Richard Stanley
Well-Known Member
The following excerpted article, by Rothkopf, is mis-framed in my opinion. It mis-characterizes Bannon under his more famous alter-ego and not properly characterizing his extensive grooming as a Lifetime Actor, as it appears is also the case for Trump.
Bannon attended Jesuit Georgetown University studying national security, and his latter years in the US Navy were spent playing footsies with the admirals and generals at the Pentagon, no longer being shipboard. Then off to Hollywood and Zionist Breitbart.
All of this is occurring, as I've stated elsewhere, when the original religio-political WASP power base has been entirely replaced with Jesuit foot soldiers (Bannon, Flynn, Conway, Pence, Ryan, Pelosi, 5 Supremes minus Scalia, ..) and apocalyptic evangelicals (Pompeo, DeVos, etc.). None of this blitzkrieg is happenstance, it is carefully orchestrated. Not even the inauguration prayers had a single mainline Protestant prayer among the many given.
Bannon attended Jesuit Georgetown University studying national security, and his latter years in the US Navy were spent playing footsies with the admirals and generals at the Pentagon, no longer being shipboard. Then off to Hollywood and Zionist Breitbart.
All of this is occurring, as I've stated elsewhere, when the original religio-political WASP power base has been entirely replaced with Jesuit foot soldiers (Bannon, Flynn, Conway, Pence, Ryan, Pelosi, 5 Supremes minus Scalia, ..) and apocalyptic evangelicals (Pompeo, DeVos, etc.). None of this blitzkrieg is happenstance, it is carefully orchestrated. Not even the inauguration prayers had a single mainline Protestant prayer among the many given.
...
This is where the bad news comes in. In Trump’s memo about the NSC, he tipped his hand about how he views the process. He established that two vital members of his national security team — the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the director of national intelligence — would be “as needed” members of the Principals Committee of the NSC, joining discussions only when their expertise was requested. This is a departure from past practice, as the last two administrations made them permanent members. Given the sometimes fluid nature of NSC meetings, where discussions and topics can change in real time, not having them in the room will mean that their expertise and views will not be taken into consideration. Given that one of these individuals is the senior member of the U.S. military and the other is mandated to be the head of the U.S. intelligence community, it is difficult to imagine any national security discussions that would not benefit from their perspectives and involvement.
Worse — much worse, in my view — the president decided to give a permanent seat at the National Security Council table to his chief strategist and senior counselor, Stephen Bannon. Bannon, formerly the publisher of an extreme right-wing, often racist and sexist website called Breitbart, not only has very limited U.S. government experience, he has almost no relevant experience with any aspect of high-level national security decisionmaking (beyond an undergraduate degree and then a seven-year stint in the Navy, some three decades ago). Combine that with the egregious lack of character his exploits at Breitbart illustrate and his past radical statements — like the instance in which he characterized himself as a “Leninist” seeking to bring down the entire system of the U.S. government — and you have precisely the sort of person who has no business at all being at an NSC meeting. But even if you were to set aside such profound character flaws and gaps in experience, the idea that a purely political advisor should be at the table while the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the director of national intelligence are not shows a profound lack of understanding of what the NSC has been — or what it should be. ...
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/01/29/trump-elevates-bannon-sabotages-himself.html
This is where the bad news comes in. In Trump’s memo about the NSC, he tipped his hand about how he views the process. He established that two vital members of his national security team — the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the director of national intelligence — would be “as needed” members of the Principals Committee of the NSC, joining discussions only when their expertise was requested. This is a departure from past practice, as the last two administrations made them permanent members. Given the sometimes fluid nature of NSC meetings, where discussions and topics can change in real time, not having them in the room will mean that their expertise and views will not be taken into consideration. Given that one of these individuals is the senior member of the U.S. military and the other is mandated to be the head of the U.S. intelligence community, it is difficult to imagine any national security discussions that would not benefit from their perspectives and involvement.
Worse — much worse, in my view — the president decided to give a permanent seat at the National Security Council table to his chief strategist and senior counselor, Stephen Bannon. Bannon, formerly the publisher of an extreme right-wing, often racist and sexist website called Breitbart, not only has very limited U.S. government experience, he has almost no relevant experience with any aspect of high-level national security decisionmaking (beyond an undergraduate degree and then a seven-year stint in the Navy, some three decades ago). Combine that with the egregious lack of character his exploits at Breitbart illustrate and his past radical statements — like the instance in which he characterized himself as a “Leninist” seeking to bring down the entire system of the U.S. government — and you have precisely the sort of person who has no business at all being at an NSC meeting. But even if you were to set aside such profound character flaws and gaps in experience, the idea that a purely political advisor should be at the table while the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the director of national intelligence are not shows a profound lack of understanding of what the NSC has been — or what it should be. ...
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/01/29/trump-elevates-bannon-sabotages-himself.html