The following 1998 address to the 12th World AIDS Conference in Geneva, by Eleni Papadopoulos gives some sense of what I've been reading off-and-on
The "Virus Myth" website doesn't claim that viruses in general don't exist. It says that the HIV virus has never been isolated using classical methods of virology. And that HIV virus doesn't cause the AIDS disease.
And I can understand the basis for raising that question. AIDS is very atypical compared to most viral diseases. In the west, it's associated with anal sex and drug use, which is an odd set of co-factors.
But, this is very different from claiming that flu or mumps or polio viruses don't exist, or that the rhinovirus doesn't cause the common cold.
I only have enough time to consider the arguments of those who counter them at this point in life.
It seems to me that the "official sources" need to be correct at least 90% of the time, otherwise people would be even more suspicious than they are now.
Since you don't have time to research the evidence that HIV really is an infectious virus that causes AIDS, I'll provide a link & summary. For the studies backing the assertions, please follow the link.
https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/news/528/the-evidence-that-hiv-causes-aids
Evidence that HIV Causes AIDS
1. HIV fulfills Koch's postulates as the cause of AIDS. ...
With regard to postulate #1, numerous studies from around the world show that virtually all AIDS patients are HIV-seropositive; that is they carry antibodies that indicate HIV infection. With regard to postulate #2, modern culture techniques have allowed the isolation of HIV in virtually all AIDS patients, as well as in almost all HIV-seropositive individuals with both early- and late-stage disease. In addition, the polymerase chain (PCR) and other sophisticated molecular techniques have enabled researchers to document the presence of HIV genes in virtually all patients with AIDS, as well as in individuals in earlier stages of HIV disease. Postulate #3 has been fulfilled in tragic incidents involving three laboratory workers with no other risk factors who have developed AIDS or severe immunosuppression after accidental exposure to concentrated, cloned HIV in the laboratory. In all three cases, HIV was isolated from the infected individual, sequenced and shown to be the infecting strain of virus. In another tragic incident, transmission of HIV from a Florida dentist to six patients has been documented by genetic analyses of virus isolated from both the dentist and the patients. The dentist and three of the patients developed AIDS and died, and at least one of the other patients has developed AIDS. Five of the patients had no HIV risk factors other than multiple visits to the dentist for invasive procedures ...
2. AIDS and HIV infection are invariably linked in time, place and population group. ...
3. Many studies agree that only a single factor, HIV, predicts whether a person will develop AIDS. ... Other viral infections, bacterial infections, sexual behavior patterns and drug abuse patterns do not predict who develops AIDS. Individuals from diverse backgrounds, including heterosexual men and women, homosexual men and women, hemophiliacs, sexual partners of hemophiliacs and transfusion recipients, injection-drug users and infants have all developed AIDS, with the only common denominator being their infection with HIV ...
4. In cohort studies, severe immunosuppression and AIDS-defining illnesses occur almost exclusively in individuals who are HIV-infected. ...
5. Before the appearance of HIV, AIDS-related diseases such as PCP, KS and MAC were rare in developed countries; today, they are common in HIV-infected individuals. ...
6. In developing countries, patterns of both rare and endemic diseases have changed dramatically as HIV has spread, with a far greater toll now being exacted among the young and middle-aged, including well-educated members of the middle class. ...
7. In studies conducted in both developing and developed countries, death rates are markedly higher among HIV-seropositive individuals than among HIV-seronegative individuals. ...
8. HIV can be detected in virtually everyone with AIDS. ...
9. Numerous studies of HIV-infected people have shown that high levels of infectious HIV, viral antigens, and HIV nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) in the body predict immune system deterioration and an increased risk for developing AIDS. Conversely, patients with low levels of virus have a much lower risk of developing AIDS. ...
10. The availability of potent combinations of drugs that specifically block HIV replication has dramatically improved the prognosis for HIV-infected individuals. Such an effect would not be seen if HIV did not have a central role in causing AIDS. ...
11. Among HIV-infected patients who receive anti-HIV therapy, those whose viral loads are driven to low levels are much less likely to develop AIDS or die than patients who do not respond to therapy. Such an effect would not be seen if HIV did not have a central role in causing AIDS. ...
12. Nearly everyone with AIDS has antibodies to HIV. ...
13. Numerous serosurveys show that AIDS is common in populations where many individuals have HIV antibodies. Conversely, in populations with low seroprevalence of HIV antibodies, AIDS is extremely rare. ...
14. The specific immunologic profile that typifies AIDS -- a persistently low CD4+ T-cell count -- is extraordinarily rare in the absence of HIV infection or other known cause of immunosuppression. ...
15. Newborn infants have no behavioral risk factors for AIDS, yet many children born to HIV-infected mothers have developed AIDS and died. ...
16. The HIV-infected twin develops AIDS while the uninfected twin does not. ...
17. Studies of transfusion-acquired AIDS cases have repeatedly led to the discovery of HIV in the patient as well as in the blood donor. ...
18. HIV is similar in genetic structure and morphology to other lentiviruses that often cause immunodeficiency in their animal hosts in addition to slow, progressive wasting disorders, neurodegeneration and death. ...
19. HIV causes the death and dysfunction of CD4+ T lymphocytes in vitro and in vivo. ...
The entire milieu of big-science, big-medical, big-university, and the financiers of same, leave me beyond disappointed in them.
I understand your disappointment. But the fact is that people are living far longer lives now than ever before.
Life expectancy was only 38 years in 1850, before infectious diseases were understood and controlled (primarily through hygiene, but also by antibiotics and vaccines).
Don't let your anger make you discount the real progress that's been made, or the valid scientific basis of modern medicine.
I'll admit that even if SpaceBuster is woo-woo, he might drop some valid clues. If you saw anything interesting, please let me know the time marker.
TPTB are going to go full-tilt boogie into whatever scenario they see fit, and the population will likely follow.
Yes. I would argue that covid-19 is a dangerous public health threat, that could kill tens or even hundreds of millions; and ALSO that the PTB are going to take advantage of it to move forward with their plans for world domination. Those two propositions are not mutually exclusive.