killing plenty of us now, even in the US. The questioner has no apparent guilt - I've rarely seen Jews express guilt or even much awareness of why people don't like them - but he does have the decency to pose a rational question - how do you prevent these atrocities?

My answer is - keep the Jews out of the country, or impose strict limits on their behavior towards the host. I think I mentioned this in the first post I made. You don't have a right to harm the Jew, but the Jew doesn't have a right to subvert your culture ( with usury, porn, and all of the usual nonsense). According to E. Michael Jones, that worked for a lot of years in Medieval Europe. The Catholic Church really kept them under control, but now maybe they are controlling the Catholics, I don't know. Anyway, you just throw any individual Jew out whenever you catch him charging interest. That way, the peasants don't lose their farms and kill the Jews, and start up the whole mess again. Maybe you could throw them out when you find they're only hiring other Jews and anti-white individuals to run Hollywood and the New York Times, etc. Better yet, they could all just move to Israel.

Of course, Peterson is afraid to answer. It's pretty funny, like he thinks he's Hamlet:

 
Last edited:
Just to be clear, we aren't predicting here that America would ever break into territories. If there's ever a civil war (which Richard considers plausible, while I think it's unlikely) it would break more or less along red-blue lines, or nationalists vs. globalists. The globalists will win easily in that case, and the nationalists will be slaughtered.
Yes, the main divide of the day is globalist vs. nationalist. I say the globalists are mainly Jews. I can't imagine why you would be a globalist. You aren't a Jew and you aren't nearly rich enough to be an oligarch, so what are you thinking? Most people just like to live with their own kind, more or less. That means splitting along racial lines, unless forced by globalists to do otherwise. LA is already split along racial lines. About the only people who are widely dispersed are white people - because they are not allowed to freely associate. There are government programs to prevent it. Even my Korean hairdresser knows this. She says Koreans have taken over Irvine - from the white people. Why do you think white people from Cali are moving to Oregon?

If you're going to disagree with academic concepts, you could at least try to understand them first. Sociologists make a distinction between 'sex' and 'gender'. The human race is divided into two sexes, male and female, with a small percentage that don't fit readily into one of the two categories. 'Gender' is a social construct built on a sexual basis, and includes concepts such as that little boys shouldn't wear tutu skirts. In Scottish culture, kilts are considered very manly.
Where is your common sense? Don't you understand that this is subversion and sickness - attempting to confuse little children? Yeah, these people are a small percentage - so why do you suppose that little kids need to know about them early on? Why do they have to go to library day with trannies? Trannies are probably mentally ill. I know a few in Hollywood. It's sick as hell. Little kids are now thinking that they're trannies. This is child abuse. The Boy Scouts will probably have to disband because they were forced to accept gay scout masters. Every gay guy I've ever known has told me that he was molested as a child. Where is your real world experience?

You think that Mexican kids prefer to have lice, or that white kids don't get lice?
Why didn't you send Melinda to a school full of lice? Frankly, do you really know any Mexicans? Have you spent time with them? Have you ghost written their books? Do you REALLY know anyone but people pretty much like yourself? Do you really know anyone with an 80 IQ? Would you like to try to hire one of them at the farm? Why didn't you send Melinda to a school full of kids with an average IQ of 80? How do you think that would have affected her education? Are you out of your mind?

Nobody here is denying that socially constructed racial prejudices exist. Yes, sometimes people murder each other based on socially constructed racial prejudices.

Perhaps you could pass for Jewish if you wanted to, and safely ride things out right where you are? Or find yourself a WASP enclave if you prefer, there are many of them still existing.
If WASPs start to masquerade as Jews, that will pretty much prove my point, won't it? I've already suspected that it might be happening in LA. But you won't easily fool the Jews, will you? The way THEY fooled US...

If there is an upper middle class WASP enclave in LA, would somebody please tell me where it is?


It seems to me you are wasting a whole lot of time worried about a hypothetical problem, while World War III is coming rapidly upon us. Look at what's happening in Iran, Venezuela, Korea, Syria, Gaza... in a context of trade war with China, and rampant Russophobia... a powder keg waiting for a match, just like 1914.
Yes, it's WWIII, and in LA, people from Russia, China, Iran, Venezuela, Korea, Syria, and/or Gaza will be coming to kill me. Especially since we all know that the second biggest crime of WWII was the Japanese internment camps.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We must also eliminate the scourge of White Trash in this great nation, before it is too late. They must be made to Absqualulate ... or else.

The following is Nancy Isenberg's lecture on such:

[/QUOT
This is, once again, sadly hilarious.

Who was it that decided to assign the humans of the world different languages (and thus cultures) and so disperse them across the world? God created one Man and one Woman, and all races descended from these two individuals. Of course, Eve's sons necessarily had to sleep with mommy. Oh ... that's how it got all fucked up. Never mind.

Of course, this isn't really how it happened is it?

How did your ancestors get to America? They followed the globalist plans and playbook of your precious 'Jew' Books. Now you complain about the process that got you ensconced among your neighbors?

https://postflaviana.org/community/index.php?threads/is-the-bible-nationalist-or-globalist.2142/

The problem is you want a nice comfy and serene life like your parents made you accustomed to. This accustomization occurred at the end of the last outward push of the globalist wave and, for your oyster culturizing, that sloshing wave was moving less in between the to and fro phases. Now you are afraid and want to surf the wave back out to sea, but this usually ends badly, one getting overtaken by the next inevitable wave.
Of course, I want a comfy life. Don't you?

I think the point here is that the European Union is trying to rebuild the Tower of Babel. They are trying to place themselves above god. Not a good idea. Maybe it's an attempted slap in the face to Christians by Jews. I don't know. The building has a Jewish name. There's a restaurant in LA called Babel, owned by Jews.

No, my ancestors got to America by ship, in the winter, and almost died. They were settlers. The founders of America were nationalists. I am ensconced among foreigners because Jews subverted the immigration laws. I'd say that's the proximate cause.

"To Kill a Mockingbird" is THE classic Hollywood anti-white hate film. White nationalists always talk about this film.

My grandmother always said she was "poor white trash." She said she and my grandfather could only afford to educate one child, my father. From my perspective, Nancy Isenberg is Jewish trash.
 
I will not stand for this re-writing of history. The US Constitution was a great aspirational document of the Enlightenment era. An era which rose out of times of feudalism, slavery, and tribal racism, but looked forward to an end of those institutions.

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
"We the People". It doesn't say "We the White People". It doesn't say "We the Protestants". It doesn't say "We the Oligarchs".

At the time that the Constitution was written, "We the People" included Jews, Catholics and Freethinkers from many European countries, as well as about 20% African-Americans, mostly slaves, but some free.

The authors of the Constitution may have been hypocrites, but they didn't enshrine their hypocrisy in the Preamble to the Constitution. They wrote it to appeal to the highest ideals of the time.
You are dead wrong. Hardly anyone but WASPs fought in the revolution. That's who the preamble was written for -WASPs and maybe a very few other white people. Don't try to apply the standards of today to the people of the 1700's. By American standards of today, they were the very worst sort of people.

No, I didn't notice a single word of glee anywhere about the burning of Notre Dame. What are you reading?
Here's a perspective that maybe you never hear, and that is a big part of your problem, and the whole country's problem. You simply never get to hear anything like this:



Well, maybe youtube doesn't want me to share these. One is called "I Don't Give a Damn About Notre Dame." The other is "What Went Up in Flames."

We've never written up a Postflavian political platform -- that is, a program to achieve what we want.

But I'm sure if we did, it would include a goal to improve living conditions everywhere, and especially in Central and South America. Those places have been turned into "shit-holes" by European and North American colonialism and imperialist economic policies. If those policies were reversed and conditions south of the US border started to improve, there would be far less economically driven immigration.
You should really meet with Lupe sometime to let her tell you about conditions in Mexico since NAFTA and mass immigration to the US. Back in the old days, forty years ago, she could drive all the way to her home town in a car. Now, she would never dream of it. She's seen dead bodies hanging in the trees on the road near her father's house. It's too dangerous. Since we allowed these people a way out of Mexico, all hell has broken loose over there. You don't know what you are talking about. You simply buy the lie that every problem is created by the white man. You do not know these people at all. But unfortunately, I do. They have colonized us. I thought you hate colonialism. Why is it okay for Jews to colonize us with Mexicans? We are also paying tribute to Mexicans. And yet, many of them hate us. Are you suicidal?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Richard Stanley

Administrator
Well, Richard, you are obviously a self hating white person. I don't know what has brought this about, but it's pretty sick.
See, you would make a good Jew.

But, before we go on too long, what makes you prefer traditional Italian-American (aka Christian) mafia porn to Jewish porn?

You see, I just did to you what you're constantly doing to Jerry and me. We're just trying to explain the sick construction of Western Civilization so that the socially constructed Jews (that don't know any better) and you socially constructed Jewish-Lite people can better see the light.

You are hysterically obsessed with maintaining a binary picture of a complex problem, a problem that is a multi-thousand year old process and neurotically reducing it down (in time and space) to your personal desire that you're entitled to a "comfy life", on a calm oasis in the middle of a storm. The Process doesn't give a damn about either Jerry or me, and certainly not you, an admitted member of White Trashdom (aka human Sheep).
Maybe you can at least come to hate them equally as much as you hate Christians.
I don't hate all Christians, and based upon your 'confessions' I'd hardly label you a Christian, except in name only. Just don't forget (because Y'all have), your Christian reward is in Heaven, not on Earth.
Christmas is always a good time because they love to unplug my Christmas lights, and say things like, "You should have to get a permit for those." I plan on torturing them this year with a blow up nativity. It's so cutting edge anti-semitic, you know.
Jesus, being a good Jew, the best Jew ever, would have a serious problem with your pagan lights and Christmas tree. Did you know this?
The questioner then goes on to say that maybe Jews will kill again in Europe because they hate Europeans for supposed mistreatment of Jews. Personally, I think Jews are soft killing plenty of us now, even in the US. The questioner has no apparent guilt - I've rarely seen Jews express guilt or even much awareness of why people don't like them - but he does have the decency to pose a rational question - how do you prevent these atrocities?
Hate begets hate.

Maybe the questioner doesn't feel any guilt for the exact same reason you don't feel any guilt?

It's rather interesting that all mistreatment of Jews (Ashkenazim, Eurasian Turkoslavs, socially constructed as 'Jews') is 'supposed' and all mistreatment of your subJews is an ongoing holocaust. I do know what has brought this about, and it's pretty sick.
My answer is - keep the Jews out of the country, or impose strict limits on their behavior towards the host. I think I mentioned this in the first post I made. You don't have a right to harm the Jew, but the Jew doesn't have a right to subvert your culture ( with usury, porn, and all of the usual nonsense). According to E. Michael Jones, that worked for a lot of years in Medieval Europe. The Catholic Church really kept them under control, but now maybe they are controlling the Catholics, I don't know. Anyway, you just throw any individual Jew out whenever you catch him charging interest. That way, the peasants don't lose their farms and kill the Jews, and start up the whole mess again. Maybe you could throw them out when you find they're only hiring other Jews and anti-white individuals to run Hollywood and the New York Times, etc. Better yet, they could all just move to Israel.
If we were allowed to do this, would it be fair for the indigenous peoples to demand the same right regarding Christians, demand the invading barbarians move back to Whitelandia?

They're surely grumbling that the Globalist Christians (Jew-lites) have a lot more guns and ammo. They're probably not too happy with the Jews for creating all those Western movies as well.
Yes, the main divide of the day is globalist vs. nationalist. I say the globalists are mainly Jews. I can't imagine why you would be a globalist. You aren't a Jew and you aren't nearly rich enough to be an oligarch, so what are you thinking?
What makes you mistakenly think we're globalists? Oh, yes, it's your superficial demand to see everything in stark, binary black and white. The globalist process got you the life you now want to maintain under a (race) nationalist guise. Now you're bitching because the next wave of globalism (the Process) has come along and you're afraind of getting sucked into its undertow. Jesus told you and Mick Jagger to build your houses on stone, not on sand, especially beach sand.
If WASPs start to masquerade as Jews, that will pretty much prove my point, won't it? I've already suspected that it might be happening in LA. But you won't easily fool the Jews, will you? The way THEY fooled US...
Of course, I want a comfy life. Don't you?
Sure, but it is also conditional on what I have to compromise.
No, my ancestors got to America by ship, in the winter, and almost died. They were settlers. The founders of America were nationalists. I am ensconced among foreigners because Jews subverted the immigration laws. I'd say that's the proximate cause.
My grandmother always said she was "poor white trash." She said she and my grandfather could only afford to educate one child, my father. From my perspective, Nancy Isenberg is Jewish trash.
So I'm confused here. Are you making common ground with Isenberg because you're both 'trash' -- in your own words?

The point of the "White Trash" video was how class was always a component of White America, from its inception, no need to involve the Jews. And you've admitted that you are White Trash. But you are so obsessed with perpetuating the sickness that you wont take the possible way out - that comes from accepting the historical truth of how Western Civilization was formed, in the Shepherd, Sheepdog, and Sheep system.

Your ancestors, who unless they absquatulated with their noble surname, descended from the Shepherds and via having too many sons your branch ended up descending past the gentry into Sheepdom generations ago.

Now the sad irony is that your American ancestors behaved like good Hebrews and conquered the New World. That you want to label it 'Christian' doesn't make a hill of beans to the Red Trash POV, does it?

But you feel entitled to trash Isenberg, because she quotes White American 'heroes' who thought your ancestors were trash? These 'heroes' most certainly did not feel that they were trash, when they discussed White Trash.

Why didn't your ancestors fight to stay in Whitelandia, the land of your precious kings and queens? I know why they didn't, and we've told you, but you want to ignore the Process, scripted in your 'Jew' books.

You complined about our being too wordy for you to understand, while ironically we were saving you the time from having to read such as James Carroll's (a former Catholic priest) Constantine's Sword, that explains clearly why the Catholic Church kept the Jews around, in the manner that fit Israel Shahak's description in his Jewish History, Jewish Religion. And we go further to explain all this as an integral part the Process. It is expected that more superficial people will psychologically refuse to believe the harsh reality when it is clearly presented to them.

Because your fleece is white as snow.
 

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
Where is your common sense? Don't you understand that this is subversion and sickness - attempting to confuse little children? Yeah, these people are a small percentage - so why do you suppose that little kids need to know about them early on? Why do they have to go to library day with trannies? Trannies are probably mentally ill. I know a few in Hollywood. It's sick as hell. Little kids are now thinking that they're trannies. This is child abuse. The Boy Scouts will probably have to disband because they were forced to accept gay scout masters. Every gay guy I've ever known has told me that he was molested as a child. Where is your real world experience?
Miss Kitty, I'm sorry to have to do this, but I've warned you before. "Tranny" is a hateful slur, and a violation of the site rules. Such persons are referred to as transsexuals, or TS. If you want to post hate speech, find another website, or send me email.

I agree that subjecting children to sex change surgery amounts to child abuse. Little boys wearing dresses, is not child abuse.

According to actual research, 46% of gay men reported that they'd experienced homosexual molestation. That's terribly high, but your claim "every gay guy I've ever known" seems odd. Confirmation bias on your part? Something special about the men you meet? I don't have any real world experience to report about this.

Well, maybe youtube doesn't want me to share these. One is called "I Don't Give a Damn About Notre Dame." The other is "What Went Up in Flames."
Among everything that's been said on the entire planet, they managed to come up with two statements that were less than respectful towards the cathedral. Including one tweet in French that's been badly mistranslated. The other, a brief quote in a Rolling Stone interview that left me suspecting that the reporter probably got it wrong.

My answer is - keep the Jews out of the country, or impose strict limits on their behavior towards the host... Better yet, they could all just move to Israel.
Which is it, Miss Kitty? Strict behavioral controls, or outright ethnic cleansing?? Again, in all honesty: if you want to post hate speech, please go somewhere else. You are bringing shame and dishonor to this website.

We must also eliminate the scourge of White Trash in this great nation, before it is too late. They must be made to Absqualulate ... or else.
Absquatulate??

I know you're being tongue in cheek, but that only makes it worse. I used this phrase "White Trash" in another post, and found myself feeling ashamed. I'll probably erase it tomorrow. It's not only a racist slur, but class-based as well. Just because the esteemed Dr. Isenberg used it in the title of her book, and just because that book became a best-seller, doesn't make it OK.
 

Richard Stanley

Administrator
Absquatulate??
Oops, my apolojeese. I corrected the spelling ... and I should not have capitalized 'absquatulate'?

I know you're being tongue in cheek, but that only makes it worse. I used this phrase "White Trash" in another post, and found myself feeling ashamed. I'll probably erase it tomorrow. It's not only a racist slur, but class-based as well. Just because the esteemed Dr. Isenberg used it in the title of her book, and just because that book became a best-seller, doesn't make it OK.
Hmmm. This sounds like an attack upon my educative irony and not upon Dr. Isenberg's. Maybe Miss Kitty is correct. After all, I wouldn't be dealing with an invasion of cats and racoons if we engaged in enforced absquatulation of such. Besides Jerry, when the Race Nations are instituted, absquatulation will be the default. Those who do not self-absquatulate will be forced to absquatulate ... or else.

Or did you mean that you'll erase your usage but not mine? If so, then never-mind.
 

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
Here's a swell video featuring Jordan Peterson, just in case you missed it.
Here is the question that Peterson refused to answer. I have bolded a couple of statements.

I have a book by Solzhenitsyn I'd like to give you.
It's 200 Years Together.
Last year a couple started translating it into English and put it on line.
I included all the chapters that they've translated so far.
As a Jewish American I think this book is very important for everyone to read.
In the book Solzhenitsyn documents the overrepresentation of Jewish individuals in the NKVD and in Bolshevik leadership.
He claims that the ethnic hatred these individuals had for Christians played a role in the Holodomor.
Jewish individuals had faced persecution in Ukraine prior to the Bolshevik rise to power.
These individuals extracted their revenge on the Christian Ukranian population.
The result was the death of 4 million Christians.
The line of good and evil cuts through the heart of every human.
One cannot simply say a given ethnic group is evil.
Every individual must struggle with the good and the evil in their own heart.
That being said, it is important to understand what motivates groups to commit atrocities against other groups,
because the previous century has been filled with groups killing other groups.
Like the Bolsheviks, Jewish individuals are overrrepresented in the ownership and senior staffing...
<commotion, Peterson tries to interject something, unintelligible...>
of the US news media.
The news media is also inexplicably hostile towards Russia.
If the current war mongering against Russian Christians is in any way motivated by
the same ethnic hatred that motivated the Holodomor we must face that truth honestly.
If Jewish individuals hated Christian Ukranians enough to starve millions of them to death
could the same thing happen today?
Could Jewish individuals use their positions of power to seek out revenge
against places like Europe and Russia that have a history of expelling Jews?

It seems to me that the questioner is not "justifying" the described actions & motivations of the Jews. He is explaining Solzhenitsyn's view of the sequence of events, and criticizing both sides in the strongest possible terms.

The questioner (a Jew) then asks whether Jews could kill again. It seems to me that an appropriate answer, coming from a (neo) Roman would be "Yes, and we Romans could also kill again."

But rather than trying to predict future atrocities, perhaps it would be more useful to ask how to reduce tensions, find increased compassion for the 'other', and thus try to prevent those atrocities?

Correct analysis is also useful. Solzhenitsyn's book has been widely criticized for historical inaccuracy. In the present day case of war mongering against Russia, the questioner should be acknowledging the role of Christian Zionist politicians, businessmen and church leaders in whipping up those tensions.
 
Top