Joe Atwill sent me this email and asked me to post here, directly linked from the Wordpress article. This is part of an email thread. I used the yellow-box quote formatting to identify material that originally came from me. _________________________ First, as the author of Caesar’s Messiah I do not need to respond to charges of anti-Semitism. Second, Jerry’s theory of a ‘Catholic Shakespeare’ is far too complicated to have any analytic strength. A Catholic who understood the Flavian typology in the Gospels is a contradiction in terms. Moreover, how would such an individual have learned about the typology? The conjecture that this bizarre individual also had a girlfriend who spoke Hebrew and for some reason taught him the language, which he then slyly put into his works, though no other Catholic could have understood it, just compounds the analytic weakness of the ‘Catholic Shakespeare’. For a solid analysis of why the Jewess Emilia Bassano is the only real candidate as the Shakespearian author see Dark Lady, John Judson, p 238 (Hudson used information I provided him) I am happy to report that Jerry is no longer trying to support the notion that Catcher is the Rye is not an occulted description of a violent Freemasonry! Our recent exchange went as follows: Joe: why did he put in the NLP (see Pedaphile in the Rye below) if he wasn't a bastard? I am confident Jerry will abandon he efforts to promote Shakespeare as a Catholic for the same reasons shortly. Way too many maybes. Finally, Jerry’s concern over DNA testing make no sense to be. For example, we could simply test all of the signers of the infamous PNAC documents. If there is no family or ethnic relationship between the purportedly Jewish and purportedly non-Jewish individuals, I stand corrected. If there is we have a greatest problem and the most important truth ever presented to our nation.