March 28: 'Jews' as a Scapegoat Class

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
The article explains that 60 million people are fleeing for their lives from desperate circumstances,
Having said all that: there certainly are limits to compassion, even given the best intentions. Next thing I know, Miss Kitty will want to put all 60 million of them in my backyard bungalow, and overflow to the cow palace.

Ron Unz's discussion of the ADL is also worth reading. I mentioned "The Secret Relationship between Blacks & Jews" Vol. 1 this morning, and here he is quoting Vol. 3.

http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-adl-in-american-society/

In January 1993, the San Francisco Police Department reported that it had recently raided the Northern California headquarters of the ADL based upon information provided by the FBI. The SFPD discovered that the organization had been keeping intelligence files on more than 600 civic organizations and 10,000 individuals, overwhelmingly of a liberal orientation, with the SFPD inspector estimating that 75% of the material had been illegally obtained, much of it by secret payments to police officials. This was merely the tip of the iceberg in what clearly amounted to the largest domestic spying operation by any private organization in American history, and according to some sources, ADL agents across the country had targeted over 1,000 political, religious, labor, and civil rights organizations, with the New York headquarters of the ADL maintaining active dossiers on more than a million Americans.
Not long afterward, an ACLU official who had previously held a high-ranking position with the ADL revealed in an interview that his organization had been the actual source of the highly controversial 1960s surveillance on Martin Luther King, Jr., which it had then provided to FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover. For many years Hoover had been furiously denounced in the national media headlines for his use of tapes and other secret information on King’s activities, but when a local San Francisco newspaper revealed that an ADL spying operation had actually been the source of all that sordid material, the bombshell revelation was totally ignored in the national media and only reported by fringe organizations, so that today almost no Americans are aware of that fact.
I am not aware of any other private organization in American history that has been involved in even a sliver of such illegal domestic espionage activity, which appears to have been directed against almost all groups and prominent individuals—Left, Right, and Center—suspected of being insufficiently aligned with Jewish and Israeli interests.
 
Today is Passover, and this reminds me that Jews still like to remember having been victims of slavery in Egypt over 3000 years ago. It's a good time for them to express solidarity with American blacks and other minorities, who are the only ones in America who can truly comprehend their sufferings. It's amazing to me that, rather than openly lamenting their own part in the American slave trade, or expressing gratitude for the wealth and security they enjoy here on this occasion, Jews like to further their victim mentality and put down white Americans with articles like this one from the ADL:

https://www.adl.org/blog/this-passover-let-us-remember-that-once-we-were-strangers-too





.
Until the last year, I had never, ever heard of any Jewish role in slave trading, in America or anywhere else, except from some Palestinian acquaintances. They mentioned Jewish trafficking of Eastern Block women in Israel. I wasn't sure I believed them. Here's the original article that woke me up to Jewish scapegoating of white Americans for slavery in America. If even one tenth of it is true, these Jews got some 'splainin' to do:

https://davidduke.com/since-white-people-are-routinely-condemned-for-200-years-of-slavery-in-america-why-are-jews-not-condemned-for-their-leading-role-in-slave-trade-over-the-last-2000-years/

Come to think of it, this is really all you need.
 
Last edited:

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
Miss Kitty, I don't understand. Are you saying it's OK to be white and own slaves, because Jews do it too? Or is it a bad thing to be a slave owner, whether you're Jewish or whether you're not?

Because the Bible is real clear about this. Leviticus 25:44-47 says it's OK for Jews to own slaves. In the New Testament: Eph 6:5-8, Col 3:22-24, 1Tim 6:1-2, Titus 2:9-10, 1Pet 2:18, and Col 4:1 all say it's OK for Christians to own slaves. So as Richard keeps asking, why are you even against slavery? Aren't you going against the Word of God when you complain about slavery?? What about the entire History of Western Civilization (up until the 19th century), are you forgetting all that?

Nation of Islam Research Group has a summary of their book "The Secret Relationship between Blacks and Jews" that's still available on line, even though Amazon has banned the book itself. Most of Eli Faber's book "Jews, Slaves and the Slave Trade: Setting the Record Straight" is also available on line as a preview at Google Books. After scanning some of this material, and David Duke's article, I have a conjecture about what's going on.

Back in the 18th century, and well into the 19th, most people involved in "Western Civilization", whether they were Jewish or Christian, saw slave ownership as a matter of pride. The more slaves you owned, the wealthier you became, and this was evidence of God's providence. So, Jewish historians, being eager to cast themselves in the best possible light, proudly boasted about the predominance of Jewish slave owners and slave traders.

I know you have the highest esteem for Jewish authors, and how accurate they generally are. But according to later research, maybe they exaggerated things just a little. One trick they played was to emphasize how some Jewish folks owned more slaves than their neighbors who weren't Jewish. But that ignored that there were so many more Christians than there were Jews. So the vast majority of slaves were owned by white Christians, even though the Jews were proud to note that they owned 10 slaves each on average, while their Christian neighbors only owned seven.

Faber explained that another big problem is to figure out who's Jewish, anyhow. Especially in Spain and Portugal, where all the Jews were banished and expelled. Or else they were forced to convert to Christianity, or die. That solved all the problems in Spain and Portugal, which became virtual utopias once they were free of all Jews. Right?

Slavery, of course, was not one of those problems that was solved by expelling all the Jews.The slave trade to Portuguese Brazil was enormous, anywhere from 40% to 90% of the total slave trade from Africa, depending on whether you believe Wikipedia or Nation of Islam. And some of the slave traders to Brazil were ex-Jews who had been baptized as Christian. Jewish historians claimed the credit for those slave traders as Jewish, while Christians say that those same individuals were so successful as slave traders because they'd accepted Jesus as their savior. So who are you going to believe?

I don't know about you, but if I were born in a Converso family in Spain or Portugal or Brazil in the 18th century, here's what I'd do. I'd pray to Jesus Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, and go to church on Sunday. But then on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays, I'd go to secret synagogue with my secret Jewish family. That way, I'd have all the bases covered.

You do know about Pascal's wager, right? Pascal didn't say which God to pray to, but obviously the more gods you include in your wager, the better. Today you'd also have to spend some time bowing towards Mecca, and don't forget Salt Lake City.

The Nation of Islam tract complains about the Rothschilds. But the fact is, Nathan Meyer Rothschild was one of the leading abolitionists of his day. The profitability of his sugar plantations in the New World was suffering because of a British citizens' boycott in the 1790's, and Rothschild came up with the idea of using British tax revenues to buy out his slaves. So Rothschild got a one-time bonanza (he even contributed some of the money himself), the slaves were freed, and British citizens could go back to enjoying their imported sugar. And those plantation slaves just reported for work the next day as usual. Slavery was completely banned in the British Empire by 1830, and it didn't hurt their corporate profits one bit.

David Duke is particularly incensed about Ukrainian prostitutes in Israel. He says that these are not actual slaves but only virtual slaves, even though they're bought and sold at auction. Actual or virtual, what's the difference? Dammit, I agree with David Duke about this. It's one thing to be upset about slavery in the 18th century, and it's another thing when it's going on right under our noses.

Why doesn't Trump do something about this?? Oh yeah, he's a Christian Zionist. He's waiting for the Temple to be re-built, and then those Jews will have the choice to repent and turn to Jesus, or burn in Hell.

And does the Christian Zionists' God care if (some) Jews are enslaving Ukrainian prostitutes, or keeping Palestinians in a concentration camp in Gaza, in the meanwhile? Apparently, no, God doesn't care.
 
The thing I've been trying to say is, in the US, white Americans are bearing all of the guilt for black slavery. And this is happening because Jews are controlling the media, and they are pointing the finger at us exclusively, making us qualify by your definition as scapegoats. It's safe to say that they are guilty, too, and maybe they were better slave traders and bigger slave owners per capita than we were. And yet, I never heard this in the MSM. I only heard it from the evil Dr. Duke, the one the MSM forced Donald Trump to renounce over and over again during the election.

A lot of white Americans have felt genuinely awful about slavery, and supported the civil rights movement, affirmative action, school busing, etc. But I think the civil rights movement was largely led by Jews, no? Even Martin Luther King had Jewish handlers. And they weren't pushing Jewish guilt. I admit I heard this from Dr. Duke. I haven't fact checked it.

I had never heard that the Bible says it's alright for Christians to own slaves. Unlike the Jews, I don't think any Christians believe that now, do they? Maybe Hillary Clinton believes it. She's guilty of re-starting the black slave trade in Libya, essentially, no? But wait, she's a Satanist. Here are some Jews who think they're gonna get a lot of goyish slaves:


Personally, I think American taxpayers are already their slaves. This might be rectified by more honest discussion about the origin of the Scofield Bible, a task which is already being undertaken by some preachers in the Bible Belt. There are Jews in this video who have made an interesting interpretation of the meaning of slavery in the Torah as being a sort of "voluntary slavery." To me, this is a typical example of "Jewjitsu." (Dr. Duke likes to talk about "Jewjitsu.") There is no such thing as voluntary slavery.

I don't think you need to believe every bit of scripture in order to consider yourself a Christian. I think you can see that the loss of Christianity in America has been, overall, a pretty bad deal. I'm sick of the ugly architecture, the ugly art, the dishonest science, the disintegration of marriage, white birth rates falling, transsexuals being held up as heroes, sodomites destroying the Boy Scouts, violent porn, and all the rest of the nasty stuff that has accelerated in my lifetime with the decline of religiosity in Christendom. The West was Christendom, you know. America was part of Christendom.

I like goodness, truth, and beauty. I don't think your average person is up to the task of developing a righteous personal ethic, and the society is now so degraded - often due to Jewish contributions - I am truly sorry my parents have to see it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dear Miss Kitty,

Your video is interesting - but note that the first Jew interviewed is a member of Neturei Karta, hyperorthodox Jews who do NOT accept the Zionist state of Israel, unlike other orthodox Jews. Most of the religious Jews however attributed future slavery of gentiles ONLY to a post-messiah situation. As for Christianity...
I had never heard that the Bible says it's alright for Christians to own slaves. Unlike the Jews, I don't think any Christians believe that now, do they?
...it always supported slavery, as shown in Paul's epistle to Philemon, where Paul returns a beloved (i.e. Christian) slave back to his master.

Islam like Judaism supported slavery, and so do major Eastern religions. We have slavery in the West too - but it's called wage slavery, where the victims put up with low wages and irregular unemployment, Marx's "Reserve Army of the Unemployed".

In Australia migration has been encouraged by the "cultural Marxist" left and the wealthy conservative right - the former wanting to save refugees, the latter to increase the population and lower wages, wages which have been falling since the collapse of the Soviet Union (whose existence kept wages high due to fear of Communism). As a result what was the lower middle class has collapsed into poverty - and hey bingo are joining far right movements everywhere to the distress of the latte Lefties of old!

In fact, the Australian Labor Party (ALP), crudely equivalent to your Democrats, is embarrassed over its foundation in 1900 upon the White Australia Policy, a policy originally created to keep wages high in Australia by deporting mainly Chinese (who came for gold mining) and Kanakas (Solomon Islanders employed to clear the forest in Queensland for sugar cane farming). I.e. the sort of situation that that goof-up apologist for eternal Western (or Marxist) eternal progress Herbert Marcuse* never envisaged.

Yours faithfully
Claude

*PS: Having long ago read his One-Dimensional Man (and been unimpressed) I'm now still reading his Eros and Civilization, that book following up on "The Authoritarian Personality."
 

Richard Stanley

Administrator
I had never heard that the Bible says it's alright for Christians to own slaves. Unlike the Jews, I don't think any Christians believe that now, do they?
If you understood the background context for the American (second) Civil War then you'd know that the burning core of the slavery issue was it's religious, Biblical Justification. The 'evil' American liberal (apostate Christians and others in the North were agin slavery, while the righteous Dukers of the day were mad about losing Divine slavery ... and pleasantly (for massah at least) and profitably creating more gooder slaves via their frequent injections of righteous genes, ala neo-droit de seigneur. Slaves were a huge financial capital investment to purchase on the market, but almost free to procreate.

Aristocratic whites do it, Jews do it, even uppity descendants of the serfs do it, let's fall in "slavish love".

As I said before, if you'd bother to read your Bible (or here), then you'd know that you're apostate and don't know it.

... The scholarly field of ‘higher Biblical criticism’ has long been charged with undermining the culture, by the denial of Jesus Christ. Our Postflavian claim that Christ was Caesar is, surprisingly, sometimes used as an ironic ‘reactionary’ response to the culture shock created by the historical-critical skeptics. That is, one can claim that the Caesars are indeed suitable vicars of the fictional Christ, as are the popes. Kenneth Atchity makes just this proud claim in his Messiah Matrix, in which he envisions a future in which the Catholic Church renounces the Jewish Jesus of Nazareth in order to embrace the wisdom of Caesar Augustus. Many others have drawn comparisons, and found that America is an excellent modern analogue to ancient Rome, as our founders had hoped for. But yet, change is change, and time does not really flow backwards. ‘Biblical criticism’ is change, Postflavian biblical criticism is further change, and both have drawn and will continue to draw reactionary opponents.
And with the perspective of history, we must recognize that the elites of every time and place have an essential and powerful role to play in determining the course of cultural change and the flow of cultural innovation, for either the well being of all or for narrow avarice and greed. This is not to deny that cultural innovations can emerge organically from anywhere in society, nor that some aspects of culture simply represent universal human nature. But our point is that ‘culture‘ is not necessarily the ultimate value that we are trying to defend. For instance, many in the American South long decried, and some still do, the cultural degradation foisted upon them by the loss of their slaves (their Lost Cause). After all, slave ownership was culturally endowed to them in both the Old and New Testaments. Spain’s traditionalist monarcho-Catholics brutally put down the Republicans (a coalition of intellectuals, anarcho-athiests, socialists, and others) along with the assistance of Hitler and the Vatican’s Opus Dei, led by Saint Escriva. But we (Postflavians) do not defend the incumbent culture of the South, or of the Spanish Catholics — while the present-day Catholic Church broke all speed records in canonizing Escriva and John Paul II. ...

There are Jews in this video who have made an interesting interpretation of the meaning of slavery in the Torah as being a sort of "voluntary slavery." To me, this is a typical example of "Jewjitsu." (Dr. Duke likes to talk about "Jewjitsu.") There is no such thing as voluntary slavery.
You seem to love proving yourself wrong over and over again don't you?

It is well known, except by serfers and such, that Sumerians practiced a form of voluntary 'bondage', whereby due to various sometimes inevitable and unfortunate life circumstances a person would place themselves in contractual bondage (slavery) to another. The conditions of such were variable, and a bonded person might even own property while in bondage. The bonded person might buy their way out of bondage, per the original agreement or choose to stay in that arrangement. The Jewish practice was similar, and even accorded that a person must treat their enslaved brother better than non-kin slaves. But, the Jews must also free all their slaves every 52(?) years and start over with a fresh batch, so that is a nice feature indeed ... for some slaves that is.

Romans had slaves, of course, but there was no ethnic basis, much as with their crypto-relatives, the Jews. Romans had the option of manumitting their slaves, based upon good service, yet the manumission could be revoked if the freedman (a freed slave) did not do the bidding of his former owner, his patrone (the basis for the term 'patriot'.

Miss Kitty is a freedwoman, but she is a patriotic mind slave. As that European white guy said: "There are no kitties so enslaved that think they are free (or once were)". And: You can lead a kitty to water, but you can't make it drink".
 
It looks to me like you are making MY point. Yeah, pretty much everybody is or has been involved in slavery. But when do you ever hear that in the MSM? The answer is, you don't. Maybe you don't know this because you are so far removed from mainstream American culture, such as the TV and Hollywood movies. All you hear is that racist white Americans enslaved the blacks. This is not true - others were involved - so we are being scapegoated. Did you ever answer to this?

Where are the Hollywood movies with the small hats trading slaves in America? Or anywhere for that matter? In the movies, Jews are always the victims of slavery. To my knowledge, there's "Ben Hur," which is about Jews enslaved in Egypt - starring Charlton Heston, or earlier, Ramone Novaro. Or Jews enslaved by Nazis during WWII in "Schindler's List." That's all I'm aware of. Mom and Dad never heard of Jewish slave traders in America, either. Maybe you guys could do a little survey of your own. You did agree that there were Jews involved int the slave trade here, didn't you?

I don't agree with you about voluntary slavery. Some of our ancestors might have been indentured servants, which is considered slavery of sorts, but that would not be something you would choose in any real sense. It's sort of like claiming that a person with a gun to their head has a choice.

Jews in the video seem to be claiming that the Torah or Talmud doesn't really use the word slavery, but it probably does. If people just want to serve the Jews because they think they're swell, that's not any form of slavery that I can recognize, unless they are brainwashed like the adherents of the Scofield Bible seem to be. I would say that they might be in the category of people that are enslaved but think they are free.

The thing is, it's always possible to be enslaved and not know it. That would fall into the category of things that you don't know you don't know.


You know, I only just started to think that I might be a Christian. I started to think that the plastic Jesus on my key chain was extremely cool. And I started to like the floor show at the Episcopalian Church. I take it that the stuff about slavery being okay for Christians is common knowledge. Mom and Dad knew about it. But I considered myself without any religion at all - all of my life until lately. It just didn't interest me.
 
Did you ever hear that Nathan Rothschild profited from the slave trade in the British Colonies? I never did. Maybe you are right. I think pointing the finger at the Rothschild family might be a good move for Americans. We could say, "No, the Rothschilds did it!" and make them pay for the reparations that are certainly coming our way if we don't do something soon.

https://rastafari.tv/boycott-21-major-corporations-got-rich-slavery/
 
Last edited:

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
All you hear is that racist white Americans enslaved the blacks. This is not true - others were involved - so we are being scapegoated. Did you ever answer to this?
Yes we did answer. Not all Whites are being scapegoated, just the ones who persist in being race nationalists. Richard said:

Miss Kitty has likely already breathlessly passed on the otherwise undisputable claim to her paranoid, neurotic, and schizo neoJewish zombie tribe (aren't they all?) that I think all 'White Americans' are being set-up for slaughter.

The White Zomboni Zealots (ZZ) du jour are indeed a stiff-necked, mostly circumsized lot, unwilling and/or unhappy to play reindeer games with the other tribes of the global imperium. "Off with their white heads" says their 'White' Queen.

That said, I'm dubious that the casus belli will be about the race-based slavery of yore, but rather the blithering zombie sins of today.
I'm thinking maybe it was a mistake to fork the thread "White Americans as a scapegoat class." It seems to be all the same discussion.

You did agree that there were Jews involved int the slave trade here, didn't you?
Yep, right where I said:

Back in the 18th century, and well into the 19th, most people involved in "Western Civilization", whether they were Jewish or Christian, saw slave ownership as a matter of pride. The more slaves you owned, the wealthier you became, and this was evidence of God's providence.
[re: voluntary slavery] It's sort of like claiming that a person with a gun to their head has a choice.
Yep, that's right. Just as Richard said, it's something that a person would choose when faced with unfortunate life circumstances.

We have slavery in the West too - but it's called wage slavery, where the victims put up with low wages and irregular unemployment, Marx's "Reserve Army of the Unemployed".
Even the dictionary seems confused about what slavery is. There's a narrow definition, and a broad definition. The narrow definition is:

Slavery is any system in which principles of property law are applied to people, allowing individuals to own, buy and sell other individuals, as a de jure form of property.[1] A slave is unable to withdraw unilaterally from such an arrangement and works without remuneration. Many scholars now use the term chattel slavery to refer to this specific sense of legalised, de jure slavery.
Then there's a broad definition, involving hard work, extreme low wages, and/or mental subjugation.

In extreme cases, "wage slavery" can be very close to the same thing as chattel slavery -- for example, the banana plantations Richard mentioned recently, where low wages were combined with overpriced company-supplied housing and food. The so-called "employees" had no choice but to accumulate a debt which could never be repaid, creating a debtors' prison.

Miss Kitty is a freedwoman, but she is a patriotic mind slave. As that European white guy said: "There are no kitties so enslaved that think they are free (or once were)".
Which European white guy was that? Was it Jeremiah? Jer. 5:21, "Hear now this, O foolish people, and without understanding; which have eyes, and see not; which have ears, and hear not." Or, Jonathan Swift: "There are none so blind as those who will not see"? Or, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe: "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free"?

Wait a minute, was Jeremiah a white guy?
 

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
John Earnest, a 19-year-old white nationalist, went on a shooting spree with an AR-15 yesterday, killing one person and wounding three. The incident happened in a Chabad synagogue in Poway, California.

Before the attack, Earnest posted a manifesto to 8ch.net, featuring a theme that will be familiar to readers of this site. He boasted of his White ancestry, "very wealthy Yankees" and "poor Southern farmers", concluding: "Truly, I am blessed by God for such a magnificent bloodline."

Then he got to his main point, which is his conviction that the beloved White race is being victimized by Jews:

Every Jew is responsible for the meticulously planned genocide of the European race. They act as a unit, and every Jew plays his part to enslave the other races around him—whether consciously or subconsciously. Their crimes are endless. For lying and deceiving the public through their exorbitant role in news media; for using usury and banks to enslave nations in debt and control all finances for the purpose of funding evil; for their role in starting wars on a foundation of lies which have costed millions of lives throughout history; for their role in cultural Marxism and communism; for pushing degenerate propaganda in the form of entertainment; for their role in feminism which has enslaved women in sin; for causing many to fall into sin with their role in peddling pornography; for their role in voting for and funding politicians and organizations who use mass immigration to displace the European race; for their large role in every slave trade for the past two-thousand years; for promoting race mixing; for their cruel and bloody history of genocidal behavior; for their persecution of Christians of old (including the prophets of ancient Israel—Jeremiah, Isaiah, etc.), members of the early church (Stephen—whose death at the hands of the Jews was both heart-wrenching and rage-inducing), Christians of modern-day Syria and Palestine, and Christians in White nations; for their degenerate and abominable practices of sexual perversion and blood libel (you are not forgotten Simon of Trent, the horror that you and countless children have endured at the hands of the Jews will never be forgiven); for not speaking about these crimes; for not attempting to stop the members of their race from committing them. And finally, for their role in the murder of the Son of Man—that is the Christ. Every Jew young and old has contributed to these. For these crimes they deserve nothing but hell.
I will send them there.
Where else have we heard all this, Miss Kitty? That is, except for where he says Jeremiah and Isaiah were Christians. News to me.

Earnest doesn't think of himself as a lone gunman, not at all. He explains:

I think it is important for you to know that I did not do this alone. I had the help of a man named Felix Arvid Ulf Kjellberg. He was kind enough to plan and fund this whole operation—the sly bastard. Apparently, Pewdiepie hates Jews as much as Pajeets. Who would’ve known?

Could this be true? The New Zealand mosque gunman, Brenton Tarrant, also mentioned PewdiePie in his snuff video, encouraging his viewers to subscribe. PewdiePie said he was horrified. But according to the Wall Street Journal, PewdiePie included anti-Semitic jokes or Nazi imagery in nine separate videos between Aug. 2016 and Jan. 2017.

Earnest explained that in yesterday's action, he intended to be a public figurehead, i.e. courting martyrdom. But he says he torched a mosque in Escondido a month ago without getting caught, and offers detailed instructions for committing mayhem undetected.

Chillingly, he says that "We are in the early stages of revolution. We need martyrs.... Every anon reading this needs to carry out attacks. They won’t find us. They won’t catch us. There are too many of us, and we are smarter than them." And: "when this revolution starts gaining traction (if I am not killed) I expect to be freed from prison and continue the fight."

This is all so crazy, that John Earnest knows what we're thinking. Brenton Tarrant, Robert Bowers, Anders Breivik: John Earnest's predecessors and inspirations have all been denounced as a bunch of false-flag CIA or Mossad agents, trying to fake provoke a fight. In answer to those critics, Earnest says: "They can’t fathom that there are brave White men alive who have the willpower and courage it takes to say, 'Fuck my life—I’m willing to sacrifice everything for the benefit of my race.'” And I know that even John Earnest's most earnest disclaimer isn't going to satisfy Richard, who is going to go right on suspecting that he's just another Mossad agent, or maybe an MK-ULTRA mind control victim. Haha, if so, the guy sure left no traces.

What are we to make of this?

Is this armed struggle going to end well for the White Nationalists, or is John Earnest only going to bring about the White Genocide which he is so fearful of?

And, should we consider Earnest as a free man? Or, a prisoner for PewdiePie?
 

Richard Stanley

Administrator
It looks to me like you are making MY point. Yeah, pretty much everybody is or has been involved in slavery. But when do you ever hear that in the MSM? The answer is, you don't. Maybe you don't know this because you are so far removed from mainstream American culture, such as the TV and Hollywood movies. All you hear is that racist white Americans enslaved the blacks. This is not true - others were involved - so we are being scapegoated. Did you ever answer to this?
This is hilarious.

Richard (me) responds with:

Miss Kitty, it looks to me like you are making MY point. Yeah, pretty much everybody is or has been involved in slavery. But when do you ever hear that in the MSM? The answer is, you don't. Maybe you don't know this because you are so far removed from mainstream American culture, such as the TV and Hollywood movies. All you hear is that racist white Americans enslaved the blacks. This is not true - others were involved - so we are being scapegoated. Did you ever answer to this?​

It appears, over and over again, that you have a problem with context, that you are neurotically hyperfocused upon covering your guilty ass. Just do as the Jewish son of God told you to, and admit that you are such a sinner .... like everyone else. Then you can go to your neighbors and tell them that you're just as guilty as they are.

I'm removed from mainstream American culture? Do you know that George Washington and Thomas Jefferson own slaves? Now, are you going to tell me that Jews put a gun to their heads and made them do that?

Who instituted feudalism in Europe, so that the lords of the land could collect their rents from the 'white serfs'? Did the Jews put swords to the pope and the kings of the day? That nobility that you're so proud of their White Christian nature?

Where are the Hollywood movies with the small hats trading slaves in America? Or anywhere for that matter? In the movies, Jews are always the victims of slavery. To my knowledge, there's "Ben Hur," which is about Jews enslaved in Egypt - starring Charlton Heston, or earlier, Ramone Novaro. Or Jews enslaved by Nazis during WWII in "Schindler's List." That's all I'm aware of. Mom and Dad never heard of Jewish slave traders in America, either. Maybe you guys could do a little survey of your own. You did agree that there were Jews involved int the slave trade here, didn't you?
You don't see these movies discussing how Joseph colluded with Pharaoh to corner the markets and enslave all the free people of Egypt either do you? But when did your parents tell you that story from their Bible? Sounds to me like they were holding back on you. Christian churches don't teach the last part of the famous story of Joseph and his dreams, only crow about the first part. That's because they are good little figurative pharisees like you.

13And there was no bread in all the land; for the famine was very sore, so that the land of Egypt and all the land of Canaan fainted by reason of the famine. 14And Joseph gathered up all the money that was found in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, for the corn which they bought: and Joseph brought the money into Pharaoh's house. 15And when money failed in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, all the Egyptians came unto Joseph, and said, Give us bread: for why should we die in thy presence? for the money faileth. 16And Joseph said, Give your cattle; and I will give you for your cattle, if money fail. 17And they brought their cattle unto Joseph: and Joseph gave them bread in exchange for horses, and for the flocks, and for the cattle of the herds, and for the asses: and he fed them with bread for all their cattle for that year. 18When that year was ended, they came unto him the second year, and said unto him, We will not hide it from my lord, how that our money is spent; my lord also hath our herds of cattle; there is not ought left in the sight of my lord, but our bodies, and our lands: 19Wherefore shall we die before thine eyes, both we and our land? buy us and our land for bread, and we and our land will be servants unto Pharaoh: and give us seed, that we may live, and not die, that the land be not desolate.
20And Joseph bought all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh; for the Egyptians sold every man his field, because the famine prevailed over them: so the land became Pharaoh's. 21And as for the people, he removed them to cities from one end of the borders of Egypt even to the other end thereof. 22Only the land of the priests bought he not; for the priests had a portion assigned them of Pharaoh, and did eat their portion which Pharaoh gave them: wherefore they sold not their lands. 23Then Joseph said unto the people, Behold, I have bought you this day and your land for Pharaoh: lo, here is seed for you, and ye shall sow the land. 24And it shall come to pass in the increase, that ye shall give the fifth part unto Pharaoh, and four parts shall be your own, for seed of the field, and for your food, and for them of your households, and for food for your little ones. 25And they said, Thou hast saved our lives: let us find grace in the sight of my lord, and we will be Pharaoh's servants. 26And Joseph made it a law over the land of Egypt unto this day, that Pharaoh should have the fifth part; except the land of the priests only, which became not Pharaoh's. (Genesis 47, KJV)​

The above is the system that was installed over the 'White' serfer people of Europe, the Feudal System. While I am certain that you will joyfully reframe this as more evidence of Jewish Guilt, your neurotic impulses for self-justification, will cause you to selectively ignore that Joseph (who is not technically a Jew (but the Jews' master) is doing all this for the Pharaoh. Identically, as I've discussed, and you refuse to read, the Jews (some unwittingly and others wittingly) do the bidding of their master(s).

Back then the movies of the day, coming out of Bethlehem, were distracting the liddle people so that they didn't notice that 'pharaoh' had picked up and moved to Rome. And everywhere the shepherd went the sheepdog was sure to follow.
I don't agree with you about voluntary slavery. Some of our ancestors might have been indentured servants, which is considered slavery of sorts, but that would not be something you would choose in any real sense. It's sort of like claiming that a person with a gun to their head has a choice.
Of course, you have noble blood, and would rather die than be relegated to serfdom, like other white people allowed.

You are also a woman, and therefore can't put yourself in the mindset of a man who would happily be 'puddy' whipped, by the right puddy that is. You are also a liberal woman, who should not even be discussing matters beyond household affairs.

You know, I only just started to think that I might be a Christian. I started to think that the plastic Jesus on my key chain was extremely cool. And I started to like the floor show at the Episcopalian Church. I take it that the stuff about slavery being okay for Christians is common knowledge. Mom and Dad knew about it. But I considered myself without any religion at all - all of my life until lately. It just didn't interest me.
But you want to be a rogue Christian. The whole purpose of Christianity was to instill conformity to the 'cosmopolitan' globalist empire of the day, the Roman empire. But, you like your Nazis, want to make Christianity and Jesus about White People, that you're supposed to be the Chosen People, not the Jews. Like Moses (again -- not a 'Jew') who inverted pagan culture to make your Jewish Lite culture, your shepherds and sheepdogs (like Duke, a fake doctor from a mail order Ukrainian diploma mill) have inverted meaning again, far more than Scofield and friends.

In fact, your Christian texts demonstrate that the Jesuit interpretation implemented by Scofield has a firm 'scientific' basis. Which Dr. Gerold Russell, the leading statistician of all time, does not refute.

You enjoy being a victim don't you? Admit it, you are reveling in it.

Did you ever hear that Nathan Rothschild profited from the slave trade in the British Colonies?
The name Rothschild means: 'red shield', which refers to the shields of the Roman legions. Here, this refers to the Bauers (the Rothschilds' prior surname) as being fronts for the Roman (Vatican) interests of today, just as Joseph was for Pharaoh. Much like Karl Marx being married into the Prussian aristocracy, the first Rothschild was employed by the Prussian nobility. The latter was about the same time that 'German' George II (of England) gave us the Romantic Movement, where your Nazi and White Nationalist serfer friends get their tiki-torch chant from, Blood and Soil.

As I've covered before, the Hasmoneans (like Josephus Flavius) helped radicalize the hillbilly Jews of the day, in Palestine, and helped lead them over the proverbial cliff, just like the Pied Piper and the lemmings. The Hasmoneans were really cosmopolitans aligned with the Romans, but even today the stiff-necked Jews, including you, consider them as Jewish 'patriots'. But, as Bill Clinton, might say: That all depends on what you mean by 'patriot'.

How many more examples do you need? The name Bauer, like Bayer, stems from Bavaria, the land of fakir Donald John Trump.

You are just too deep in the wallowing misery such that you think you're a cat and not a lemming.
 
Last edited:

Richard Stanley

Administrator
If one had the courtesy to read the materials we have either written here or discuss, then one would know they have to read Saussy's Rulers of Evil, then one would come away with the proper lens to analysis the Jewish question from, as a so-called American 'patriot' that is.

The key thing to figure out is that the USA currently is the military spear of the underlying, de facto imperium, of the Western enterprise (that includes Russia BTW). As such, the USA is a nation 'synthesized through the Machiavellian machinations of the collaborative [sic] Masons and Jesuits. OMG !!!, they're all Jews. Well, as I've been saying all along, this is the way the West was Won, and the true and integral relationship of the Jews to the Roman system. This is why, Roman Catholic theology insists upon the importance of having Jews around, to be there as operating fronts for advancing the elites' causes, and which the muggles (mostly serfer whites, but others as well) would certainly object to.

Thus, the USA represents a duality. On the muggle level, the USA is the champion of its (white) citizens - who deserve, by God, to be the Chosen People du jour; and on the elite levels (Ephraim and Judah), the USA serves the imperial interests of the historical Abrahamic (with Rome as Esau andhis regained birthright) schema. So, the muggles, somewhat like me, object to what is going on, the only difference is that I understand the actual relationships.

Per the tenets of The Art of War, if one does not recognize who their real enemy is, and what he is doing, you'll soon be led over the cliffs of Gadara. If you want to bark at a scarecrow, then don't complain about the results.

Six months before my mother died, she asked why my nature had changed (since 9/11). I told her that I had come to understand that most everything I had been taught was a lie, and so she asked me to explain. I warned her, but she said to go ahead. So in the matter of an hour or so, she was able to easily comprehend. It's just not that hard, unless you make it so. My mother was not stiff-necked.
 

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
In fact, your Christian texts demonstrate that the Jesuit interpretation implemented by Scofield has a firm 'scientific' basis. Dr. Gerold Russell, the leading statistician of all time, does not refute.
Sadly, Dr. Russell could not statistically refute his way out of a rhetorical cul-de-sac. But if he could refute this, I'm sure he would.

However, Scofield's millenarian apocalyptic formulation has at least a firm pseudo-scientific basis. And who needs more than that?
 
Last edited:

Richard Stanley

Administrator
However, Scofield's millenarian apocalyptic formulation has at least a firm pseudo-scientific basis. And who needs more than that?
The Logos wants what the Logos wants. In this case the Greco-Jew, cutting edge Science of the Day, as presented in Revelation 12, divinely predicted that the stars and solar system would precisely align on September 23, 2017, unique in at least 2,000 years. It was announced, in Miss Kitty's favorite language, Spanish, in front of the Pope on September 25, 2015, that the baby savior, Space Jesus, would soon be born to the Heavenly Virgin. This announcement was read from the Book of Isaiah (chapter 9). Is that a Jewish text, or a Christian text?

They gnew, they gnew, a long timagoo!!
https://postflaviana.org/community/index.php?threads/part-1-the-futurist-apocalypse-is-now.2022/post-11629

OG Jesus said to his non-Greek pig disciples: "I'll be with you until the ... uuhm ... End of the Age, and then cometh Space Jesus, my brother from the same Virgin Mutha. Alpha and Omega out Macca-bee-atches!!!"

Ooooh Jesus, will the second Third Temple be ready in time for Spacy J to bring down the house (just like last time)?

No probs, I've got my Ashkan house niggers following the script ... to the Letta!!! Now you guys get to work on the new Episcopalian floor show, I'm thinking that beastly Trump guy should audition the virgin models beforehand, even though he says he was raised Presbyterian.
 
Last edited:
You guys are too wordy.

But yeah, Pewdiepie also loves Mishima - a nationalist, right? Didn't he kill himself because he couldn't accept Western interference in Japan? And don't you love Mishima, too, Jerry? And don't we all love the Dalai Lama? There is nothing wrong with nationalism. It's a good practical way to try to get along with people in your own territory that does not attempt to deny human nature. It's just easier to get along with people who share a common language, culture, history, and descendancy. Didn't you guys agree with me that the US will probably break up into territories? Do you really think this would be happening if we had honored the founder's original intention - that America would be a nation for the posterity of the founders? That means people like Jerry and me and our extended family. Maybe Rich Stanley, too. I don't know.

But anyway, I think we can all agree that America doesn't really exist as a free republic now, anyway. There's a globalist occupied government that rules over us like a conquered people.

NO, Jews are not just targeting white nationalists. They are targeting all whites, but especially white men. In the Cultural Marxist scheme of things, we are the bourgiousie, the oppressor. Everybody else is the oppressed.

That reminds me, I don't think there is any Judeo - Christian. I think it's probably WWII era nonsense meant to make Americans feel good about having more Jews in our country, where they do not belong. It's garbage - like the Scofield Bible. Jews are our historic enemies, and we are screwed because we forgot.

Look it up on GOOGLE NGRAM. Judeo - Christian.

I don't think there is anything to be gained by shooting Jews, even though they are the most guilty of destroying America. Emanuel Celler spent most of his life trying to change the immigration laws - along with Jewish organizations. They finally succeeded in 1965. This was America's biggest mistake. The Jews used it to colonize us with tens of millions of foreigners. And don't tell me it was that slime Teddy Kennedy. He was a third generation immigrant and not an American.

Another big mistake, of course, was bringing in African slaves, and Jews had a lot to do with that, too. They need to OWN it in public - like we do.

Did you guys answer my question about finding anyone in your own circle of friends who have heard that Jews were involved in the slave trade? I've gone on asking people that I know, and it just doesn't seem to be common knowledge at all. So, if people don't know this in general, it's the Jews' fault. They control Hollywood and the MSM.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Richard Stanley

Administrator
Didn't you guys agree with me that the US will probably break up into territories? Do you really think this would be happening if we had honored the founder's original intention - that America would be a nation for the posterity of the founders? That means people like Jerry and me and our extended family. Maybe Rich Stanley, too. I don't know.
How do you know what the founder Freemasons and Jesuits intended ... versus the rhetoric that you zealously spout of the zealous freedom loving-freedom haters?

Again, the historical propaganda that you (and I) were framed with is superceded by the real original intent for America (New Canaan and New Israel), consistent with the JudaeoChristian religious canon of globalization. As such, yes, the republic is dead, .... for a reason. You might call it planned obsolescence. Nothing new here, but if you don't like it then start getting wordy and not dookie. Then maybe you can educate your neighbors about their role in history and how you'll soon be joining them, one way or the other (depending on your attitude towards serfing that is).

https://postflaviana.org/community/index.php?threads/who-created-the-usa-and-why.1794/post-5517

Look it up on GOOGLE NGRAM. Judeo - Christian.
Dumb asses. No, read the Bible -- like General Patton, "Every God Damn day!!"

As I've tried to educate you, like the former serfs of Europe cum American friends of Miss Kitty, you think you're entitled to some continuity, based upon some supposedly sacred (to you) dookie words. Just like the White serfer Jews of Gospel times thinking they were entitled to same. Then Imperial (not Republican) Rome and their rich city Jew friends gave them some uncomfortable seats on crosses. But, I've told you this before.

Your myopic model of history (and religion) that frames your mind, your untrue Truth, is not serving you well, and you want us to share in your vain misery.
 

Richard Stanley

Administrator
Did you guys answer my question about finding anyone in your own circle of friends who have heard that Jews were involved in the slave trade? I've gone on asking people that I know, and it just doesn't seem to be common knowledge at all. So, if people don't know this in general, it's the Jews' fault. They control Hollywood and the MSM.
Pointless. Who cares?

They control Hollywood and the MSM. Well, if they do the elitest of Jews also helped the imperial Romans create your JudaeoChristian religion that you love so much.

The name 'Catholic' means 'universal' for a reason. A globalizing reason. And the Catholic Church has stated, over and over again, that (living) Jews are necessary to its globalizing mission. Put that in your nationalist peace-pipe and smoke it.
 
The preamble of the constitution says that the United States was founded for the benefit of the founders themselves and their posterity.

I think the founders were mainly WASPs, not Catholics. Yeah, I guess a lot of them were Masons, too.

You guys are difficult for me to follow, I admit, and I am not alone. But maybe you are seeing stuff that we don't see. You know I am lazy. I need the Cliff Notes.

The dissident right likes to quote Voltaire: "To know who rules over you, notice who you cannot criticize." That would definitely be the Jews. If someone calls them out for something - even if it's true - that person is labeled an anti-semite. They might have to issue a tearful public apology, or lose their job, or be de-platformed. I think Jews are hiding their true history very well. At the same time, they have re-written our history, with us as villains and idiots in a thousand Hollywood movies.

Catholics are easy to criticize and even harm. Did you notice the glee over the burning of Notre Dame - a lot of it Jewish? Did you notice how many Churches in France have been vandalized over the last year?

Yeah, the pope is definitely a globalist, and a nut job. I think some of his own cardinals or other officials are wanting to charge him with heresy. There are definitely a lot of globalists who aren't Jews, From what I read, Jews have infiltrated the Catholic Church. Have you read that? Now the pope is wanting to approve of adultery, I think. Who is he to judge? :D He's not extolling Christian virtues, for sure. Didn't the story of the Tower of Babel indicate that different peoples should remain separate and speak different languages?

So, you think the Church was always evil and in league with evil Jews. Well, maybe so. I don't know. But as mom likes to say - about Christianity, "It's a superior ethic." That's still true. Its value doesn't depend upon the motives of the authors.

I can't understand why you guys would be globalists. What would you be getting out of it? I guess you think there's simply nothing the billions of little people can do, eh, against the tiny handful of all powerful oligarchs(?)

And yes, I am miserable. My city is gone. There are no major American cities that I know of. My nation is still here somewhere, but they aren't even fighting for it. You guys especially. The predominant culture I'm familiar with here is not WASP culture. Starbucks and Porn, I would call it. I tend to think it's Jewish culture. We're gone, and they're happy as clams. My neighbor's twitter says, "We conquered LA."

La Raza will soon take California, and it will be a barrio. Maybe the Jews will go to China. What do they care? They were never Americans. They're international. A separate nation in diaspora. Have you been to Detroit lately? Oregon may be safe, but not for long. People will chase down every livable area until there is nothing left. Is this what you want?
 

Richard Stanley

Administrator
The preamble of the constitution says that the United States was founded for the benefit of the founders themselves and their posterity.

I think the founders were mainly WASPs, not Catholics. Yeah, I guess a lot of them were Masons, too.
So then why are yall so shy about defending the founder's divine right to slavery ... as your posterity? If yall feel ethically queasy about slaves being only of one race, then you can be more ecumenical, and for instance, make Catholics your slaves. Just not good atheists and agnostics please. I know, I know, this would require a cheesy deviance from the Biblical interpretation about the the descendants of Ham. But that's Old Testament stuff right?

Besides the Catholics consider WASPs to be Jewish. Did you know THAT??? What would happen if you went around to your circle of friends and asked them if they knew that?

Of course, there are pale-faced English peoples that consider themselves to more properly be Hebrews, as one of the Lost Tribes of Israel.

Back in the day, when the Protestant Ivy League universities were just devout sprouts, the interest in Old Testament studies was very high, especially as they understood their living parallels (Scripture as script) to the Conquest of Canaan. The interest was so high that there was serious talk about making the official language of the new Confederation to be .... Hebrew. I'm guessing that even Daweed Duke's ancestors were down with that, likely even Daweed himself (he just wont admit it publicly).

The dissident right likes to quote Voltaire: "To know who rules over you, notice who you cannot criticize." That would definitely be the Jews. If someone calls them out for something - even if it's true - that person is labeled an anti-semite. They might have to issue a tearful public apology, or lose their job, or be de-platformed. I think Jews are hiding their true history very well. At the same time, they have re-written our history, with us as villains and idiots in a thousand Hollywood movies.
Do you really know your true history? Really? Oh right, the Jews have re-written it. But starting when?

There is an old saying, "The winners write history." So you need to be asking yourself if the Jews are now the winners, then was your history as true to actuality as you claim? I gave you a link that can tell you some of your history and how it fits into the long running globalist enterprise. Which, not so incidentally is why Freemasons and Jesuits played such roles in the Revolution and more. But, who wrote the Jesuits out of American history, ... and why are you protecting them ... by focusing so much attention of the Jews? Now, the Jew-Protestant Freemasons are just a degraded drinking society, probably watch some porn at the same time. Or, ... is that what they want you to think?

Catholics are easy to criticize and even harm. Did you notice the glee over the burning of Notre Dame - a lot of it Jewish? Did you notice how many Churches in France have been vandalized over the last year?
I like how you switched focus there. Very subtle.
Yeah, the pope is definitely a globalist, and a nut job. I think some of his own cardinals or other officials are wanting to charge him with heresy. There are definitely a lot of globalists who aren't Jews,
Of course he's a globalist, he runs a globalist religion.

From what I read, Jews have infiltrated the Catholic Church. Have you read that?
Why do you keep asking whether "I have read that"?

This is a nice cover story to make the true-believers (not the insiders) feel better and stay with 'their' agenda. These people that you're talking about usually say that the Church has been infiltrated rather late, but others say that it was infiltrated by the founder of the Jesuits, Ignatious of Loyola (that he was a Jew). Others, like me, say that the Church was infiltrated the day it was fake born, with that fake Jew, the fake Jesus of fake Nazareth.

Did someone say Loyola? Did you know about all the poor goyim being mind fucked at the Jewish Loyola Marymount University in your city?

Didn't the story of the Tower of Babel indicate that different peoples should remain separate and speak different languages?
That's from the Jewish book. Yuck. Oh wait, not so Yuck. The Christian book says that the most worthy Hebrews, including Jews, shall stand closest around God, with the remaining hordes of faithful standing behind them. It doesn't really say what the latters' groupings are in relation to each other.

Before there was ever a Jew, the Jewish book (that is also Christian) says that humans were so evil that God lovingly killed them all, except for Noah and his family. Noah then got shit-faced drunk, from becoming the world's first post-Flood vintner, and fell naked on his floor. Then his youngest son, Hambone, let his eyes fall upon his father's naked body, and the rest is Western History, as they say.

For Hambone's sin was so egregious that the descendants of Hambone's son, Canaan will be slaves in perpetuity to the descendants of Noah's other sons. Awesome, .... except that ... where's my slaves God Damnit? What? They're in China, making trinkets?

Those Canaanites are Africans, not Chinamen. Every decent American knows this, right?

Wait a minute, if the Africans are the Canaanites, then who are those Palestinians, or those 'Semites' for that matter?
I can't understand why you guys would be globalists. What would you be getting out of it? I guess you think there's simply nothing the billions of little people can do, eh, against the tiny handful of all powerful oligarchs(?)
In theory I have no problems with 'globalism', almost as the doctors [sic] of your religion ordered. Where I differ is in the means employed, as per the script, and practice of you JudaeChristians. As thus, I am quite sympathetic to the indigenous peoples who feel that their cultures are being destroyed by your MacDonalds invasions and much worse. But, you are making their lives BETTER, aren't you? You don't like Jewish Globalism, but rather Christian Globalism. Guess what, they are both the same thing and the consequent military industries are making their JudeoChristian owners koo-koo-boo-coo-buks. Injuns say: "White Man (meaning Jews and Christians) speaks with forked-tongue; Alice likes a Black Kitty and then becomes a queen (thankfully not a Red queen). WTF? We thought our mushrooms were badass, but sheesh!!"

Yes, there is NOTHING you can do against the tiny handful of powerful oligarchs. Exactly!!!!

Because, you keep taking their bait. Kill as many Jews as you want, and it wont change a thing, except that the tiny handful of oligarchs will just recruit more replacement Jews, just as they had to do before (and just as they were synthetically created in the first place). You can't change the system if you don't understand it, worse if you wont understand it, because of your vanity. As that good Jesuit book, The Art of War says: "Know your enemy (and your fake enemy)".

I know it's hard to believe, but I am an asshole. But I like like all sorts of people, that's the way I was brought up. However, I don't like people that have their stiff necks stuck up their own or other peoples asses, even if they are White asses or necks.

Nationalism is an expanded form of tribalism. In actuality, as utilized by the Western globalist enterprise it is just a temporary expediency to facilitate transient vain attitudes (about platitudes) across a few generations of time, till the next Conquest and such mandates expansive 'changes'.

As such, since the beginnings of transforming clans into tribes and onto empires, the smaller social construct is always in dialect tension with the larger construct(s). Deal with it, but understand that at some point the shepherds of men made a darkly brilliant decision to create a human front to buffer themselves from the discordant platitudizers and deflect the blame onto that front, or bloody shield, a red shield.

And yes, I am miserable. My city is gone. There are no major American cities that I know of. My nation is still here somewhere, but they aren't even fighting for it. You guys especially. The predominant culture I'm familiar with here is not WASP culture. Starbucks and Porn, I would call it. I tend to think it's Jewish culture. We're gone, and they're happy as clams. My neighbor's twitter says, "We conquered LA."
Sounds like God's plan to me.
Is this what you want?
It's not about what I want. Read your Bible, as with the eyes of child. And reap what you sow, as yea be reaped.
 
Top