http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/16/mega-rich-rocket-ships-escape-earthThe Russians the English and the American bomb europe back to the Stone Age Then let Europe starve to death. Who killed who? Then the victors write the history. Then blame it on the victims. The people of Europe were site up for the big fall.
Here is a interview with author; -dr-nick-kollerstrom-the, when where what who why how
time to look at new information;
As if you know nothing to learn about what people are saying then make a decision!
The holocaust of people is evil is it going on today? Genetically modified food pesticides vaccine loss of bees herbicides Chemtrail plastic touching your food and drink, The rich can eat organically, making it illegal to use wood burning stove let you freeze like in England because CO2 is so bad for you . If you live within 50 miles of a nuclear power plants you are living in a cancer cluster and waiting for all help to break out like Fukushima. The death of the ocean it is not because of too many people it's because of a few people who've done terrible things continue to do them today the same ones that believe there's too many people seem to be doing something about it the same ones who control history same ones who control the media same one who control our schools, genocide is their answer to the problems of the world. Listen to this and decide for yourself! LH
Seems to me if we can take robots to the Mars we certainly have robot on the moon now.http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/16/mega-rich-rocket-ships-escape-earth
What if the mega-rich just want rocket ships to escape the Earth they destroy?
Just recently NASA gave a little YouTube show talking about going to Mars one day, ... if only they could figure out how to get through the Van Allen Belts. But I repeat myself. (Actually, I repeat what the science guy said into the camera; once they solve that problem...)Seems to me if we can take robots to the Mars we certainly have robot on the moon now.
2001: A Space Odyssey Official Re-Release Trailer (2014) - Stanley Kubrick Movie HD - YouTube
Oct 21, 2014 - Uploaded by Movieclips Trailers
... A Space Odyssey Official Re-Release Trailer (2014) - Stanley Kubrick Movie HD 2001: A ...
2001: A Space Odyssey (film) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2001: A Space Odyssey is a 1968 epic science fiction film produced and directed by Stanley Kubrick. The screenplay, written by Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke, ...
Budget: $10.5–12 million
Box office: $138–190 million
Starring: Keir Dullea; Gary Lockwood
Release dates: April 2, 1968 (Uptown T...
They could also use giant telescope Hubble to see the landing site, I guess were not supposed look at that.
I don't believe they went to the moon. The photograph showing underneath the lander the soil not being disturbed and there's no dust all over the craft, makes no sense.
2001 movie, 1 year before was to get us ready, to believe in the new religion! "science". Who better to rule the world. Then The scientific elite. Pre programming to believe we can go to the moon. What's that odds that movie with come out then. Just After dr strange love showed how you can fake airplanes flying by using a projector of plane flying out the window.
More proof we didn't go is When landing they talk normally over the radio where the engine they're sitting on would be so load they wouldn't be able to speak or hear.
I believe Joe is right that we was cannot leave the safety of the earths shield, at 30, ooo feet in a airplanemy radation counter was going crazy.
O ya Then they want use to believe they could bring a car and gulf clubs, to the moon, who kidding who? 4
Radiation is a favorite topic of many moon landing hoax theorists. No matter how badly they may lose the debate on other issues, they believe that space radiation is the one thing that trumps all others. If it were impossible for spacefarers to survive the Van Allen radiation belts then Apollo was hoaxed regardless of what all other evidence suggests. The argument typically goes like this:
Radiation is bad + There is radiation in space = Space is bad
That's generally all you'll get because that's all they know. It's no secret that space radiation exists, and we all know radiation can cause death, so, to the conspiracy theorist, the only conclusion is that space is a maelstrom of deadly radiation that will fry any outbound astronaut. Unfortunately this is a very simplistic and naive way of looking at the problem. Radiations vary dramatically in strength and intensity, with some being dangerous and some being harmless background radiation. Whether or not a human will experience illness or death is related to the radiation dose received. It is a problem with a very real answer that can be determined quantitatively.
However, for every conspiracy theory, there are debunkers. The 'Clavius' website is devoted to demonstrating that the Apollo moon missions really did happen. Their reply is that the pogo stick problem was well understood, and gradually brought under control over the course of the project.[The problem] -- structural vibrations in the body of the rocket, caused by the vibration of the thrust chambers of the first stage engines – was found at the second-ever trial of the Saturn V, after its unmanned launch on 4 April 1968, known as Apollo 6. The so-called pogo vibrations were found to be so large that they were recognized as a threat to the health and survival of the crew and to the integrity of the payload, including the Lunar Module (LM). Even at the time it was admitted: 'Had there been men on board Apollo 6, the crew probably would have aborted the mission during the pogo, when they would have been so violently banged around that they couldn’t have operated the spacecraft.' (Apollo, 1989 p.314)
However, without any further test launches since the problematic trial in April, in December 1968 the Saturn V, according to NASA reports, successfully took Apollo 8 to fly around the Moon with a human crew. Much later, during the third unmanned launch of the Saturn V with Skylab on board, the vibrational problem returned. During the launch on 14 May 1973, the Skylab station was heavily damaged due to the severe vibrations of the first stage of the rocket. One solar panel was torn away from the station body and severely dented it as a result. For some period of time, due to the damage, the station was treated as lost.
Yet it begs the question: how did the Saturn V manage to run perfectly from 1968 through to 1972 and then, some six months after the end of the Apollo missions succumb to the same problem that it had at its birth? For it was between the second and the third unmanned launches of the Saturn V that all the apparently successful missions to the Moon occurred.
...there was no one single mission before which pogo was a serious problem, and after which it wasn't. Pogo occurred in the Saturn V all the way up to Apollo 17. But during the program engineers took a series of steps to make pogo less of a problem for each successive mission.
NASA's explanation is that Armstrong wore big, heavy “EVA boots" over his space suit, and these boots were left behind on the lunar surface. However, they claim that Apollo 17 astronaut Eugene Cernan’s boots were brought back home and are now in a museum.
And here are the quality control X-rays of Armstrong’s boots.
The other story (about the Chinese skeptics) is said to come from Beijing Daily Express by way of World News Daily Report. As far as I can find from the Internet, there is no such paper as Beijing Daily Express. But, World News Daily Report is a satire site, seems to be a send-up of World Net Daily. Here’s their disclaimer:
WNDR assumes however all responsibility for the satirical nature of its articles and for the fictional nature of their content. All characters appearing in the articles in this website – even those based on real people – are entirely fictional and any resemblance between them and any persons, living, dead, or undead is purely a miracle.In this context, it's also worth mentioning that NASA claims that their "Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter" has captured images of the Apollo lunar landing sites. Of course they could be fakes, we would need an independent citizen funded satellite to know for sure.