As has been discussed on this thread several times, the circumstances of the election and the campaigns made several factors come into play, any one of which could have determined the outcome. Therefore, we are left to twiddle our fingers about what actual weight to give the Wikileaks dump.It's known that after Wikileaks dumped information about Hillary Clinton, polls about her victory dropped, while before she was given as winner. So we can really say that those leaks determined the victory of Trump. Well, those hacked documents were received by Wikileaks from Russian hackers. Assange did a very stupid thing, by publishing documents that helped elect the man who would later pursue his destruction. Assange was not trying to help Trump to be elected, he just had a bad opinion of both candidates.
In any case, I'm not at all certain if you have read those discussions or pondered those considerations, and I'm not going to reiterate them in detail ... again.
I will only address here that the Clintons were considered political geniuses, and their collective genius fell flat on the floor for 2018. They are corporate Neoliberals from day one of their Partnership in Power (there is a book by that name). They are Machiavellian actors in a larger Machiavellian construct, as is Donald John Trump. The Clintons played the role of fake populists before (their good personal friend) Trump came along to fake challenge Hillary. So, they had to have understood everything that Trump was doing, and Hillary played into that hand.
Both the RNC and the DNC rigged their operations so that we got the result we did, else we would now have a President Sanders. This is what the political parties have always done, nothing new here.
[Off topic discussion about 9/11 moved here: https://postflaviana.org/community/index.php?threads/9-11-the-demolition-of-truth.2480/]
Last edited by a moderator: