Has there been a Coup D'etat in America?

Has there been a Coup D'etat in America?

  • YES - But I don't know when, Or NONE of the following times

    Votes: 2 50.0%
  • Yes - Slowly, after WW2

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes - With the assassination of JFK

    Votes: 2 50.0%
  • Yes - With 9/11

    Votes: 1 25.0%
  • No - Are you crazy?

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Not Sure

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    4

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
Frank,

Once there is some basic agreement on WHAT and WHEN, which I sense is coming, I want to talk about WHO were the key actors in making the change, and then HOW it happened.
In making this statement, weren't you already making your further discussion contingent on this basic agreement, which we've been telling you doesn't exist?

I'm having trouble seeing this as a "small" disagreement. It seems fundamental to me.

If you read our articles, you might get a sense for our opinions about WHO, HOW and WHY as well. Do you think you'd find we are in agreement about those topics?

Anyhow, thanks for your blessing of good luck, and for your comments. Best wishes to you also.
 
Was there ever a time when the elected governing group was in charge of the state? I don't think so. The recent mini-series with Paul Giamatti as Adams showed how little meaning the vote had. The Gangs of New Youk is closer to real history and the era of Tammany Hall.

Andrew Jackson had to fight the Rothschilds by building corruption. He avoided an assassination by doing this. Garfield and every President who talked about financial reforms like the Silver Certificates JFK was about to use to pay off the debt - was asassinated. Warren Harding was a drunken woman (child actually) chaser who was run by thugs who created Hoover who was a Tyrant. Hoover used blackmail to control Washington and was influential all over for many decades. Probably the only American President who was not controlled was Reagan = because he lost control of his mind (unless you count Nancy's astrologer). My ancestor Rufus King was a Minister Plenipotentiary and I would like someone to try to say that these Ministers were not above the government and the law.

Then there is this POV.

The numbers of corporations doesn't matter especialy if the shareholder control (takes less than 8% usually) is owned by certain families and their status quo organizing ethic. As Marshall McLuhan (the author who wrote about the Global Village before it became reality) said; if he had 15 years in control of the media he would control the world. His biographer said McLuhan knew enough about the secret societies (listen to the JFK speech on them too) to know it had happened.



https://books.google.ca/books?id=6vfBDo9MR14C&pg=PT107&lpg=PT107&dq=Katharine+Graham+"media+mogul"&source=bl&ots=rwvZOIYY8T&sig=DmMnKIznATq0la5qomc0JPbL-4o&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CDQQ6AEwBmoVChMImYzM7onQxwIVAZeICh3JqwYa#v=onepage&q=Katharine Graham "media mogul"&f=false



However, the control of the media and even control of religion and political machnnery is no longer as important as the control of bureaucracy when bureaucracy includes black ops machines capable of manipulating the World Mind.

If there was no interest to pay on the debt and generally accepted accounting priciples were used for countries the world would be free! There would be no debt in most countries but especially the US.
 
You mention Marilyn and the Rat Pack. My High Priestess in Wicca hung with the Rat Pack and was the last consort of Gary Cooper. I heard stories about the drugs and I knew from other sources about the huge number of girls.

My sister-in-law's cousin bought Peter Lawford's cottage in Rancho Palos Verdes where many trysts took place.

Here is some research from my book on America's Assassinations and Aspirations.

I doubt Marilyn Monroe was anything but a confused star-struck drug-using individual with some gifts and talents that the Kennedy boys enjoyed. But she may have been so obsessed with them that she would have threatened to tell some of what she knew and she did have the attention of the people and media. There was a general lack of knowledge about the nature of JFK's drug use and sexual shenanigans even after his death. It would not surprise me if this was managed and agreed to, or asked for by the Kennedy clan. They still value their image even though Old Joe has been exposed on Arts & Entertainment. Maybe Maria Shriver and Arnold will make a run for the Presidency. It is important to note that Mary Jo Kopechne figures into the issue in a big way however. Maybe she intended to leak a lot more about the Kennedy clan.

"Smathers also betrayed JFK over Marilyn Monroe. According to Sarah Churchill's recently published book, The Many Lives of Marilyn Monroe (2004), it was Smathers who first leaked the story to the press about the affair. The story first appeared in an article by Dorothy Kilgallen the day before Monroe died (Kilgallen was herself to die in similar circumstances as Monroe on 8th November, 1965).

Why should Smathers do this? One possibility is that Smathers was trying to link JFK with Monroe's death. According to Matthew Smith's Victim: The Secret Tapes of Marilyn Monroe (2003) the CIA was involved in a plot to implicate the Kennedys in Monroe's death as punishment for the Bay of Pigs disaster.

If Smathers was involved in any conspiracy to kill JFK one would expect those close to him like Grant Stockdale {Mobbed-up vending-machine owner who was in a position to expose many things after JFK's death and who was eliminated.} to find out about it. One person who might have discovered what was going on was his secretary, Mary Jo Kopechne, and her flat mate, Nancy Carole Tyler, who was Bobby Baker's secretary. According to Penn Jones, it was Kopechne and Tyler who leaked the story about JFK replacing LBJ by Smathers as vice president. {I have no doubt about LBJ's involvement in the assassination of JFK.}

Nancy Carole Tyler died in a plane crash, near Ocean City, Maryland, on 10th May, 1965.

Kopechne went on to become Robert Kennedy's secretary. She was to die in Edward Kennedy's car on 18th July, 1969." (1)



Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/55608
 
No one will think it was bad to do info warfare on Qaddafi (duck).

They did a far more concerted coup d'etat using info warfare on Canada to get nukes on our soil.

The contentious part people might not agree with and might think the government will not allow, has to do with Casey as head of the CIA getting involved with disinforming the American public. Some idiots might even think the CIA does nothing domestic because the FBI is in charge or Homeland (DARPA and the all seeing occult eyes) etc.. I do think the person who says the success of government will occur (as Casey says) when all people believe their disinformation.

http://truthstreammedia.com/2015/01/13/c...-is-false/
 

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
My sister-in-law's cousin bought Peter Lawford's cottage in Rancho Palos Verdes where many trysts took place.
Haha. Never buy a celebrity house. My sister bought L'Wren Scott's house, where Mick Jagger used to visit. What a nightmare. And that's all I can say about that.

No one will think it was bad to do info warfare on Qaddafi (duck).
If Qaddafi was so bad, why was it necessary to do info warfare (that is, false propaganda) against him? Why shouldn't the truth be sufficient?

They did a far more concerted coup d'etat using info warfare on Canada to get nukes on our soil.
I can't parse this. Whose nukes on our soil? Whose coup d'etat?
 
There was a show in TV this week explaining the Qaddafi operation. I think that show was also an over-statement of his badness - but he did do some weird ass sh*t. I employed a person who he went to school with (I think it was Malta) and that person respected Q. The people interviewed (A German couple) spent years as his friend and in the show the woman was saying he went nuts. That might be true and the US has means to do this remotely - Waco and Ruby Ridge or read the book Info Warfare by two Georgetown professors who document things in Iraq where 200 highly trained soldiers in a deep german built bunker housing tanks and enough food to live for months - came out and surrendered without a bullet being fired. The book also documents what Hill and Knowlton charged 15 million for doing - fabricating the babies torn from incubators vids you probably bought as news.

This is the kind of thing that JK Galbraith and Pearson, and the CIA et al worked on Diefenbaker to get (You certainly know whose) nukes on canadian soil.
 
Top