Chabad Lubavitch

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
This is typical of the Catholic institutional attitude towards pedophilia. Acosta, BTW, was a law clerk for the Catholic Supreme Alito. Acosta's plea deal allowed Epstein to leave jail 6 days a week to go to his office and have sex with underage girls. Of course, Agent Orange Leaks only grabs great looking, adult women by the pussy, and only walks in on naked, underage beauty pagaent girls when in HIS dressing rooms. He did date his eldest daughter through, but before or after she became a Zionist?

President Donald Trump's new nominee for secretary of labor, Alexander Acosta, could face a grilling in the Senate over claims that — while he was the top federal prosecutor in Miami — he cut a sweetheart plea deal in 2008 with a billionaire investor accused of having sex with dozens of underage girls.

As the U.S. attorney for Southern Florida, Acosta agreed not to file any federal charges against the wealthy financier, Jeffrey Epstein, if he pled guilty to state charges involving soliciting prostitution and soliciting a minor for prostitution.

Epstein ultimately received an 18-month sentence in county jail and served about 13 months — treatment that provoked outrage from alleged victims in the case.

Soon after the deal was cut in 2008, two women filed suit claiming that the decision to forgo federal prosecution violated a federal law — the Crime Victims Rights Act — because they and other teenagers Epstein paid for sex were never adequately consulted about the plea deal or given an opportunity to object to it.

Acosta is not a party in the suit, which names only the federal government as a defendant. In 2015, lawyers for the women demanded Acosta submit to a deposition in the case. The motion was withdrawn last year as settlement talks in the case went forward, but the case remains pending.

"There is good reason to believe that if the prosecutors had exposed their dealings to scrutiny by Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and other victims, they would not have reached such a sweetheart plea deal," the alleged victims' attorneys wrote in a court filing last year.

Acosta’s involvement in the saga could be personally or politically awkward for Trump, drawing fresh attention to his ties to Epstein — including the financier’s tenure as a member at Trump’s Palm Beach club, Mar-a-Lago.

“I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy,'' Trump told New York Magazine back in 2002. "He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life."

A Trump associate told POLITICO in 2015 that Trump and Epstein were not particularly close. “He was a member of one of Trump's clubs where he would visit with women and business associates, but there was no formal relationship," the source said. ...

Marcilla Smith

Active Member
In the spirit of neutrality, I think Jerry's perspective makes for a more reasonable model and a better documentary, while Richard's makes for a more qualitatively satisfying explanation and a better summer blockbuster.

To Collectivist, I offer my apologies. I do not mean to exclude you from your own thread, only that I do not understand your position well enough yet. Perhaps I am letting myself be too thrown by the dissonance between the left-leaning implications of your handle and the right-leaning implications of your rhetoric

Jerry Russell

Staff member
Thanks Marcilla. I don't think we have enough data to really settle the question, whether there is a single, persistent, central cabal. If there is, I think it's far more likely that the Master Cylinders are Euro-nobles per Rick's theory, rather than a bunch of Lubavitchers. It's just a matter of which side has the deeper, wealthier power base.

Collectivist's handle seems to imply a deceptive intent. He is the opposite of a collectivist, as he's stated frequently in this thread. But, I don't understand how Collectivist's stuff can be construed as "bald ultramontane Catholic agitprop" when C hardly even mentions the Pope. Covertly ultramontane Catholic agitprop, maybe, but not bald.

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
Covertly ultramontane Catholic agitprop, maybe, but not bald.
Bald on a different level perhaps, but otherwise you are correct that he (she?) is attempting to do so subtly. As I have complained consistently on this thread, nearly everything he (she?) does here is deceptive. This includes complaining that this is his (her?) thread, when he (she?) designed and uses it as a catch-all for whatever crap he (she?) wants to light his (her?) neoNazi branded hair product on fire about. Gee, no wonder he (she?) loves alt-President Agent Orange Leaks so much. But, he (she?) knows that soon we will have President Pence to deal with. Bait and Switch, the Art of the Deal.

Odd that snowmelt water (it?) can have hair to light on fire, maybe it is algae?

C, doesn't like Pope Francis, at least on the surface, because Francis is a consistently liberal appearing Jesuit Jerry. But agents like Bannon, Milo Yiannopoulos, and Orange Leaks can play both sides of the fence (AC/DC, if you know what I mean) and C just slurps it all down like a good choir boy (girl?).

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
Proof positive about my claims, and C's agenda (especially note the last excerpted highlighted sentence). Yiannopoulos is describing the classic Spartan attitude about sexual relations of which President Bannon is a big, big, big, fan of. This is why Bannon keeps Yiannopoulos around him, and that Bannon hates women (excepting Julia Hahn for some reason).

But look at these so-called CPAC snowmelters getting all POLITICALLY CORRECT.

Conservative blogger Erick Erickson on Monday slammed the ACU’s decision to include Yiannopoulos among their speakers, casting the move as more of a publicity stunt than a contribution to conservative dialogue.

“Yiannopoulos has expressly said he is not a conservative,” Erickson wrote on his blog “The Resurgent.” “His entire schtick is about political correctness. He has championed the alt-right, despite claiming not to be a part of the alt-right.

“He has made more than his fair share of media attention getting incendiary comments, including about a Catholic priest and sexual relations between younger and older men, though he claims some tapes circulating were edited,” he added. “The unedited bits appear problematic at best.”

Yiannopoulos’ comments came under intense scrutiny on Sunday and into Monday, after a conservative blog tweeted out a clip from an interview posted on YouTube in January 2016.

"We get hung up on this sort of child abuse stuff to the point where we are heavily policing consensual adults,” Yiannopoulos says in the clip.

“In the homosexual world, particularly, some of those relationships between younger boys and older men – the sort of ‘coming of age’ relationship – those relationships in which those older men help those young boys discover who they are and give them security and safety and provide them with love and a reliable, sort of rock, where they can’t speak to their parents,” he adds.

He also flippantly recalls his own sexual abuse, apparently with a priest, saying, “I'm grateful for Father Michael; I wouldn't give nearly such good head if it wasn't for him." ...

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
Yiannopoulos has been victimized by political correctness yet again, by the CPAC snowmeltwaters. Apparently Milo's agitprop was great when he was schlapping the radical left, but when he came back on them, whoa Nelly. It was only a problem for Milo schlapping this event because they were caught.

Far-right provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos will not be allowed to speak at the Conservative Political Action Conference.

The decision comes while Yiannopoulos is roiled in controversy over a video in which he is appears to defend pedophilia. The video clip was posted on YouTube in January 2016, but gained new traction on social media after a conservative blog shared it Sunday.

American Conservative Union Chairman Matt Schlapp said in a statement announcing the decision that Yiannopoulos' efforts to address the video clip have fallen short, calling the remarks "disturbing." ...

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
Now the snowmeltwater drops at Breitbart Propaganda are going down on Yiannopoulos for PC reasons. They knew about this issue for years, and that Milo's and their boss, Bannon, was into Sparta's main military sex practice. Bannon is a military Greek geek and the Spartans claimed that homo love was the prime reason they were such a military power. Those that freak together, ... have each others' backs. It's only because this has come out into the open that the Zionists at Breitbart are having a hissy fit.

Employees at Breitbart News are reportedly prepared to leave the company if controversial senior editor Milo Yiannopoulos is not fired.

Another senior editor at the publication told Washingtonian Monday that "at least a half dozen" employees are prepared to leave to organization because of remarks Yiannopoulos made about pedophilia that gained attention this weekend.

“The fact of the matter is that there’s been so many things that have been objectionable about Milo over the last couple of years, quite frankly. This is something far more sinister,” the senior editor said.

“If the company isn’t willing to act, there are at least half a dozen people who are willing to walk out over it.” ...

Jerry Russell

Staff member
Say again, where is the evidence that Bannon himself is into this? Is it just because he admires Sparta? Lots of people are willing to look the other way about that, while still appreciating the Spartans militarily.

And what does this have to do with C's agenda?

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
"Looking the other way" Jerry? This is pretty much an admission, yes, as this is what systemic Catholic priest pedophile Culture is centered on, as I've related. Denial of the Facts about this Truth, whether they are facts or not, is approaching some kind of Fake News fakundery. But I assert, that I do not exdulge in such 'fake' practices.

Bannon is not merely an admirer, Jerry, he is a geek about all things military (including fomenting holy war), and what is the point if you're not going to indulge in their practices. This is why he had to get divorced from his 3 cover wives, whom he beat. This divorce biz is not a Catholic sin for Bannon, because they were fake marriages covered under dispensations.

C's agenda is to refocus our attention onto Jewish ritual child murder and indulging us in irrelevant right/left dialectic, while the CathoZionist coup d'etat is being completed. Did you forget this?

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
The following excerpted article is demonstrative of more of the Catholic agitprop alt-President Agent Orange Leaks has indulged in. This is similar to his campaign claim that crime was up in America under Obama, when in reality there was only a recent short term spike. Otherwise crime was much lower under Obama, including at the peak of the spike.

And all of this is centered around the fact that Sweden, whose population is that of a moderate American state, has allowed many more Islamic refugees than the entire USA.

Agent Orange Leaks made this latest orange leak in Florida's Orange County.

Former Swedish Prime Minister Carl Bildt responded to President Trump’s remarks on Sweden again — this time with statistics on the country’s crime rates.

In a tweet Monday morning, Bildt said the counties Trump made the speech at in Florida experienced higher murder rates last year than the whole country of Sweden did.

“Last year there were app 50% more murders only in Orlando/Orange in Florida, where Trump spoke the other day, than in all of Sweden. Bad,” Bildt tweeted.

Last year there were app 50% more murders only in Orlando/Orange in Florida, where Trump spoke the other day, than in all of Sweden. Bad.

— Carl Bildt (@carlbildt) February 20, 2017

Jerry Russell

Staff member
He only beat up his 2nd wife. The third one, he kept paying for her apartment, while she was beating up on her Mexican boyfriends.

Why try to divine the Truth in facts that are not facts, when it's so hard to make up the actual factual facts?

You can't beat Trump at his own game. If Sweden is taking in a lot of immigrants, it might be a Truth that their crime rate is on the way up, even if Carl Bildt hasn't admitted it yet. But it's not a fact until there's evidence.

C's agenda is the Zionist half of the CathoZionist coup d'etat, while your agenda is primarily focused these days on the Catholic half. If you guys would stop throwing insults around, you might realize you're complaining about the same thing.

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
while your agenda is primarily focused these days on the Catholic half.
I am Fair and Balanced Jerry. The Old Testament analysis is pre-Catholic Church, and besides Jesus was Jewish, or so the Catholic Church claims. I am not Zionist at all, but C has been exposed as a cryptoZionist.

Jewish Zionist and Cristian Zionist rhetoric is that once they achieve their global unification that life will be a paradise for all humans, that is, if everyone assumes their proper place in the caste hierarchy. With the most devious douche bags running the show at the top. If the Brown Shirts don't figure this out, SOON, then all this will be moot commentary.

BTW, did God commit any sin(s) when he preggered the So young Virgin? So sad. She was Jewish too, BTW.

I wonder where C is these days? I wonder if C is moving back to Greece? And/or maybe reading C's globalist Bible?

Trump knows what's going on in Sweden better than Carl Bildt? Trump claims that he got this info from conflating a fake news story from Fox News that he watched after playing golf. Fox News is even ragging on him, big time. Tic, toc, President Pence.

Jerry Russell

Staff member
If the Brown Shirts don't figure this out, SOON, then all this will be moot commentary.
Where is this sense of urgency coming from? The End of the World is just the Beginning of the New World, which is the same as the Old World.

Since when have we ever had anybody but the "most devious douche bags" at the top? Today's Catholics are almost all crypto-WASP's, anyhow.

I wonder where C is these days?
I guess he's not impressed with the zingers you keep slinging at him. But he probably is amused at the extent to which you extrapolate endlessly from his few cryptic comments.

Trump knows what's going on in Sweden better than Carl Bildt?
For every piece of fake news, there's an equal and opposite item of fake news. In this situation, what else can one do, but go with one's own pre-conceptions?

Who needs facts anyway. Everyone already has their own Truth.

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
Where is this sense of urgency coming from? The End of the World is just the Beginning of the New World, which is the same as the Old World.
Maybe I have a different visceral perspective of my mortality than you do. Or maybe I am being too much like Don Quixote? Or maybe, that despite my conscious understanding that this is always the way it is, I am still bitter that most of my life was lived under an illusory lie, like Wonderland? I have wasted too much time with all this. How ironic to read an article that former South Carolina governor, Mark Sanford, feels almost exactly the same way, about Trump at least. He just doesn't realize it's all kabuki theater.

But, no Jerry, the New Order is going to be much better, for a few. I'd just like to see Agent Orange Leaks get caught up on a meat hook before my looming expiration date, but I know this will likely just be his body double.

I guess he's not impressed with the zingers you keep slinging at him. But he probably is amused at the extent to which you extrapolate endlessly from his few cryptic comments.
How do you know so much about Collectivist? Perhaps I am equally 'stimulated' by his extrapolations about me? But when I have posted material on the forum or blog, or others, and my comments on them, he is too imperial to be bothered to reply, instead sticking to his personal prelature thread.

C's gold standard on Trump is whether or not he takes care of the immigration issue. How does this equate to C and I having supposedly similar anti-Zionist values? I consider Christians to be Zionist enablers and C thinks they are great. In C's assertions (I don't know about C's mind) its only the Jews.

There seems to be a massive gulf between C and me, and I'm sorry that you and C don't seem to understand this. C claims to have wanted a real discussion, but all I got was C's insults and irrelevant talking points, all mostly diverting remaining valuable time from what interests me. So I really don't give a Flying Fuck anymore. There are not enough filthy words and permutations of usage in the English language that I might possibly use to express my utter contempt.

For every piece of fake news, there's an equal and opposite item of fake news. In this situation, what else can one do, but go with one's own pre-conceptions?
As bad as the globalist MSM is, I'm going to go with that they and Sweden know better about crime in general there and crime cause by Muslim immigrants than Trump knows about it. Especially after he admitted that he conflated his comment from something else. Why are you defending this?

Who needs facts anyway. Everyone already has their own Truth.
OK, you win.

Sgt Pepper

Active Member
In related news, a riot broke out in Sweden hours ago.

Also related is Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, which I've stumbled upon:

In his book Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism), written in 1925, he describes the future of Jews in Europe and of european racial composition with the following words:[45]

The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals. [...]

Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit. This happened at the moment when Europe's feudal aristocracy became dilapidated, and thanks to Jewish emancipation.

Jerry Russell

Staff member
Maybe I have a different visceral perspective of my mortality than you do.
We all have an "expiration date", and I can see how feeling face to face with it would lend to a sense of urgency. But, I also see an acknowledgment here, that the sense of panic is not entirely grounded on a solid basis.

I'd just like to see Agent Orange Leaks get caught up on a meat hook
Ummm... can you see that considering Trump is just part of a pattern that's been going on for at least 3,000 years, and considering that he's probably not really the driving force behind this "kabuki theater"; that this kind of reaction is just blowing off emotional steam?

There seems to be a massive gulf between C and me
In retrospect, I haven't been all that polite to Collectivist, either. I did call him a neo-Nazi punching bag. And I suggested that he might be working for a propaganda mill. He actually hasn't denied any of that, and I'm not feeling inclined to take it back. I do see the gulf that exists.

But, none of that precludes the possibility that Collectivist is also making an honest effort to make the world a better place by his work. Even neo-Nazis and paid employees can often have good intentions.

How do you know so much about Collectivist?
I only know him by what he posts here. What I've said is my interpretation of his comments.

In related news, a riot broke out in Sweden hours ago.
In saying, "Who needs facts anyway. Everyone already has their own Truth." I was being facetious, and hoping that some actual facts might be forthcoming. Thanks to Sgt. Pepper for the news! Googling this, I found an article that describes a rather confusing situation. In the article itself, and even more so in the comments, there are indications that my suspicions might be correct, that Bildt and the Swedes are covering something up.

While I'm inclined to stand up for immigration and multiculturalism, it's also necessary to admit that their might be costs associated with that policy.

I have wasted too much time with all this.
Yes, I agree. If this is a diversion from things that seem like a better use of time -- then I would really encourage you to leave this forum thread alone, and attend to those other things.
In researching the kabbalist infiltration of the Catholic church, I stumbled across an interesting blog of an individual who will save me much time in explaining this from a historical context. What really should interest you, Jerry, is some of his other articles about the Lubavitch infiltration of both the Putin and Trump presidency.

You may recall a long time ago I mentioned this about Putin as well.

Perhaps you will find his writing style more palatable however most of his views are somewhat inline with mine (not all) ...

Here are a couple of links that will hopefully start your investigation into the Kabbalist infiltration of the Catholic church and the dangers of Chabad Lubavitch ...
Last edited:

Jerry Russell

Staff member
Hello Collectivist,

What you seem to be missing here is that according to our narrative, the Jews and the Catholics have been linked in this intimate dance ever since Christianity was invented. Under Vespasian and Titus, the Jewish religion was entirely re-invented with the Rabbinical Talmud, and placed in the role of a "controlled opposition" scapegoat.

I linked this article recently in another thread. It's very apropos here: Is Jared Kushner the Court Jew of Donald Trump's Realm --

The Leader has everything: money, land, power. There’s just one thing missing, the support of the Godly. The Leader has never been big on religion. In fact, he’s a little concerned that many of his Christian supporters are openly anti-Semitic. That’s a problem, since the Leader owes the Jews big time. Many of his father’s biggest land deals — and the Leader wouldn’t be the Leader without his father — were made with the Jews.

So the Leader comes up with a brilliant plan. He’ll marry his beautiful daughter to Hebrew nobility, a real Prince of the Jews. That way, no matter how egregiously anti-Semitic he and his followers might appear, he can always say — but look at my son-in-law, you don’t get more Jewish than him!

If this story sounds familiar, then you’re pretty well up on the story of Charlemagne.
About your link to the article "How the Kabbalist Jews took over the Roman Catholic Church through the Jesuit Order" I mostly agree with the analysis, with one important exception. When it comes to 2nd, 3rd, 4th... generation "crypto-Jews", it is impossible to say what true religious views these individuals might have arrived at, while under the influence of outside cultural forces as well as their parents. They might well see a lack of integrity in their parents' false conversion, and/or see some merit in the Christian religion. When you're talking about an entire order made of 2nd and 3rd generation 'conversos', I imagine there would be a diversity of true opinions, but that no one would have dared utter a word against Jesus, even in confidence.

Regardless of any of that, I am certainly willing to go as far as the article suggests, that they might have aspired to improve Catholic tolerance towards Jews. If they finally succeeded in taking the worst edge of anti-Semitism off the official Roman Catholic doctrine at Vatican 2, I say -- congratulations, job well done.

But, do you think that Pope Paul III (1534-49) was a complete idiot who had no idea whatsoever, that Ignatius Loyola and the Jesuits might have harbored some Jewish sympathies? It must have been transparently obvious at the time. And he chose them anyhow, to spearhead the Catholic response to the Protestants. Why??? For exactly the same reason that Catholics have always used Jews as operatives.

I was intrigued to notice that your anonymous blogger at "Redefining God" wrote:

...beware of narratives that spin the converso takeover of the Church as the action of “Satanic” forces… By blaming the takeover on “Satanic” forces, which play the “bad guys” in the Christian spiritual dialectic, they are establishing the traditionalist Christians as the “good guys.” But in reality, there are no good guys to be found in the whole drama. The Roman Catholic Church was created by the Roman imperial elite as an instrument of spiritual control over their subjects. It is a man-made religion and an abomination, and it always has been. All that happened with the Jesuit takeover is that Jewish elite monsters took over from Roman elite monsters.

This I mostly agree with, except that we say here that these elite Jews and Roman Catholics are working together in solidarity behind the scenes, and neither has taken over from the other.

I confess I'm still confused about Chabad Lubavitch, the Kabbalah and the Zohar. What, exactly, was added to Judaism with the Zohar? Was this philosophy generally accepted by Ignatius Loyala's ancestors, the Sephardic Jews of Spain? What do orthodox Jews today say about the Zohar?

I've read that the Chabad Lubavitchers consider themselves to be Orthodox Jews, but most Jewish rabbis tend to disagree. They consider Chabad to be heretical because the Hasidics believe that the Messiah has come, or is coming; and the Orthodox obviously don't agree. But with Chabad's wealth, there's considerable incentive to ignore such theological disagreements.

And, I'm confused about whether the Lubavitchers themselves believe that the Lubavitcher Rebbe was the Messiah, or whether they are still expecting the Messiah to come, or both.

Why do you consider the Chabad to be a Satanic sect? Are they Gnostics who see the serpent as a heroic figure at the temptation of Adam & Eve? Or is there some other reason?

The article you provided makes it appear as though Kirchner is a tool of Trump, when in fact it is entirely the other way around. Trump was selected president so that Kirchner can move in and call the shots. Perhaps you should re-read that blogger's article again because he provides some good insights into the relationship between Chabad Lubavitch and both Trump and Putin. As for the whole Catholic Jewish arrangement, you seem to want to rationalize everything to events and people from a time long long gone and no longer relevant to the realities of today.

Your narrative simply is not supported by any sort of current day evidence. What we do see is a Roman Catholic church that has been taken over, serving the interests of Jewish power. This is NOT an admission that the original Roman Catholic church was some benevolent entity because it wasn't; it was an instrument of control for an empire long gone. All I am saying is this tool has changed hands and there is so much evidence to this reality that frankly it is becoming tiresome to repeat it.

As for your confusion with regards to Chabad, this is because they have been very secretive about their operations. They say one thing but do another. They are snakes in the grass. It is my belief their satanism (or anti-God) ties back to Sabbatei Zevi. This cult believed the return of the messiah was contingent on one of two conditions occurring (1) Justice and peace permeated all the world --OR-- (2) the world was indulged in unspeakable evil and sin. The mystical order believed the latter was the quickest path to lead to his return and these freaks engaged in all acts of evil to make it happen.

The main area of disagreement between this death cult and other Hasidic sects is not the outcome once the messiah returns but how it is allowed to come about. All Orthodox Jews believe they will rule as kings over all mankind but must wait for their messiah to come. The old tradition demands that God himself decides the "when" and "how" and consider it heresy to play God's hand in this matter. Regardless, the death cult believes it must bring matters into their own hands and hasten events to fit their own kabbalistic timetables.

This is my understanding of the background but the result is obvious to see. We are moving into a world that grows uglier and uglier by the day and we are sinking into a terrible abyss. Those responsible should be exposed before it is too late.