March 28: 'Jews' as a Scapegoat Class

[Jerry Russell]

Tsar Nick, fake God on Earth.

According to the fount of all first glance research, Tsar Nick and his family were executed by an action of the Ural Soviet of Worker's Deputies, headed by Yakov Yurovsky. They said that the White Guards were attempting to rescue the Romanovs, and the German government was known to favor the restoration of the monarchy.

So, under wartime conditions, the Presidium of the Ural Soviet decided to execute the Romanovs, and Yurovsky and his 10-man firing squad carried out the execution. They felt there was no time for a proper trial, but said that Tsar Nick was "guilty of countless, bloody, violent acts against the Russian people." I have no reason to doubt that judgment.

Yurovsky said he personally fired the shot that killed the Tsar. Yes, Yakov Yurovsky was born Jewish. But he converted to Lutheranism in the early 1900's.

I guess maybe Christians shouldn't be so eager to accept converts, but should ask some questions to find out what those "cryptos" are really thinking? At any rate, the (Lutheran) gates of heaven were opened, and Yurovsky was presumably washed in the blood of the Lamb. So his sins have been forgiven, right?

(and I'm not 'really' making some snide comment about Trump dating Ivanka).

Yes you are, although Miss Kitty is likely to miss your point. Continuing a tradition dating back to the pharaohs of Egypt, the Jewish royal family frequently engaged in marriages with sisters, daughters or first cousins. It was also common for elderly rulers to marry much younger women in their immediate family. The Bible mentions a number of examples.

Romans and Greeks found this practice rather scandalous, and complained about it for propaganda advantage. But their royals were not above occasionally doing the same thing themselves.

 

[Jerry Russell]

I think Trump is a civic nationalist, a Zionist, and a disappointment.

Miss Kitty, are you ready to admit yet that Trump is also a treacherous snake of a liar? Please consider these videos about Trump's views on Wikileaks. From our other active thread today, about Assange.

Then...

https://www.msnbc.com/ali-velshi/wa...ays-he-knows-nothing-about-them-1488506947507

versus now...

 

[Richard Stanley]

Yes you are, although Miss Kitty is likely to miss your point. Continuing a tradition dating back to the pharaohs of Egypt, the Jewish royal family frequently engaged in marriages with sisters, daughters or first cousins. It was also common for elderly rulers to marry much younger women in their immediate family. The Bible mentions a number of examples.

Well, the very first Jews were born from Judah getting 'properly' screwed by his technically goyim daughter-in-law, Tamar, as Judah refused to obey the Levirate marriage contract vows. Tamar fooled Judah by pretending to be a street hooker. Judah's first round of progeny didn't fare well, as, for instance, God himself had to off Onan, because Onan wouldn't get off with Tamar. Poor Onan thought he only had to worry about hair growing on his palms.

Of course, this all begs the question of whether the "Jewish royals" were Jewish, or if the popes were ever Catholic much less Christian? And this is ignoring if some of the Jewish royals ever existed at all.

King David, who likely didn't exist, as did his fake progeny, fake Jesus of fake Nazareth, is said to have been born of the line of shiksas Ruth and Bathsheba, yet more goyimesses. Ruth, the Moabite, descends from drunken sot Lot, whose daughters conned him into reproducing. Maybe this had something to do with Lot having prior turned them over to the Sodomites to diddle with, because Lot didn't want to get in trouble by turning over God's angels to said Sodomites? Quite a pickle!!! Too bad they didn't have motorcycles back in the day.

Bathsheba and her first husband, Uriah, were Hittites, supposedly Indo-Europeans (whom some falsely claim to be Aryans).

Jesus, who claimed he was going to fulfil The Law, refused to obey such JudeoChristian strictures as getting married and making some little Jesu's, was obviously a homosexual and a socialist pinko, except that he didn't really exist, at least as Jesus of Nazareth. More likely he was that tax farmer dude, descended from the other JC, Julius Caesar and Cleopatra.

On the third day, JC was seen ascending to Heaven, from his funeral bier. When Marc Antony showed the wounds in the side of JC's wax effigy hung upon the traditional Roman tropaeum (like a body on a cross), it was the Jews of Rome who wailed the most loudly, for JC was their second messiah, after Cyrus of Persia.

 

[Jerry Russell]

More likely he was that tax farmer dude, descended from the other JC, Julius Caesar and Cleopatra.

Again, Miss Kitty is not going to have a clue what you're talking about. And I'm a little puzzled too. Are you making some claim about Caesarion, son of Julius Caesar and Cleopatra, who was killed by Octavian at age 17 according to the official story? Are you referring to Augustus, JC's adopted nephew? Or to Titus, Vespasian and/or the Alexanders, who were Caesar's spiritual descendants?

Biblical Jesus seems to be a fictional character invented for the purpose of telling lies about the rebel Jews' messianic candidates of the 1st century. The Essenes of the Dead Sea Scrolls were definitely socialist. All of those nationalist rebel Jews were probably socialist. Their Messiahs were probably all socialist.

And Biblical Jesus himself seems to be some sort of socialist, what with the stuff about lilies of the field, and about giving all you've got to the poor. He was the king of gibs, he even fed the five thousand without sending them a bill. If Biblical Jesus wasn't a socialist, nobody would even have recognized him as any kind of Jewish Messiah, fake or not. But his message was all garbled and inconsistent. A real pinko of the time wouldn't have walked a mile with the Romans.

 

[Richard Stanley]

Again, Miss Kitty is not going to have a clue what you're talking about.

Miss Kitty has committed herself to do a LOT of reading, so I'm not worried at all, unless the looming civil war interrupts her reading list, that is.

But, as we know, there are multiple historical candidates to be the real Jesus behind the fake, parody Jesus the white, fake Aryan Christians worship. There was Jesus of Sepphoris, Jesus of Gamala, Izates (aka the Islamic Isa), the Egyptian, among others. Izates was both the grandson and great-grandson of Julius and Cleo (because of some 'naughty' boinking going on). Izates mom, Helena, was also a Nazarite (not Nazarene from Nazareth), like fake Jesus and fake Samson (Donald Trump's chaotic alter ego). Likely, fake Jesus was a literary amalgam of all the candidate Jesi.

We should also remember that the German Catholics, upon celebrating Hitler's election victory in 1933, brought out the seamless robe, the ephod, of Jesus Christ, for glorious display. The ephod means that Jesus was indeed the high priest and/or King of the Jews. And thus, as Ralph Ellis asserts for other good reasons, Christianity is Judaism Lite. The Catholics next brought out the ephod in 1959, with Franz von Papen again [sic] in attendance. FvP was originally the Catholic politician whose machinations helped Hitler win, while in 59 he had been made an official papal camerlingo, a chamberlain.

But, OKaaaay. Christians don't worship a Jew.

 

[Jerry Russell]

Izates was both the grandson and great-grandson of Julius and Cleo (because of some 'naughty' boinking going on).

How could I forget? You're referring to Ralph Ellis's theory that Julius and Cleo had a secret daughter, who (he speculates) was sent for safekeeping to the Parthian royal court, disguised as a concubine. This 'concubine' married into the Parthian royal family as Queen Thea Muse Ourania. And later allegedly became quite the cougar, marrying her own son.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musa_of_Parthia

Musa was Queen of the Parthian Empire from c. 2 BC to 4 AD. She is called as Thermusa by Josephus and is also known as Thea Urania (Astarte).​

​

Musa was a Roman concubine given by the Roman Emperor Augustus (27 BC – 14 AD) to King Phraates IV of Parthia (37–2 BC). Around the same time, Augustus recovered the eagle standards (Aquilae) lost by Marcus Licinius Crassus in the Battle of Carrhae in 53 BC.​

​

Phraates IV made her his favored wife; he appointed her son Phraates V (2 BC – 4), commonly called Phraataces (a diminutive form), as his successor. She persuaded Phraates IV to send his other sons to Rome as hostages. ​

​

With all rivals out of the way, Musa and Phraataces poisoned the king and assumed the throne in 2 BC. They appear together on their coins, and were apparently co-rulers.​

​

Josephus alleges that Musa then married Phraates V, and, this being unacceptable to the Parthians, they rose up and overthrew them, offering the crown to Orodes III (who ruled briefly in 6).​

 

[Jerry Russell]

But, OKaaaay. Christians don't worship a Jew.

Don't confuse me. According to the Bible, Christians worship a Jew. And according to Christians, the Bible is full of nothing but factual facts.

 

[Richard Stanley]

The Christian Zealot (aka OG Jew, American Taliban) version of California Dreaming:

All the leaves are brown​

And the sky is gray​

I've been for a walk​

On a winter's day​

​

I'd be safe and warm​

If I was in L.A.​

California dreaming​

On such a winter's day​

​

Stopped into the church​

I passed along the way​

Well, I got down on my knees​

And I pretend to pray​

You know the preacher likes the cold​

He knows I'm gonna stay​

California dreaming​

On such a winter's day​

​

Now if a federal judge would​

Just open a brief window in California's​

High capacity ammo clip ban​

I'd buy as many clips as I ca....n (background vocals: up to one milli...on)​

Oh California dreaming​

On such a winter's day​

As my old flame from LA Gear once said: "It's not a dream". https://www.newsweek.com/california-guns-law-judge-magazines-ammo-1384193

Nobody's claiming they're going to use these for hunting anymore, and the pretext now is for self-dense ... because the civil war is a'coming.

​

 

[Miss Kitty]

I am so tired of saying - not all not all not all. It's a recent thing that you have to do that, you know. How often have you heard - not all Germans were responsible for WWII?

I don't relate to any discussions attempting to deny that ethnic groups exist. In the end, ethnicity seems to be a matter of perception. You are part of an ethnic group that sees you and accepts you as a part of that group. I can live in the Hollywood Hills, but I will never be seen as a part of the Tribe. I can move to Spain, but I will never be accepted as a Spaniard. Living in LA, I can tell you, my "in group" has been scattered and/or erased.

I've been trying to make sense of your idea that Jews are a scapegoat class. It doesn't seem to coincide with what I see. What I see is that too many Jews are lousy guests. If I move to Spain, I am going to try to be a good guest. I am going to respect their cultural heritage. I am not going to try to stop the bullfights or remove statues of bulls from the Spanish countryside, for instance. But this is precisely the sort of things that too many Jews like to do. Right now, not all Jews are spearheading an attempt to remove a statue of John Wayne from the John Wayne airport.

Not all Jews are extremely fearful right now as evidenced by the highly dishonest congressional hearing they held on white nationalists the other day. I can only guess that they have access to vast information from social media - which they largely control - informing them that they are in dire straights again with the white majority. They know that they can be kicked to the curb - if the majority wakes up and starts to act in concert in time - and they will do just about anything to stop it, including destroying our American tradition of free speech.

Please help me to understand the scapegoat idea. Here's an example of creepy behavior that I particularly don't like: Not all Jews are making practically all of the porn in the US. I didn't know this until recently. I understand they make most of it in the Valley. I hear it gets more sick and violent all the time, now featuring black and white scenarios and incest. I read an interview with a Jewish pornographer in which he said he likes to make porn in order to express his atavistic hatred of white Christians, and to humiliate white women. I hear from Palestinian acquaintances that Jews in Israel liked to make sure plenty of porn was piped into their homes in Palestine. And yet, for a Jew to watch porn in Israel, he has to declare it publicly. So, there's a double standard. We all know the disastrous effect that porn has on families and male/female relations generally, right? The thought that I'm surrounded by porn addicts is disgusting. People who create moral hazards are a scourge on the community. If there were, say, an uprising against Jewish pornographers in the Valley, why would that make them scapegoats? Are you maybe blaming the victims?

 

[Richard Stanley]

I am so tired of saying - not all not all not all. It's a recent thing that you have to do that, you know. How often have you heard - not all Germans were responsible for WWII?

Yes, indeed. I'm quite sympathetic to how the Nazi masses were duped into buying into that messianic, apocalyptic version of Christianity [yes, I meant to say this.], the 1,000 year Reich, cribbed right from the Christian Book of Revelation. The result of the false messiah was Israel. Only about 10 percent of Nazis were 'pagan' nature worshipers, the rest being devout and patriotic Christians, all looking to Make Germany Great Again. That is, after Kaiser Wilhelm and friends established the conditions for the inane WWI by COLLUDING with their royal relatives [sic] in England, Russia, and Austro-Hungaria. As I have also covered recently, Wilhelm and Otto von Oppenheim got the Ottoman Turks to establish the beginnings of today's global Islamic Jihad, which numerous defeated Nazis contributed to the global terrorist efforts.

Of course, as Martin Bernal went to great lengths to document in his Black Athena, Vol. 1, it was the 'German' king of England, George Hanover II, that established the 'modern', 'scientific', university system at Gottingen (Germany) in the 1730s. It's very first fake intellectual product was the Romantic Movement, which the later Nazis, and today's alt-right has built upon. Gut based feelings, like fear and vanity, are proof that some people are superior over others, based upon the land they supposedly evolved upon. Before this, Bernal claims that there are no such cultural expressions of racial hatred. I think he was correct except for the Church's institutional theology against their profitable foil, the Jews.

Your strong desire to play Christian Victimology is a sardonic mirror to Jewish Victimology. Almost makes me want to become a Muslim, but no.

If Jews aren't doing those naughty things you need to complain about then how could they be scapegoats in the first place. There has to be something to set y'all off in the first place. What, are you going to merely tell a bunch of crows that there is a scarecrow out there, somewhere, and not actually put one up?

Jerry told me that I was taking your bait, but you are taking the Deep Vatican's bait, like I use to. Be a part of the solution, not the problem.

Go tell your neighbors that the whore Gomer, from Hosea 1:1, is not a literal whore, but a figurative one. Clue, Gomer was the father of Ashkenaz.

Are you maybe blaming the victims?

Not so much, Jerry and I are trying our best to expose the 'shepherds' of the flocks. Problem is the sheep refuse to pull their heads out of each others asses. So, if a bunch of whiny white snowflakes carrying Chines made tiki-torches are victims, well I tried to warn y'all. These are the pussies that Trump is grabbing now.

 

[Iconn2222]

Both side are guilty of drinking the Liberalism cool-aid. See my new treatise on

In Group Social Identity and Cultural Divisions
A Treatise on the two Divisions.
The Fox in the Hen House
or
Toward a Generic Culture of Gray Everywhere​

 

[Jerry Russell]

I read an interview with a Jewish pornographer in which he said he likes to make porn in order to express his atavistic hatred of white Christians, and to humiliate white women.

I've traced this down, and it seems to be based on a quote from an article by Nathan Abrams, published in the Jewish Quarterly in 2004. The quote really needs to be read in context, as the author isn't exactly endorsing the analysis, and neither am I.

The article does say that Jews have a "disproportionate role" in the pornography industry, but it certainly doesn't say they make "practically all" the porn. It says that Jewish people got into the business because of low barriers to entry, and because of a "desire to make profits". He also says that many Jews in the industry see it as a rebellion against orthodox Torah law and middle-class Jewish values, and as a means of personal and political liberation.

Then he also says that some Jews see it as part of a spiritual battle against "Christian America" as well. However, Miss Kitty hasn't remembered the quote accurately, if indeed this is the ultimate source of the information. From the Wayback Machine:

https://web.archive.org/web/2018082...rg/issuearchive/articled325.html?articleid=38

Sexual revolutionaries​

​

Extending the subversive thesis, Jewish involvement in the X-rated industry can be seen as a proverbial two fingers to the entire WASP establishment in America. Some porn stars viewed themselves as frontline fighters in the spiritual battle between Christian America and secular humanism. According to Ford, Jewish X-rated actors often brag about their ‘joy in being anarchic, sexual gadflies to the puritanical beast’. Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion. Astyr remembers having ‘to run or fight for it in grammar school because I was a Jew. It could very well be that part of my porn career is an “up yours” to these people’. Al Goldstein, the publisher of Screw, said (on lukeford.net), ‘The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.’ Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged. Porn is no longer of the ‘what the Butler saw’ voyeuristic type; instead, it is driven to new extremes of portrayal that stretch the boundaries of the porn aesthetic. As new sexual positions are portrayed, the desire to shock (as well as entertain) seems clear.​

​

When it comes to the statement about "atavistic hatred", nobody is being directly quoted, but the perspective is being (critically) explained. It's not based in Judaism, but in secular humanism. It's not a hatred of White Christians, but of "Christian authority", Catholic authoritarianism, puritanism, and anti-semitism. And there's not a word at all about "humiliating white women", although (elsewhere in the article) Abrams does quote E. Michael Jones, who observed that many of the movies feature Jewish men and Catholic women. Abrams says that this is a fulfillment of a Jewish fantasy.

 

[Miss Kitty]

The father of the atom bomb was Robert Oppenheimer, a Jew. Therefore, the ultimate evil in the world is not the white man, but the Jew. No white guilt!

 

[Jerry Russell]

At the same time, black men do things like rape about 25,000 white women a year in the US according to FBI crime statistics, a figure white women are not told, placing them at further risk. (By contrast, white men who rape black women are statistically zero.)

I traced this down too, and it's based on a highly unfortunate misinterpretation of a BJS (not FBI) report from 2008 that was based on a very small sample. If indeed rapes between the races occurred at a random rate, the expected number of rapes of black women by white men was 2, and in fact none were reported. In seven cases, the black women didn't say or didn't know what race the assailant was? Anyhow, the sample was too small to reach any valid conclusion.

Sadly, in the comments to this excellent blog article, all too many racist white people come forward to graphically demonstrate they don't know anything about statistics.

https://thesocietypages.org/socimag...statistics-launched-a-white-supremacist-meme/

 

[Jerry Russell]

The father of the atom bomb was Robert Oppenheimer, a Jew. Therefore, the ultimate evil in the world is not the white man, but the Jew. No white guilt!

Don't forget Enrico Fermi (Catholic) and Werner Heisenberg (German nationalist) made huge scientific contributions, and that Roosevelt provided the funding, and Truman pulled the trigger. A Judeo-Christian endeavor. Although for the most part, the scientists involved weren't religious in any traditional sense.

 

[Miss Kitty]

I do like E. Michael Jones. He makes a lot of sense to me. Do you remember PORTNOY'S COMPLAINT? I can do without Jewish perversion. I think the whole world would be better off without it. Let them watch it themselves.. Of course they have more than one motivation, money being high on the list. Jones says that the problem with Jews is that they've abandoned the logos. Reason. Truth.

You've always been so into the bomb, Jerry... Didn't Einstein have something to do with it? I've been reading lately that Einstein was a fraud who was not admired by Tesla, the true genius of the age. What did you think about Einstein's physics? Have you ever heard that Einstein hoped to see ALL of the German people wiped out by the end of WWII? Did you ever hear that there's a sort of Jewish Einstein mafia that prevents people from talking dirt about Einstein? I never heard of Tesla until maybe five or ten years ago.

 

[Richard Stanley]

The father of the atom bomb was Robert Oppenheimer, a Jew. Therefore, the ultimate evil in the world is not the white man, but the Jew. No white guilt!

With your emoticon it's difficult to tell whether you're serious or not, and whether you're still trolling us, or have ever stopped.

I am so tired of saying - not all not all not all. It's a recent thing that you have to do that, you know. How often have you heard - not all Germans were responsible for WWII?

So what you're saying is that entitled liddle serfer (not surfers) dudes and dudettes, have dispensation to make propagandic distortions about endless specific factoids, such that feed their vanity need for 'White' Victimologist Stockholm Syndrome? And you in particular, from a once rarified member of the 'white' nobility cum gentry have now identified with the poor liddle serfers?

And, ... that the various 'mud people' do not have the right to complain about anything, because there really is nothing to complain about?

Don't forget Enrico Fermi (Catholic) and Werner Heisenberg (German nationalist) made huge scientific contributions, and that Roosevelt provided the funding, and Truman pulled the trigger. A Judeo-Christian endeavor.

And that the Nazis had a yuuuge nuclear weapons program of their own. But, ... I'm sorry, we're not allowed to expand this to all Germans, or white people according to MK.

Jones says that the problem with Jews is that they've abandoned the logos. Reason. Truth.

Here we go again. We have to keep up with what the Joneses 'say' now.

 

[Miss Kitty]

I traced this down too, and it's based on a highly unfortunate misinterpretation of a BJS (not FBI) report from 2008 that was based on a very small sample. If indeed rapes between the races occurred at a random rate, the expected number of rapes of black women by white men was 2, and in fact none were reported. In seven cases, the black women didn't say or didn't know what race the assailant was? Anyhow, the sample was too small to reach any valid conclusion.

Sadly, in the comments to this excellent blog article, all too many racist white people come forward to graphically demonstrate they don't know anything about statistics.

https://thesocietypages.org/socimag...statistics-launched-a-white-supremacist-meme/

I don't know if you are correct, Jerry. The title makes me suspicious. In my experience, only anti-whites call people "white supremacists." None of the people I read are white supremacists. In fact, I don't know of a single one. Even Andrew Anglin is just satire. Who are the private donors of TSP? I heard this from David Duke who said he got it from FBI statistics. I stopped researching what he says awhile ago because I always found him to be correct. (When I started listening to him a few years ago, it was practically all unbelievable.) Also, I don't know shit about statistics. The same sort of argument on TSP is made about supposedly superior Jewish IQ's, btw. Small sample a long time ago. I would think that the only place to go would be directly to the FBI. Did you do that? Do they have more recent records? And if not, why not? Where are the numbers? Do you really think they don't know? I'm sure the FBI is obsessed by race, like every other government agency... Right?

 

[Jerry Russell]

Where are the numbers?

Rape is a very difficult topic to research. There are massive problems: What is rape, exactly? Who do you believe in any given case, or in general? How often is it reported? Is there any police bias in reporting or prosecution?

I would think that the only place to go would be directly to the FBI. Did you do that?

Not before. But since you asked, here's the most recent report:

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2017/crime-in-the-u.s.-2017/topic-pages/rape

Indeed, it seems they don't collect statistics by racial categories. So, there's no information here.

Also, they are looking at cases reported to law enforcement, which is likely to be very different from what you'd get with a statistical questionnaire like the BJS study.

 

[Miss Kitty]

With your emoticon it's difficult to tell whether you're serious or not, and whether you're still trolling us, or have ever stopped.


So what you're saying is that entitled liddle serfer (not surfers) dudes and dudettes, have dispensation to make propagandic distortions about endless specific factoids, such that feed their vanity need for 'White' Victimologist Stockholm Syndrome? And you in particular, from a once rarified member of the 'white' nobility cum gentry have now identified with the poor liddle serfers?

And, ... that the various 'mud people' do not have the right to complain about anything, because there really is nothing to complain about?


And that the Nazis had a yuuuge nuclear weapons program of their own. But, ... I'm sorry, we're not allowed to expand this to all Germans, or white people according to MK.


Here we go again. We have to keep up with what the Joneses 'say' now.

Well, I'm just surprised that Jerry actually believes this stuff about white people being uniquely evil because they invented the bomb or had slaves or killed Indians or took other people's resources. I thought this was the sort of stuff you had to take the white kids out of school to avoid. You know, you want to avoid demoralizing them with nonsense. Are you unaware that this anti-white point of view is taught systematically in American schools? Even my Korean hairdresser believes it. That's why I had to point out that Jews were involved in inventing the bomb. I guess maybe they were even overrepresented in inventing the bomb, you know, relative to their tiny population. Maybe Jerry could do a statistical analysis to determine mathematically who in America is truly evil. Germans should be excluded since they didn't succeed in making the bomb, and they weren't here. Really, I think since Jews have been involved in the bomb, slavery, genocide, and theft of resources - and they didn't invent anything that's WAY COOL, like airplanes, they probably take the prize as the most worthless human beings per capita on the planet, not us!