So the "plan" of Stalin was to play the little boy of the British and sacrifice his plans/ambitions he worked on for 2 decades for the benefit of the British oligarchy ???
And the author sees nothing wrong with this (own ?) thesis ?!
Not everything is as it seems on the surface.
The underlying premise of Postflaviana is that Western Civilization (and here I am including Russia and the USSR), at least, has been foundationally formed and run continuously by elites that function as if they were 'shepherds' of various human flocks, which we today call nations. For some of the time they have run things openly, as emperors, popes, and kings, and in more contemporary times covertly pulling strings as if puppetmasters. In the latter case using agents that are motivated by various means: intellectual, financial, blackmail, etc..
Imagine if one was to read accounts of a young Stalin acting much like has been discussed in some of the recent books we've talked about on this forum about the Apostle Paul acting like a military counter-intelligence agent for the Romans against the nationalist Jews of the day. It seems that when Stalin, in the days leading up to the revolution was getting caught and curiously released from custody by the Okrana, the imperial Russian secret police, just as Paul was always getting 'saved' (from the angry Jews) and released by the imperial Romans.
Check these links for more instances of former Okhrana agents:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=okhrana+agents+becoming+cheka+agents&t=ffsb&ia=web
To this day, players on the right continue to profitably conflate communism with socialism, when in fact if the German communists and German socialists had been able to compromise on a candidate against Hitler in 1933 Hitler would not have won election. Fortunately we are aide by the analysis of Wolfgang Waldner (and Jerry's efforts) in demonstrating the
true nature of Karl Marx, who was married into the Prussian nobility. Before taking on his big economic project, his first assignment was spying on Bruno Bauer, perhaps the first major critic of Christianity in the 'modern' era. The gist here, for Marx, was to co-opt the Industrial Revolution's worker's true interests by creating an extreme construct that could easily controlled, if one has their 'agent' in the proper position. The same can easily be the case with Hitler, or Napoleon (and his overt display of the Hidden Hand).
Identically, this same means of 'mitigation' of peoples' greater interests can be found with the the libertarian movement and its extreme focus on the (Ayn) Randian economic hero, its celebration of those who are hyper-driven, and thus inevitably result in the concentration of wealth, and it's default opposite. Imagine the surprise to find the seemingly paradoxical sponsors of such 'individualism' ideology are the remnants of European royalty, the Hapsburgs and the Bourbons, etc, connected with the Mont Pelerin Society. The paradox vanishes once one analyzes the hidden agenda correctly. In other words, covertly create the environment for a Robber Baron-esque society of sufficient inequality and enough people will be sufficiently receptive to a truly global new order, and a return of the ' benevolent king'.
In the context of of Futurist interpretation of the Book of Revelation, there will be ethnic based nations (making racists happy) all answering to the global 'king' likely per the feudal model described in Genesis 47.
This thread begins with the (cultural Catholic) discussion of Joe Atwill's and Tim Kelly's over the covert involvement of the British Crown with such as Hitler, but we also know the similar role of the Vatican with the Nazis. It is no big leap to me since I consider the entire creation of the Church of England, via Henry VIII's divorce, a sham. As Donald Trump might say (privately), it is Fake Protestantism. It's all cynical manipulation of the flocks of human sheep.
Much is known about Adolf Hitler's life, except for a silent period of about 5(?) years just prior to WWI. It was during this time that Adolf's half-brother, Alois, went to England and fathered a child, Patrick. Where was Adolf during this time that his half-brother was in England?
And, put this in the context that the British Crown is essentially ... German, and has been since before the American Revolution. And that it was 'England's' George II that sponsored the 'modern scientific' university system, in Gottingen Germany, where the very first fake 'scientific' product was the baseless basis [sic] of the Romantic Movement, where we are still living with the idiotic ideology of 'Blood and Soil'.
As I have been discussing on another thread, based upon Levenda's
The Hitler Legacy and Redles's
Hitler's Millennial Reich, we are still living with the (now global) terrorist legacy of the Nazi apocalyptic movement that excites both today's race - nationalist movements and such as American right wing Evangelicals, and such as radical Catholic crypto-monarchists.
