Lloyde did his best to explain to Craig Ranke and Christopher Taylor, where he was, but they just did not want to hear it.
I guess I'm allowing at least some possibility that CIT's bias was important.
If Lloyde's story is true, then the government story is a monstrous fabrication,.
I just watched Chapter 12 [of the Chandler / Coste video presentation], on the distribution of aircraft debris at the Pentagon. I hadn't seen some of the images and video footage before. At least superficially, this seems pretty convincing. There are images showing various fuselage parts, wing parts, landing gear, and engines. Not that all this couldn't be faked.
But it's easy to see how even a perfectly reasonable person (not in any way a troll or spook) would look at this and think it must be real.
False arguments should not be used to support the no-plane-hit-the-Pentagon theme.
Also Massimo Mazzucco made an error in claiming that the two Gatecams were exactly synchronised except for a single frame.
Comparison of all the frames, which run for almost 3 and almost 4 minutes respectively, shows that there was a substantial difference between their exposures.
"Many of us see evidence of a multi-threaded disinformation campaign waged for the purpose of muddying the waters about the Pentagon in order to create as much confusion as possible.
Perhaps you should share them with David Chandler.
It's nice to have some respite from the fray.
... more than misunderstanding and obstinacy, I feel.
This suggests an agenda.
Back then, you did back me up to McKee when I posted better transcriptions of what Lloyde said, than McKee did.