Chabad Lubavitch

Sgt Pepper

Active Member
How so? By bringing up that the last book of the Christian Bible is Zionist and says that 12K each, of Judah, Benjamin, and Levi are amongst the 144K celibate male Hebrews in the secret society of the religion that Collectivist says does wonderful things?
I'm not sure those writings have to be observed or followed to a T. Why not omit some if it suits one's circumstance?

For example: how many dutifully follow the 10 commandments? If one is a weasel, then let others observe them while one can do what thou whilst.
 

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
So what do you think about the chaplain of the US Congress, one of your Jesuit associates, Father Patrick J. Conroy, giving one of the prayers at der Grop'n Fuhrer's inauguration? The diocese that he is from, Oregon, has paid out something like $160 million for pedophilia. That means this is just the tip of the iceberg, as you know, being a very smart, celibate priest.

Did you know that the Jesuits originated the Futurist End Times school that the jungle Christians use today, and that is being enacted today?

Are these Jesuits then the secret society of 144K celibate males that get to stand around God, just behind the 24 Elders?

Do these Jesuits get dispensation to do naughty things for the greater good Collectivist?

Why does der Grop'n Fuhrer have so many Jesuit trained people in his administration, like Bannon, who wants to wage a holy war against all of Islam, and all American secularists? He stated so to his Vatican audience. Did you know that der Grop'n Fuhrer went to a Jesuit College, and at least one of his sons (as did Bill Clinton)?

Do you think that Bannon's and der Grop'n Fuhrer's actions against Islam, so far, are emblematic of stoking their desired holy war?

Do you think that, given der Grop'n Fuhrer's un-Christlike behavior in all respects (except wanting to sow massive discord) makes him eligible for the role of the Antichrist, the Beast from Mar-a-lago perhaps?

Do you think that the 'good' Christians that get to be resurrected will even be able to see God with all those Elders and 144K celibate males standing in front of them? Do you look forward to the day when you will be able to stand around in your robe, like a good Zionist (a requirement to be a 'good' Christian according to the Bible) and sing hymns all day and night to God? You wont even have time to see the wife and children that you don't have.

If you had a daughter would you want to date her like der Grop'n Fuhrer does?

 

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
I'm not sure those writings have to be observed or followed to a T. Why not omit some if it suits one's circumstance?

For example: how many dutifully follow the 10 commandments? If one is a weasel, then let others observe them while one can do what thou whilst.
Of course, you are probably correct, the total number of 144K and the 12K for each Hebrew tribe is likely meant to be symbolic rather than literal. But Collectivist, if he is not a Jesuit himself, is then likely a literalist Christian, and same for his timid friends that click along. In the minds of such mindless followers they Should know that their God is rather demanding in making them meet the canonic requirements of his divine Word, in order to reach the final goal of resurrection into the Bannon cleansed world. This is the Christian Zionist worldview, aka globalism free of deviant humanity. Collectivist has some liberty to be kind to Jews here because some of them will accept the new messiah.

In this last case, Trump's loving daughter is converted to Judaism to be with her Zionist Jewish husband. And Collectivist, being an exposed Zionist secretly loves this, except he wants to continually refocus the discussion, as is his propagandist nature.

Regarding the 10 Commandments, Collectivist surely knows that the real words are "thou shall not murder", not "thou shall not kill". If one should accept the latter then he and Bannon could not wage holy war properly, flinging deviant blood right and left. This is how they convince themselves that the bloody Conquest of the New World was righteous.

We are conversing with a stone cold killer, not a stone cold murderer. One who dearly loves his new leader who sleeps with his daughter, and gropes PUSSY. Because he can. This is a subhuman who can recontextualize anything to support his fantasies.

 

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
In the America that I was raised in, and no longer exists, one was expected to be consistent, to honorably engage in what they had started, to obey the norms of what they were participating in. But, here we have a character, who like his hero Trump, betrays all of this. Including his kitchen sink propaganda thread that we're on right now.

He started out discussing the economic situation in Greece, and then used this as a Greek backdoor (a nice pun) to demonstrate his neo-Nazi propaganda. Then when you press him to be consistent with such matters, he changes the topic once again. Especially if something like Jesuits are mentioned.

In reality, his posting of the neoNazi material here was to get us slimed, marginalized, by his cryptoZionist handlers. His new hero, Trump and Trump's brain, Bannon, are overtly Zionist, yet he asserts that he is anti-Zionist? Bannon and Trump are at least consistent with the Christian Bible, which is Zionist. This is the ONLY thing that Trump is consistent about (and well .. dating his daughters).

He has displayed, over and over again, disturbing behavioral signs that he is not a sincere sheep, but rather that he is indeed a propaganda agent, intent on pressing an agenda for his superiors. The irony here is being accused of being robotic, when it is Collectivist's robotic behavior that is so transparent. Collectivist is a Lifetime Actor, probably a low paid one. Why not, we don't have that many readers.
 

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
How is he contradicting himself then?
In Collectivist's quote from Gilad, he is saying that the rabbinical Jews are blameless for the genocides committed by the Israelis. But at the end of the interview, Gilad reverses himself, admitting that some of these religious Jews are very active participants in the Zionist project.

The OT testament is explicitly globalist
I am losing my ability to compartmentalize nationalism vs. globalism. Globalism is when one nation conquers and destroys all the other nations, in order to create a single global nation.

Collectivist... wants to continually refocus the discussion, as is his propagandist nature.
Yes, one can hardly say that a conversation exists here. Collectivist is working from a set of talking points, and usually completely ignores what we say in response.

But, I submit that as long as the volume of posts doesn't get excessive, his posts are serving our purposes. We can take advantage of the opportunity to compare and contrast our views against his.

Just don't take his insults personally... as you say, for all we know, he could be working for a dollar a day for some web brigade in Olgina or the Ukraine. The praise of Trump is consistent with that.
 
Last edited:

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
I am losing my ability to compartmentalize nationalism vs. globalism. Globalism is when one nation conquers and destroys all the other nations, in order to create a single global nation.
One nation conquers and destroys, or one entity?

My thesis is that, following the historical format of the Romans versus the Jews, that most of today's Christian nationalist zombies will be exterminated in the cause that cryptoZionist Collectivist espouses. Bannon has explicitly said that he wants to destroy the government of the USA, and he's damn well doing it, from the highest echelon of the government. Ordinarily this would be called 'treason'. But we live in a New World Order.

And I'm thinking just how much this is like the TV series Braindead. This where the alien insects represent a certain secret agency of celibate males that has infected the brains of our government, now to the point where we can't recognize explicit treason, like Bannon's and Collectivist's.
 

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
One nation conquers and destroys, or one entity?
The one entity attempts to work behind the scenes to control several nations if possible. But that doesn't change its basic nature. And in order for it to achieve its goals, doesn't one nation (or an alliance) ultimately need a military conquest? Otherwise, how to prevent continual rebellions?

You say that Christian nationalists will be exterminated. Collectivist says that secular left-wing atheists and multiculturalists will be exterminated. Isn't it possible you're both right?
 

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
It has been my theory that the 'entity' (that is owned by the global oligarchs) will employ their biggest hammer in their cause. They will exhaust it as best they can against those obstructing the Final (globalist) Solution, and in doing so they will use the useful idiots of the United States of America, the majority of whom are zealous nationalist evangelical, Pentecostal, and Catholic chimpigs. Spill your enemies' blood, not your own. Steve Bannon, BTW, is a great fan of The Art of War.

This is how it worked for the Germans and the French. The result, each time was an expansion of the globalist network. Any benefit to the average man was merely incidental, the real aim is the lasting benefit of the owners of the secret society of celibate master bators, and obfuscators. If you want to make a global omelette you have to break more than a few eggs. But the oligarches never sacrifice their own sons, when such as the Christians, Jews, and Muslims are more than happy to do so.

Yes, Collectivist is correct when he says those people will be exterminated, unless they are very elite oligarchs, such as those he really worships, like the faux populist.

Speaking of which, the new Supreme nominee is supposedly a Protestant, (a real one or a fake evangelical?) Whatever the case, his record demonstrates that he is more concerned about the crony rights of corporations over average people, and against the empty rhetoric of Steve Bannon, the former employee of Goldman Sachs. And the empty rhetoric of the Zionist named Collectivist, the most fake human that ever existed, bar none.

BTW, I watched an English detective show where there was a pub in the town called the Bar None.
 

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
All this insane moral hypocrisy reminds me of the reality of military life, from time immemorial, and my brief tangential connection to it. I'm referring to the need of soldiers, including Christians, to get their nuts off, and so that they are always provided with some R&R time and places to do so. The Greek Spartans, of course, made sure that they had a convenient hole inside the Spartan standing next to themselves.

Vietnam was quietly famous for various R&R resorts, both 'in country', and in places like Bangkok (ironic name), Thailand, the Philippines, etc. Of course, many of the girls employed were underaged, and still are today. But none of the moralizing Christian prigs, like Collectivist could give a rat's ass. Because it all supports the Greater Good. And, as I alluded to, this went on all during and before the supposed height of American Cultural Perfection frequently asserted at Postflaviana.

My first job out of tech school was working on a small island out in the Pacific, letting the USAF fire Minutemen ICBM's at us once a month. There were about 25 American men (contractors) on the island and about the same number of 'natives'. Imagine my surprise when one of the logistics workers paraded his 12 year old girlfriend around, and nobody lifted an eyebrow. I was glad to get home after the island manager mentioned a story to me about people disappearing for making waves, in this case about some financial fraud his employer was up to.

This is when I started to find out my American never existed in the first place. It's always been Collectivist's Rome. But the illusions of wonderfulness must be maintained for the sake of the gullible majority.
 
In the following debate about multiculturalism, Brandon Martinez schools the Muslim host Kevin Barrett on the purpose of the mass immigration policy of the West. It seems Kevin Barrett is an apologist for Soros open borders project which Brandon demolishes quite handedly.

The only missing piece in Brandon's argument is that he fails to understand the full deception of kabbalistic jews whose plan for world domination predate the Zionist movement which is nothing but a means to an end. He correctly points out the atrocities of the Jewish Zionists just as some in this forum correctly point out the atrocities of the Christian Jesuits however both are not well versed in how these faiths have been corrupted by crypto satanic kabbalist jews. Gilad Atzmon hinted to this in the prior debate on Jewish identity as did the rabbi when they tried to explain why radicalism has infected some orthodox jews who seem to contradict their own faith as described by the anti zionist rabbi.

The rabbi, in a somewhat defensive mode, hints what the contradiction is all about ... the kaballah. He is coy about it, again, because this poisonous garbage predates Zionism. The kabbalah is an older and far more evil ideology and reserved for a tiny Jewish high priest class. Does he condemn it as he does Zionism?

No

This is not a contradiction at all if you understand that the purpose of infiltrating and radicalizing religious groups is to have them destroy each other. This makes it easier for a minuscule priest class to redefine the belief system of the masses so that they can be controlled and ruled by these god men.

The tactic is necessary for these god men are far too few in number to demoralize the masses outwardly. Divide and conquer is the only way the satanic kabbalists can usher in a new messianic age where they can rule absolutely ... as gods on earth.

Kevin appears to have a slightly better grasp of this in understanding Muslim radicalism but he appears to be all over the map.

Simplicity is key.

A great debate nonetheless.

 

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
Sorry Collectivist, but once again you don't understand our position. The following Christian verses from the very last book of their Bible, is explicitly Zionist and includes Jews in a secret society. As I have stated many times on the forum and on the blog pages, both religions are explicitly globalist in intent and function. One finds plenty more verses spread throughout the Old and New Testaments.

Passing strange that the 'Gentiles'' Christian Good Book favors Jews over the goy eh?

And, as I have pointed out to you before, you are a Zionist, and are in denial. Of course, you might choose to tell me that President Bannon, is really an infiltrator into his native Catholic Church and not the other way around. The other way around being that he took over the explicitly Zionist Breitbart News, after the Zionist Breitbart was suspiciously terminated. And then Bannon has shneakily shnuck the Zionist Jews Stephen Miller and Julia Hahn, from Breitbart, into the White House staff. And that alt-President Orang-u-tan didn't state that he was going to be the biggest supporter of Israel yet, while appointing 6 former Goldman Sachs officials to the administration. Mr. Mnuchin profited over 2 billion dollars from his crony purchase of a bank where he booted thousands from their homes, because of the bank's fault.

What kind of populist are you? Apparently no breit-bartier than the rest.

1And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father's name written in their foreheads. 2And I heard a voice from heaven, as the voice of many waters, and as the voice of a great thunder: and I heard the voice of harpers harping with their harps: 3And they sung as it were a new song before the throne, and before the four beasts, and the elders: and no man could learn that song but the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth. 4These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. These are they which follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth. These were redeemed from among men, being the firstfruits unto God and to the Lamb. 5And in their mouth was found no guile: for they are without fault before the throne of God. (Revelation 14 KJV)

4And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel.

5Of the tribe of Juda were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Reuben were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Gad were sealed twelve thousand. 6Of the tribe of Aser were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Nepthalim were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Manasses were sealed twelve thousand. 7Of the tribe of Simeon were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Levi were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Issachar were sealed twelve thousand. 8Of the tribe of Zabulon were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Joseph were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Benjamin were sealed twelve thousand.
(Revelation 7 KJV)​
 
Last edited:
I actually do read the posts on this thread but I simply will ignore them if they are nonsensical (such as the last reply) or try to redefine my messages to "fit in" with "your" position. I think I have articulated my position pretty well.

As for my defense of some of Trumps positions, such as his stance on immigration: This has been twisted as some sort of admission that I like Trump which is rubbish. I have explained why unchecked migration is toxic. If Obama had taken a similar stance, I would have defended it as well. Trump's pro-Israel stance is similar to that held by Putin and I have clearly stated in the past that this makes them both suspect as Zionist puppets but their actions also appear to be anti-globalists also, which I am in favor of. I reserve the right to agree and disagree on Trump's individual positions instead of simply rejecting (or accepting) everything about him like some gatekeeper, shill, or partisan politician.

The same is true of the Bible. I have said before that to throw the baby out with the bathwater is not only lazy, but wrong. Those who simply dismiss Christian morals and ethics outright to me are very suspect. It makes me question just what sort of moral code they would replace it with. For my part, I have already stated the areas within the Bible I take issue with but Richard continues to spread the lie that I accept it whole-cloth.

Let me be perfectly clear, I do not idolize or follow anyone, I look at the merits or worthlessness of individual positions regardless of their source. This is true of Trump, David Duke or vacuous gatekeepers such as Alex Jones or Webster Tarpley.

I listen to everyone, follow no one.

"National Enquirer" gossip style commentary is quite boring and useless. If you wish to express some opinion on Trump's immigration policy that is fine, intelligently articulate it and it may be worthy of a response...Pasting pictures of Trump and his daughter (or chimp pigs) is not worth my time in formulating a response. In fact, I don't know why Richard even posts in this thread anyway. If I were him, I would simply ignore the Group Think thread altogether as it is clearly a waste of his time
 

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
I actually do read the posts on this thread but I simply will ignore them if they are nonsensical (such as the last reply)
Well then, thanks for reading. But I didn't have any trouble making sense of Richard's reply. If you did, it makes me wonder if perhaps our thinking is so advanced that you can't understand what we're saying?

I have already stated the areas within the Bible I take issue with but Richard continues to spread the lie that I accept it whole-cloth.
I take it you mean here:

http://postflaviana.org/community/index.php?threads/group-think.6/page-3#post-167

You said that you deny the divinity of Christ, but are attracted to the ethics you find in the book of James. I don't recall whether you've ever addressed Rick's view that the entire Bible, both Old and New Testaments, is permeated with Zionist and Globalist ambitions.

For our part, I'm not sure we've ever articulated a clear view of what's up with the Kabbalah, and this esoteric sect of elite Judaism. Or, a detailed critique / appreciation of the book of James.

If you wish to express some opinion on Trump's immigration policy that is fine, intelligently articulate it and it may be worthy of a response...
Have you seen our front page article "Racism, Cultural Degradation and Misplaced Paranoia"? I believe we articulated a position there....

Pasting pictures of Trump and his daughter [...] is not worth my time in formulating a response.
You missed Richard's point then: that Trump's behavior and public persona is consistent with the Roman Catholic hierarchy's ongoing pattern of accommodation and denial with respect to pedophilia in the priesthood. Regardless of whether Trump himself is a Catholic or Jesuit, his administration represents a massive turn towards Catholicism, considering his choice of advisors.

The fact that Trump has a few positions that you happen to agree with, is beside the point when it comes to evaluating the overall character and direction of the new administration.
 
Last edited:

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
Well then, thanks for reading. But I didn't have any trouble making sense of Richard's reply. If you did, it makes me wonder if perhaps our thinking is so advanced that you can't understand what we're saying?
Jerry, he said that he only reads his thread. The frozen snowflake even has the audacious cajones to suggest that I don't participate on 'his' thread. This, because he doesn't want his fatuous fatwas challenged. This is like his hero, Trump, who doesn't like people leaking true data about his personal and political networks' dealings with the Russians, while Agent Orange Leak would not be the alt-President if it were not for leaks.

Agent Orange Leak has also appointed many persons to the highest levels, who not only have explicitly stated that they want to bring the American government to its knees, but they indicate that they have a close affinity for Russia, even doing significant business with them. I'm sorry, but matters of globalism aside, Putin's camp is not someone any American should want to be in bed with, whether that bed has been urinated on or not.

Agent Orange Leak is provably a faux Populist, just like Collectivist is a faux collectivist, and this gets to the matter that Collectivist keeps trying to frame all issues here under an obsolete paradigm for Postflaviana. The problem may not be that he, or she, is not intelligent enough, or intelligence enough, but rather that such people are too psychologically wed to their babyspoonfed snowflake concepts that have been long culturally cuckholded into their minds, appearing as divine sureties. They dare not examine the underlying principles for this will melt their snowflake identities.

Have you seen our front page article "Racism, Cultural Degradation and Misplaced Paranoia"? I believe we articulated a position there....
BTW, we will have to revise the discussion there about Race Nationalism. They do indeed want to send everyone, (except Whites) back to where they came from. This of course begs the question of the Native Americans. Where do the White Nationalists send them? Or do they just deliver them the Final Solution?

As for my defense of some of Trumps positions, such as his stance on immigration: This has been twisted as some sort of admission that I like Trump which is rubbish. I have explained why unchecked migration is toxic. If Obama had taken a similar stance, I would have defended it as well. Trump's pro-Israel stance is similar to that held by Putin and I have clearly stated in the past that this makes them both suspect as Zionist puppets but their actions also appear to be anti-globalists also, which I am in favor of. I reserve the right to agree and disagree on Trump's individual positions instead of simply rejecting (or accepting) everything about him like some gatekeeper, shill, or partisan politician.
Unchecked immigration is not an issue between us, but Trump hired 64 aliens to work at Mar-a-Lago during his election campaign. I'm guessing merely because his openly racist resort manager wouldn't have to hire American blacks and other undesirables. He hired illegal Poles to build Trump Tower, and married a woman who came to America to work illegally. Then he doesn't pay American contractors, while claiming that they do bad work. What kind of businessman regularly hires contractors that do bad work? One that has been in 6 bankruptcies and thousands of lawsuits.

There is practically no level of examining this flake where I can agree with you. His positions of immigration are merely the typical tactics of a usually faux populist, and his constituency of dupes buys it every time.

He said he was going to drain the swamp, and so he fills his cabinet with the Swamp. His Sec Commerce profited ~$500 million from the Bush and Clinton caused financial crisis, and his Sec Treas (and friends) profited ~$2.5 billion from the same, putting thousands out of their homes, caused by criminal loan practices. And, yes, Obama did not jail a single one. Ironically Chris Christie jailed Jared Kushner's father, but I suspect that this will come back into play, when Trump is shown the 25th Amendment door, by a real Catholic President, Mike Pence.

The repeated focus on the impact of the Kabbalists is all part of the traditional agitprop diversionary magic show. "Oh, BTW, I'm so concerned about CHILDREN." Only the problem is just certain children and not all children, and the phenomenon is much older and wider than the Jews, to whatever extent it does indeed exist. Collectivist, and his agitprop pals' intent is to stir paranoia, and here, to smear us with his anonymous neoNazi content.
 
Last edited:

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
Collectivist, and his agitprop pals intent is ... to smear us with his anonymous neoNazi content.
If that's the intent, I don't see how it's going to work. On the contrary, he serves as an illustrative neo-Nazi punching bag. Hopefully, his evasive dodging is obvious to anyone else who wanders into the thread.
 
Jerry, it is obvious that my position is not well understood or perhaps I have not articulated it clearly enough. Let me try again.

The original Roman Catholic church was an abomination and fraud created by Roman aristocracy, no disagreement there, but I simply do not subscribe to the idea that this old institution has retained any sort of power whatsoever -- It has long been infiltrated by a group of crypto jewish kabbalists who have gained entry through the Society of Jesus. In more recent times, we need only look at the handiwork of the Donmeh and the Young Turk movement. The fall of the Ottoman empire at the hands of such a small group of conspiring kabbalists is a theme we see over and over. Their legacy is not well understood because their operations have been so well concealed. It had to be, otherwise they would never have achieved their aims so decidedly, which to a great degree were arrived at through the most deceptive and despicable means.

Texxe Marrs, I believe, put it best when describing this synagogue of Satan:
One group and one group alone is responsible for virtually all wars and bloodshed on the face of this planet. This evil cabal is few in numbers but, like a deadly octopus, its tentacles reach out to grip and strangle untold multitudes of innocent victims. The initiates of every secret society and internationalist organization, from the Council on Foreign Relations and the Jesuits to the Bilderbergers and the Order of Skull & Bones, obey the dictates of this sinister group and tremble when standing before its leaders.
The lack of understanding of this group is your biggest stumbling block, Jerry, and without investigating this angle further, you will be stuck in a false narrative that goes nowhere fast. The evidence for infiltration is abundant but you continue to dismiss this fact by diverting my discussion back to a Roman Catholic conspiracy. This is obvious to me.

Another thing that is obvious is the unmistakable parallels between the Marrano Jew Ignatius of Loyola of Spain and the 17th-century Jewish kabbalist, Sabbatai Zevi. While this connection is compelling enough, let's focus on the Spaniard for now, and the order he founded.

Over the next few posts, I will try to better articulate my position and hope it will start to finally sink in ...
 
Last edited:

Richard Stanley

Well-Known Member
Sorry Collectivist, but we do understand your position. We are two moves ahead of you on the chessboard of reality.

Knock yourself out, but you are wasting both yours and our time pushing the main False Dialectic of the last two thousand years plus. They say that many generals are historically guilty of fighting the previous wars, not learning what their opposition is currently up to. Your battle was two thousand years ago, and it was wrong even then.
 

Jerry Russell

Administrator
Staff member
But Rick, there is at least some similarity between Collectivist's view, and yours? I think you would both agree that there is a small "evil cabal", few in numbers, whose tentacles reach everywhere? Some "sinister group" whose dictates are obeyed by the "initiates of every secret society and internationalist organization"?

Whereas I'm not so sure there is any such inner sanctum of evil. Maybe there's nothing but meme-driven chaos.

Joe agrees with Collectivist, not only that this "evil cabal" exists, but that he thinks they're probably Jewish. At any rate, he doesn't see any other serious candidates that should be subject to suspicion.

If there is really a single cabal that runs the New World Order, isn't it odd that we can't identify who are the central individuals in this conspiracy? And, how can we show that Collectivist and Joe are mistaken? It seems to me that broad, sweeping historical generalizations and meta-theories are inadequate to the task.

What we've tried to do is show that other actors (such as Jesuits, Freemasons, CIA, Muslims, Republicans, Democrats, industrialists and bankers of all races and creeds, etc.) have played a vital role in the overall trend to create a globally dominant central government. But in showing how broad the support is, I feel we're undermining the idea that it's all under the command of some central cabal.

Getting back to Collectivist's theory, you at least have to give him credit for a variant on the ancient scheme, specifically blaming the Kabbalists rather than Jews in general. Although I still feel comfortable describing it as a form of neo-Nazism.
 
Top