Cheryl Ryefield gives another account at the start of this video.
No, that's Lloyde's cab. It was taken after Lloyde had left. Note the sheet if yellow paper inside the windshield, apparently authorisation for the towing company.I wonder – is the cab at 0:19 seconds the decoy? Or was the decoy cab undamaged?
Craig's knowledge of this event is crap Sheila, totally superficial, same as yours.
Your interview on that recent video was so shallow when you started mocking and slandering Lloyde. Appalling.
Craig is constantly misquoting Lloyde. His transcription of Lloyde's words sucks.
I have painstakingly transcribed the entire 2 CIT videos, and I KNOW that Craig has misrepresented him.
You told me that you had a big disagreement with CIT. Adam Syed told me the same thing.
But here you are, defending and promoting their worst work as though they were covered in fairy dust.
You all act like lovesick CIT groupies. You cannot assess them rationally. You are unable to discuss anything they did critically.
They were inexperienced interviewers with an agenda to disregard everything Lloyde actually said, and make him out to be a liar responsible for the crime of 9/11.
Their minds were made up before they met him.
They made mistakes.
Especially with Lloyde England, Father McGraw, Joel Sucherman, Vin Narayanan and Mary Ann Owens, who have all been proven to be North of Citgo witnesses, in different locations than CIT placed them.
You refuse to discuss any of these 5 valuable NOC eyewitnesses.
Lloyde did not draw that car. Russell Pickering drew it. Lloyde only added the pole. To scale.
Lloyde showed the length of the pole on video, multiple times. It came to the front of the hood. Just as he showed on that sketch. About 12 feet long.
Which is "LONG" when it is inside your car, by anyone's standards.
But when Craig Ranke asked Lloyde, about the length of the pole in his car, Lloyde was about to answer him.
Then Craig interrupted (he interrupted Lloyde's answers DOZENS of times),
"No, I mean the pole, the WHOLE POLE,"
to which Lloyde truthfully replied that a WHOLE lightpole would be 30 or 40 feet long, which could he proven by measuring one.
So Ranke changed his question before Lloyde could answer it.
Lloyde answered the second question, because Ranke gave him no chance to answer the first one.
You totally ignore the actual evidence, with your constant bleating about "blurry images".
If those images were crystal clear, do you imagine they would ever have been released?
It took someone like me to put in the time to study all the images from dozens of sources, and piece Lloyde's true story together.
Why are you blind to the fact that Lloyde being proven to have been beside the cemetery wall, AS HE ALWAYS SAID, actually CONFIRMS and STRENGTHENS the NOC flightpath and the flyover?
WHY do you keep repeating CIT's lie that "Lloyde changed his story" when I have shown you that Lloyde ALWAYS denied being on the bridge when the pole hit, from the first day they spoke to him?
Aldo and Craig were blindsided by the circumstantial evidence on the Ingersoll photos.
But those photos, as they should have known full well, actually PROVE that Lloyde was NOT on the bridge until 18 minutes AFTER the explosion.
Explain where he was until then!!
Show proof of where he was during those 18 minutes!!
What is wrong with you people?
WHY are you blaming a humble cab driver for this crime, when I have shown you that Donald Rumsfeld's own bodyguard was sent down to the bridge, to supervise Lloyde during the photo shoot?
How do you not comprehend the magnitude of the significance of this?
You're supposed to be a couple of hard-hitting reporters, and you just don't get it!!
This fact alone, proves Rumsfeld's involvement in the farcical tableau of the taxi and light pole on the bridge, the victimisation of Lloyde, and the entire contrived process required to stage the scene, just to support the government's fraudulent flightpath.
That bodyguard was promoted to head of the Pentagon anti-terrorism force.
He lied blatantly about their activities on 9/11, in his statements in the book written on Rumsfeld by someone whose name escapes me just now. That is apparent from the numerous videos and photos showing that what he actually did was quite different from what he claimed to have done.
Why are you not investigating HIM???
You could both win fame and adulation for exposing a major player in the crime of 9/11!
WHY did CIT delete his photos from their website when I told them who he was?
Why did CIT suddenly quit, after being so passionate?
They were got at.
Yet they were permitted to leave all their websites intact for years, because the gross errors in them discredited their other excellent work.
You lot are no better than Chandler and Coste.
You are no more interested in the truth of the Pentagon event than they are.
I'm not friends with her but just sent a request so if she accepts I will come to your rescue lol obviously not your rescue but McKee saying that your goal is to discredit CIT is fucking bonkers.
I followed the link and found that Ruby's post came at the end of a rather long conversation involving Craig McKee as well as Sheila and 'Lorraine'. And there's been no further reply from McKee, regarding Ruby's accusation that McKee consistently misquotes Lloyde and garbles his "transcriptions". For the moment, our 'Lorraine' has the last word.Sheila's post