OK, and that also explains why the 3:00 and 9:00 portals appear almost invisible in the docking video, to the point where I thought you were writing more satire. The question then becomes, whether a porthole that has been covered over and riveted shut, should even be called a porthole? I agree, this could explain the permanently black appearance from inside.Perhaps the 3:00 and 9:00 o'clock portals have been permanently covered from the outside, and this is why the one appears black in the interior shot?
This is a redux of the same problem raised by the late Dave McGowan in his Moon landing analysis. The difference in the effective luminosity of our Sun to other stars is hard to imagine, until one comprehends the difference in distance. Also, because our eyes' irises help to compensate for such differences, to a smaller extent. Try using a PV solar panel inside your dwelling and see how much energy it produces from your lights. Not very much.For whatever it's worth, my theory about the stars is that they are very far away, and therefore much dimmer in brightness than either the Sun, or any object directly illuminated by the Sun. Indeed, they are below the threshold of brightness necessary to excite the photoreceptors in the camera, when it's adjusted to correctly expose the highlights in the image of the spacecraft.
I looked further into this, and I've satisfied myself that the recoverable booster footage is genuine. I had thought all these landings were far out at sea. But some of them (including the double booster landing for the Falcon Heavy rocket, that I was referring to above) happened on dry land, with hundreds if not thousands of eyewitnesses. And, many of those eyewitnesses posted their own video to YouTube, so we have confirmation of the event from multiple viewpoints. Here's a compilation:... the booster recovery landing images look fake. They're too perfect, with the twin boosters touching down at exactly the same moment.
Sometimes I get away with all kinds of stupid stuff on this website and nobody calls me on it. The ISS is easy to see with the naked eye, or you can take a picture of it with a telescope & a camera.the ISS that's supposedly been in orbit since 1998, but might have long since crashed to earth for all we know.
I'm going to have to broaden the topic of this thread, or else start a new one. There's a lot going on in what's been called "Space 2.0". I hardly know where to begin. But, let's have a look at the space tourism business. I have to ask whether we're looking here at priest training for the Space Jesus religion to come...what's most interesting about this video is the simulation of happy customers enjoying the ride.
Well ... uhmm ... Jerry, there are giant cannons placed around the ice wall rim of the Earth, from which they shoot these communication transponders (that They hilariously call 'satellites'). Near the end of each shot the transponder assembly deploys a parachute where each is recovered by trained Labrador 'retrievers' so that they can be reused repeatedly.I'd like to see flat earthers explain how this works.
...since if real trouble broke out in the spacecraft (e.g. a fire) and they had to call back to Earth for detailed assistance in fighting this complicated emergency, light signals could take 20 mins each way, hence by the time effective and correct measures were communicated from Earth, the astronauts could long be dead or the situation turned to fatality because they did not know the intricate manoeuvres needed to save themselves (remember Apollo 13).And furthermore, Musk comes across like a true believer. If so, he's the best kind of person to convince his employees to believe likewise.
Turning humans into space colonizers is his stated life’s purpose. “I would like to die thinking that humanity has a bright future,” he said. “If we can solve sustainable energy and be well on our way to becoming a multiplanetary species with a self-sustaining civilization on another planet—to cope with a worst-case scenario happening and extinguishing human consciousness—then,” and here he paused for a moment, “I think that would be really good.” (pp. 3-4).