Richard Stanley
Well-Known Member
As a prelude to my coming article on the (multiple) End Times, in progress, I'm posting here more on some common ground between Greek and Judaic esoterica, in this case having to do with such as the real meaning of the infamous number, 666, from Chapter 13 of the Book of Revelation.
Most are commonly aware that it is linked to "The Beast" and his "Mark", apparently like a tattoo that will allow any man to buy and sell in the marketplace; apparently women belonging in the kitchen and such.
Note the phrase that I have highlighted in red, to "count the number of the beast". This begs two questions: the first being why does one have to count the number, especially when the author immediately proceeds to inform us what that number is? Secondly, who, or what, is "the beast"? Not so incidentally, remember that one of the target occupants in the Twin Towers on 9/11 was named: The Beast, an IT company. What happened to the AntiChrist? Wait, if there is an AntiChrist, who and what really is the Christ ... some humble godman named Jesus (or Titus Flavius, ... and/or)?
Many (less than most) are aware that this 666 number is somehow a referent from a branch of the Greek esoteric mathematical system, that branch being known as Gematria. But this is about as far as most people have gone in their understanding, other than confusingly having likely seen a variety of terms and names tied to the number. After all, there indeed can be a fairly large number of words and names that can add up to any particular number. As for '666', persons such as Nero have been linked to it, and here I am not saying that is incorrect. What I am saying is that there is something much deeper -- that also has implications to our understanding of Nero (and Papa Nero as well).
In reality, the way the Greeks (and the Jews) used their gematria was that, if anything, the numbers themselves were the source of the names, and not the other way around. For instance, the authors of the NT used the name IESOUS for Jesus (or Yeshua) in the first Greek texts, because IESOUS adds up to the number 888, whereas Jesus or Yeshua are meaningless. This is so because numbers were seen as the sacred building blocks that transcendentally provided structure to the material universe as we know it.
This made them have sacred or divine powers, and even the respective names of the 'pagan' gods were ultimately derived from numbers. That is, this is what you understood if you were an intellectual initiate into the system of divine knowledge. It is at such a relatively low level as this (and usually lower), that leads the contemporary individual, especially rationalists, to summarily dismiss this system of understanding as just plain wacky and not worthy of their consideration. Even as to allowing themselves to understand, clearly, what were the important underlying conceptions that Christianity was built upon -- as opposed to the several layers of superficial obfuscation, imperial vanity included.
Understanding the deepest layer(s) will allow one more easily to judge that the transition to Christianity was not accidental and fortuitous serendipity as some are suggesting. This, in the repurposing of the Flavian's dark comedy (gospels) and (Josephan) historical account of their incomplete pacification of the Jews. If this were merely the case, there would have been no need for Philo of Alexandria's efforts (and his nephew's Jewish generalship in the Flavian cause) and the ultimate inclusion of so many Pythagorean and Platonic elements in the NT (See Fideler's Jesus Christ, Sun of God). Not only is this gematrical numerology employed (integrated inherently with sacred geometry), but as they saw it, they were dealing with the latest cutting edge science of the day as applied to all existence, including the cosmology of the Heavens. This includes knowledge of the zodiacal precession of the equinox. The symbol of the fish was much more to the intellectuals than reading their daily horoscope in the daily Tribune.
As the title of Fideler's book implies, at the end of the day, IESOUS CHRISTOS, if not really 'Jesus' or 'Yeshua' are solar terms that belie the hysterical claims of the Church apologists, then and now, that Christianity is really something uniquely different than what came before it. In reality the only substantive difference is that it is just a massive distillation of what came before it, especially in esoteric theology. All such prior religions operated with a sophisticated esoteric core that only the educated initiates understood, leaving the surface gloss of gross superstition for the common person. "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss." "A rose by any other name is still a Rome."
As I have discussed in another thread, Christ was seen as the latest incarnated manifestation of all his solar precedents, such as Dionysus, Apollo, Helios, Mithra, and etc.. and yes, as I see it, even the Aten, ... perhaps especially the Aten.
Here, let's see what Fideler says on page 164:
Elsewhere, Fideler discusses the Magic Square of the Sun, and this link demonstrates even more of the magic square's ability to derive more, including demonstrating the X, or 'Chi', of early Christianity, laid out across the Sun's square. Here the value of the numbers in the square equals 666. Fideler discusses that 666 represents the Physical Sun, while 888 (IESOUS) represents the Spiritual Sun or Solar Logos. In my estimation, this is just restated Atenism, with the "Sun behind the Sun".
With the above verses, not long ago, I discussed Fabre d'Olivet's completely separate analysis (in review of the Sabbah brother's work) that Mose's burning seneh bush was an esoteric reference to the Sun, albeit that this was derived from a Judaic geometrical system tied to their lettering system.
So then, what is this business about allowing a man to buy and sell? In the supposed time of Christ Jesus, many people would carry magic amulets. In this case, a common one was that of one depicting the Magic Square of the Sun, or 666.
Hence, could the number also represent someone such as Nero, according to some beloved by all except the Roman senators, and maybe some of Bartram's 'Chrestians'? Absolutely in my view. There are some today who suspect that Nero had to have his reputation take a posthumous propaganda hit, and I suspect that this may be the case with the NT.
In any case, as with the Sun that provides both feast and famine, an emperor like Nero could play the same role on Earth. And hence the verses of Isaiah 45:6-7:
Most are commonly aware that it is linked to "The Beast" and his "Mark", apparently like a tattoo that will allow any man to buy and sell in the marketplace; apparently women belonging in the kitchen and such.
The Mark of the Beast
16And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: 17And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. 18Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. KJV
16And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: 17And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. 18Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. KJV
Note the phrase that I have highlighted in red, to "count the number of the beast". This begs two questions: the first being why does one have to count the number, especially when the author immediately proceeds to inform us what that number is? Secondly, who, or what, is "the beast"? Not so incidentally, remember that one of the target occupants in the Twin Towers on 9/11 was named: The Beast, an IT company. What happened to the AntiChrist? Wait, if there is an AntiChrist, who and what really is the Christ ... some humble godman named Jesus (or Titus Flavius, ... and/or)?
Many (less than most) are aware that this 666 number is somehow a referent from a branch of the Greek esoteric mathematical system, that branch being known as Gematria. But this is about as far as most people have gone in their understanding, other than confusingly having likely seen a variety of terms and names tied to the number. After all, there indeed can be a fairly large number of words and names that can add up to any particular number. As for '666', persons such as Nero have been linked to it, and here I am not saying that is incorrect. What I am saying is that there is something much deeper -- that also has implications to our understanding of Nero (and Papa Nero as well).
In reality, the way the Greeks (and the Jews) used their gematria was that, if anything, the numbers themselves were the source of the names, and not the other way around. For instance, the authors of the NT used the name IESOUS for Jesus (or Yeshua) in the first Greek texts, because IESOUS adds up to the number 888, whereas Jesus or Yeshua are meaningless. This is so because numbers were seen as the sacred building blocks that transcendentally provided structure to the material universe as we know it.
This made them have sacred or divine powers, and even the respective names of the 'pagan' gods were ultimately derived from numbers. That is, this is what you understood if you were an intellectual initiate into the system of divine knowledge. It is at such a relatively low level as this (and usually lower), that leads the contemporary individual, especially rationalists, to summarily dismiss this system of understanding as just plain wacky and not worthy of their consideration. Even as to allowing themselves to understand, clearly, what were the important underlying conceptions that Christianity was built upon -- as opposed to the several layers of superficial obfuscation, imperial vanity included.
Understanding the deepest layer(s) will allow one more easily to judge that the transition to Christianity was not accidental and fortuitous serendipity as some are suggesting. This, in the repurposing of the Flavian's dark comedy (gospels) and (Josephan) historical account of their incomplete pacification of the Jews. If this were merely the case, there would have been no need for Philo of Alexandria's efforts (and his nephew's Jewish generalship in the Flavian cause) and the ultimate inclusion of so many Pythagorean and Platonic elements in the NT (See Fideler's Jesus Christ, Sun of God). Not only is this gematrical numerology employed (integrated inherently with sacred geometry), but as they saw it, they were dealing with the latest cutting edge science of the day as applied to all existence, including the cosmology of the Heavens. This includes knowledge of the zodiacal precession of the equinox. The symbol of the fish was much more to the intellectuals than reading their daily horoscope in the daily Tribune.
As the title of Fideler's book implies, at the end of the day, IESOUS CHRISTOS, if not really 'Jesus' or 'Yeshua' are solar terms that belie the hysterical claims of the Church apologists, then and now, that Christianity is really something uniquely different than what came before it. In reality the only substantive difference is that it is just a massive distillation of what came before it, especially in esoteric theology. All such prior religions operated with a sophisticated esoteric core that only the educated initiates understood, leaving the surface gloss of gross superstition for the common person. "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss." "A rose by any other name is still a Rome."
As I have discussed in another thread, Christ was seen as the latest incarnated manifestation of all his solar precedents, such as Dionysus, Apollo, Helios, Mithra, and etc.. and yes, as I see it, even the Aten, ... perhaps especially the Aten.
Here, let's see what Fideler says on page 164:
Jesus Christ: The solar Logos
"IN THE BEGINNING was the Logos" reports the Gospel of John and, in the words of the Logos itself, "I am the Light of the World." Naturally, everyone who comes into the world is outwardly illuminated by the physical sun, but only those who turn their attention back to the world of first principles are inwardly enlightened by the Spiritual Sun of the Logos.
The early Christians maintained that Iesous was "a name above all names." Origen, the early church father, even went so far as to boast about how the name of Jesus possessed more magical efficacy than those of the pagan divinities.
In the same way that the names of Apollo, Hermes, Abraxas, and Mithras were designed to represent aspects of the Universal Logos, the values of both IESOUS (888) and CHRISTOS (1480) are obtained from 74, the most characteristic number from the magic square of the Sun. It is unlikely that this is a coincidence, for, as Dr. Eisler has pointed out, the name Iesous is "an artificial and irregular Greek transliteration" of the Aramaic name Joshua [Yeshua , aka Jesus -rs], designed to bring out the number 888. One can see an unmistakable parallel between the names Iesous and Christos, and the names of the Hebrew planetary Spirits and Intelligences which were likewise derived from the magic squares of the planets.
And the Spiritual Sun of what was then a new age, Jesus represents the idea of the Solar Logos incarnate, the Logos as Illuminator, Healer, Mediator, and Gnostic Revealer. This symbolism was intentially reflected in the numerical frequency of his celestial name, which reveals the spiritual "word" of the Piscean Aeon.
"IN THE BEGINNING was the Logos" reports the Gospel of John and, in the words of the Logos itself, "I am the Light of the World." Naturally, everyone who comes into the world is outwardly illuminated by the physical sun, but only those who turn their attention back to the world of first principles are inwardly enlightened by the Spiritual Sun of the Logos.
The early Christians maintained that Iesous was "a name above all names." Origen, the early church father, even went so far as to boast about how the name of Jesus possessed more magical efficacy than those of the pagan divinities.
In the same way that the names of Apollo, Hermes, Abraxas, and Mithras were designed to represent aspects of the Universal Logos, the values of both IESOUS (888) and CHRISTOS (1480) are obtained from 74, the most characteristic number from the magic square of the Sun. It is unlikely that this is a coincidence, for, as Dr. Eisler has pointed out, the name Iesous is "an artificial and irregular Greek transliteration" of the Aramaic name Joshua [Yeshua , aka Jesus -rs], designed to bring out the number 888. One can see an unmistakable parallel between the names Iesous and Christos, and the names of the Hebrew planetary Spirits and Intelligences which were likewise derived from the magic squares of the planets.
And the Spiritual Sun of what was then a new age, Jesus represents the idea of the Solar Logos incarnate, the Logos as Illuminator, Healer, Mediator, and Gnostic Revealer. This symbolism was intentially reflected in the numerical frequency of his celestial name, which reveals the spiritual "word" of the Piscean Aeon.
Elsewhere, Fideler discusses the Magic Square of the Sun, and this link demonstrates even more of the magic square's ability to derive more, including demonstrating the X, or 'Chi', of early Christianity, laid out across the Sun's square. Here the value of the numbers in the square equals 666. Fideler discusses that 666 represents the Physical Sun, while 888 (IESOUS) represents the Spiritual Sun or Solar Logos. In my estimation, this is just restated Atenism, with the "Sun behind the Sun".
2And [Jesus] was transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was white as the light. 3And, behold, there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with him. (Matthew 17 KJV)
With the above verses, not long ago, I discussed Fabre d'Olivet's completely separate analysis (in review of the Sabbah brother's work) that Mose's burning seneh bush was an esoteric reference to the Sun, albeit that this was derived from a Judaic geometrical system tied to their lettering system.
So then, what is this business about allowing a man to buy and sell? In the supposed time of Christ Jesus, many people would carry magic amulets. In this case, a common one was that of one depicting the Magic Square of the Sun, or 666.
Hence, could the number also represent someone such as Nero, according to some beloved by all except the Roman senators, and maybe some of Bartram's 'Chrestians'? Absolutely in my view. There are some today who suspect that Nero had to have his reputation take a posthumous propaganda hit, and I suspect that this may be the case with the NT.
In any case, as with the Sun that provides both feast and famine, an emperor like Nero could play the same role on Earth. And hence the verses of Isaiah 45:6-7: