Well Jerry, Robert Mueller did say that Atta's passport was vaporware. So there!Skeptics ask, why are there no insiders blowing the whistle about 9/11 or any number of other government conspiracies? This seems like a good enough explanation to me.
Your points are well taken.
But just as well, we've been long agreeing, and not arguing, that the national parties are "Controlled". And by definition that Hill and Bill are part of that corrupt structure. And, I'm saying that Trump is too, despite the sturm und drang about Trump's opposition to the Deep State. He was steered into this (with the (collusion) help of the RNC and others) and I'm saying that Wikileaks was used, wittingly or unwittingly, as the convenient vehicle to deploy the 'stolen' emails.
As a natural reaction to what Joshstone is discussing, Wikileaks was formed out of 'anonymous' individuals (excepting Assange) to protect against revenge of the corrupt state interests. This very construction ironically made it a target for being used as a political weapon. Like we've mentioned, leaks have a long history as political weapons, and there is usually impunity if the source is powerful enough.