In his book Caesar's Messiah, Joseph Atwill showed that Christians have unknowingly been worshiping the head of the church (and state) instead of a divine being. This is the case because the Bible turned out to be Roman propaganda, so that "God" and "Jesus" refer specifically to mortal men within the Church as opposed to any divine supernatural beings described by the surface level narration. Also, it's hard to distinguish between the two since some mortal men may consider themselves to be supernatural and divine when technically they are made of human flesh like us - or potentially half AI even (save that possibility for another thread!).
According to Josephus insiders working for the imperial court were already referring to the pontiffs as God and Jesus - just like Christians (unknowingly) - but with the additional insider knowledge of their true earthly identity; for example, at one time Vespasian and his son Titus, held the titles God and Jesus Christ, respectively.
Since the Roman Empire rules today and there's no reason to believe the Vatican (and other spawned Secret Societies) ever lost their power or titles, could the same system still be in place today: insiders fanatically referring to mortal men as God and Jesus Christ without ever revealing they know their identity to be as such, i.e. the heads of the church now represented by the white, grey and black popes?
And if there are 2 x Gods and Jesus Christs at present - with one perception being of earthly figures as per the ancient Flavian court - then does it follow that Allah and/or Mohammad could also refer to the same Popes as heading all world religions (and potentially all states)? Since the Vatican may have created Islam too in a similar way to how they created Christianity?
Lastly, since Islam has been described as comprising Muslim extremists - could the same not be said about the holy warriors representing the Vatican and connected secret societies - in particular the western army (often photographed with a cross)? Would it then be unfair to just label Islam as having such religious extremists when in fact it could be evenly spread across the world under different guises in order to protect those at the top of the pyramid?
According to Josephus insiders working for the imperial court were already referring to the pontiffs as God and Jesus - just like Christians (unknowingly) - but with the additional insider knowledge of their true earthly identity; for example, at one time Vespasian and his son Titus, held the titles God and Jesus Christ, respectively.
Since the Roman Empire rules today and there's no reason to believe the Vatican (and other spawned Secret Societies) ever lost their power or titles, could the same system still be in place today: insiders fanatically referring to mortal men as God and Jesus Christ without ever revealing they know their identity to be as such, i.e. the heads of the church now represented by the white, grey and black popes?
And if there are 2 x Gods and Jesus Christs at present - with one perception being of earthly figures as per the ancient Flavian court - then does it follow that Allah and/or Mohammad could also refer to the same Popes as heading all world religions (and potentially all states)? Since the Vatican may have created Islam too in a similar way to how they created Christianity?
Lastly, since Islam has been described as comprising Muslim extremists - could the same not be said about the holy warriors representing the Vatican and connected secret societies - in particular the western army (often photographed with a cross)? Would it then be unfair to just label Islam as having such religious extremists when in fact it could be evenly spread across the world under different guises in order to protect those at the top of the pyramid?